Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Consumer Protection Regarding Health Information and Warnings on Tobacco Cigarette Packaging Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri; Purnamasari, Dian; Sabirin, Ahmad; Putra, Dimas Ananta; Elizaga , Jhon Rojell Y.
Journal of Consumer Sciences Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Consumer Sciences
Publisher : Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29244/jcs.9.2.247-265

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the countries that has a cigarette community, it becomes a problem when the packaging on cigarettes does not provide accurate information, this certainly blames consumer protection. This study aims to delineate consumer protection measures regarding tobacco cigarette circulation without providing accurate information. Conducted in a normative framework. The findings suggest that legal protection for cigarette consumers who receive unclear or inaccurate information on cigarette product packaging can encompass preventive and repressive legal measures. Preventive measures are outlined in PP No. 109 of 2012 and PERMENKES No. 28 of 2013, specifically in Article 4 sub-articles c and i. Conversely, repressive measures enable individuals to file complaints with the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (known as BPSK) or initiate lawsuits. Furthermore, the responsibility of business actors to provide accurate information is underscored by Decision Number 32/Pid.B/2021/Pt. Pbr. This responsibility extends not only to distributors but also to cigarette manufacturers, such as PT. Leadon International, found in violation of various regulations, including Article 8 paragraph (1) sub-paragraphs a I, and j of the Godrej Consumer Products Limited (GCPL), in conjunction with Article 14 of Government Regulation Number 109 of 2012, and Article 10 paragraph (2) sub-paragraph a and paragraph (3) of PERMENKES No.28 of 2013. Sanctions for producers should adhere to Article 19, in conjunction with Article 62 paragraph (1) of the GCPL. At the same time, distributors face reprimands for product withdrawals as stipulated in Article 60 paragraph (3) of PP No. 109 of 2012.
ENSURING JUSTICE AND UTILITY: Addressing Alleged Monopolistic Practices in Ibu Kota Nusantara Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri; Sabirin, Ahmad; Abriant, Sharda; Rahma, Rais Akbar; Wibawa, Berto Mulia
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 15, No 2 (2024): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v15i2.28765

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential implications of establishing PT Karya Logistik Nusantara regarding Indonesia's antimonopoly law, particularly concerning the production and distribution of concrete for construction in Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN). PT Karya Logistik Nusantara is a joint venture adhering to the procedures for forming a Limited Liability Company (LLC). As an LLC, it does not qualify as a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE). Utilizing a normative legal research method, this study highlights critical findings regarding the establishment of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for concrete production and logistics services in the new capital. There are concerns that this arrangement may violate trust provisions, mainly due to the merger of six construction State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), which raises the possibility of monopolistic practices. Such practices could hinder competition by creating barriers to entry for other businesses, as the merged entities control approximately 60% of the market share for concrete in Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN). In conclusion, the study emphasizes the need to scrutinize these developments to ensure compliance with competition law and promote a fair market environment. Recommendations for further research and regulatory oversight are also suggested to mitigate potential monopolistic behaviors.Artikel ini menyelidiki implikasi potensial dari pendirian PT Karya Logistik Nusantara dalam kaitannya dengan UU Antimonopoli Indonesia, khususnya mengenai produksi dan distribusi beton untuk konstruksi di Ibu Kota Nusantara. PT Karya Logistik Nusantara adalah perusahaan patungan yang telah mematuhi prosedur yang diperlukan untuk membentuk Perseroan Terbatas (LLC). Sebagai LLC, itu tidak memenuhi syarat sebagai Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN). Memanfaatkan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini menyoroti temuan penting mengenai pembentukan Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) untuk layanan produksi dan logistik beton di ibu kota baru. Ada kekhawatiran bahwa pengaturan ini dapat melanggar ketentuan kepercayaan, terutama karena penggabungan enam BUMN konstruksi, yang meningkatkan kemungkinan praktik monopoli. Praktik semacam itu dapat menghambat persaingan dengan menciptakan hambatan masuk bagi bisnis lain, karena entitas yang digabungkan menguasai sekitar 60% pangsa pasar beton di Ibu Kota Nusantara. Kesimpulannya, studi ini menekankan perlunya pengawasan yang cermat terhadap perkembangan ini untuk memastikan kepatuhan terhadap hukum persaingan dan untuk mempromosikan lingkungan pasar yang adil. Rekomendasi untuk penelitian lebih lanjut dan pengawasan peraturan juga disarankan untuk mengurangi potensi perilaku monopoli.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAPKONSUMEN CAPIT COKELAT KEDALUWARSA DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN: Consumer's Legal Protection Of The Expired Claw Chocolate From Legal Perspective Of Consumers Protections Salsabila, Anzela; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/bx0sjx82

