Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Minat Membaca Buku Elektronik pada Siswa di Tingkat Pendidikan Tinggi Taufiq, Nazif Baihaqi; Sesmiyanti; Yulmiati
EduCurio: Education Curiosity Vol 3 No 1 (2024): Agustus-November 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Tanggui Baimbaian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana minat baca mahasiswa terhadap buku elektronic. Penelitian in merupakan penelitian qualitative. Partisipan dari penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa jurnalistik tahun ajaran 2021. Sumber data dari penelitian ini adalah kuisioner yang dibagikan melalui Google form. Data dikumpulkan dengan cara menganalisis hasil kuisioner yang telah diisi oleh partisipan. Ada tiga indicator yang akan membantu peneliti untuk mengukur minat baca siswa, yaitu, perasaan senang membaca ebook, kebutuhan mahasiswa terhadap ebook, dan perhatian mahasiswa saat membaca ebook. Temuan menunjukan bahwa minat baca mahasiswa terhadap ebook di perguruan tinggi termasuk kategori Tinggi (65%), Masing-masing indikator minat baca e-book masuk dalam kategori tinggi yaitu perasaan senang membaca e-book (63%) kebutuhan mahasiswa terhadap e-book (66%), dan perhatian mahasiswa saat membaca ebook (64%).
EFFECTIVENESS OF SHARINGPLUS MODEL AS ATOOL FOR CONTROLLING STUDENTS’ LEARNING TASKS Yelfiza, Yelfiza; Siska, Siska; Sesmiyanti, Sesmiyanti; Perpisa, Lili; Zulfariati, Zulfariati
TELL - US JOURNAL Vol 9, No 2 (2023): English Education Art
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/tus.2023.v9i2.6858

Abstract

Controlling undergraduate students’ tasks and supervising the process via online could decrease the quality of the task, since online feedback could not be well transmitted, which then resulted in unexpected revision.  Therefore, this research was aimed at finding out the effectiveness of SHARINGPLUS. This research used the action research method, done to twenty students in even semester 2020/2021. The model contained kinds of tasks with indicators and sub-indicators, list of students, and task options related to their final grades. The model contains eleven stages for every kind of task, but the students who succeed in doing the task until stage 4 do not need to do the following steps. Only the students with difficulty should follow the steps until the end. Findings showed that 45 % participants could follow 4 processes (SHAR). They worked in R stage repeatedly, since there was no limitation of task submission. The remaining students found difficulty in working in the system so that they could not finish their tasks  in the system. Thus, conclusion can be stated that the model was not yet effective to make students work as expected so that it needs more development.