Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.533
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Spektrum Hukum LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Rechtsidee Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jambe Law Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Al-Syakhsiyyah : Journal of Law and Family Studies Jurnal Suara Hukum Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Batulis Civil Law Review Jurnal Legisia RechtIdee SASI Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)
Disantara, Fradhana Putra
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Intellectual Property Law and Ethics Creating Space for Ethical Innovation from the Perspective of Dignified Justice Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Samsithawrati, Putu Aras; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 16, No 1 (2025): JNH VOL NO 1 JUNI 2025
Publisher : Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v16i1.4647

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the relationship between intellectual property law and ethics in fostering ethical innovation in Indonesia from the principles of dignified justice. This study employs normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach, analyzing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through literature study and qualitative analysis to examine the relationship between intellectual property law, ethics, and dignified justice in the context of innovation. The research findings indicate that the integration of ethical principles into Indonesia’s intellectual property legal framework is crucial for building a fair, inclusive, and sustainable innovation ecosystem. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) should be seen not only as protection for exclusive rights but also as a tool to balance the interests of creators, society, and indigenous communities. Analysis of regulations and case studies such as copyright piracy, compulsory licensing in health emergencies, and protection of traditional knowledge demonstrates that ethical considerations must complement legal protections to ensure equitable access, cultural respect, and social responsibility. Adaptive legal reforms, stronger institutional enforcement, recognition of indigenous contributions, and incentives for green innovation are necessary to make Indonesia’s IPR system more humane, just, and aligned with both local wisdom and global standards.AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis hubungan antara hukum kekayaan intelektual dan etika dalam mendorong inovasi yang beretika di Indonesia dalam prinsip keadilan bermartabat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, menganalisis bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier melalui studi kepustakaan dan analisis kualitatif untuk mengkaji hubungan antara hukum kekayaan intelektual, etika, dan keadilan bermartabat dalam konteks inovasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa integrasi prinsip etika dalam kerangka hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) di Indonesia sangat penting untuk membangun ekosistem inovasi yang adil, inklusif, dan berkelanjutan. HKI harus dipahami bukan hanya sebagai pelindungan hak eksklusif pencipta, tetapi juga sebagai instrumen untuk menyeimbangkan kepentingan kreator, masyarakat, dan komunitas adat. Analisis terhadap berbagai regulasi dan studi kasus seperti pembajakan hak cipta, lisensi wajib dalam krisis kesehatan, serta pelindungan pengetahuan tradisional menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan etis harus melengkapi pelindungan hukum demi memastikan akses yang adil, penghormatan budaya, dan tanggung jawab sosial. Reformasi hukum yang adaptif, penguatan lembaga penegak hukum, pengakuan terhadap kontribusi masyarakat adat, serta dorongan inovasi ramah lingkungan diperlukan agar sistem HKI Indonesia menjadi lebih manusiawi, adil, dan sejalan dengan nilai-nilai kearifan lokal dan standar global.
PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN BERMARTABAT DALAM PARADOKS ETIKA DAN HUKUM Disantara, Fradhana Putra
LITIGASI Vol. 22 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v22i2.4211

Abstract

The law and ethics have a relationship between the two. However, there are often conflicts between law and ethics. This phenomenon is as happened in the case of cancellation by the State Administrative Court (PTUN) of the Presidential Decree as a follow-up to the ethical decision that is final and binding from the Election Organizing Honorary Council (DKPP). This study uses a statutory and conceptual approach by using primary and secondary legal materials. The two legal materials are inventoried to obtain a prescriptive legal analysis and provide a holistic conceptual study of the legal issues discussed. This legal research aims to analyze the position of ethics in legal instruments in Indonesia concerning infrastructure and ethical decisions and to investigate the enigma between law and ethics in one case in the perspective of a dignified justice theory. The study results show that the DKPP decision's position is equivalent to a legal court decision. On the other hand, the role of ethics in legal instruments in Indonesia is equal; and is based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Based on the perspective of the theory of dignified justice, the cancellation of the Presidential Decree as a follow-up to the ethical judgment of the DKPP has ‘abused’ the three legal functions. Thus, it is necessary to distinguish between Presidential Decrees, which are products of administrative law and the Presidential Decree, which is a follow-up to the decision of the DKPP ethical court. Keywords: Law and Ethics, Dignified Justice, DKPP, Ethics Court.
EKSTENTIFIKASI KEWENANGAN MAJELIS KEHORMATAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMPERKUAT GAGASAN CONSTITUTIONAL ETHICS Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Putri, Febri Falisa; Mufarrochah, Sylvia; Assari, Elsa
LITIGASI Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.7232

