Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.809
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Journal of Consumer Science LAW REVIEW JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Empowerment : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Media Iuris Jurnal Hukum Adigama International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP) Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Jurnal AKAL: Abdimas dan Kearifan Lokal Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika Amicus Curiae Journal of Law and Legal Reform JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Tribuere Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Pamulang Law Review
Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 82 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 82 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
PENDEKATAN RULE OF REASON DALAM PRAKTIK DISKRIMINASI PADA PUTUSAN KPPU TAHUN 2020: Rule Of Reason Approach To Discrimination Practices In The 2020 KPPU Decisions Mardohar, Joice Chintya; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19751

Abstract

Discriminatory practices are common in business competition and this is not prohibited as long as it does not lead to unfair business competition. The thesis discusses 3 (three) KPPU decisions in 2020 regarding allegations of discriminatory practices committed by business actors. The main problem in this thesis is how the actions of business actors can fulfill the element of violation and how to apply the rule of reason approach in Article 19 point d of Law Number 5 of 1999 in the 2020 KPPU Decisions. This thesis is a normative descriptive using secondary data in the form of journals or books and primary data in the form of interviews with KPPU and data processing is carried out qualitatively, and conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. The conclusion from this study is that discriminatory acts cause obstacles in vertical business relations and are in the relevant market which are different but interrelated and often occur in the essential facilities sector. Discriminatory practices can occur effectively if the KPPU's business actors use the application of the rule of reason in handling the case, in which the result is that discriminatory practices can only run effectively if the business actors are in the position of highest market control.
PEMULIHAN HAK KONSUMEN DI SEKTOR JASA PENDIDIKAN (STUDI KASUS YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN X MELAWAN DJONI SUKOHARDJO): Restore Consumer Rights in the Education Services Sector Case Study of X Education Foundation Against Djoni Sukohardjo Magfirah, Wanda Pasya; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19777

Abstract

Education is an important aspect of life that everyone need. To protect students in order to ensure the comfort of learning, so the students can be said to be consumers. The problem raised is how legal remedies can be restored consumer rights in education services sector and how the application of legal remedies restored consumer rights in the case of the X Education Foundation against Djoni Sukohardjo. Legal remedies that can be taken if consumers are not fulfilled by business actors can be resolved through the court or out of court based on Article 45 paragraph (1)(2) of CPL. If the business actor ignores the request for compensation, the consumer can file a lawsuit through BPSK or to the general court according to Article 23 of the CPL. Legal remedies to restore the rights of consumer Djoni Sukohardjo from the business actor X Education Foundation in Decision Number 005/A/BPSK-DKI/II/BPSK does not consider the contract between business actors and consumers. BPSK's decision was wrong in determining relationship between consumers and business actor. In this case, BPSK Decision does not consider the agreement between the two parties, considering the theory of the Privity of Contract and the principle of freedom of contract.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PT. GRAB TEKNOLOGI INDONESIA TENTANG PENCAIRAN DANA TERHADAP RESTORAN SEBAGAI PENGGUNA JASA GRABFOOD: Liability of PT. Grab Teknologi Indonesia Regarding Fund Disbursement to Restaurants as GrabFood Merchants Azzahra, Mutiara; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19787

Abstract

Consumers using online food delivery applications that provide electronic payment in 2020 increased to date. One of the most used services by consumers in Indonesia is GrabFood, created by PT. Grab Technology Indonesia. In practice, the system for fund claim service provided does not follow the Restaurant's agreement as a Merchant. This study analyse how PT. Grab Teknologi Indonesia violates the UUPK. This study also analysed the fund claim method based on Law No. 8 of 1999 Consumer Protection (UUPK) between PT. Grab Teknologi Indonesia as a GrabFood service provider and Restaurant Menepi Kitchen as a merchant. This study uses normative and descriptive research methods based on secondary and primary data as supporting data and to obtain conclusions deductively. PT. Grab Teknologi Indonesia had violated UUPK article 7, letters a and g regarding the obligation of service providers to provide compensation if the services received are not following the content of the agreement and must be responsible for providing compensation as emphasized in UUPK article 19 and based on contractual liability
QUO VADIS AKUISISI TOKOPEDIA OLEH GOJEK DI ERA EKONOMI DIGITAL? Quo Vadis Tokopedia Acquisition by Gojek in the Digital Economy Era? Sabirin, Ahmad; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19818

