Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.809
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Journal of Consumer Science LAW REVIEW JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Empowerment : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Media Iuris Jurnal Hukum Adigama International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP) Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Jurnal AKAL: Abdimas dan Kearifan Lokal Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika Amicus Curiae Journal of Law and Legal Reform JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Tribuere Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Pamulang Law Review
Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 82 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 82 Documents
Search

 4   5   6   7   8 
ANALISIS TERHADAP TINDAKAN PENGUASAAN MITRA DI BIDANG PETERNAKAN AYAM: Analysis Of Partners' Controlling Actions In The Field Of Chicken Farming Syahreza Jakti Kusuma; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 2 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v7i2.22776

Abstract

The interpretation of the term “controlling MSMEs” as business partners in a partnership relationship illustrates the application of the control criteria in KPPU Decision No. 21/KPPU-K/2019 and KPPU Decision No. 03/KPPU-K/2021. The research problem in this article is: What is the legal form of control exercised by the reported party in the partnership agreement between PT Sinar Ternak Sejahtera and its partners? This study employs normative legal research with a descriptive approach. The data used consists of primary and secondary data, collected through interviews and various literature sources. The result and conclusions of the study indicate that decision-making within the partnership was unilaterally conducted by PT Sinar Ternak Sejahtera. The decisions also highlight the occurrence of control exerted by large businesses over MSMEs. The criteria for determining control vary across decisions because each decision applies different standards for assessing control and/or ownership. Therefore, KPPU needs to develop guidelines for interpreting the terms “ownership” and/or “control” of medium/large businesses over MSMEs.
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP INFORMASI YANG TIDAK JELAS DALAM MENU MAKANAN DAN MINUMAN DI RESTORAN X DAN Y: Consumer Protections Against Unclean Information On The Food And Drink Menu At Restaurants X And Y Muhammad Vachry Irsyad Prasanna; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 3 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v7i3.23091

Abstract

This study aims to examine the regulation and its implications of the obligation to include clear price information on food and beverage menus at Restaurants X and Y. The focus of the study is also directed at the problem is the role of the government in supervising business actors' compliance with the provisions of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK) and Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 35 of 2013. The method used is normative juridical with a qualitative descriptive approach, based on secondary data from laws and regulations, and the results of interviews with consumers and business actors. The research result and conclusion indicate that the inclusion of non-transparent price information on the menu at Restaurants X and Y has the potential to harm consumers and violate right to correct, clear, and honest information as stipulated in Article 4 of the UUPK and is contrary to provisions of Article 2 of Permendag 35/2013. In addition, weak supervision by the government has resulted in the absence of strict sanctions against business actors who violate. Therefore, more effective enforcement of regulations and education for business actors are needed to improve compliance and ensure protection of consumer rights.
PRAKTIK MONOPOLI DALAM DISTRIBUSI CABAI MERAH YANG BERPOTENSI MENIMBULKAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT DI PASAR INDUK CIBITUNG: Monopolistic Practices In Red Chili Distribution That Have Potential To Cause Unhealthy Business Competition In Cibitung Main Market Sultan Naufal Sivha; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 4 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v7i4.23090

Abstract

The current era of curly red chili trade shows the potential for unfair business competition, especially when legal provisions governing competition are not adhered to. In the Cibitung Main Market, monopolistic practices were found by middlemen in the distribution of curly red chili. This action creates market dominance that is detrimental to other business actors and consumers. This study uses a socio-legal research approach with a descriptive nature and an inductive conclusion-drawing method. The results and Conclusion of the study indicate that these monopolistic practices are contrary to the principles of healthy business competition and cause economic losses to the wider community. In addition, uncontrolled monopolies can create inequality in the food commodity distribution system. Therefore, supervision and firm action are needed from the government to prevent and follow up on forms of monopoly that are detrimental, in order to maintain fairness and stability of the agricultural commodity market in Indonesia.
POTENSI PENGGUNAAN LENIENCY PROGRAM DALAM PERKARA KARTEL INDONESIA: STUDI PERBANDINGAN LENIENCY JEPANG M Faqih Surbakti; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i1.15419

Abstract

The leniency program is a pardon mechanism that allows cartel members to complain to the business competition authorities about cartel operations and receive partial or whole exemption from the penalties and/or fines that should be imposed. In Japan, the Leniency Program is in use. This article's formulation of the problem is how to create a leniency program in Japan based on the Antimonopoly Act and what are the chances of doing so to expose cartels in Indonesia's competition law system. This article offers a normative legal analysis of Indonesia's prospective use of leniency schemes in cartel proceedings. The research is descriptive-analytical in character, and data collecting through literature reviews and interviews, whereas data processing is qualitative. The findings of the research and debate indicate that it is highly likely that Indonesia will implement the leniency program by enacting the bill as the new Business Competition Law. The research's finding is that the leniency program is likely to be implemented in Indonesia by passing the bill as the country's new Business Competition Law because it is comprehensively implemented in Japan, from reporting procedures to sentencing reductions. It is suggested that Law No. 5/1999, whose provisions include a leniency program system, be amended, and that the KPPU then work with the LPSK to offer protection for reporters in the leniency program system.
- Perbandingan Penerapan Predatory Pricing Menurut Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat: - Farhandi Himawan; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i3.16483