Abstract

This research has an urgency to construct the extension of MKMK's authority to be required to provide information in its capacity as an examiner of code of ethics violations committed by MK judges to law enforcement officials if MK judges become suspects or defendants of a crime. This research is a normative legal research with a concept and statutory approach. The urgency of idea  constitutional ethics in maintaining the code of ethics of MK judges  which can actually be optimized with  formation of MKMK based on MK Regulation No. 1 of 2023. The extension of MKMK's authority as the implementation of  idea of constitutional ethics in optimizing efforts to safeguard the code of ethics of MK judges can actually be carried out by revising Article 3 of MK Regulation No. 1 of 2023 to extend or expand the authority of MKMK in providing information if MK judges are caught in a crime, in particular giving considerations from an ethical perspective is actually aimed at strengthening  relationship between ethical norms and legal norms. Also that the phenomenon in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 103/PUU-XX/2022 will not be repeated in the future. Keywords: Constitutional Ethics, Authority, Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court.
Navigating Territoriality and International Harmonisation: A Comparative Study of Bank Trademark Protection Across Jurisdiction under the TRIPS Agreement Gorda, Anak Agung Ayu Ngurah Sri Rahayu; Kurniawan, I Gede Agus; Samsithawrati, Putu Aras; Disantara, Fradhana Putra; Kapanadze, Maia; Sybelle, Jan Alizea
Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Vol 7 No 3 (2026): Oktober (In Progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/up.v7i3.54372

Abstract

Background: The globalization of financial services and the rapid expansion digital banking have intensified trademark disputes in the banking sector. This development challenges the territoriality principle of trademark law, as banking brands increasingly operate across jurisdictions without maintaining a physical presence. Although international instruments, including TRIPS, the Paris Convention, and the Madrid Protocol, establish a harmonised framework for trademark protection, enforcement remains fragmented owing to national sovereignty and the coexistence of sector-specific banking regulation. Methodology: This study adopts a normative legal research methodology employing both a functional comparative approach alongside a conceptual approach. It examines the legal frameworks governing banking trademark protection in Indonesia, South Africa, and Georgia, each representing a distinct institutional and regulatory context. Primary legislation and international legal instruments are analysed qualitatively through deductive legal reasoning and cross-jurisdictional functional comparative analysis. Objectives: This research aims to examine the regulatory framework and enforcement mechanisms of banking trademark protection in the three countries and assess their consistency with the international trademark standards. It further seeks to formulate an integrated regulatory framework capable of balancing territorial sovereignty with international legal harmonisation.  Findings: The findings indicate that all three countries have formally complied with international intellectual property instruments, significant institutional fragmentation and inadequate coordination between trademark authorities and banking regulators persist, particularly in relation to digital financial services. These shortcomings undermine the effectiveness of trademark protection and regulatory enforcement. Originality/Novelty: This research proposes an integrated model for banking trademark protection that incorporates a dual-gate verification system and digital brand monitoring as a preventive regulatory mechanism.
Co-Authors Abdul Hamid Abdunayimova, Dinara Anak Agung Ayu Ngurah Sri Rahayu Gorda Assari, Elsa Bayu Dwi Anggono Budiana, I Nyoman Disantara, Geraldha Islami Putra Dwi Edi Wibowo Efendi, Aan ENY SULISTYOWATI Firmansyah, Jaka Geraldha Islami Putra Disantara HANANTO WIDODO I Gede Agus Kurniawan Ishwara, Ade Sathya Sanathana Kadir, M. Yakub Aiyub Kapanadze, Maia Masnun, Muh. Ali Mau Lulo, Lourenco de Deus Miftah Arifin Muchamad Taufiq Mufarrochah, Sylvia neny, Neny rahmawati Niken Larasati Nurhidayat, Tri Nutako, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo Nutakor, Briggs Samuel Mawunyo Prasetio, Dicky Eko Putri, Febri Falisa Putu Aras Samsithawrati Radityo, Eka Sulaksono, Sulaksono Suyitno, Didik Sybelle, Jan Alizea Thuong , Mac Thi Hoai Thuong, Mac Thi Hoai Valentino, Widhi Wildani, Sahril