Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

The Principle of People's Authoritative Manifestation in Mining Management: An Inclusive Legal Perspective Taufiq, Muchamad; Disantara, Fradhana Putra
SASI Volume 29 Issue 3, September 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1329

Abstract

Introduction: Principle of the people's authoritative manifestation in mining activities must be a reference and guide by the state in formulating policies related to mining management.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to construct the people's authoritative manifestation principle in mining management. In addition, this study also focuses on an inclusive legal perspective and uses comparisons with Brazil and the United States.Methods of the Research: This research is normative legal research with the approaches used conceptual, comparative, and statutory approaches.Results of the Research: The study results confirm that the efforts to actualize the principle of authoritative manifestation of the people in an inclusive legal perspective can be carried out with an integrated mining licensing system that takes into account the aspirations and input of the community, the need for community participation and involvement in every mining management activity, and the need for protection and empowerment, especially for communities around mining and in particular again to customary law communities who have local wisdom to manage local resources in their area so that their existence is maintained even though there is mining activity.
Utilitarianism Versus Communalism: A Legal Theory Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Ethics in Global North and South Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Samsithawrati, Putu Aras; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Budiana, I Nyoman; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo
Jambe Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/home.v8i1.450

Abstract

The development of the idea of ​​intellectual property has become a separate debate related to countries in the Global South and countries in the Global North. Global South and Global North are concepts used to distinguish between developed and developing countries in social, economic, and political contexts. This study aims to analyze the views of utilitarianism versus communalism in understanding intellectual property rights in Global North and Global South countries. This study is a normative legal study that prioritizes conceptual, historical, and philosophical approaches. The results of the study confirm that the differences in views between Global North and Global South countries on intellectual property reflect global economic and political inequality. Global North countries support strict intellectual property protection to maintain their economic and technological dominance, while Global South countries want a more flexible system to ensure fair access to technology, medicines, and protection of traditional knowledge. Global North countries see IP protection as a driver of innovation and economic growth, based on the theory of utilitarianism, while Global South countries prioritize the principle of communalism to ensure fair access to technology and knowledge. To achieve balance, inclusive policies, international cooperation in research and development, and integration of communal values ​​in IP policies are needed, in order to create social justice and redistribution of global wealth
The Philosophy of Justice in Business Law: A Comparative Study of Ethical Values in Ghana and Indonesia’s Constitutional Frameworks Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Putu Aras Samsithawrati; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo; Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian State Law Review, April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v8i1.18111

Abstract

The role of the philosophy of justice in business law as a moral and normative foundation that ensures economic activities are not only oriented towards technical efficiency but also uphold principles of justice such as distributive, commutative, and fairness. The philosophy of justice is closely related to constitutional values because the constitution not only regulates legal norms but also contains ethics and social goals that must be reflected in business regulations. Not only regulates legal norms but also contains ethics and social goals that must be reflected in business regulations. This research aims to analyze the philosophy of justice in business law in relation to the principles and values in the constitution and ethical values of a country, with a legal comparison between Indonesia and Ghana. This research is a normative legal study with a conceptual, comparative legal, and legislative approach. The research findings affirm that a comparative study with Ghana shows that although both countries emphasize the importance of ethical and just economic governance based on constitutional values, their approaches differ. Indonesia has a structured system based on the constitution and the interpretation of the Constitutional Court, whereas Ghana relies on a pluralistic legal framework and sectoral regulations that are not fully integrated with the constitution. This difference highlights the importance of the role of the constitution and the judiciary in realizing fair, transparent, and sustainable business law.
The Exploration of Human Rights from the Perspective of Development Law Theory: What and How? Suyitno, Didik; Sulaksono, Sulaksono; Sulistyowati, Eny; Disantara, Fradhana Putra
Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/legitimasi.v13i2.26934