Abstract

Online shopping has become very attractive in this day and age when it is easier for people to meet their needs and is considered easier from the standpoint of searching for goods, payment to delivery. Online sales can be made through TikTok Live and payments can be made through the online marketplace Shopee. This online shopping also has a weakness: in the transaction, the product that arrives may not match the product offered or even the product that arrives has expired. On this basis, questions arise about the liability of commercial actors in the sale of expired chocolate claws under the Consumer Protection Act and other relevant regulations as well as how customers can may pursue legal remedies against expired chocolate swipes under the Consumer Protection Act and other related regulations. This study uses a normative research method using primary data and secondary data, which are then analyzed using
ANALISIS YURIDIS PRAKTIK MONOPOLI DALAM JASA PENGURUSAN TRANSPORTASI PENGIRIMAN (EKSPOR) BENIH BENING LOBSTER BERDASARKAN UU NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 (STUDI TERHADAP PUTUSAN KPPU NOMOR 04/KPPU- I/2021): Juridical Analysis of Monopoly Practices in Services Shipping Export Lobster Seeds Based on Law Number 5 of 1999 (Study of KPPU Decisions Number 04/KPPU-I/2021) Andrina, Bidhari; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/ch1we537

Abstract

Fishery products are one of the main livelihoods of the Indonesian people which can be traded internationally. To facilitate international trade, sending products to international shipping areas from Republic of Indonesia (export) can be done by appointing a transportation management service company. This is done to avoid monopolistic practices carried out by each business actor to benefit themselves. However, implementing these regulations is certainly not easy. One of the cases is the alleged violation of Article 17 of Law 5/1999 committed by PT Aero Citra Kargo (PT ACK). In this case, the author conducts a discussion related to monopoly practices in BBL delivery (export) transportation services by PT ACK according to Article 17 and the accuracy of KPPU decision No. 4/KPPU-I/2021 regarding monopolistic practices for BBL delivery (export) transportation services against PT ACK. Next, the author analyzes the fulfillment of the legal elements and approaches to Article 17 of Law 5/1999. On the other hand, the author also discusses the active role of the government, the period of substitution, and the absence of sanctions against violators in this decision to see the accuracy of the decision. So the conclusion of this research shows that PT ACK has violated Article 17, however in the decision there are still many things that are not explained further, especially regarding the absence of sanctions against violators.
Pembaharuan Hukum Penyelenggaraan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Secara Elektronik Pada Perseroan Tertutup Muninggar, Roro Ajeng; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v11i2.11821

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the legal reform of the implementation of e-GMS in Private Companies. The issue focused on the regulation of the implementation of the e-GMS of the Private Company and legal reform. The writing of this study uses normative legal methods, and qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of the study show that the regulation of the e-GMS of a Private Company is contained in Article 77 of PT Law, however, the technical implementation has not been regulated. The implementation of the e-GMS of a Private Company can adopt the provisions for the implementation of the e-GMS of a Public Company as stated in POJK No. 16/2020. Basically, the implementation of the e-GMS of a Private Company is valid as long as the implementation is in accordance with the Law and other related technical rules. The role of legal reform in the field of PT has been reflected by the issuance of POJK No. 16/2020 which regulates the implementation of e-GMS of Public Companies as a form of responsive legal theory, however, it needs to be optimized because legal reform is still needed in the field of PT, especially regarding the implementation of e-GMS in Private Companies.
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN ATAS PENERAPAN KLAUSULA EKSONERASI DALAM PERJANJIAN KEANGGOTAAN FIT HUB MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999: Consumer Protection Against Exclusion Clauses in Fit Hub Membership Agreements Based on Law No. 8/1999 Muhammad Fathan Zahran Dika; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 4 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i4.21335

Abstract

Economic transactions, such as buying and selling goods or services, often place consumers at a disadvantage due to an unequal position compared to business actors. An example is the FIT HUB membership agreement, which contains an exoneration clause. This study examines the form and content of such clauses under Law No. 8 of 1999 and the legal protection available to consumers. Using normative legal research based on secondary data, the study result and concludes that while the FIT HUB membership agreement does not violate Article 18 paragraph (2) of the Consumer Protection Law—since it is easy for consumers to read—it is invalid under the Civil Code. The agreement fails to meet the objective requirements of Articles 1320, 1337, and 1338. Article 18 paragraph (1) of the Consumer Protection Law prohibits exoneration clauses, with legal consequences being that such clauses are null and void, as stipulated in Article 18 paragraph (3). Legal protection for consumers can be preventive, through sectoral regulations and the Consumer Protection Law, or repressive, through civil and criminal sanctions.
Consumer Protection for High School Students with Disabilities: Between Practice and Context Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri; Sabirin, Ahmad; Israriyanto, Muhammad Firli; Abrianti, Sharda
Journal of Consumer Sciences Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Consumer Sciences
Publisher : Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29244/jcs.10.1.78-96

