Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.189
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Corruptio YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Jurnal Ibu dan Anak Borobudur Journal on Legal Services Abdimas Indonesian Journal Jurnal Mitrawarga Law and Justice JPEMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Jurisprudence
Febriani, Hanifah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Constitutional Perspective of Human Rights Values in Local Wisdom in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (Study of Constitutional Court Decision No. 88/PUU-XIV/2016) Triwahyuningsih, Triwahyuningsih; Zuliyah, Siti; Putri, Uni Tsulasi; Febriani, Hanifah; Zulfiani Ayu Astutik
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 13, No. 1, June 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v13i1.1846

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: This research aims to (1) explore the local wisdom values of the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY), which can constitutionally strengthen human rights values in Indonesia, and (2) analyze the judge's consideration of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 88/PUU-XIV/2016 from the perspective of universalism versus particularism of human rights in Indonesia. Methodology: This normative legal research employed a philosophical and statutory approach. This research used only secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials refined through Focus Group Discussion. The data were then analyzed by descriptive qualitative philosophy to find the meaning behind the object under study through data reduction, classification, interpretation, display, and drawing conclusions. Results: The study revealed that (1) constitutional human rights values in DIY’s local wisdom are explicitly stated in the DIY Regional Regulations (Perda) and Special Regional Regulations (Perdais). DIY’s local wisdom can philosophically strengthen human rights values in Indonesia based on Pancasila, confirming that Pancasila as a constitutional identity crystallizes cultural customs and religious values throughout Indonesia. (2) The judges’ opinion for the Constitutional Court Decision No. 88/PUU-XIV/2016 is relative-particular; other than human rights is universal as there is no differentiation between the male and female to be the Governor of Yogyakarta Special Region, in the particular case of Yogyakarta, it remains upholding the local wisdom values as the requirement to be the Governor of Yogyakarta Special Region, where he shall be the reigning monarch of Sultan Hamengku Buwono, and the requirement to be the Sultan relies on the hereditary internal law of the Kasultanan Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat (Yogyakarta Palace) since 1755. Applications of the study: This study is applied (1) to maintain and preserve the local wisdom values of the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY) for the upholding of human rights in Indonesia as mandated by the 1945 Constitution and (2) to support the government’s program in the 2019-2024 RANHAM so that every Indonesian’s human rights receive perfect protection, in which the administrators of state power uphold human rights values in carrying out their duties to serve the community. Novelty/Originality: This research explored the local wisdom values of the DIY which can strengthen human rights values in Indonesia from various existing regulations in DIY with a broader approach, including raising local wisdom from human rights enforcement cases in Indonesia. Keywords: Constitutional Perspective, Human Rights, DIY’s Local Wisdom, Constitutional Court Decision No. 88/PUU-XIV/2016   ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) menggali nilai-nilai kearifan lokal Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) yang secara konstitusional dapat memperkuat nilai-nilai HAM di Indonesia dan (2) menganalisis pertimbangan hakim terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 88/PUU-XIV/2016 dari perspektif universalisme versus partikularisme hak asasi manusia di Indonesia. Metodologi: Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan filosofis dan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini hanya menggunakan data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang disempurnakan melalui Focus Group Discussion. Data tersebut kemudian dianalisis dengan filosofi kualitatif deskriptif untuk menemukan makna dibalik objek yang diteliti melalui reduksi data, klasifikasi, interpretasi, penyajian, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Temuan: Kajian menunjukkan bahwa (1) nilai-nilai konstitusional HAM dalam kearifan lokal DIY dinyatakan secara eksplisit dalam Peraturan Daerah (Perda) dan Peraturan Daerah Khusus (Perdais) DIY. Kearifan lokal DIY dapat memperkuat nilai-nilai hak asasi manusia di Indonesia secara filosofis berdasarkan Pancasila dan menegaskan bahwa Pancasila sebagai identitas konstitusional merupakan kristalisasi adat budaya dan nilai-nilai agama di seluruh nusantara. (2) Pendapat hakim terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 88/PUU-XIV/2016 bersifat relatif-khusus; selain hak asasi manusia bersifat universal karena tidak ada perbedaan antara laki-laki dan perempuan untuk menjadi