Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.589
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pangan dan Gizi JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha FORUM BANGUNAN Pandecta Harmonia: Journal of Research and Education Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat PREDIKSI Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi SCHOOL EDUCATION JOURNAL PGSD FIP UNIMED International conference on Information Technology and Business (ICITB) INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI YUSTISI Jurnal Ilmiah Ecosystem Jambura Law Review Unnes Journal of Public Health Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Law Research Review Quarterly Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum & Keadilan Jurnal Suara Hukum Jurnal Analisis Hukum G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam AMNESTI : Jurnal Hukum Cermin Dunia Kedokteran MACHINERY: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan Chemistry Education Review Perspektif Hukum Reformasi Hukum Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Annual Review of Legal Studies Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research Journal of Law and Legal Reform Lex Scientia Law Review Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services "Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development " Law Research Review Quarterly Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum
Mardiana -
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 63 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 63 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
Comparative Analyzation of Criminal Law for Sexual Harassment Based on Awig-Awig and Law 12 of 2022: Analisis Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Pelecehan Seksual Berdasarkan Awig-Awig dan Undang-Undang 12 Tahun 2022 Afra, Fairuz; Sumardiana, Benny
Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 25 ISSUE 1
Publisher : Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/ph.v25i1.333

Abstract

Indonesia has two legal systems, customary law and national law, which often clash in sexual harassment cases. Bali's Awig-Awig promotes restorative justice, while Law No. 12 of 2022 emphasizes strict criminal sanctions. This difference can trigger conflict, especially regarding the rights of female victims. Therefore, this study will discuss how the mechanism between the two laws compares and which law is more effective in applying in sexual harassment cases in Bali. This research compares the effectiveness of the two legal systems using a socio-legal method and comparative approach. The results show that the integration of customary deliberation with formal legal protection can bridge such differences, ensuring culturally sensitive and comprehensive justice.
The Role of Forensic Laboratory Results in Proving Document Forgery Criminal Offenses: Peran Hasil Laboratorium Forensik dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen Dona Febiani; Sumardiana, Benny
Annual Review of Legal Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/arls.vol1i3.10580

Abstract

Implementation of proof in court should rightfully involve judges evaluating all evidence submitted to the court, including the results of forensic laboratory examinations. However, in reality, in some cases, judges overlook the results of forensic laboratory examinations in proving the crime of document forgery. Therefore, this research aims to understand and analyze the role of forensic laboratory examination results in supporting the proof of document forgery, as well as the considerations of judges in placing and evaluating forensic laboratory examination results used as evidence in court. This study employs a juridical-empirical research method with a qualitative approach using primary and secondary data sources. Data validity is ensured using triangulation techniques, while data analysis is conducted through qualitative narrative analysis. The research findings indicate that: 1) Forensic laboratory examination results on documents play a crucial role in supporting the proof of document forgery crimes, as they can be used by investigators to ascertain the authenticity of a document, aid in identifying suspects, and serve as evidence tools such as expert testimony and/or exhibits in court to support prosecution. 2) Judges assess the validity of forensic laboratory examination results by examining the methodology used in the examination and the credibility of forensic experts in conducting the analysis. Furthermore, forensic laboratory examination results can assist judges in deliberating alongside other relevant and supportive evidence. Therefore, judges may render verdicts with at least two valid pieces of evidence accompanied by their conviction. In conclusion, the findings affirm that forensic laboratory examination results can serve as valid evidence in court, playing a crucial role in supporting the proof of document forgery crimes. These results can influence judges in decision-making and aid in uncovering document forgery crimes.
Manipulated Stocks and Corruption: Lessons from Three Indonesian Verdicts Chevalier, Henry; Sumardiana, Benny; Waspiah, Waspiah
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): October, 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i4.30606

