Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Comparative Analyzation of Criminal Law for Sexual Harassment Based on Awig-Awig and Law 12 of 2022: Analisis Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Pelecehan Seksual Berdasarkan Awig-Awig dan Undang-Undang 12 Tahun 2022 Afra, Fairuz; Sumardiana, Benny
Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 25 ISSUE 1
Publisher : Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/ph.v25i1.333

Abstract

Indonesia has two legal systems, customary law and national law, which often clash in sexual harassment cases. Bali's Awig-Awig promotes restorative justice, while Law No. 12 of 2022 emphasizes strict criminal sanctions. This difference can trigger conflict, especially regarding the rights of female victims. Therefore, this study will discuss how the mechanism between the two laws compares and which law is more effective in applying in sexual harassment cases in Bali. This research compares the effectiveness of the two legal systems using a socio-legal method and comparative approach. The results show that the integration of customary deliberation with formal legal protection can bridge such differences, ensuring culturally sensitive and comprehensive justice.
The Role of Forensic Laboratory Results in Proving Document Forgery Criminal Offenses: Peran Hasil Laboratorium Forensik dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen Dona Febiani; Sumardiana, Benny
Annual Review of Legal Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/arls.vol1i3.10580

Abstract

Implementation of proof in court should rightfully involve judges evaluating all evidence submitted to the court, including the results of forensic laboratory examinations. However, in reality, in some cases, judges overlook the results of forensic laboratory examinations in proving the crime of document forgery. Therefore, this research aims to understand and analyze the role of forensic laboratory examination results in supporting the proof of document forgery, as well as the considerations of judges in placing and evaluating forensic laboratory examination results used as evidence in court. This study employs a juridical-empirical research method with a qualitative approach using primary and secondary data sources. Data validity is ensured using triangulation techniques, while data analysis is conducted through qualitative narrative analysis. The research findings indicate that: 1) Forensic laboratory examination results on documents play a crucial role in supporting the proof of document forgery crimes, as they can be used by investigators to ascertain the authenticity of a document, aid in identifying suspects, and serve as evidence tools such as expert testimony and/or exhibits in court to support prosecution. 2) Judges assess the validity of forensic laboratory examination results by examining the methodology used in the examination and the credibility of forensic experts in conducting the analysis. Furthermore, forensic laboratory examination results can assist judges in deliberating alongside other relevant and supportive evidence. Therefore, judges may render verdicts with at least two valid pieces of evidence accompanied by their conviction. In conclusion, the findings affirm that forensic laboratory examination results can serve as valid evidence in court, playing a crucial role in supporting the proof of document forgery crimes. These results can influence judges in decision-making and aid in uncovering document forgery crimes.
Manipulated Stocks and Corruption: Lessons from Three Indonesian Verdicts Chevalier, Henry; Sumardiana, Benny; Waspiah, Waspiah
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): October, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i4.30606

Abstract

The Jiwasraya, Asabri, and DP4 cases are major financial scandals in Indonesia involving stock price manipulation and corruption. These crimes stemmed from weaknesses in capital market regulations, weak oversight, and conflicts of interest in the management of investment funds in state financial institutions. The perpetrators exploited regulatory loopholes to divert funds into low-quality stocks whose prices were manipulated through fraudulent transactions and misleading information. The state losses, reaching hundreds of trillions of rupiah, underscore the need for financial governance reform and regulatory strengthening. The legal verdicts in these cases have a deterrent effect, with severe penalties for perpetrators, including life imprisonment and the confiscation of assets. Furthermore, capital market regulations have been tightened, a risk-based oversight system has been implemented, and transparency in the management of public funds has been increased. To prevent similar crimes, stricter oversight of investments by state-owned insurance companies and pension funds, increased transparency in financial reporting, and synergy between institutions in financial law enforcement are needed. Stronger regulatory measures can curb stock price manipulation linked to corruption, thereby restoring trust in the capital market and the national financial system.
ANALISIS VIBRASI FRAME MESIN CNC PLASMA CUTTING SECARA EKSPERIMEN Irawan, Agung; Malik, Irawan; ., Mardiana
MACHINERY Jurnal Teknologi Terapan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Machinery: Jurnal Teknologi Terapan
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (317.938 KB) | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6383878

Abstract

erdasarkan dari terjadinya vibrasi pada mesin CNC plasma cutting, perlunya dilakukan pengecekan dan pengukuran untuk mengetahui besaran dari parameter vibrasi yang menyebabkan terganggunya hasil dari proses permesinan, yang salah satunya bisa melakukan pengukuran vibrasi. Pengukuran vibrasi adalah salah satu pengukuran yang sangat umum dalam pemantauan pada proses permesinan. Analisa yang dilakukan pada pengujian ini berupa pengambilan data dari hasil vibrasi. Pengukuran nilai vibrasi yang telah dilakukan dengan menggunakan aplikasi Mathlab dan diolah menggunakan metode Fast Fourrier Transform (FFT), menunjukkan bahwa Frame CNC Plasma Cutting ini memiliki nilai amplitudo tertinggi 0.0332 mm/s dan nilai amplitudo terendah 0.0128 mm/s pada Frame X serta memiliki nilai amplitudo tertinggi 0.0363 mm/s dan nilai amplitudo terendah 0.0124 mm/s pada Frame Z.
REVERSAL EVIDENCE POLICY ON CORRUPTION AS SPECIALIZATION OF CRIMINALIZATION Sumardiana, Benny
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol 2, No 2 (2017): November 2017 Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v2i2.12323