Abstract

Background: In fact, there are still many students with disabilities who do not get their rights in schools with adequate facilities and infrastructure. Purpose: This study examines how consumer protection efforts are carried out by four (4) high schools in North Bekasi District based on Bekasi Regional Regulation Number 16 of 2019 concerning the Protection and Fulfilment of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Consumer Protection Obstacles faced by four high schools in North Bekasi District based on Bekasi Regional Regulation Number 16 of 2019. Methods: This research is normative, based on secondary and primary data gathered through direct interviews with the authorities in four (4) high schools in Bekasi. Findings: The interesting findings are that consumer protection efforts to protect and fulfill the rights of persons with disabilities are still not fully implemented. Related, the fulfillment of the right to inclusive education has been fully implemented but is inversely proportional to the implementation of accessibility. The obstacles faced in realizing consumer protection for students with disabilities are in fulfilling accessibility, both non-physical and physical accessibility. Conclusions: This study shows that although consumer protection efforts to fulfill the rights of persons with disabilities in four high schools in North Bekasi District have been carried out, their implementations are still not fully effective, especially for accessibility. Although the right to inclusive education has been fulfilled, significant challenges remain in ensuring adequate physical and non-physical accessibility. Research implication: The study is expected to provide input to the local government of Bekasi and other local governments on paying attention to the rights of people with disabilities in schools, both facilities and pre-facilities, to provide comfort and the rights of citizens as mandated in the constitution of justice for the entire nation of Indonesia.
PENENTUAN PEMENANG TENDER YANG BERPOTENSI MELANGGAR LARANGAN PERSEKONGKOLAN TENDER: Determination Of Tender Winners Who Have The Potential To Violate The Prohibition Of Tender Conspiracy Rahmadhani, Zahra Fide; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/yyesfc12

Abstract

The global economy requires Indonesia to grow as a force in the new economy. This is expected to support national development and create a competitive market situation among them. This condition causes competition, can run in a healthy and unhealthy way.  One of the activities that can cause unfair business competition is the process of procurement of goods and/or services, known as tenders. In fact, many business actors run tenders with bad intentions, which is called tender conspiracy. Using normative legal methods by collecting library materials from primary, secondary and tertiary materials to produce descriptive data, then ending with a conclusion using the concept of agreement based on the Civil Code that conspiracy is a prohibited agreement. . In determining the winner of the tender, what is considered to be a violation of Article 22 is vertical conspiracy because it results in unhealthy business competition. This shows that there must be updates in the provisions regarding business competition, especially provisions regarding bid rigging, and tender selection must be carried out through appropriate and accurate procedures. For example, the selection of the tender committee must be qualified, have integrity and be honest in carrying out the tender. Settlement in cases of conspiracy to determine tender winners can be implemented using a per se illegal approach carried out by the KPPU to assess business activities that violate the provisions of Law Number 5/1999
PENGATURAN DOKTRIN SINGLE ECONOMIC ENTITY: STUDI PERBANDINGAN INDONESIA DAN UNI EROPA: Regulation of the Single Economic Entity Doctrine: A Comparative Study between Indonesia and the European Union Wati, Widiya; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/rw69yg41

Abstract

Competition law has rapidly evolved alongside the dynamics of trade conducted by businesses. One notable development in Indonesia is the understanding of the Single Economic Entity (SEE) doctrine. This doctrine is often opposed by corporate law regimes that uphold the independence of companies. Therefore, it is crucial to examine how companies can be considered a single economic entity and how regulations differ between Indonesia and the European Union. This study employs a normative approach, using descriptive legal comparison with secondary data such as literature, regulations, and competition authority decisions from both regions. Data is analyzed qualitatively with deductive conclusions. The findings indicate that a group of companies is considered a single entity if its strategic policies are controlled by the holding company. There are both similarities and differences between Indonesia and the EU in their approach to this doctrine. The similarity is that both implicitly regulate SEE, while the difference lies in its application: in Indonesia, it was first applied in the Temasek Holding case in 2007, while the EU used it in the 1972 Deystuff case. To reduce misinterpretations, clearer explanations for business actors are necessary to prevent violations by business groups.  
POTENSI TINDAKAN PRAKTIK MONOPOLI DAN PENYALAHGUNAAN PENGUASAAN PASAR FASILITAS ESENSIAL SEKTOR PELABUHAN DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA: Potential Monopolistic Practices and Abuse of Market Power of Essential Facilties in the Port Sector: A Competition Law Perspective Simanullang, Venty Elisa Margareth; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/2q846165

Abstract

Indonesia is the largest archipelago, which makes the port an essential means for mobilizing the infrastructure that supports the country's economic growth. The port sector, which is operated by state-owned enterprises, has the potential to maximize economic growth. However, in reality, there have been numerous instances of state-owned companies operating in the port sector violating business competition laws. It is thus imperative to comprehend the doctrine of essential facilities and the potential transgressions perpetrated by business actors who are state-owned enterprises. This research adheres to a descriptive normative methodology, utilizing secondary data. The findings indicate that the doctrine of essential facilities espouses the notion that essential facilities are crucial facilities that the state must facilitate and nurture to enable optimal economic activities benefiting the community. Essential facilities are established by state-owned enterprises (SOEs) as a means of implementing Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In their operations within the port sector, SOEs are required to adhere to the standards set forth in Law Number 17 of 2008 concerning shipping. SOEs as business actors in carrying out their business activities must also pay attention to the principles and norms contained in Law Number 5 of 1999, especially the prohibition of monopolistic practices and market control so as to create healthy business competition.