Abstract

The Jiwasraya, Asabri, and DP4 cases are major financial scandals in Indonesia involving stock price manipulation and corruption. These crimes stemmed from weaknesses in capital market regulations, weak oversight, and conflicts of interest in the management of investment funds in state financial institutions. The perpetrators exploited regulatory loopholes to divert funds into low-quality stocks whose prices were manipulated through fraudulent transactions and misleading information. The state losses, reaching hundreds of trillions of rupiah, underscore the need for financial governance reform and regulatory strengthening. The legal verdicts in these cases have a deterrent effect, with severe penalties for perpetrators, including life imprisonment and the confiscation of assets. Furthermore, capital market regulations have been tightened, a risk-based oversight system has been implemented, and transparency in the management of public funds has been increased. To prevent similar crimes, stricter oversight of investments by state-owned insurance companies and pension funds, increased transparency in financial reporting, and synergy between institutions in financial law enforcement are needed. Stronger regulatory measures can curb stock price manipulation linked to corruption, thereby restoring trust in the capital market and the national financial system.
ANALISIS VIBRASI FRAME MESIN CNC PLASMA CUTTING SECARA EKSPERIMEN Irawan, Agung; Malik, Irawan; ., Mardiana
MACHINERY Jurnal Teknologi Terapan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Machinery: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (317.938 KB) | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6383878

Abstract

erdasarkan dari terjadinya vibrasi pada mesin CNC plasma cutting, perlunya dilakukan pengecekan dan pengukuran untuk mengetahui besaran dari parameter vibrasi yang menyebabkan terganggunya hasil dari proses permesinan, yang salah satunya bisa melakukan pengukuran vibrasi. Pengukuran vibrasi adalah salah satu pengukuran yang sangat umum dalam pemantauan pada proses permesinan. Analisa yang dilakukan pada pengujian ini berupa pengambilan data dari hasil vibrasi. Pengukuran nilai vibrasi yang telah dilakukan dengan menggunakan aplikasi Mathlab dan diolah menggunakan metode Fast Fourrier Transform (FFT), menunjukkan bahwa Frame CNC Plasma Cutting ini memiliki nilai amplitudo tertinggi 0.0332 mm/s dan nilai amplitudo terendah 0.0128 mm/s pada Frame X serta memiliki nilai amplitudo tertinggi 0.0363 mm/s dan nilai amplitudo terendah 0.0124 mm/s pada Frame Z.
REVERSAL EVIDENCE POLICY ON CORRUPTION AS SPECIALIZATION OF CRIMINALIZATION Sumardiana, Benny
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol 2, No 2 (2017): November 2017 Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v2i2.12323

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime, because corruption happens in all areas of life, and has been done systematically, accordingly extraordinary action is required. To overcome with the occurrence of various type of corruption that required a special strategy.In this article, the authors use normative juridical approach method, that is by doing observation and then review and analyze secondary data in the form of legal materials, especially primary law materials and secondary legal materials. The collected data, both qualitatively and quantitatively, is further classified according to the data types. After that, the results of the study are arranged in a systematic and coherent manner, using problem studies that are specific to take the basics of general knowledge. The conclusion will be drawn in response to the issues that raised in this paper.The legislation that has been regulated the reverse evidence of corruption is considered to be ineffective, in several regulationabout corruption, only gratification acts that embrace pure inverse evidence, while others are not purely adherent, whereas the effectiveness of the system of reversal of the burden this evidence is very good if it can be implemented properly and based on strict rules, the problem that concerned in this study is, the contradiction between the presumption of innocence principle and the presumption of guilt principle underlying this evidentiary system.The ideal concept offered in this study is, with the renewal in the setting of the eradication of corruption, and ultimately embraces the reversal of the burden of evidence purely in the corruption trial by considering the concept of equilibrium.
Strategi Pembangunan Blue Economy Indonesia Melalui Pembentukan Aturan Hukum Terkait Deep Seabed Mining Sumardiana, Benny; Simangunsong, Edward Michael Harapan; Hamdi, Muhammad Faisal; Lubis, Anisa Latifah Rahman; Febrian, Fariss
Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum & Keadilan
Publisher : Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/SKD.v11i1.y2024.41910