Abstract

Entrepreneurs engage in the practice of "selling and loss" in order to eliminate their rivals. Each nation has its own laws governing the proscription of selling at a loss. The formulation of the issue is the parallels and discrepancies between Indonesian and American laws governing sales and losses, business competition, and the application of the ban on predatory pricing based on KPPU-P Decision No. 03/KPPU-L/2020 and Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. Legal normative approach opposed to legal comparison between Indonesian and American law. utilizing secondary qualitative data and inference. The findings of the study and discussion show that it is governed in Indonesia by Article 20 of Law No. 5/1999, while In the United States, agreements including predatory pricing are prohibited by Section 2 of the Sherman Act and Section 2(a) of the Clayton Antitrust Act. In terms of the business competition authorities in Indonesia and the United States, KPPU, DOJ, and FTC are autonomous Indonesian organizations. Only one authority in Indonesia, namely KPPU, is in charge of business competition matters, although DOJ and FTC are present in the United States. In conclusion, Indonesia and the United States are required to take into account economic theories.
- TINDAKAN MENGHAMBAT MASUK (BARRIER TO ENTRY) PELAKU USAHA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA: - Raafid Haidar Herfian; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18403

Abstract

The act of inhibiting and/or blocking entry is contained in Article (17), (19), and (25) of Law Number 5 Year 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. Barrier to entry result in the difficulty for Business Actors to be participate in the market. The problem is how the qualifications of business actors' actions can be categorized as barriers to entry based on competition law and how the KPPU applies the element of barrier to entry in KPPU’s case. This research is a normative research that uses secondary data and is supported by interviews. The data is analyzed qualitatively and concluded by deductive method. The results of the research and analysis show that barriers to entry can occur due to the behavior of incumbent business actors and/or regulations that makes difficult for new players to enter. The forms of barrier to entry in KPPU decisions are the establishment of internal office memos containing requirements not to sell competitors' products, and setting high tariffs that burden competitors' production costs. Therefore, KPPU needs to clarify the term barrier to entry in its guidelines, and business actors should develop compliance guidelines to prevent violations of Law Number 5/1999
ISTILAH MENGUASAI TERHADAP UMKM DALAM HUBUNGAN KEMITRAAN DENGAN BENTUK INTI-PLASMA Intan Purwanti; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18499

Abstract

In the modern business landscape, large and small companies frequently form collaboration agreements with micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), creating mutual benefits. This study investigates the interpretation of 'ownership' and/or 'control' of MSMEs as business partners in partnerships, examining the application of criteria in two KPPU decisions (Number 21/KPPU-K/2019 and Number 03/KPPU-K/2021). Using normative and descriptive research methods with primary and secondary data, the study finds that 'ownership' implies an unequal condition resulting in a loss for one party, while 'control' involves decision-taking. The decisions reveal instances of domination by large businesses over MSMEs, each with distinct criteria for control and/or ownership. The study recommends KPPU to formulate guidelines clarifying the terms 'owning' and/or 'controlling' concerning medium/large businesses towards MSMEs.
PENYALAHGUNAAN PENGUASAAN PASAR TERHADAP PELAKU USAHA LAIN DI PELABUHAN YOS SUDARSO AMBON BERDASARKAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA: Kemal Kusuma Wardana; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18690

Abstract

The activities carried out by PT Pelabuhan Indonesia (Persero) constitute a violation of Article 19 Letters a and b of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The formulation of the problem in this research is the form of abuse of market control carried out by PT Pelabuhan Indonesia (Persero) according to Article 19 of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition and how the KPPU applies whether there are violations of Article 19 of Law 5 /1999 in KPPU Case Decision No. 29/KPPU-L/2020. This research uses a descriptive type of normative research, with secondary data obtained by literature study. The results of the research, discussion and conclusions in this research are that PT Pelabuhan Indonesia abuses market control in the form of circulars aimed at taking over loading and unloading activities carried out by other business actors operating at the port. The circular letter made by PT Pelabuhan Indonesia has no basis and is not binding, so the letter is purely an initiative of PT Pelabuhan Indonesia to make it. KPPU does not have strong evidence so PT Pelabuhan Indonesia declared not to have violated.
Upaya Perlindungan Konsumen melalui Pencantuman Informasi Gula, Garam, dan Lemak (GGL) pada Label Kemasan Pangan Simanjuntak, Megawati; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan dan Biosains Tropika
Publisher : Direktorat Kajian Strategis dan Reputasi Akademik IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29244/agro-maritim.0502.573-577

