Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

Intellectual Property Rights and Ethics: A Comparison of Philosophical Approaches in Northern and Southern Countries Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Samsithawrati, Putu Aras; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo; Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 25 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i1.24489

Abstract

The philosophical differences between Northern countries, which adopt utilitarian and libertarian perspectives emphasizing strict Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) protection, and Southern countries, which prioritize distributive justice and universal access, create tensions in implementing global IPR policies, particularly concerning important issues such as access to medicines and technology. This research aims to analyze the influence of philosophical approach differences between Northern and Southern countries on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) policies and implementation, as well as their ethical implications for public access to knowledge and technology. This research employs normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach, analyzing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through literature study, and uses qualitative analysis to interpret the differences in philosophical approaches to IPR policies between Northern and Southern countries along with their ethical implications. The research findings show that philosophical differences between Northern countries, which adopt a utilitarian-libertarian approach with strict IPR protection, and Southern countries, which emphasize distributive justice-collectivism with a more flexible approach, have significant ethical implications for public access to knowledge and technology, as seen in the HIV/AIDS crisis in Africa and access to education, where strict patent policies of Northern countries often hinder developing countries' access to important technology and knowledge, while Southern countries advocate for universal access especially for basic needs such as health and education, creating tension between IPR protection and fulfillment of society's basic needs.
Legal Reform in Business Dispute Resolution: A Study of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Samsithawrati, Putu Aras; Dharmawan, Ni Ketut Supasti; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): April, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i2.21128

Abstract

Legal pluralism in the resolution of business disputes in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand illustrates the intricate interplay between the particular and the general elements of the national laws, international laws, and other legal systems, which allow for flexibility in resolving disputes, but at the same time brings problems for legal integration and certainty for the business people. This study examines the role of legal pluralism in the resolution of business disputes in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand. Legal pluralism creates an interaction between national law, international law, and other legal systems, providing flexibility in dispute resolution while also posing challenges to integration and legal certainty for business practitioners. The research approach employed is a legal study focusing on literature regarding legal pluralism and business dispute resolution systems. The analysis method used is normative-qualitative, utilizing legislative, conceptual, and comparative methods. The research findings show that legal pluralism in business dispute resolution in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand offers flexibility but also creates legal uncertainty. In Indonesia, the coexistence of civil, Islamic, and customary law leads to overlapping jurisdictions. Vietnam's state-controlled legal system incorporates arbitration and mediation but struggles with enforcing international awards. Thailand balances civil law with Buddhist-influenced mediation, favoring informal resolution but facing enforcement challenges. While legal pluralism enhances accessibility to justice, its effectiveness depends on legal integration and enforcement mechanisms to ensure certainty and fairness in business disputes.
The Principle of People's Authoritative Manifestation in Mining Management: An Inclusive Legal Perspective Taufiq, Muchamad; Disantara, Fradhana Putra
SASI Volume 29 Issue 3, September 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1329

Abstract

Introduction: Principle of the people's authoritative manifestation in mining activities must be a reference and guide by the state in formulating policies related to mining management.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to construct the people's authoritative manifestation principle in mining management. In addition, this study also focuses on an inclusive legal perspective and uses comparisons with Brazil and the United States.Methods of the Research: This research is normative legal research with the approaches used conceptual, comparative, and statutory approaches.Results of the Research: The study results confirm that the efforts to actualize the principle of authoritative manifestation of the people in an inclusive legal perspective can be carried out with an integrated mining licensing system that takes into account the aspirations and input of the community, the need for community participation and involvement in every mining management activity, and the need for protection and empowerment, especially for communities around mining and in particular again to customary law communities who have local wisdom to manage local resources in their area so that their existence is maintained even though there is mining activity.
Utilitarianism Versus Communalism: A Legal Theory Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Ethics in Global North and South Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Samsithawrati, Putu Aras; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Budiana, I Nyoman; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo
Jambe Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/home.v8i1.450

Abstract

The development of the idea of ​​intellectual property has become a separate debate related to countries in the Global South and countries in the Global North. Global South and Global North are concepts used to distinguish between developed and developing countries in social, economic, and political contexts. This study aims to analyze the views of utilitarianism versus communalism in understanding intellectual property rights in Global North and Global South countries. This study is a normative legal study that prioritizes conceptual, historical, and philosophical approaches. The results of the study confirm that the differences in views between Global North and Global South countries on intellectual property reflect global economic and political inequality. Global North countries support strict intellectual property protection to maintain their economic and technological dominance, while Global South countries want a more flexible system to ensure fair access to technology, medicines, and protection of traditional knowledge. Global North countries see IP protection as a driver of innovation and economic growth, based on the theory of utilitarianism, while Global South countries prioritize the principle of communalism to ensure fair access to technology and knowledge. To achieve balance, inclusive policies, international cooperation in research and development, and integration of communal values ​​in IP policies are needed, in order to create social justice and redistribution of global wealth
Enigma Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Naftali, Septina Andriani; Putra, R. Yuri Andina; Irmayanti, Dwi; Rahmawati, Galih
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): MAY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v5i1.4135