Abstract

This study analyzes human rights in legal development to ensure that fundamental human rights are not neglected. Human rights are inherent to every human being, derived from religious, moral, and noble cultural values. Everyone is part of society, consisting of individuals with fundamental rights. Human rights-based development planning becomes a benchmark in development planning so that it does not sacrifice human rights but is used as a tool to achieve goals in enforcing the right to development. However, this becomes a challenge that needs to be faced to prioritize human rights without neglecting the public interest. This study aims to develop development strategies based on the close relationship between strategies and development processes with efforts to promote respect for human rights. The study method uses a normative juridical approach. Data were collected through legal literature and legal materials, namely primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research results show that development law is important to address increasingly complex social changes and ongoing development agendas. The state must prioritize and ensure that business and development align with the fulfillment of the right to a good and healthy living environment rather than opening up space for environmental destruction. The manifestation of the legal development model is to pay attention to the human dimension as the main goal of development, which provides citizens with access to participate in decision-making in various fields of life. The law allocates greater authority to citizens for their self-realization as subjects, not objects shaped and controlled by other subjects.
Kekaburan Hukum Terkait Batasan Materi Muatan Peraturan Bersama Kepala Desa Nurhidayat, Tri; Masnun, Muh. Ali; Widodo, Hananto; Disantara, Fradhana Putra
JURNAL LEGISIA Vol 16 No 2 (2024): Juli
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum dan Sosial Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58350/legisia.v16i2.534

Abstract

Peraturan bersama kepala desa merupakan instrumen hukum penting di tingkat desa untuk mengatur aspek kehidupan masyarakat lintas desa, namun kekaburan hukum terkait batasan materi muatannya menimbulkan kebingungan dan potensi konflik yurisdiksi, sehingga diperlukan kejelasan pedoman untuk menjamin efektivitas implementasinya dalam konteks otonomi desa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk kekaburan hukum dalam batasan materi muatan Peraturan Bersama Kepala Desa serta mengkaji implikasi hukum yang ditimbulkan oleh ketidakjelasan batasan tersebut. Penelitian hukum normatif mengkaji aturan-aturan hukum tertulis melalui studi kepustakaan dan analisis kualitatif untuk memahami kekaburan hukum terkait batasan materi muatan peraturan bersama kepala desa, dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan serta berbagai sumber bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Hasil penelitian memaparkan bahwa kekaburan hukum dalam batasan materi muatan Peraturan Bersama Kepala Desa disebabkan oleh kurangnya regulasi yang jelas dan spesifik dalam perundang-undangan yang ada, seperti Undang-Undang Desa dan peraturan turunannya. Hal ini menyebabkan interpretasi yang berbeda-beda dan sering kali menimbulkan tumpang tindih kewenangan antara peraturan desa, peraturan bersama kepala desa, dan peraturan pemerintah daerah. Akibatnya, peraturan bersama sering kali mengatur hal-hal di luar kewenangan desa, yang berdampak pada munculnya konflik kewenangan, penafsiran yang tidak seragam, pelanggaran aturan hukum yang lebih tinggi, hingga potensi sengketa hukum antar desa yang terlibat dalam peraturan bersama tersebut
ASPEK IMUNITAS DALAM PENANGANAN CORONA VIRUS DISEASE 2019 Disantara, Fradhana Putra
Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2020): Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Metro, Lampung, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/istinbath.v17i1.2049

Abstract

The Government of Indonesia has issued various regulations in an effort to provide a legal basis for the technical handling of COVID-19, including Presidential Decree (Keppres) No. 11 of 2020 concerning Stipulation of Public Health Emergency and President Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1 of 2020 (Perppu) No. 1 of 2020 concerning State Financial Policy and Stability of the State Financial System for Handling Covid Pandemic 19 And / Or In Order To Face Threats That Harm National Economy And / Or Financial System Stability. With the Presidential Decree No. 11 of 2020, the Government of Indonesia establishes a public health emergency status. However, this raises problems, related to the proper legal status in the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the formulation of Article 27 of Perppu No. 1 of 2020 also left a problem, with Article 27 which actually provides a strong aspect of immunity for the implementers of the regulation. This type of research is legal research. This legal research aims to analyze the relevance of determining the state of public health emergency with the concept of an emergency state administration law, and identifying aspects of immunity in the formulation of Article 27 Perppu Number 1 of 2020. In this study a statute approach and conceptual approach are used, with an inventory of primary legal materials and secondary in order to get a proper analysis and critical analysis related to legal issues. The results showed that the proper legal status during the COVID-19 pandemic was state legal emergency, and the immunity aspect in the formulation of Article 27 of the Perppu contradicted with some Articles in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945. So, The Constitutional Court must cancel the Article 27 of Perppu No. 1 of 2020
Tripartite Collaborative Institutions: Skema Konvergensi Institusi Untuk Mewujudkan Ketahanan Siber Indonesia Disantara, Fradhana Putra
Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18 No 2 (2021): Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Metro, Lampung, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/istinbath.v18i2.3641

