Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

APPLICATION OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IN THE RECORDING OF THE DEED OF NOTARIAL SALE AND PURCHASE BINDING AGREEMENT ON LAND AT THE LAND OFFICE Agung Iriantoro
NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jn.9.1.2024.40-46

Abstract

An agreement is an agreement of both parties to do a deed. Agreements are very often used in everyday life, both underhand and notary agreements. In the content of the agreement the parties make in accordance with the principle of freedom of contract. Agreements under hand often have problems between parties because the agreement is not strong binding. For this reason, the role of the Notary Public is needed in making a notarial agreement deed so that the parties can achieve their respective goals and it is safe if one day there is a party who defaults, the notarial agreement deed can be used as valid evidence. The principle of prudence into the deed of Notarial Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement on registered land to be recorded at the Land Office. Using normative methods with a statutory approach and a legal concept approach. The results of this study show that the Notarial Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement Arrangement on registered land registered at the Land Office can only be carried out against the Notarial Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement that has been paid off. The formulation of the precautionary principle into the Notarial Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement deed on registered land that will be registered at the Land Office can be seen in the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2021, which can be done using analogous arguments by Notaries in applying the precautionary principle to the preparation of the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement Deed.
Electronic Storage Of Notary Protocols Based On A Cloud Computing System In The Cyber Notary Concept Agung Iriantoro; Banu Sopian Hardiansyah
Jurnal Hukum Prasada Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Prasada
Publisher : Magister of Law, Post Graduate Program, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jhp.11.2.2024.62-72

Abstract

The manual storage of notary protocols poses various risks such as damage due to unforeseen events, degradation from chemical influences, destruction by rodents or insects, dispersal, loss, and physical harm. It is crucial for notaries to embrace modern technology for storing notary protocols electronically, particularly through the use of Cloud Computing Systems. According to Article 1 number 13 of the Notary Act, notary protocols are considered state archives that notaries are responsible for preserving in compliance with relevant legal regulations. Therefore, the management of notary protocols should adhere to the Archives Law and Government Regulation Number 28 of 2012. The Notary Protocol, considered a dynamic archive of vital importance, should have the capability to be transformed into electronic documents. As stated in Article 48 and Article 49 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 28 of 2012, the transfer of dynamic archive media is permissible, and such transfer can take any form in line with technological advancements and information regulations. The adoption of a Cloud Computing System for the electronic storage of Notary Protocols reflects the progress in technology and information. The concept of Idea cyber notary involves using technological advancements to enable notaries to perform their notarial responsibilities. Notaries, acting as data controllers and processors for their clients' personal data, have the responsibility to gather, store, and handle such information. In legal terms, notaries can be held accountable for mishandling personal data.
Ethics-Based Professionalism of Notaries and PPAT: The Main Pillar In Carrying Out Professional Duties Agung Iriantoro
Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): April
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/sipakatau.v3i3.595

Abstract

Notaries and Land Deed Officials (PPAT) are public officials authorized by the state to produce authentic deeds with strong evidentiary value in civil and land law systems. This authority is accompanied by a high level of public trust, requiring not only legal compliance but also strong ethical responsibility. This study aims to analyze the professionalism of Notaries and PPAT as state-trusted public officials and to examine how professional ethics function as a fundamental mechanism in strengthening accountability and legal certainty in their practice. The research employs normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by literature review of laws, regulations, ethical codes, and scholarly writings. This study does not use a case-study approach. The study finds that professionalism of Notaries and PPAT is structured through an integrated framework consisting of statutory authority, ethical codes, and supervisory mechanisms. However, a gap remains between normative ethical standards and their practical implementation, particularly in issues related to conflicts of interest, indirect promotion, and neutrality in practice. This study proposes an integrative framework of ethics-based professionalism that positions professional ethics not as a complementary element, but as a binding foundation ensuring legal certainty, institutional accountability, and public trust in the execution of authentic deed services.
Implementation of Forest Area Regulation and Environmental Justice Challenges in Indonesia under Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025 Agus Surono; Sadino Sadino; Zaitun Abdullah; Agung Iriantoro; Adnan Hamid; Maslihati Nur Hidayati
Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): December
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/sipakatau.v3i1.603

