Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.2
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Progresif DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan JUSTISI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syari'ah Electoral Governance : Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Law Development Journal USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Journal of Business, Management and Social Studies Journal of Mutidisciplinary Issues Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Silalahi, Wilma
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 46 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 46 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Reformasi Hukum Acara Penyidikan di Era Digital: Analisis Kesesuaian KUHAP dan KUHP Baru terhadap Kebutuhan Teknologi Informasi dalam Perspektif Ketatanegaraan Silalahi, Wilma; Antonio, Michelle Linda
Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November: Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/federalisme.v2i4.1286

Abstract

The reform of criminal investigation procedures has become a crucial aspect of Indonesia’s criminal justice system renewal, particularly following the enactment of the new Criminal Code, which introduces significant shifts regarding the rights of suspects, investigative authority, and the implementation of due process of law. In an era of rapid digital development, investigative practices must also incorporate the principles of good governance and human rights protection to ensure that state authority is exercised proportionally. This study aims to analyze the relevance of the principles of good governance in modern investigative processes, assess the adequacy of due process guarantees under the current Code of Criminal Procedureand the new Criminal Code, and identify practical challenges in application. Using a normative legal research method through statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study finds that criminal investigations in Indonesia continue to face issues such as normative inconsistency, regulatory disharmony, and weak accountability mechanisms. The integration of the principles of good governance has the potential to strengthen the quality and fairness of investigations, yet requires clearer normative foundations and consistent implementation. Moreover, the new Criminal Code does not fully resolve harmonization issues with Code of Criminal Procedure, making procedural reform an urgent necessity. The findings contribute to the enhancement of suspect protection, professionalism among investigators, and the overall improvement of Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Judicial Inconsistency and Its Implications for Trademark Protection in Indonesia Purba, Jeremy Exaudi; Silalahi, Wilma
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.369

Abstract

The issue of legal certainty and trademark protection for relevant parties arises from the inconsistency between the decisions of the Judex Facti and Judex Juris in trademark cancellation cases. This study aims to identify the nature of this inconsistency and its implications for trademark legal protection in Indonesia. Drawing on statutory regulations, Medan Commercial Court Decision No. 6/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022, and Supreme Court Decision No. 989 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2024, this normative legal research employs both case-based and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the Commercial Court adopts a narrow interpretation of “interested parties” and does not recognize first use as a legal basis, resulting in the dismissal of the trademark cancellation claim. In contrast, the Supreme Court applies a broader and more progressive interpretation by acknowledging historical use and identifying indications of bad faith in the trademark registration process. These divergent interpretations generate legal uncertainty, underscoring the need for harmonization between courts to ensure equitable trademark protection.
Algorithmic Maladministration: Rekonseptualisasi Peran Ombudsman dalam Pengawasan Pelayanan Publik Berbasis AI dan Big Data di Indonesia Silalahi, Wilma; Maharwani, Gesta Sebysesa
Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Riau, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jptam.v9i3.33794

Abstract

Perkembangan pelayanan publik berbasis digital telah mengubah cara pemerintah membuat keputusan, mulai dari sistem informasi kependudukan, seleksi ASN, penyaluran bantuan sosial, hingga sistem perizinan otomatis. Penggunaan artificial intelligence (AI), algoritma, dan big data menghadirkan efisiensi baru, tetapi juga melahirkan bentuk-bentuk maladministrasi yang tidak terakomodasi dalam kerangka hukum Ombudsman saat ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi bentuk maladministrasi digital, mengevaluasi kecukupan norma dalam UU No.37/2008 tentang Ombudsman, serta menawarkan model pengawasan baru yang relevan dengan era digital governance. Menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan studi literatur mutakhir, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa maladministrasi di era digital memiliki karakteristik baru seperti bias algoritmik, ketidaktransparanan logika sistem (algorithmic opacity), kesalahan otomatis (automated error), dan diskriminasi berbasis data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Ombudsman perlu mengembangkan standar baru berupa Algorithmic Transparency Standard, Digital Audit Framework, dan unit khusus untuk pengawasan sistem AI dalam pelayanan publik. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa reformulasi kewenangan Ombudsman merupakan urgensi untuk memastikan akuntabilitas, keadilan, dan kepastian hukum dalam pelayanan publik berbasis digital.
POSITION OF A NOTARY PUBLIC IN INVESTIGATIONS RELATING TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS Silalahi, Wilma; Sudiro, Ahmad
DE LEGA LATA: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 10, No 2 (2025): July-December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/dll.v10i2.27787

