Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.686
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah Politicon : Jurnal Ilmu Politik Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab IJOIS: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Al-Mutsla: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Socio Politica : Jurnal Ilmiah Jurusan Sosiologi Advances In Social Humanities Research Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Khazanah Sosial Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan
Idzam Fautanu
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Religion Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Radicalism Among Students: A Study of Perception of Radicalism of Indonesian and Malaysian Students Idzam Fautanu
Khazanah Sosial Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Khazanah Sosial Vol 4, No 1 April 2022
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ks.v4i1.17297

Abstract

This article examines radicalism as a socio-religious phenomenon in constructing ideological and political struggles. This study aims to determine the perceptions of Indonesian-Malaysian students regarding radicalism based on religious understanding obtained at the university. This research uses qualitative methods through online interview data collection, focus group discussions (FGD), and a descriptive-interpretative analysis literature study. This study found several findings, namely: students' perceptions of the level of radicalism were divided into three levels: 1) high (extremism, socio-political movement for political purposes); 2) medium (intolerance); 3) low (exclusive, does not accept differences of opinion). However, it should be noted that the perception of Indonesian students is more diverse regarding the level of radicalism, in contrast to the perception of Malaysian students who view the level of radicalism as narrower. This is due to the political influence of each country. Furthermore, the power of religious understanding at universities regarding the level of radicalism on Indonesian and Malaysian students is different due to the reception of information in class, discussions in communities/organizations, and information from social media. This article contributes to increasing the discussion on youth's response to religious-based radicalism so that various parties, including the government and academics, can carry out a more comprehensive anti-radicalism campaign.
Divergent Jurisprudential Paradigms of Productive Zakat: A Madhhab-Based Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning in LAZISNU and LAZISMU Solehudin, Ending; Fautanu, Idzam; Ahyani, Hisam; Masuwd, Mowafg
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 8 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.64628

Abstract

This study examines productive zakat not merely as a managerial instrument for economic empowerment, but as a manifestation of contemporary Islamic legal ijtihād (independent legal reasoning) shaped by divergent jurisprudential paradigms. Situated within the framework of comparative madhhab studies, this research analyzes how differences in legal reasoning between LAZISNU—rooted in the Shāfiʿī legal tradition—and LAZISMU—characterized by a reformist approach grounded in tajdīd (renewal) and tarjīḥ (legal preference)—influence the formulation and implementation of productive zakat practices in Indonesia. Employing a qualitative juridical-empirical method, the study draws on in-depth interviews with zakat administrators and institutional documents from LAZISNU and LAZISMU operating in Java and Bali. The findings reveal that the transformation of zakat from consumptive distribution to productive utilization is legitimized through distinct modes of istidlāl (legal reasoning or inferential deduction), wherein LAZISNU emphasizes adherence to authoritative Shāfiʿī doctrines, particularly concerning the principle of tamlīk (transfer of ownership to beneficiaries), while LAZISMU adopts a more flexible form of ijtihād that prioritizes maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (the higher objectives of Islamic law) and socio-economic outcomes. This divergence reflects an ongoing dialectic within contemporary Islamic legal thought regarding the boundaries of zakat utilization. By integrating empirical practices with cross-madhhab legal analysis, this study contributes to the development of comparative fiqh al-zakāt (Islamic jurisprudence of zakat) and demonstrates how modern philanthropic institutions negotiate classical legal doctrines within heterogeneous socio-legal contexts such as Java and Bali.
Law Enforcement Model for the Execution of Court Decisions on Civil Servant Fathers' Child Support Obligations After Divorce in the Bengkulu High Religious Court Area Maman Abdur Rahman; Idzam Fautanu; Hasan Bisri; Aden Rosadi; Ahmad Hasan Ridwan
Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Vol 28, No 2 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/madania.v28i2.6471