Abstract

Enigma pemberantasan korupsi di masa krisis sebagaimana pandemi Covid-19 menimbukan berbagai persoalan hukum. Kajian ini termasuk dalam penelitian hukum yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Penelitian hukum ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa enigma dan dinamika kejahatan korupsi di masa krisis; sekaligus mengkaji mengenai hubungan antara pemberantasan korupsi di masa pandemi Covid-19 dengan penyalahgunaan wewenang pejabat publik. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa pemberantasan terhadap tindak pidana korupsi juga dapat menggunakan perspektif Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (TPPU). Di sisi lain, kasus korupsi eks Menteri Sosial dan eks Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan dapat disangkakan telah merugikan perekonomian negara berdasarkan ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindakan Korupsi. Sehingga, pada konteks tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh kedua eks menteri tersebut, tidak terdapat keraguan untuk menuntut mereka secara maksimal; oleh karena mereka telah melakukan hal-hal yang dapat memberatkan suatu bentuk pidana.
The Business Legal Policy in Indonesia, Ghana, and Vietnam: A Perspective from the Theory of Dignified Justice Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Putu Aras Samsithawrati; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in th
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i1.18096

Abstract

This study aims to compare business law policies in Indonesia, Ghana, and Vietnam from the perspective of dignified justice and analyze the challenges and opportunities in their implementation. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches to analyze business law policies in Indonesia, Ghana, and Vietnam from the perspective of dignified justice. The study’s findings reveal that business law policies in Indonesia, Ghana, and Vietnam have unique characteristics influenced by their respective legal systems, histories, and socio-economic conditions. The main challenges include complex bureaucracy, regulatory uncertainty, weak law enforcement, and widespread corruption, which hinder transparency and fair business competition. Indonesia adopts a mixed legal system with reforms such as the Omnibus Law (Job Creation Law) to simplify regulations. However, it still faces issues in licensing and legal protection for SMEs. Ghana, operating under a common law system, seeks to strengthen corporate governance through the Companies Act 2019 but continues to struggle with capital access and burdensome bureaucracy for businesses. Meanwhile, Vietnam, with its socialist legal system, has encouraged private sector growth through reforms like the Law on Enterprises 2020 but still faces challenges related to regulatory transparency and labor protection. All three countries have opportunities to enhance economic competitiveness through bureaucratic digitalization, more transparent legal reforms, and broader support for SMEs and startups. With more inclusive and stable policies, they can establish a fairer and more sustainable business law system from the perspective of dignified justice.
The Philosophy of Justice in Business Law: A Comparative Study of Ethical Values in Ghana and Indonesia’s Constitutional Frameworks Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Putu Aras Samsithawrati; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo; Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian State Law Review, April 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v8i1.18111

Abstract

The role of the philosophy of justice in business law as a moral and normative foundation that ensures economic activities are not only oriented towards technical efficiency but also uphold principles of justice such as distributive, commutative, and fairness. The philosophy of justice is closely related to constitutional values because the constitution not only regulates legal norms but also contains ethics and social goals that must be reflected in business regulations. Not only regulates legal norms but also contains ethics and social goals that must be reflected in business regulations. This research aims to analyze the philosophy of justice in business law in relation to the principles and values in the constitution and ethical values of a country, with a legal comparison between Indonesia and Ghana. This research is a normative legal study with a conceptual, comparative legal, and legislative approach. The research findings affirm that a comparative study with Ghana shows that although both countries emphasize the importance of ethical and just economic governance based on constitutional values, their approaches differ. Indonesia has a structured system based on the constitution and the interpretation of the Constitutional Court, whereas Ghana relies on a pluralistic legal framework and sectoral regulations that are not fully integrated with the constitution. This difference highlights the importance of the role of the constitution and the judiciary in realizing fair, transparent, and sustainable business law.
The Exploration of Human Rights from the Perspective of Development Law Theory: What and How? Suyitno, Didik; Sulaksono, Sulaksono; Sulistyowati, Eny; Disantara, Fradhana Putra
Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Islamic Criminal Law Department, Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/legitimasi.v13i2.26934