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime, because corruption happens in all areas of life, and has been done systematically, accordingly extraordinary action is required. To overcome with the occurrence of various type of corruption that required a special strategy.In this article, the authors use normative juridical approach method, that is by doing observation and then review and analyze secondary data in the form of legal materials, especially primary law materials and secondary legal materials. The collected data, both qualitatively and quantitatively, is further classified according to the data types. After that, the results of the study are arranged in a systematic and coherent manner, using problem studies that are specific to take the basics of general knowledge. The conclusion will be drawn in response to the issues that raised in this paper.The legislation that has been regulated the reverse evidence of corruption is considered to be ineffective, in several regulationabout corruption, only gratification acts that embrace pure inverse evidence, while others are not purely adherent, whereas the effectiveness of the system of reversal of the burden this evidence is very good if it can be implemented properly and based on strict rules, the problem that concerned in this study is, the contradiction between the presumption of innocence principle and the presumption of guilt principle underlying this evidentiary system.The ideal concept offered in this study is, with the renewal in the setting of the eradication of corruption, and ultimately embraces the reversal of the burden of evidence purely in the corruption trial by considering the concept of equilibrium.
Strategi Pembangunan Blue Economy Indonesia Melalui Pembentukan Aturan Hukum Terkait Deep Seabed Mining Sumardiana, Benny; Simangunsong, Edward Michael Harapan; Hamdi, Muhammad Faisal; Lubis, Anisa Latifah Rahman; Febrian, Fariss
Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum & Keadilan
Publisher : Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/SKD.v11i1.y2024.41910

Abstract

Negara Indonesia merupakan negara maritim atau negara pantai dengan luas wilayah laut Indonesia sebesar 3.257.357 km2, dengan batas wilayah laut/teritorial dari garis kontinen sejauh 12 mil diukur dari garis dasar. Secara umum, penggunaan wilayah laut terkait dengan aspek kewilayahan, kedaulatan, dan yurisdiksi negara pantai diatur oleh UNCLOS 1982. Aturan mengenai penggunaan wilayah laut untuk eksplorasi dan eksploitasi sumber daya alam, baik di dalam yurisdiksi nasional maupun di luar yurisdiksi nasional, juga dicakup oleh konvensi ini. Secara internasional, hampir 6.000.000 km persegi area penambangan dasar laut (deep seabed mining) yang belum pernah dieksplorasi atau dieksploitasi. Pada dasarnya Negara Indonesia telah mempunyai regulasi mengenai penambangan terkhusus mineral dan batubara akan tetapi penambangan bawah laut masih tidak ada yang mengatur. Penelitian sebelumnya sudah dilakukan oleh peneliti yang berasal dari berbagai unsur keilmuan baik hukum yang berfokus pada urgensitas pengaturannya, maupun dari keilmuan pertambangan dan/atau kelautan yang berfokus pada teknis pertambangan dan ekosistem laut. Maka dari itu, penelitian ini sangat penting dilakukan karena perlu adanya suatu regulasi yang mengatur mengenai penambangan bawah laut di Indonesia sehingga meningkatkan perekonomian Indonesia (blue economy) melalui pemanfaatan sumber daya laut di Indonesia.
Reforming Justice: Unpacking the Pre-Judication and Post-Judicate Dynamics of the Sarpin Case in Law and Practice in Indonesia Sumardiana, Benny; Pujiyono, Pujiyono; Cahyaningtyas, Irma
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Advancing Justice, Rights, and Governance in a Digital and Decentralized World
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i2.10744

Abstract

This paper critically examines the Sarpin case within the context of Indonesia's criminal justice system, focusing on the legal reformation of pretrial procedures and their impact on the protection of suspects' human rights. Indonesia's criminal justice system adheres to the principle of presumption of innocence, which underscores the importance of safeguarding individual rights throughout the legal process. The introduction of the pretrial institution under the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) has introduced significant shifts in judicial practices, particularly in evaluating coercive measures such as arrest, detention, and the termination of investigations. This research addresses three key questions: first, how pretrial procedures are regulated from the perspective of criminal law; second, how the reform of pretrial practices has been influenced by Judge Sarpin's landmark decision; and third, the broader implications of his ruling on the protection of human rights within the Indonesian criminal process. The paper utilizes a normative research method, analyzing relevant statutes and legal concepts through a statutory approach. In the Sarpin case, Judge Sarpin ruled that the investigation warrant used to initiate proceedings against Budi Gunawan was invalid, highlighting a critical legal interpretation of pretrial powers. This ruling not only questioned the procedural foundation of the case but also demonstrated the significant role of pretrial in defending the rights of suspects. Article 77 of KUHAP grants district courts the authority to examine the legality of coercive actions, providing a vital safeguard against potential abuses. The paper evaluates how Judge Sarpin's decision has reshaped legal practices in Indonesia, emphasizing its potential to reform both judicial attitudes and the protection of fundamental rights.