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s forest governance continues to face challenges such as overlapping land claims, agrarian conflicts, and institutional fragmentation. Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025 establishes a cross-sectoral Forest Area Order and Enforcement Task Force (PKH Task Force) to accelerate forest recovery and improve legal certainty. However, concerns remain regarding data reliability and social justice in its implementation. Objective: This study examines the implementation of forest area regulation under Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025, focusing on governance effectiveness, socio-ecological impacts, and the relationship between enforcement mechanisms and environmental justice. Methods: A qualitative socio-legal approach was employed, combining normative juridical analysis, focus group discussions, field observations, and comparative policy review. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis and cross-case comparison. Results: Findings show that the PKH Task Force recovered approximately 3.3 million hectares of forest land by September 2025. Despite this achievement, structural issues persist, including inconsistent spatial data, overlapping customary land claims (17.6–24.4 million hectares), and unequal enforcement between large-scale actors and smallholders. Limited community participation has contributed to ongoing socio-ecological tensions. In contrast, participatory schemes such as PPTPKH/TORA (3.04 million hectares) and social forestry programs (4.1 million hectares involving over 800,000 households) indicate more inclusive governance outcomes. Conclusion: Forest governance reform demonstrates strong administrative performance but limited social legitimacy. Effective implementation requires integrating distributive, procedural, and restorative justice principles supported by participatory and integrated data governance systems. Limitations: The study is based on secondary data and selected qualitative cases, which may not fully represent regional variations in Indonesia
Strategy for Strengthening Restorative Justice Policy in Resolution of Land Disputes in Indonesia: Strategy for Strengthening The BPN Institution Agung Iriantoro; Agus Surono; Zaitun Abdullah; Rahmat Rahmat
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.1.217-234

Abstract

Land dispute resolution in Indonesia faces multi-dimensional complexity stemming from unclear land boundaries, overlapping ownership rights, and conflicts between indigenous communities and the state. Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (Permen ATR/BPN) No. 21 of 2020 introduces a mediation mechanism based on restorative justice principles as an alternative non-litigation dispute resolution that focuses on restoring social relations and reaching consensus in accordance with local wisdom. This study uses a qualitative approach with data were collected through in-depth interviews with BPN officials, mediators, and related parties; direct observation of the mediation process; and a study of regulatory documents and implementation reports. Key findings reveal that while mediation success rates can reach 28.5% to 55-65% in areas with integrated customary deliberations, optimal implementation is still hampered by institutional structural gaps, heterogeneity in mediator capacity with only 45% certified, weak legal force of mediation outcomes that allows for the cancellation of 25% of agreements, informal cross-institutional coordination, and limited technology utilization. Policy strengthening requires a holistic approach that integrates institutional restructuring with the establishment of dedicated mediation units, the development of multi-layered competency standards, strengthened regulations with executive powers, formalization of cross-institutional coordination including legal recognition of customary deliberations, and optimization of JUSTISIA technology. Socio-legal implications indicate that restorative justice contributes significantly to reducing social tensions and increasing institutional trust, particularly by integrating local wisdom.
Legal Protection of the Rights of the Maba Sangaji Customary Law Community over Its Traditional Territory in the Expansion of Nickel Mining in East Halmahera Dewi Kirei Novianty; Nadhifa Dliya Sambodo; Nahira Malik; Zahra Shafira; Agung Iriantoro
DE'RECHTSSTAAT Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JURNAL HUKUM DE' RECHTSSTAAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Djuanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30997/jhd.v12i2.23241

Abstract

Analyzes legal protection of rights of the Maba Sangaji indigenous community over their customary management areas amid the expansion of nickel mining in East Halmahera. A normative juridical method with regulatory, conceptual, also case study approach. Recognition of indigenous peoples' rights has been affirmed in 1945 Constitution also Constitutional Court decisions, sectoral legal framework in the mining sector still places mining business permits as the dominant instrument that weakens the recognition of customary territories. FPIC has been normatively recognized, but the absence of binding operational guidelines has resulted in its formalistic and ineffective implementation. This study emphasizes the need for harmonization of sectoral regulations and strengthening of FPIC mechanisms based on positive law to ensure constitutional protection and the human rights of the Maba Sangaji indigenous community.
Business Judgment Rule (BJR) Principle in Relation to Corruption Offenses in Regionally Owned Enterprises Muhammad Olik Abdul Holik; Agus Surono; Agung Iriantoro; Andi Wahyu Wibisana
Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Agustus, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Multidisciplinary Perspectiv
Publisher : Lembaga Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/kwz5j396