Abstract

Negara Indonesia merupakan negara maritim atau negara pantai dengan luas wilayah laut Indonesia sebesar 3.257.357 km2, dengan batas wilayah laut/teritorial dari garis kontinen sejauh 12 mil diukur dari garis dasar. Secara umum, penggunaan wilayah laut terkait dengan aspek kewilayahan, kedaulatan, dan yurisdiksi negara pantai diatur oleh UNCLOS 1982. Aturan mengenai penggunaan wilayah laut untuk eksplorasi dan eksploitasi sumber daya alam, baik di dalam yurisdiksi nasional maupun di luar yurisdiksi nasional, juga dicakup oleh konvensi ini. Secara internasional, hampir 6.000.000 km persegi area penambangan dasar laut (deep seabed mining) yang belum pernah dieksplorasi atau dieksploitasi. Pada dasarnya Negara Indonesia telah mempunyai regulasi mengenai penambangan terkhusus mineral dan batubara akan tetapi penambangan bawah laut masih tidak ada yang mengatur. Penelitian sebelumnya sudah dilakukan oleh peneliti yang berasal dari berbagai unsur keilmuan baik hukum yang berfokus pada urgensitas pengaturannya, maupun dari keilmuan pertambangan dan/atau kelautan yang berfokus pada teknis pertambangan dan ekosistem laut. Maka dari itu, penelitian ini sangat penting dilakukan karena perlu adanya suatu regulasi yang mengatur mengenai penambangan bawah laut di Indonesia sehingga meningkatkan perekonomian Indonesia (blue economy) melalui pemanfaatan sumber daya laut di Indonesia.
Reforming Justice: Unpacking the Pre-Judication and Post-Judicate Dynamics of the Sarpin Case in Law and Practice in Indonesia Sumardiana, Benny; Pujiyono, Pujiyono; Cahyaningtyas, Irma
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Advancing Justice, Rights, and Governance in a Digital and Decentralized World
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i2.10744

Abstract

This paper critically examines the Sarpin case within the context of Indonesia's criminal justice system, focusing on the legal reformation of pretrial procedures and their impact on the protection of suspects' human rights. Indonesia's criminal justice system adheres to the principle of presumption of innocence, which underscores the importance of safeguarding individual rights throughout the legal process. The introduction of the pretrial institution under the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) has introduced significant shifts in judicial practices, particularly in evaluating coercive measures such as arrest, detention, and the termination of investigations. This research addresses three key questions: first, how pretrial procedures are regulated from the perspective of criminal law; second, how the reform of pretrial practices has been influenced by Judge Sarpin's landmark decision; and third, the broader implications of his ruling on the protection of human rights within the Indonesian criminal process. The paper utilizes a normative research method, analyzing relevant statutes and legal concepts through a statutory approach. In the Sarpin case, Judge Sarpin ruled that the investigation warrant used to initiate proceedings against Budi Gunawan was invalid, highlighting a critical legal interpretation of pretrial powers. This ruling not only questioned the procedural foundation of the case but also demonstrated the significant role of pretrial in defending the rights of suspects. Article 77 of KUHAP grants district courts the authority to examine the legality of coercive actions, providing a vital safeguard against potential abuses. The paper evaluates how Judge Sarpin's decision has reshaped legal practices in Indonesia, emphasizing its potential to reform both judicial attitudes and the protection of fundamental rights.
PENGATURAN PENYADAPAN OLEH PENYIDIK KEPOLISIAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF RANCANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG KUHAP Rizki Samuel Nainggolan; Benny Sumardiana
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 13 No. 10 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2025.v13.i10.p11