Abstract

From early 2021 to 2022, Acquisitions and Mergers are an interesting issue to discuss. Two large companies, namely PT Karya Anak Bangsa, made acquisitions of PT Tokopedia. KPPU, as the supervisory body for business competition, assessed the acquisitions of the two companies, whether or not the acquisitions made by a business violated business competition in Indonesia. If we look at the provisions of Law No. 5 Year 1999 which provides three indicators to declare the existence of unfair business competition, namely; 1) Business competition conducted dishonestly; 2) Business competition is conducted in an unlawful manner. 3) Business competition conducted by inhibiting competition among business actors. These indicators have their own challenges in the era of digital economy as today, there are many challenges in enforcing business competition. Merger assessment using the SLC test method is insufficient to apply because the SLC test focuses less on market structure issues, and only focuses on the competitive impact of the acquisition and the market power that emerges after the acquisition. That is, the SLC test looks at the likelihood that prices will rise after an acquisition occurs. While the determination of relevant market and market share is very important in assessing the effect on competition, this has been done by the European Union, so the assessment of acquisitions for large technology companies needs to be evaluated.
EKSAMINASI PUTUSAN KPPU MENGENAI RAHASIA PERUSAHAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT: Examination Of KPPU Decisions Regarding Company Confidential That Might Lead To Unfair Business Practices Mayva, Verandha; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/ygbbhn17

Abstract

The guideline for article 23 of Law Number 5 of 1999 not yet approved, making company secrets andcriteria for company secrets often equated with the meaning of Trade Secret as regulated in Law Number30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets. The main problem is whether the information in the contractagreement between the musician and the recording company and company data about DMO in thecontract for the procurement of goods and/or services are included in the criteria for company secretsaccording to the perspective of business competition law and whether the decision of the panel of judgesin decision number 19/KPPU-L/ 2007 and number 35/KPPU-I/2010 are correct. This research usingnormative legal research by secondary and primary data. This research is descriptive and conclusionswith deductive reasoning. The results are, the essence the two decisions both discuss company secretswhich must keep the secret because it has economic value and if it open to the public will bring losses tothe company whose secrets are leaked so that both of them are included in the criteria of companysecrets in the perspective of business competition law. The decisions must contains more sanction onpenal law.
PEMAKNAAN ISTILAH TINDAKAN BERSAMA (CONCERTED ACTION) DALAM PERJANJIAN PENETAPAN HARGA (STUDI PUTUSAN KPPU NOMOR 04/KPPU-I/2016 DAN NOMOR 15/KPPU-I/2019) Monica Alina Yolanda; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18351

Abstract

There is no explicit explanation of the term concerted action in Law Number 5 of 1999, but this term is often used by the KPPU to uncover cases of cartels and price fixing. Therefore, it is necessary to raise the issue of how to interpret the term concerted action in price fixing agreements according to Article 5 of Law Number 5 of 1999 and its implementing regulations; and how the KPPU applies the concerted action qualifications in Decision Number 04/KPPU-I/2016 and Number 15/KPPU-I/2019. The study uses a normative method, which is equipped with the result of interviews. The results of research show that the meaning of concerted action in the form of a meeting of minds from business actors is realized in verbal agreements which are followed up with actions aimed at gaining profit. The application of concerted action in KPPU decisions is to contain four (4) elements which include the meeting of mind, a verbal agreement followed by concerted action and changes in market conditions which cause price increases. The KPPU should complete the guidelines by explicitly stating joint actions, and business actors should prepare compliance guidelines as a means of preventing violations of Law Number 5 of 1999
ENSURING JUSTICE AND UTILITY: Addressing Alleged Monopolistic Practices in Ibu Kota Nusantara Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri; Sabirin, Ahmad; Abriant, Sharda; Rahma, Rais Akbar; Wibawa, Berto Mulia
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 15, No 2 (2024): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v15i2.28765