Abstract

Untuk melindungi konsumen melalui pencantuman Informasi Nilai Gizi (ING) GGL (Gula, Garam, Lemak), BPOM dan Kementerian Kesehatan dapat memperkuat pembinaan melalui sosialisasi/edukasi kepada masyarakat terkait ING GGL, menentukan prioritas pemberlakuan kewajiban pencantuman ING GGL dengan melakukan updating studi paparan GGL, mengeluarkan peraturan menteri berikut sanksi apabila pelaku usaha tidak mencantumkan informasi GGL dan pesan kesehatan mengenai bahaya konsumsi GGL secara berlebihan, melakukan kegiatan pembinaan dan monitoring label ING, pencantuman P-IRT, takaran GGL dan pesan kesehatan, dan pada Pelaku Usaha IKM baik pada kemasan.
Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Bahaya Phishing Data Perbankan Simanjuntak, Megawati; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan dan Biosains Tropika
Publisher : Direktorat Kajian Strategis dan Reputasi Akademik IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29244/agro-maritim.0502.588-592

Abstract

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) harus mendorong pelaku usaha jasa keuangan untuk memperkuat sistem keamanan data nasabah yang andal, aman, dan bertanggung jawab dalam upaya mencegah dan menghentikan berbagai kasus phising. Selain itu, OJK harus membuat pedoman yang menyampaikan informasi terbaru tentang jenis dan teknik penipuan digital terbaru. Pedoman ini juga harus menjelaskan bagaimana pelaporan dilakukan kepada otoritas berwenang. Secara nasional, OJK harus menetapkan kebijakan untuk mengubah sistem verifikasi. Keempat, perlu mendorong Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik (PSE), termasuk sektor jasa keuangan, untuk melakukan pelatihan dan melakukan evaluasi tentang seberapa efektifnya. OJK harus melakukan sosialisasi lebih luas dan terintegrasi. Keenam, Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika bertanggung jawab untuk mendorong pembentukan dan pembentukan lembaga yang akan bertanggung jawab atas pelaksanaan Undang-Undang. Selain itu, Kementerian harus mengawasi penyedia layanan media digital dalam menyediakan lencana verifikasi.
Co-Authors Abriant, Sharda Abrianti, Sharda Ahmad Sabirin Ahmad Sabirin Ahmad Sabirin Ahmad Sabirin Alex Siswanto Alfin Sulaiman Alfiyyah Inayah Taqyuddin Andrina, Bidhari Arief Safari Azzahra, Mutiara Bachry, Ramadhana Anindyajati Berto Mulia Wibawa Dian Purnamasari Dian Purnamasari Dimas Ananta Putra Dwi Tiara Febrina Elfrida Ratnawati Elizaga , Jhon Rojell Y. Ermania Widjajanti Farhandi Himawan Farhandi Himawan Fitrah Bukhari Gladys Prita Pertiwi Grace Michaela Japranata Grace Riana Yudistira Hendrian Wulansari Ignatius Pradipta Probondaru Illona . Imam Hartanto Intan Purwanti Jhon Haward Hutagaol Jhon Rojell Y. Elizaga Jimi Rambo Arranchado Joice Chintya Mardohar Kabes, Irianto Kemal Kusuma Wardana Kerti, Renti Maharaini Laeli Rahmawati M Faqih Surbakti M Faqih Surbakti Magfirah, Wanda Pasya Mahal Frawansa, Syukron Mali, Yosefa Oktriviani Mutiara Mardohar, Joice Chintya Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wangga Maya Indrasti Notoprayitno Mayva, Verandha Megawati Simanjuntak Mia Amelia Monica Alina Yolanda Muhammad Fathan Zahran Dika Muhammad Raldo Johansyah Muhammad Riziq Babeheer Muhammad Vachry Irsyad Prasanna Muninggar, Roro Ajeng Nadya Angelina Notoprayitno, Maya Indrast Notoprayitno, Maya Indrasti Oktabiani, Andiya Putra, Dimas Ananta Putri Fildzah Andini Raafid Haidar Herfian Raafid Haidar Herfian Rafli Syah Maulana Rahma, Rais Akbar Rahmadhani, Zahra Fide Raras Ayundhani Rizal E. Halim Rizal Edy Halim Rizka Syarifa Roro Ajeng Muninggar Rumahorbo, Yoel Nixon A Sabirin, Ahmad Safari , Arif Safari, Arief Salsabila, Anzela Séréna Ortigosa Fernandez Serena Ortigosa Fernandez Sharda Abrianti Sharda Abrianti Simanullang, Venty Elisa Margareth Siti Nurbaiti Slamet Riyadi Slamet Riyadi Sri Bakti Yunari Stella Trixie Jane Sultan Naufal Sivha Syahreza Jakti Kusuma Syukron Mahal Frawansa Takenia Tifany Triani Nabila Diaqilah Surmana Tribuana Chris Shinta Tubagus Andri Purnama Vizna Qurrotul A’yuniyah Wangga, Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wati, Widiya Yohanes Firmansyah Zayyan, Khalillah