Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Tumbang Anoi: Manifestasi Teori Living Law Eugen Erlich Dalam Preferensi Penyelesaian Sengketa Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Suku Dayak di Kalimantan Tengah Tarigan, Alpi Emkananta; Safari, Fuji Syifa; Juniar, Vindira Edka; Simamora, Naomi Artika; Manullang, Tio Evangelish; Ali, Nuraliah

Publisher :

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52947/.v11i2.1107

Abstract

Pluralisme hukum di Indonesia menampilkan konfigurasi interaktif antara hukum negara dan hukum adat yang terus eksis dalam masyarakat multikultural. Salah satu manifestasi penting adalah Perjanjian Tumbang Anoi 1894 yang berfungsi sebagai fondasi hukum adat Dayak di Kalimantan Tengah sekaligus representasi living law sebagaimana dikemukakan Eugen Ehrlich. Penelitian ini bertujuan menelaah bagaimana Kedamangan menjadi preferensi penyelesaian sengketa serta menilai dinamika implementasi Perjanjian Tumbang Anoi dalam konteks pluralism hukum dan sosio-yuridis kontemporer. Metode yang digunakan adalah mixed methods dengan desain sequential explanatory, melalui survei terhadap 116 responden, wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipatif, dan FGD. Analisis data dilakukan dengan pendekatan concurrent triangulation guna mengintegrasikan temuan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa 75% responden lebih memilih penyelesaian berbasis hukum adat dengan tingkat pemahaman 80,8% terhadap Perjanjian Tumbang Anoi. Preferensi tersebut dipengaruhi oleh efisiensi, aksesibilitas, dan keselarasan nilai lokal yang menekankan musyawarah, kekeluargaan, serta keadilan substantif. Dengan demikian, hukum adat Dayak tidak hanya lestari, tetapi juga adaptif, menegaskan posisinya sebagai living law sekaligus instrumen restoratif dalam menjaga harmoni sosial.
Between Customary Justice and Criminal Accountability: Dayak Bakumpai Adat Law in Domestic Violence Resolution Nugraha, Satriya; Ali, Nuraliah; Wulandari, Vicka Prama
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss2.art5

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of Dayak Bakumpai’s Adat Law in resolving domestic violence (DV) cases. Dayak Bakumpai Adat Law continues to play a significant role in community life, particularly in addressing family conflicts, including DV. Although customary mechanisms are often preferred at the community level for their emphasis on deliberation, reconciliation, and social harmony, they cannot legally replace formal criminal prosecution for DV cases under Indonesian law. Therefore, this study provides a nuanced analysis to avoid implying that customary sanctions, such as fines or community service, constitute a lawful substitute for state-enforced criminal accountability. This study adopts an empirical approach, using a descriptive qualitative method that includes literature reviews and interviews with customary leaders and local community members. Data were also collected through field observations to understand the process of resolving DV cases based on Dayak Bakumpai's Adat Law mechanisms. The study results reveal that Adat Law demonstrates flexibility in handling DV cases through deliberation involving families, customary leaders, and community leaders. This customary resolution mechanism effectively maintains social harmony and prevents conflict escalation. However, the study also identifies challenges arising from inconsistencies between customary and national laws. In some cases, customary sanctions are deemed too lenient for DV perpetrators, raising concerns about the protection of victims, especially women. Still, they hold no authority to terminate or replace criminal liability. Additionally, Adat Law has not been fully recognized within Indonesia's formal legal system, leading to a duality of legal approaches in addressing DV cases. This creates a potential duality in legal approaches and underscores the need to harmonize customary practices with the national criminal justice system to safeguard victims’ rights while respecting local wisdom.