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi telah mendorong perubahan besar dalam praktik penegakan hukum, termasuk dalam penggunaan penyadapan sebagai alat bantu penyidikan. Penyadapan memiliki peran penting dalam mengungkap tindak pidana yang kompleks, namun di sisi lain berpotensi menimbulkan pelanggaran hak privasi apabila tidak diatur secara tegas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kewenangan penyadapan oleh penyidik Polri berdasarkan Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (RUU KUHAP), serta urgensi pembentukan regulasi khusus penyadapan sebagai bentuk pengawasan dan pembatasan wewenang penyidik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual melalui analisis terhadap sumber hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa RUU KUHAP memberikan dasar hukum baru bagi penyidik Polri dalam melakukan penyadapan sebagai upaya paksa yang sah, namun diperlukan regulasi khusus yang mengatur tata cara, batasan, dan mekanisme pengawasan penyadapan agar selaras dengan prinsip negara hukum dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia. The advancement of information and communication technology has significantly transformed the landscape of law enforcement, particularly in the use of wiretapping as an auxiliary instrument in criminal investigations. Wiretapping serves a crucial function in unveiling complex and organized crimes; nevertheless, it simultaneously raises concerns regarding potential infringements of the right to privacy when not governed by clear and comprehensive regulations. This study examines the scope of authority vested in police investigators to conduct wiretapping under the Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata (RUU KUHAP) and to examine the urgency of establishing a specific legal framework on wiretapping as a mechanism of supervision and limitation of investigative powers. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this research draws upon primary and secondary legal materials. The findings reveal that the RUU KUHAP provides a formal legal basis for police investigators to undertake wiretapping as a legitimate coercive measure within the criminal justice process. However, the study also emphasizes the necessity for a specific law that delineates the procedures, scope, and oversight mechanisms of wiretapping to ensure its conformity with the principles of the rule of law, due process, and the protection of fundamental human rights.
Implementation of Rehabilitation of Narcotics Users as Detention According to Article 127 of Law No. 35 of 2009: A Case Study of BNNP Central Java Oktavia, Widya; Sumardiana, Benny
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Articles in press
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/llrq.v12i1.41054

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal law regulation of narcotics users based on Article 127 of Law Number 35 of 2009, examine the practice of implementing inpatient rehabilitation for narcotics users sentenced to one year of imprisonment, and assess whether inpatient rehabilitation may be regarded as a form of detention and its implications for the rights of the defendants. The research employs an empirical legal research method with a descriptive analytical approach. Data were obtained through interviews with investigators from the National Narcotics Agency of Central Java Province, as well as an examination of laws and regulations, legal documents, and related literature. The results of the study indicate that, normatively Article 127 of the Narcotics Law has provided a legal basis for the implementation of medical and social rehabilitation as an alternative to punitive criminal sanctions. However, in practice, the implementation of inpatient rehabilitation is not fully consistent with its rehabilitative purpose. In certain circumstances, it functions in a manner similar to detention during the legal process, particularly due to the absence of a clear time limit and divergent interpretations among law enforcement officials. This condition has implications for potential violations of the rights of defendants who use narcotics, especially the right to personal liberty, adequate medical treatment, and humane treatment. Therefore, consistency in the application of Article 127 is needed in line with the principles of restorative justice and the protection of human rights so that rehabilitation truly functions as an instrument of social recovery and reintegration.
Illegal Nickel Mining in Protected Forests: Challenges in Whistleblower and Justice Collaborator Protection in Indonesia Utari, Indah Sri; Maskur, Muhammad Azil; Sumardiana, Benny; Ramada, Diandra Preludio; Alias, Nizamuddin
Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): July-December, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijel.v4i2.38220

