Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

KONTROVERSI HERMENEUTIKA DALAM PENAFSIRAN TEKS AL-QURAN: PERSPEKTIF FILOLOGI Kosasih, Ade
KABUYUTAN Vol 4 No 3 (2025): Kabuyutan, Nopember 2025
Publisher : PT. RANESS MEDIA RANCAGE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61296/kabuyutan.v4i3.404

Abstract

Pendekatan hermeneutika dalam penafsiran Al-Quran dapat dianggap sebagai isu kontroversial di ranah studi Islam dewasa ini. Hermeneutika dipandang sebagai metodologi ilmiah yang mampu menjembatani jarak historis, linguistik, dan kultural antara teks suci dan realitas modern. Bahkan, pendekatan itu dikritik keras karena dianggap berakar dari tradisi filsafat Barat sekuler, berpotensi merelatifkan makna wahyu, serta menggeser otoritas tafsir dari teks ilahi kepada subjektivitas penafsir. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara kritis kontroversi di kalangan para ahli terkait penafsiran hermeneutika Al-Quran dengan menelusuri basis epistemologis, metodologis, serta implikasi teologisnya. Penelitian ini memanfaatkan metode kualitatif dengan melakukan studi literatur untuk membahas, secara deskriptif-kritis, karya-karya tokoh yang berbeda dalam memandang penafsiran Al-Quran sekarang, baik dari para pemikir Muslim maupun sarjana Barat. Data dianalisis melalui pendekatan komparatif antara metodologi tafsir model hermeneutika filosofis Hans-Georg Gadamer dan hermeneutika kritis Paul Ricoeur. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kontroversi hermeneutika Al-Quran tidak semata-mata bersumber dari perbedaan metode, tetapi juga dari perbedaan paradigma epistemologi tentang hakikat wahyu, bahasa ilahi, dan otoritas penafsiran. Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa hermeneutika dapat berfungsi sebagai perangkat bantu metodologis sepanjang ditempatkan secara proporsional, tidak menggantikan prinsip dasar ulūm al-Qur’ān, serta tetap berlandaskan pada akidah Islam. Dengan demikian, dialog metodologis antara tafsir klasik dan hermeneutika modern perlu dikembangkan secara kritis dan selektif, bukan ditolak atau diterima secara absolut.
AESTHETICS AND POLITICAL PERSUASION IN CONTEMPORARY SAUDI ARABIAN POETRY ON NEOM: A SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF LITERATURE Firmansyah, Muhammad; Kosasih, Ade; Hodijah, Ooh; Nashir, Abdul Barr
Afshaha: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Arab Vol 5, No 1 (2026): Afshaha: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Arab
Publisher : Faculty of Humanities UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/afshaha.v5i1.40455

Abstract

Literature has become an important tool for expressing and validating ideas about the future of the country as Saudi Arabia increases its cultural and symbolic commitment in the Neom megaproject. This article analyzes how award-winning poems from a Neom-themed poetry competition held by Nadi Tabuk Adabi function both as aesthetic representations of the Neom project and as instruments of ideological conditioning in contemporary Saudi Arabia. Employing a qualitative descriptive method, this study draws on Alan Swingewood’s sociology of literature to examine poetry as a social product shaped by institutional and political contexts. Hermeneutic textual analysis is applied to three winning poems, focusing on diction, metaphor, symbolism, and narrative structure, while situating these elements within their socio-political environment. The findings show that Neom is consistently represented as a utopian, transformative, and inevitable future through futuristic imagery. Beyond textual representation, the poetry competition itself operates as a cultural institution that conditions meaning production through prestige, recognition, and symbolic legitimacy rather than coercion.This research contributes to Arabic literary studies by demonstrating the continued political function of poetry in contemporary state-sponsored cultural practices and by framing modern Arabic poetry as a site of ideological negotiation rather than purely aesthetic expression.