p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.222
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK) Ekuitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Jurnal Promosi Pendidikan Ekonomi Et-Tijarie: Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis Syariah Monex: Journal of Accounting Research JURNAL PENDIDIKAN EKONOMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, Ilmu Ekonomi dan Ilmu Sosial Akuntabel : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Forum Ekonomi : Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi SELAPARANG: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan JURNAL EKONOMI PENDIDIKAN DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN Martabe : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JURKAMI) Humaniora JAE (Jurnal Akuntansi dan Ekonomi) Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Akun Nabelo : Jurnal Akuntansi Netral, Akuntabel, Objektif Jurnal Edukasi (Ekonomi, Pendidikan dan Akuntansi) Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran (JINOTEP) Kajian dan Riset Dalam Teknologi Pembelajaran Jurnal Abdimas Ilmiah Citra Bakti (JAICB) VALUE: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, Keuangan dan Bisnis Basic and Applied Education Research Journal (BAERJ) Jurnal Pengabdian dan Edukasi Sekolah (Jubaedah) Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan JOMPA ABDI: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, Akuntansi dan Kewirausahaan (JPEAKU) Education Journal: Journal Educational Research and Development Journal of Management, Economic, and Accounting Amal Ilmiah: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Ekuitas Jurnal Pnedidikan Ekonomi CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA MENGGUNAKAN PBL BERBANTUAN MIND MAPPING DENGAN PBL BERBANTUAN PPT Indah Lestari; Sukidin Sukidin; Dwi Herlindawati
Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JURKAMI) Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JURKAMI
Publisher : STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31932/jpe.v11i1.5170

Abstract

The low critical thinking ability of students is the basis for this study. The focus of this study is to compare the critical thinking ability of class X students of SMAN Jenggawah in economics learning with the implementation of the PBL model assisted by Mind Mapping and the PBL model assisted by PowerPoint (PPT). This study applies a quasi-experimental method with a posttest nonequivalent control group design. This study involved all class X students of SMAN Jenggawah as the population, the research sample was selected using the purposive sampling method. Primary data were obtained from posttests, observations, and interviews. Hypothesis testing was carried out through independent sample t-tests. The results showed that the average value in the class using the PBL model assisted by Mind Mapping was higher, which was 80.14 compared to the class implementing the PBL model assisted by PPT of 74.29. Thus, it can be concluded that the PBL model supported by Mind Mapping has a significant effect on critical thinking skills.
Development of AI-based interactive digital modules to enhance innovation in economics learning Dwi Herlindawati; Irmadatus Sholekhah; Sri Kantun; Titin Kartini; Tiara Tiara
Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jppfa.v13i1.67329

Abstract

Rapid technological advancements in the digital era require teachers to continuously innovate in selecting effective learning media. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to enhance instructional quality through more adaptive, interactive, and personalized digital learning resources. This study aims to develop and evaluate an AI-based interactive digital module for senior high school economics instruction. Employing a research and development (R&D) approach with the ADDIE model — Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation — the study conducted expert validations and large-scale trials involving five economics teachers and 158 Grade XI students across five public senior high schools in Jember Regency. The module was assessed using five core criteria of e-module quality. Results show that the module achieved excellent ratings across all categories: self-instruction (96.36%), self-contained (96%), stand-alone (94.10%), adaptive (99.66%), and user-friendly (97.36%), with an overall average score of 96.70%. These findings indicate that the AI-based interactive module is highly feasible and effective for supporting economics learning, addressing the limitations of conventional instructional materials, and aligning with the demands of digital learning in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era. The study concludes that the developed module can serve as a valuable instructional innovation for economics teachers, enhancing both learning engagement and the quality of technology-integrated education.
Evaluasi Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Menggunakan Model CIPP Di SMAN 1 Kencong Jember Mulyo Budi Santuso; Pudjo Suharso; Dwi Herlindawati
CENDEKIA: JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN Vol 12 No 2 (2024): CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan
Publisher : STKIP Paris Barantai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33659/cip.v12i2.355

Abstract

Kegiatan evaluasi penerapan model PBL dapat memberikan manfaat untuk melihat capaian model pembelajaran yang dilaksanakan selama ini dan kendala-kendala yang dihadapi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kesesuaian penerapan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah di SMAN 1 Kencong pada mata pelajaran ekonomi ditinjau menggunakan model evaluasi CIPP. Metode pengumpulan data adalah observasi, dokumen dan wawancara. Analisis data menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif evaluatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dari seluruh komponen yang dievaluasi ditemukan bahwa penerapan model PBL yang diterapkan oleh guru ekonomi di SMAN 1 Kencong hampir sesuai dengan standar penerapan model PBL. Persentase setiap komponen yaitu evaluasi context sebesar 100% dengan tingkat kesesuaiannya yaitu sangat sesuai, evaluasi input sebesar 75% dengan tingkat kesesuaian “sesuai”, evaluasi process sebesar 94,73% dengan tingkat kesesuai “sangat sesuai” dan evaluasi product sebesar 100% dengan tingkat kesesuaian “sangat sesuai”. Salain itu, ditemukan juga ketidaksesuain antara lain; guru ekonomi belum memiliki sertifikasi profesi guru, keterbatasan jumlah sarana dan prasarana seperti projector.