Abstract

Law enforcement of child support obligations of fathers as Civil Servants (PNS) after divorce often encounters obstacles, such as non-compliance in implementing Religious Court rulings. This study focuses on the Bengkulu High Religious Court (Pengadilan Tinggi Agama, PTA), which has implemented an execution system to ensure the financial rights of women and children after divorce.The primary objective of this research is to analyze the factors contributing to non-compliance among fathers with civil servant status, assess the implementation process of court decisions, evaluate the execution model employed by the PTA of Bengkulu, and explore avenues for its improvement. The study is grounded in the theories of the supremacy of law, law enforcement, and legal execution, employing a normative-empirical approach with descriptive methods. Data collection techniques included observation, interviews, and document analysis. The findings reveal that several factors, including economic constraints and limited legal awareness, contribute to the non-compliance of civil servant fathers in fulfilling child support obligations. The execution process is largely similar to the procedures for enforcing monetary payments. The PTA of Bengkulu has innovatively introduced the E-Mosi Caper application to monitor compliance and track the implementation of child support orders. To enhance the effectiveness of this execution model, the study proposes regulatory harmonization, the establishment of a dedicated implementation team, and heightened public awareness campaigns. These measures aim to support the development of a more robust and efficient system for ensuring compliance with child support obligations, ultimately advancing the protection of women’s and children’s financial rights after divorce. Penegakan hukum terhadap kewajiban nafkah anak oleh ayah berstatus Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS) pasca perceraian sering kali menghadapi kendala, seperti ketidakpatuhan dalam melaksanakan putusan Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini berfokus pada Pengadilan Tinggi Agama (PTA) Bengkulu, yang telah menerapkan sistem eksekusi untuk menjamin hak-hak finansial perempuan dan anak setelah perceraian. Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah menganalisis faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan ketidakpatuhan ayah berstatus PNS, menilai proses pelaksanaan putusan pengadilan, mengevaluasi model eksekusi yang diterapkan oleh PTA Bengkulu, serta mengeksplorasi cara-cara untuk meningkatkan efektivitas sistem tersebut. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada teori supremasi hukum, penegakan hukum, dan eksekusi hukum, dengan pendekatan normatif-empiris menggunakan metode deskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi observasi, wawancara, dan analisis dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa beberapa faktor, seperti keterbatasan ekonomi dan rendahnya kesadaran hukum, berkontribusi pada ketidakpatuhan ayah PNS dalam memenuhi kewajiban nafkah anak. Proses eksekusi menyerupai pelaksanaan pembayaran uang. PTA Bengkulu memanfaatkan aplikasi E-Mosi Caper untuk memantau kepatuhan dan melacak pelaksanaan perintah nafkah anak. Untuk meningkatkan efektivitas model eksekusi ini, penelitian ini mengusulkan harmonisasi regulasi, pembentukan tim pelaksana khusus, dan kampanye peningkatan kesadaran publik. Langkah-langkah ini bertujuan untuk mendukung pengembangan sistem yang lebih kuat dan efisien dalam menjamin kepatuhan terhadap kewajiban nafkah anak, sehingga pada akhirnya memperkuat perlindungan hak-hak finansial perempuan dan anak setelah perceraian.
The Husband’s Absolute Authority in Nikah Sirri: An Analysis of Maqāṣid al-Syarī’ah on Women’s Rights Sahrul Hanafi; Nurman Akhmadi; Beni Ahmad Saebani; Idzam Fautanu
IJoIS: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/ijois.1479

Abstract

The practice of nikah sirri in Indonesia often results in the husband’s absolute authority, which is detrimental to women due to the lack of state legal protection. This study aims to analyze the impact of such authority on women’s rights through the perspective of Maqāṣid al-Syarī’ah and to propose a reconstruction of family law. The method employed is normative legal research with an ecosentric approach, examining laws, legal concepts, and court rulings. The results of the study indicate that absolute authority in secret marriages disrupts the family justice ecosystem and violates the principles of Maqāṣid, particularly the protection of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), lineage (ḥifẓ al-nasl), and property (ḥifẓ al-māl). Women face structural vulnerabilities in the form of the loss of maintenance rights, shared property, and the legal status of their children. In conclusion, this practice contradicts the spirit of substantive Islamic justice. A legal reconstruction is needed to strengthen the role of the state and judges as guardians of the balance of the justice ecosystem, as well as a reinterpretation of the concept of qiwamah based on consultation and gender justice. Marriage registration must be viewed as a Sharia instrument to guarantee human dignity, not merely an administrative formality.
Legal Analysis of Family Maintenance in Labor Dynamics: A Review of Contemporary Family Law Dewa Sukma Kelana; Sahrul Hanafi; Beni Ahmad Saebani; Idzam Fautanu
IJoIS: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/ijois.1480