Abstract

This study analyzes human rights in legal development to ensure that fundamental human rights are not neglected. Human rights are inherent to every human being, derived from religious, moral, and noble cultural values. Everyone is part of society, consisting of individuals with fundamental rights. Human rights-based development planning becomes a benchmark in development planning so that it does not sacrifice human rights but is used as a tool to achieve goals in enforcing the right to development. However, this becomes a challenge that needs to be faced to prioritize human rights without neglecting the public interest. This study aims to develop development strategies based on the close relationship between strategies and development processes with efforts to promote respect for human rights. The study method uses a normative juridical approach. Data were collected through legal literature and legal materials, namely primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research results show that development law is important to address increasingly complex social changes and ongoing development agendas. The state must prioritize and ensure that business and development align with the fulfillment of the right to a good and healthy living environment rather than opening up space for environmental destruction. The manifestation of the legal development model is to pay attention to the human dimension as the main goal of development, which provides citizens with access to participate in decision-making in various fields of life. The law allocates greater authority to citizens for their self-realization as subjects, not objects shaped and controlled by other subjects.
The Legal Certainty Versus National Economic Recovery: Peace Fines by Prosecutors in Corruption Crimes Comparative Law Perspective Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai
PATTIMURA Legal Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2025): April 2025 PATTIMURA Legal Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate Program Doctoral in Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pela.v4i1.18442

Abstract

Introduction: The application of peace fines in corruption crimes in Indonesia creates a complex legal dilemma. The Prosecutor's Law grants prosecutors the authority to use peace fines in economic crimes, but on the other hand, the Anti-Corruption Law explicitly states that the return of state losses does not absolve the criminal liability of corruption perpetrators. Purposes of the Research: This research aims to analyze the aspect of legal certainty related to the application of peace fines in connection with corruption crimes, linked to national economic recovery efforts, and a comparative legal analysis in other countries regarding peace fines in the enforcement of corruption crimes. Methods of the Research: This research is a normative legal study with a conceptual, legislative, and comparative legal approach. Results Main Findings of the Research: The research results show that the application of restorative fines related to corruption crimes in connection with national economic recovery efforts does not yet guarantee legal certainty due to a conflict of rules between Article 35 paragraph 1 letter (k) of the Amendment to the Prosecutor's Law and Article 4 of the Anti-Corruption Law. The issue can be resolved with the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali. The application of peace fines in England, the United States, and Saudi Arabia above shows that peace fines are of a global nature and constitute a general legal policy in their efforts to save a country's national economy from losses due to corruption. The implementation of peace fines in Indonesia to achieve legal certainty needs to consider several factors, such as clear regulatory revisions to avoid legal uncertainty and conflicts of rules in various laws and regulations.
Kekaburan Hukum Terkait Batasan Materi Muatan Peraturan Bersama Kepala Desa Nurhidayat, Tri; Masnun, Muh. Ali; Widodo, Hananto; Disantara, Fradhana Putra
JURNAL LEGISIA Vol 16 No 2 (2024): Juli
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum dan Sosial Universitas Sunan Giri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58350/legisia.v16i2.534

Abstract

Peraturan bersama kepala desa merupakan instrumen hukum penting di tingkat desa untuk mengatur aspek kehidupan masyarakat lintas desa, namun kekaburan hukum terkait batasan materi muatannya menimbulkan kebingungan dan potensi konflik yurisdiksi, sehingga diperlukan kejelasan pedoman untuk menjamin efektivitas implementasinya dalam konteks otonomi desa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk kekaburan hukum dalam batasan materi muatan Peraturan Bersama Kepala Desa serta mengkaji implikasi hukum yang ditimbulkan oleh ketidakjelasan batasan tersebut. Penelitian hukum normatif mengkaji aturan-aturan hukum tertulis melalui studi kepustakaan dan analisis kualitatif untuk memahami kekaburan hukum terkait batasan materi muatan peraturan bersama kepala desa, dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan serta berbagai sumber bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Hasil penelitian memaparkan bahwa kekaburan hukum dalam batasan materi muatan Peraturan Bersama Kepala Desa disebabkan oleh kurangnya regulasi yang jelas dan spesifik dalam perundang-undangan yang ada, seperti Undang-Undang Desa dan peraturan turunannya. Hal ini menyebabkan interpretasi yang berbeda-beda dan sering kali menimbulkan tumpang tindih kewenangan antara peraturan desa, peraturan bersama kepala desa, dan peraturan pemerintah daerah. Akibatnya, peraturan bersama sering kali mengatur hal-hal di luar kewenangan desa, yang berdampak pada munculnya konflik kewenangan, penafsiran yang tidak seragam, pelanggaran aturan hukum yang lebih tinggi, hingga potensi sengketa hukum antar desa yang terlibat dalam peraturan bersama tersebut