Abstract

Cybercrime is a crime that is carried out systematically to damage or destroy computer networks, and will automatically have an impact on important data stored on the computer network. This article is written using a normative legal research method, with data sources in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, understood using a conceptual approach and a statute approach, then the data is analyzed qualitatively through deductive thinking. From the results of the research, it is known that the weakness of technical and non-technical infrastructure related to the network and information systems of a country is one of the reasons of cyber crime. So we need a defense concept that can overcome these weaknesses. The concept of cyber defense with tripartite collaborative institutions can be used as an option to strengthen cyber defense. With a system of cooperation between the Ministry of Defense, Kominfo, and BSSN. The Ministry of Defense focuses on cyber threats from abroad, the Ministry of Communication and Information focuses on cyber threats from within the country, while BSNN focuses on coordination, prevention, and handling of cyber crimes.
The Legitimacy of Circular Letter in Handling COVID-19 Pandemic: Legitimasi Surat Edaran dalam Penanganan Pandemi COVID-19 Disantara, Fradhana Putra
Rechtsidee Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.2020.6.645

Abstract

The purpose of this legal research is to analyze the relevance of the discretion of government officials during the COVID-19 pandemic with the concepts and legislation related to legal issues; as well as analyzing the existence of a Circular to legitimize the handling of COVID-19 with statutory regulations. This legal research is carried out by making an inventory of various primary and secondary legal materials, so as to obtain relevant and critical studies of the legal issues discussed. The results of this legal research are that the discretion made by government officials can be justified legally if it is relevant to several provisions contained in legislation for the realization of good emergency governance; and the existence of a circular letter is legally valid if it is in accordance with the laws and regulations and the General Principles of Good Governance, by understanding that a circular is not a product of rules that are in the order of national legislation. Thus, a circular does not have strong and binding legal legitimacy. Therefore, the researcher recommends the criteria and classification of the parameters of discretion in the form of a circular as outlined in the form of a Supreme Court Regulation. This should be done so that there is no abuse of authority in implementing discretionary power by government officials and general legal principles.
Establishing Ethical Norms: Dignified Justice Theory Perspectives on Ethics and Legal Relations: Mendudukkan Norma Etika: Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat terhadap Relasi Etika dan Hukum Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Anggono, Bayu Dwi; Efendi, Aan
Rechtsidee Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v10i0.773

Abstract

The relationship between ethical norms and legal norms is different for experts, especially concerning their position. Moreover, legal norms seem to be superior to ethical norms. This study aims to analyze the position of ethical norms and legal norms. The dignified justice theory was chosen because it seeks to orient the divine and human aspects, which can only be fulfilled if ethical and legal norms synergize. This research is juridical-normative research. The juridical-normative research was chosen because it confirms the existence of ethical norms and legal norms as part of the system of norms prevailing in society. The study's results confirm that, in practice, legal court decisions are often considered higher and more authoritative than ethical court decisions. This has implications for the position of ethical norms that are considered inferior to legal norms. Furthermore, the theory of dignified justice seeks to see the relationship between ethical norms and legal norms as different norms, but in its implementation in society, the two norms must synergize and complement each other.
Prophetic Law in Modern Business: Integration of Humanization, Liberation, and Transcendence in Commercial Contracts Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Ishwara, Ade Sathya Sanathana; Disantara, Geraldha Islami Putra; Abdunayimova, Dinara
Batulis Civil Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): VOLUME 6 ISSUE 3, NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/ballrev.v6i3.3364

Abstract

Introduction: Economic globalization has significantly influenced the practice of business law, particularly commercial contracts that are increasingly complex, cross-border in nature, and dominated by capitalist interests. Contracts, which ideally serve as instruments of justice, often function as tools of domination by stronger parties over weaker ones, thereby neglecting humanitarian, ethical, and spiritual dimensions.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this research is to analyze how the principles of prophetic law can be integrated into modern commercial contract practices and to identify the challenges arising in the era of globalization.Methods of the Research: This study employs normative legal research with a conceptual approach, examining the principles of prophetic law and linking them to contemporary business law practices. The data were analyzed qualitatively through a review of legal literature, philosophical discourse, and modern commercial contract practices.Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings indicate that the principle of humanization plays a crucial role in restoring contracts to their human dignity by protecting weaker parties; the principle of liberation calls for the elimination of exploitative contractual practices; while the principle of transcendence stresses the necessity of embedding ethical and spiritual values in business. The challenges of integration include the dominance of global capitalism, rigid digital contract frameworks, and the weak moral awareness of business actors. The originality of this study lies in its systematic effort to connect prophetic law with modern commercial contract practices, thereby offering a new paradigm for global business law that is more just, humane, and sustainable.