Abstract

Transformations in the labor market and shifts in the family law paradigm have blurred the concept of spousal support, which remains rooted in the male breadwinner paradigm. This study analyzes the dynamics of spousal support rights and obligations in the context of modern employment and identifies gaps in policy and judicial responses. Using a normative legal method with a legislative, conceptual, and case-law analysis approach covering the 2020–2025 period, the data were examined qualitatively through the harmonization of legal norms and the extraction of the ratio decidendi. The results indicate: (1) the legal framework for spousal support has not yet internalized the principle of shared responsibility or recognized the economic value of domestic labor; (2) the fragmentation of jurisprudence between Religious Courts and Industrial Relations Courts (PHI) in addressing the income volatility of non-standard workers creates legal uncertainty; and (3) labor regulations remain individualistic and disregard household resilience. The concepts of a living wage and household-centered responsibility are operationalized as parameters for adjusting obligations based on real economic capacity, childcare time allocation, and dependency ratios. The novelty of this study lies in the integration of family and labor law through a household resilience framework. Policy reforms are urgently needed to prevent the feminization of poverty and to create a gender-just labor ecosystem.
Selective Maslahah: Judicial Reasoning on Child Marriage Dispensation at the Religious Courts of Madura, Indonesia Moh. Afif Wahyudi; Idzam Fautanu; Siah Khosyi'ah; Ateng Ruhendi
Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan
Publisher : Universitas Islam KH. Achmad Muzakki Syah Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53515/alqodiri.v24i2.268

Abstract

Although Indonesia raised the minimum legal age for marriage to nineteen years through Law Number 16 of 2019, judicial dispensation remains available, placing Religious Courts at the center of decisions concerning child marriage. This study examines how judges at the four Religious Courts of Madura operationalize maslahah mursalah in marriage dispensation proceedings and evaluates the extent to which their reasoning reflects the objectives of maqasid al-shari'ah. An empirical-juridical qualitative approach was employed using semi-structured interviews with four senior judicial officers, documentary analysis of ten marriage dispensation decisions, and examination of annual court reports from 2020 to 2023. Data were analyzed through qualitative content analysis, thematic coding, and critical legal interpretation, with triangulation applied to strengthen the credibility of the findings. The results reveal that judges consistently invoke maslahah mursalah when justifying marriage dispensation; however, judicial reasoning predominantly emphasizes the protection of religion (hifz al-din) and lineage (hifz al-nasl), while the protection of life, intellect, and property receives limited evidentiary consideration. Pregnancy outside marriage emerges as the principal factor shaping judicial decisions, whereas multidisciplinary assessment and long-term evaluation of children's welfare remain inconsistently implemented. The study concludes that selective application of maslahah is primarily influenced by institutional and evidentiary constraints rather than inadequate doctrinal understanding. These findings contribute to Islamic family law scholarship by proposing a more systematic framework for evaluating judicial reasoning and offer practical recommendations for strengthening child-centered marriage dispensation procedures in Indonesia.
Co-Authors A. Rio Makkulau Wahyu Aden Rosadi Al Aziz, Alfandy Faris Alfin Maqbul Fauzi Ateng Ruhendi Bainon, Masalan Buhori M Daulay, Habib Rasyidi Dede Kania Dewa Sukma Kelana Ending Solehudin Fadillah Walduda’ini, Al Gugun Gumilar Habib Rasyidi Daulay Hasan Bisri Heri Gunawan Hisam Ahyani Irawan, Sandra Jefry Tarantang Khaeruman, Badri Khosyi’ah, Siah Lutfi Fahrul Rizal, Lutfi Fahrul Maman Abdur Rahman Moh. Afif Wahyudi Mowafg Abrahem Masuwd Muchlis Muhammad Tsaqib Idary Najamudin Najamudin Najib, Moh. Nandang Najmudin Nugraha, Alfan Azri Nurman Akhmadi Prasetyo, Ridwan Eko Ramdani Wahyu Sururie Rhamdani Wahyu Sururie Ridwan, Ahmad Hasan Saebani, Beni Ahmad Sahrul Hanafi Sailellah, Sirajuddin Siah Khosyi'ah Sirajuddin Sailellah Solihin, Dadin Urfan Hilmi Usep Saepulah Wahyu Sururie, Ramdani WIRANI AISYAH ANWAR, WIRANI AISYAH Yaekaji, Aisyah Yanuar Chandra, Tofik Yanuar Chandra