Abstract

The systematic destruction of Indonesia’s Protected Forests—particularly in Southeast and Central Sulawesi—driven by illegal nickel mining operations poses an acute challenge to environmental rule of law. Utilizing data from recent cases (2023–2025) involving large-scale violations, such as those reported in the Mandiodo Block, this article critically assesses the effectiveness of existing legal mechanisms in protecting and utilizing key informants: the Corporate Whistleblower (WB) and the Justice Collaborator (JC). The analysis finds a significant gap between the legal mandate for protection and its implementation. Although Law No. 32/2009 (PPLH Law) guarantees identity confidentiality (Article 112), its utility is undermined by evidence of frequent retaliation against WBs—including job termination and counter-criminalization—by powerful corporate entities implicated in illegal nickel activities. Furthermore, the application of Law No. 31/2014 (LPSK Law) to grant JC status is often hindered by the reluctance of the judiciary to offer substantial sentencing concessions for environmental crimes, unlike in corruption cases. This reluctance limits the incentive for internal perpetrators to expose the Beneficial Owners who orchestrate the destruction of protected forest areas (e.g., the reported illegal clearing of hundreds of hectares for nickel ore extraction). This study concludes that the failure to establish robust, integrated legal immunity and sufficient sentencing differentiation for WBs and JCs transforms these protective instruments from effective crime-fighting tools into mere theoretical provisions. To successfully dismantle the complex, high-value chain of illegal nickel mining, the article recommends establishing a Specialized Penal Policy that standardizes the granting of JC status in environmental crimes, ensuring maximum physical and professional protection by the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK), and mandating its consideration for reduced sentencing to effectively breach the corporate veil.
Co-Authors Abidah, Shofriya Qonitatin Afra, Fairuz agus pera, agus Alias, Nizamuddin Anantawikrama Tungga Atmadja,SE,Ak.,M. . Aprila Niravita, Aprila Aprima Tirsa, Aprima Arrochman, Ferry Arum, Nurreka Sekar Athaya, Raden Mas Agra Arinda Betaubun, Ance Imelda Cahya Wulandari Chevalier, Henry Dessi Aryani Diandra Preludio Ramada, Diandra Preludio Didik Purnomo, Didik Dina Nur Anggraini Ningrum Dona Febiani Dwi Fibrianto Eriyanto - Fatmawati - Febrian, Fariss Fikri, Wildan Azkal Hafidzi, Marlan Hamdi, Muhammad Faisal Hasri . Herry Koesyanto Heryanto, Diana Marlisye Hibahtillah, Muhammad Alldo Hutari ., Hutari Indah Julianto, Indah Indrayuda Indrayuda Irawan Malik Irawan, Agung Irma Cahyaningtyas, Irma Kharismawati, Alfaning Martina Kusuma, Bagus Hendradi Laskarwati, Batari Lubis, Anisa Latifah Rahman Maharani, Eva Naura Maheswari, Jovita Lituhayu Masrukhi Masrukhi Mufti Akbar, Afriansyah Muhammad Azil Maskur Muhammad, Meizano Ardhi Nagari, Cikal Gumiwang Ni Kadek Sinarwati Nugraha, Wibisono Nunna, Bhanu Prakash Nurrachmat Mulianto Permana, Melati Aisyah Pujiyono Pujiyono Quddus, Ati Atul Ramadhani, Zaenu Agil Rinandari, Ummi Rita Hayati Ritiau, Ester Joytry Rizki Samuel Nainggolan Sakinah, Tri Indah Salsabila, Karina Azzahra Sasra, Adelia Dara Satya Negara, Achmad Selawati, Fitri Shamsuddin, Mohd Effindi Bin Shelomita L.T, Ruth Siboro, Yevanya Sagita Purba Simangunsong, Edward Michael Harapan Sinaga, Romauli Yohana Sugiarto . Suryansyah . Syapsan -, Syapsan Syariefudin, Iqbal Syukron Salam, Syukron Tabrani Gani Togatorop, Agracecia Ebena Tri Ifanti, Rakhma Ubaidillah Kamal Ulya, Alifia Rasydatul Waspiah - Wedhatami, Bayangsari Wibowo, Aldo Satrio widya oktavia, widya Wijayanti, Aprilia