Gubernur Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, khusus Yogyakarta, tetap menjunjung tinggi nilai-nilai kearifan lokal sebagai syarat untuk menjadi Gubernur Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, di mana beliau akan menjadi raja yang bertahta Sultan Hamengku Buwono dan syarat menjadi Sultan didasarkan pada hukum internal turun temurun dari Kasultanan Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat (Istana Yogyakarta) sejak tahun 1755. Kegunaan kajian: Penelitian ini diterapkan untuk (1) menjaga dan melestarikan nilai-nilai kearifan lokal Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) untuk penegakan hak asasi manusia di Indonesia sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh UUD 1945 dan (2) untuk mendukung program pemerintah dalam RANHAM 2019-2024 agar hak asasi manusia setiap orang di Indonesia mendapat perlindungan yang sempurna, di mana penyelenggara kekuasaan negara menjunjung tinggi nilai-nilai hak asasi manusia dalam menjalankan tugasnya melayani masyarakat. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Penelitian ini menggali nilai-nilai kearifan lokal Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) yang dapat memperkuat nilai-nilai HAM di Indonesia dari berbagai regulasi yang ada di DIY dengan pendekatan yang lebih luas, termasuk mengangkat kearifan lokal dari kasus-kasus penegakan HAM di Indonesia. Kata Kunci: Perspektif Konstitusi, Hak Asasi Manusia, Kearifan Lokal DIY, Putusan MK No. 88/PUU-XIV/2016
Review of Judges ' Consideration in the Court Decision Regarding the Illegal Sale of Subsidized Fertilizer: Comparison of Indonesian and Uzbekistan Kuswardani; Qori Endah Pramesthi; Turdialiev Mukhammaf Ali Polatjon Ogli; Hanifah Febriani
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 1, June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i1.4419

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This research aims to review the subsidized fertilizer trade from the standpoint of the National Criminal Law, taking into account both the policy considerations that went into its formulation and the background information provided by the judge in two court decisions (Decision No.19/Pid Sus/2022/Fr.Pti. and the decision of MA 105 K/Pid.Sus/2019). It also looks at how the disparities in legal rulings have affected the criminal act of subsidized fertilizer sales between Indonesia and Uzbekistan as per Law No. 93 of 1997 concerning the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan Article 177. Methodology: Normative research approach to legislation and case approach. Secondary data were gathered from legal documents. Results: Since subsidized fertilizer is a good under supervision under the Ministry of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia No. 15/M-DAG/PER/4/2013 on the procurement and distribution of subsidized fertilizer in the agricultural sector, the trade must have a license in accordance with Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 15/2011 on amendments to Presidential Regulation No. 77 of 2005 on the determination of subsidized fertilizer as a good under supervision.  Trading actors who disregard this clause are liable for errors in the form and for not having the proper authorization or authority to trade subsidized fertilizer, according to the defendant's Decision No. 19/Pid Sus/2022/PN.Pti. and the Decision of MA 105 K/Pid.Sus/2019. The dangerous nature of the perpetrator's actions also makes them classified as economic crimes because they have the potential to disrupt the national economy. This study aims to compare the legal framework, legal proceedings, and punitive measures of the judge's rulings on the criminal act of illegal fertilizer sales in Uzbekistan and Indonesia. The laws that govern plant cultivation systems in Indonesia are Law Number 12 of 2019, Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, and Criminal Code Article 386, which imposes fines, administrative penalties, and jail time. The legal procedure entails a police or Civil Servant Investigator's investigation, a prosecutor's prosecution, and a trial involving the cross-examination of witnesses and evidence. Illegal fertilizer trade is punishable by law in Uzbekistan under Law No. 93 of 1997 concerning the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Article 177, and Law No. 221-I of 1996 concerning the Protection of Consumer Rights, with fines, social work, or incarceration as possible forms of punishment. The legal process entails an inquiry conducted by investigative entities, an accusation made by prosecutors, and a trial during which witnesses are questioned and evidence is presented. Only one case—the Navoiyazot case—has made it to the Uzbek court thus far. Applications of this study: This research can be applied to examine economic crimes committed against the supervision of trade in goods, particularly fertilizers that are subsidized. It is also to compare the conditions of the illicit sale of fertilizers that have been subsidized in Uzbekistan and Indonesia, as well as the rulings made by the courts. Novelty/Originality of this study:  This study is novel in that it examines the trade of fertilizers that are illegally subsidized between two nations. Keywords: economic crime, subsidized fertilizer, trade.  ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perdagangan pupuk bersubsidi dari perspektif hukum pidana nasional dari aspek kebijakan formulasinya serta dari aspek latar belakang keputusan hakim dalam putusan pengadilan (Putusan No. 19/Pid Sus/2022/PN.Pti. dan Putusan MA 105 K/Pid.Sus/2019 serta mengkaji bagaimana perbedaan putusan hukum yang diterapkan terhadap tindak pidana penjualan pupuk bersubsidi antara Indonesia dengan Uzbekistan pada Law No. 93 of 1997 concerning Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan Pasal 177. Metodologi: Penelitian normatif pendekatan perundang – undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Data yang dibutuhkan data sekunder yaitu dokumen hukum. Temuan: Pupuk bersubsidi sebagai barang dalam pengawasan, sehingga perdagangannya harus ada izin sebagaimana ditetapkan Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia No 15 /2011 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 77 Tahun 2005 Tentang Penetapan Pupuk Bersubsidi Sebagai Barang Dalam Pengawasan jo Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan RI No 15/M-DAG/PER/4/2013 tentang Pengadaan dan Penyaluran Pupuk Bersubsidi Sektor Pertanian. Pelaku perdagangan yang tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan ini berdasarkan Putusan terdakwa No. 19/Pid Sus/2022/PN.Pti. dan Putusan MA 105 K/Pid.Sus/2019., bahwa terdakwa melakukan kesalahaan dalam bentuk tanpa izin atau tanpa kewenangan memperjualbelikan pupuk bersubsidi. Selanjutnya perbuatan pelaku dikategorikan sebagai tindak pidana ekonomi karena sifat berbahaya perbuatan bisa berdampak pada gangguan tingkat perekonomian nasional. Perbandingan putusan hakim terhadap tindak pidana penjualan pupuk ilegal di Indonesia dan Uzbekistan meliputi dasar hukum, prosedur peradilan, dan jenis hukuman. Di Indonesia, dasar hukum terdiri dari Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Budidaya Tanaman, Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, dan KUHP Pasal 386, dengan hukuman berupa penjara, denda, dan sanksi administratif. Proses peradilan melibatkan penyidikan oleh kepolisian atau PPNS, penuntutan oleh jaksa, dan persidangan dengan pemeriksaan saksi dan bukti. Di Uzbekistan perdagangan pupuk illegal adalah perbuatan criminal berdasarkan Law No. 93 of 1997 concerning Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan Pasal 177 dan serta Law No. 221-I of 1996 concerning on Protection of Consumer Rights, dengan hukuman berupa penjara, denda, atau kerja sosial. Proses peradilan melibatkan penyidikan oleh badan investigasi, penuntutan oleh jaksa, dan persidangan dengan presentasi bukti dan pemeriksaan saksi. Sejauh ini baru satu kasus yang masuk kepengadilan Uzbekistan yaitu kasus Navoiyazot. Kegunaan: Dapat dimanfaatkan untuk kajian – kajian tindak pidana ekonimi terhadap perdagangan barang dalam pengawasan terutama pupuk bersubsidi. Dapat membandingkan ketentuan penjualan secara illegal pupuk bersubsidi di Indonesia dan Uzbekistan serta bagaimana pengadilan memutuskan. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Kebaharuan penelitian ini adalah pada kajian mengenai putusan tentang perdagangan pupuk bersubsidi secara illegal terkait dua negara. Kata Kunci: tindak pidana ekonomi, pupuk bersubsidi, perdangangan
Benefits of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for the Community of Mundu Village, Klaten Setiawati, Diana; Febriani, Hanifah; Wibowo, Rio Pradita; Anggraeni, Chintya
Borobudur Journal on Legal Services Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Vol 6 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/bjls.v6i2.15189

Abstract

This community service activity aims to provide an understanding of the benefits of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) program for improving the welfare of the community in Mundu Village, Klaten Regency. CSR is understood as a company's social responsibility that is not only oriented towards economic profit, but also towards sustainable social and environmental contributions. The implementation methods included field observations, interviews with village officials and beneficiary communities, and focus group discussions (FGDs). The results of the activity showed that the CSR program in Mundu Village had a positive impact on the economy through the empowerment of MSMEs and skills training, on society through the improvement of public facilities and education, and on the environment through waste management based on waste banks and the use of cow dung waste to produce biogas.
Co-Authors Achmad Miftah Farid Anastasya, Dita Nadya Andria Luhur Prakoso Andriani, Devi Luluk Anggraeni, Chintya Arief Budiono Arifin, Achmad Januar Baehaqi Bagus Mulia Pandu Winoto Carissa Maharani Carissa Maharani Chintya Anggraeni Daing, Crisanto A. Denny Saptono Fahrurodzi Diana Setiawati Eny Winaryati Fahmi Fairuzzaman Ika Rahmawati Inda Fresti Puspitasari Kuswardani LAILIYANA, LAILIYANA Marisa Kurnianingsih Muchamad Iksan Muhamad Taufik Hidayat Muhammad Anas Muhammad RM Fayasy Failaq Nugraha, Handy Putri, Uni Tsulasi Qori Endah Pramesthi Rizka Sadida Amalia Izzatul Haq Salazar, Ramonita A Santi Putriani Siti Zuliyah Soepatini Susilawati, Elly Syarifa, Gizha Trian Gigih Kuncoro Triwahyuningsih, Triwahyuningsih Turdialiev Mukhammaf Ali Polatjon Ogli Wibowo, Rio Pradita Yanti Yanti Zuhdi, Syaifudin Zulfiani Ayu Astutik