Abstract

A notarial deed is a perfect form of evidence and must therefore be prepared to serve as a strong evidentiary basis in the event of a breach of contract. Thus, a notary in carrying out his/her duties must act trustworthy, honest, thorough, independent, impartial, and safeguard the interests of the parties involved in legal actions. In fact, the notary's duty is basically to express the wishes or actions explained by various parties which will be included in the deed. Thus, the interesting problem in this study is how the notary's position in the investigation related to alleged violations. This study uses a normative legal approach or doctrinal research. For notaries suspected of committing violations in the investigation, the notary can be positioned as a witness or suspect or co-defendant, depending on the notary's involvement in the alleged violation. In the process of examining a notary, investigators are required to obtain approval from the Notary Honorary Council, both for examination as a witness and for confiscation of documents. Therefore, regarding the approval of the Notary Honorary Council, it is not intended to complicate the investigation process or the need for examination of the notary, because this has been anticipated by the provisions of Article 66 paragraph (3) and paragraph (4) of Law 2/2014. Where investigators can obtain an answer no later than 30 (thirty) days. Therefore, there are no issues related to the request for approval from the Notary Honorary Council. If the 30-day deadline is exceeded, the request is deemed approved
Analysis of the Use of Discretionary Rights in the Implementation of Regional Elections DAN, Elisabeth; Silalahi, Wilma
Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.4.799-808

Abstract

Democracy is a system of governance that places the people as the ultimate holders of political authority. One of its primary manifestations is the mechanism of general elections, including local elections (Pilkada). Pilkada represents a concrete form of democracy at the regional level, allowing citizens to determine their local leaders. In practice, however, election administrators may confront circumstances that are not clearly regulated. In such situations, discretionary right becomes relevant to enable decision-making in the face of legal gaps or ambiguities, provided that it aligns with the general principles of good governance. This study aims to analyze the use of discretion by the Banjarbaru City General Election Commission (KPU Kota Banjarbaru) as the election management body in the 2024 mayoral and vice-mayoral election. The research method was used normative (doctrinal). The novelty in this research is the need to address specific situations, such as those encountered during the Pilkada implementation phase, by examining the 2024 simultaneous Pilkada in Banjarbaru City. Based on the research concluded that KPU’s decision to continue using the original ballotlisting two candidate pairs despite the disqualification of one pair and to classify votes for the disqualified candidate as invalid without clear differentiation constitutes an improper exercise of discretion. This decision neglected the principles of public interest, legal certainty, justice, and the protection of citizens’ electoral rights. The KPU’s inaccurate use of outdated ballots resulted in ambiguity regarding vote status, violations of fairness and electoral validity, and a decline in public trust in the integrity of the election process.
PENATAAN REGULASI BERKUALITAS DALAM RANGKA TERJAMINNYA SUPREMASI HUKUM Silalahi, Wilma
Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol 8, No 1 (2020): April 2020
Publisher : Doctoral of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (626.283 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/hp.8.1.56-66

Abstract

Permasalahan mengenai penyusunan dan pembentukan regulasi sampai saat ini menjadi hal yang penting agar menghasilkan suatu regulasi berkualitas. Oleh karena itu, sebelum dibentuk atau direvisi suatu peraturan perundang-undangan, sebaiknya diketahui terlebih dahulu tujuan dan kebutuhan pembentukan suatu peraturan perundang-undangan. Permasalahannya adalah bagaimana pembentukan regulasi sehingga menghasilkan suatu regulasi berkualitas? Dalam penyusunan suatu regulasi yang dapat memberikan kepastian hukum kepada masyarakat, perlu diwujudkan regulasi yang sederhana dan tertib. DPR dan Pemerintah sebagai lembaga perancang dan pembentuk regulasi tidak boleh mempunyai kepentingan, baik kepentingan pribadi, kelompok, atau golongan, tetapi harus bersifat netral dan bebas dari kepentingan-kepentingan. Pembentukan suatu regulasi juga harus mendasarkan kepada asas pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan dan materi muatannya juga harus jelas asas tujuannya sesuai dengan UU 12/2011. Selain itu, sebelum diumumkan, perlu dilakukan pengujian atau evaluasi sehingga kualitas regulasi yang akan ditetapkan meningkat.
Co-Authors Adeputri, Gesta Subysesa Maharwani Ahmad Sudiro Akhirudin Antonio, Michelle Linda DAN, Elisabeth Djaja, Benny Djayanti Djayanti, Djayanti Evelina, Shane Fadhli, Rifqi Naufal Fudianto, Mahfudz Hamonangan, Marcellius Kirana Helmi, Teofilus Titus Ismantara, Stefany Jonathan, Michael Kirana, Kimmy Baby Linda Antonio, Michelle Maharwani, Gesta Sebysesa Manurung, Rachel Wahyunita Theodor Marsanti, Aliyah Marsela Berliana Mutiara Putri, Mutiara Naomy Christian Yulianty Simanjuntak1, Indah Natassya, Meily Ngabut, Rupertus Arvinci Permatasari, Yofi Princes, Elfindah Purba, Jeremy Exaudi Ranadi, Gladys Felicia Sanjaya, Aqila Herdiyanto Satriyo Mandiri, Muhammad Sudirman Taufano, Martinus Al Ibrani Giga William Chandra William, Joseph