Abstract

This research examines legal protection for directors of Regional-Owned Enterprises (BUMD) through the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) in the context of liability for corporate losses often associated with corruption offenses. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing BJR in BUMD governance in Indonesia, examine director liability for corporate losses from the BJR perspective, and formulate a regulatory reform model to provide legal certainty and protection for BUMD directors. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through literature review and interviews. The findings indicate that BJR application is essential to distinguish between legitimate business risks and criminal offenses. Therefore, regulatory reform is necessary to clearly incorporate BJR principles such as good faith, due care, and rational business judgment as the basis for legal protection of BUMD directors. Such regulation is expected to enhance legal certainty, prevent criminalization of business decisions, and strengthen sound and professional governance of regional enterprises.
BAD FAITH REGISTRATION AND WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARK PROTECTION IN INDONESIAN LAW Kusumowardono, Adityo; Sulistyono, Joko; Hamid, Adnan; Iriantoro, Agung; Nur Hidayati, Maslihati
TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): VOLUME 10 NUMBER 2, 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/tlj.v10i2.107315

Abstract

AbstractTrademark applications filed in bad faith remain an important issue in Indonesian trademark law. The problem is not limited to the administrative process of registration, but also concerns legal certainty, the protection of legitimate trademark owners, and the creation of fair business competition. This study examines how Indonesian law regulates and assesses bad faith in trademark registration, and how far this regulation is consistent with international trademark protection standards, particularly the Paris Convention and the TRIPs Agreement. The legal issue addressed in this study arises from the absence of clear and consistent criteria for determining bad faith, both during trademark examination and in trademark dispute resolution. The novelty of this study lies in positioning good faith as a substantive standard, rather than merely a formal requirement in trademark registration. In this sense, good faith is used to assess whether an application has been filed honestly, reasonably, and without the intention of taking advantage of another party’s reputation or legal rights. This research uses a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The legal materials examined include the Indonesian Law on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, the Paris Convention, the TRIPs Agreement, legal doctrines on trademark protection, and relevant court decisions concerning bad faith. The findings show that Indonesian law already provides a normative basis for refusing or cancelling trademarks filed in bad faith. However, its application still faces difficulties in interpretation, proof, and consistency of legal reasoning. Therefore, clearer indicators of bad faith are needed, along with stronger substantive examination by the trademark office, greater consistency in court decisions, and better harmonization between Indonesian trademark law and international trademark protection standards. These improvements are necessary to prevent opportunistic trademark registration, protect legitimate trademark owners, and strengthen legal certainty within Indonesia’s trademark protection system. Abstrak Permohonan pendaftaran merek yang diajukan dengan itikad tidak baik masih menjadi salah satu persoalan penting dalam hukum merek Indonesia. Persoalan ini tidak hanya berkaitan dengan aspek administratif pendaftaran, tetapi juga menyangkut kepastian hukum, perlindungan terhadap pemilik merek yang sah, dan terciptanya persaingan usaha yang sehat. Penelitian ini membahas bagaimana hukum Indonesia mengatur dan menilai itikad tidak baik dalam pendaftaran merek, serta sejauh mana pengaturan tersebut telah sejalan dengan standar perlindungan merek dalam instrumen internasional, khususnya Paris Convention dan TRIPs Agreement. Permasalahan yang hendak dijawab dalam penelitian ini berangkat dari belum  adanya ukuran yang cukup tegas dan konsisten dalam menentukan adanya itikad tidak baik, baik pada tahap pemeriksaan merek maupun dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penempatan prinsip itikad baik sebagai standar substantif, bukan sekadar syarat formal dalam pendaftaran merek. Dengan demikian, itikad baik digunakan untuk menilai apakah suatu permohonan diajukan secara jujur, wajar, dan tidak bertujuan mengambil keuntungan dari reputasi atau hak pihak lain. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan hukum. Bahan hukum yang dianalisis meliputi Undang-Undang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, Paris Convention, TRIPs Agreement, doktrin hukum merek, serta putusan yang relevan mengenai itikad tidak baik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum Indonesia telah menyediakan dasar normatif untuk menolak atau membatalkan merek yang diajukan dengan itikad tidak baik. Namun, penerapannya masih menghadapi kendala dalam hal penafsiran, pembuktian, dan konsistensi pertimbangan hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan perumusan indikator itikad tidak baik yang lebih jelas, penguatan pemeriksaan substantif oleh otoritas merek, konsistensi putusan pengadilan, serta harmonisasi hukum merek nasional dengan standar perlindungan merek internasional. Penguatan ini penting untuk mencegah pendaftaran merek secara oportunistik, melindungi pemilik merek yang sah, dan memperkuat kepastian hukum dalam sistem perlindungan merek Indonesia.