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential implications of establishing PT Karya Logistik Nusantara regarding Indonesia's antimonopoly law, particularly concerning the production and distribution of concrete for construction in Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN). PT Karya Logistik Nusantara is a joint venture adhering to the procedures for forming a Limited Liability Company (LLC). As an LLC, it does not qualify as a State-Owned Enterprise (SOE). Utilizing a normative legal research method, this study highlights critical findings regarding the establishment of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for concrete production and logistics services in the new capital. There are concerns that this arrangement may violate trust provisions, mainly due to the merger of six construction State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), which raises the possibility of monopolistic practices. Such practices could hinder competition by creating barriers to entry for other businesses, as the merged entities control approximately 60% of the market share for concrete in Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN). In conclusion, the study emphasizes the need to scrutinize these developments to ensure compliance with competition law and promote a fair market environment. Recommendations for further research and regulatory oversight are also suggested to mitigate potential monopolistic behaviors.Artikel ini menyelidiki implikasi potensial dari pendirian PT Karya Logistik Nusantara dalam kaitannya dengan UU Antimonopoli Indonesia, khususnya mengenai produksi dan distribusi beton untuk konstruksi di Ibu Kota Nusantara. PT Karya Logistik Nusantara adalah perusahaan patungan yang telah mematuhi prosedur yang diperlukan untuk membentuk Perseroan Terbatas (LLC). Sebagai LLC, itu tidak memenuhi syarat sebagai Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN). Memanfaatkan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini menyoroti temuan penting mengenai pembentukan Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) untuk layanan produksi dan logistik beton di ibu kota baru. Ada kekhawatiran bahwa pengaturan ini dapat melanggar ketentuan kepercayaan, terutama karena penggabungan enam BUMN konstruksi, yang meningkatkan kemungkinan praktik monopoli. Praktik semacam itu dapat menghambat persaingan dengan menciptakan hambatan masuk bagi bisnis lain, karena entitas yang digabungkan menguasai sekitar 60% pangsa pasar beton di Ibu Kota Nusantara. Kesimpulannya, studi ini menekankan perlunya pengawasan yang cermat terhadap perkembangan ini untuk memastikan kepatuhan terhadap hukum persaingan dan untuk mempromosikan lingkungan pasar yang adil. Rekomendasi untuk penelitian lebih lanjut dan pengawasan peraturan juga disarankan untuk mengurangi potensi perilaku monopoli.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAPKONSUMEN CAPIT COKELAT KEDALUWARSA DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN: Consumer's Legal Protection Of The Expired Claw Chocolate From Legal Perspective Of Consumers Protections Salsabila, Anzela; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/bx0sjx82

Abstract

Online shopping has become very attractive in this day and age when it is easier for people to meet their needs and is considered easier from the standpoint of searching for goods, payment to delivery. Online sales can be made through TikTok Live and payments can be made through the online marketplace Shopee. This online shopping also has a weakness: in the transaction, the product that arrives may not match the product offered or even the product that arrives has expired. On this basis, questions arise about the liability of commercial actors in the sale of expired chocolate claws under the Consumer Protection Act and other relevant regulations as well as how customers can may pursue legal remedies against expired chocolate swipes under the Consumer Protection Act and other related regulations. This study uses a normative research method using primary data and secondary data, which are then analyzed using
ANALISIS YURIDIS PRAKTIK MONOPOLI DALAM JASA PENGURUSAN TRANSPORTASI PENGIRIMAN (EKSPOR) BENIH BENING LOBSTER BERDASARKAN UU NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 (STUDI TERHADAP PUTUSAN KPPU NOMOR 04/KPPU- I/2021): Juridical Analysis of Monopoly Practices in Services Shipping Export Lobster Seeds Based on Law Number 5 of 1999 (Study of KPPU Decisions Number 04/KPPU-I/2021) Andrina, Bidhari; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/ch1we537

Abstract

Fishery products are one of the main livelihoods of the Indonesian people which can be traded internationally. To facilitate international trade, sending products to international shipping areas from Republic of Indonesia (export) can be done by appointing a transportation management service company. This is done to avoid monopolistic practices carried out by each business actor to benefit themselves. However, implementing these regulations is certainly not easy. One of the cases is the alleged violation of Article 17 of Law 5/1999 committed by PT Aero Citra Kargo (PT ACK). In this case, the author conducts a discussion related to monopoly practices in BBL delivery (export) transportation services by PT ACK according to Article 17 and the accuracy of KPPU decision No. 4/KPPU-I/2021 regarding monopolistic practices for BBL delivery (export) transportation services against PT ACK. Next, the author analyzes the fulfillment of the legal elements and approaches to Article 17 of Law 5/1999. On the other hand, the author also discusses the active role of the government, the period of substitution, and the absence of sanctions against violators in this decision to see the accuracy of the decision. So the conclusion of this research shows that PT ACK has violated Article 17, however in the decision there are still many things that are not explained further, especially regarding the absence of sanctions against violators.
Pembaharuan Hukum Penyelenggaraan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Secara Elektronik Pada Perseroan Tertutup Muninggar, Roro Ajeng; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v11i2.11821

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the legal reform of the implementation of e-GMS in Private Companies. The issue focused on the regulation of the implementation of the e-GMS of the Private Company and legal reform. The writing of this study uses normative legal methods, and qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of the study show that the regulation of the e-GMS of a Private Company is contained in Article 77 of PT Law, however, the technical implementation has not been regulated. The implementation of the e-GMS of a Private Company can adopt the provisions for the implementation of the e-GMS of a Public Company as stated in POJK No. 16/2020. Basically, the implementation of the e-GMS of a Private Company is valid as long as the implementation is in accordance with the Law and other related technical rules. The role of legal reform in the field of PT has been reflected by the issuance of POJK No. 16/2020 which regulates the implementation of e-GMS of Public Companies as a form of responsive legal theory, however, it needs to be optimized because legal reform is still needed in the field of PT, especially regarding the implementation of e-GMS in Private Companies.
Co-Authors Abriant, Sharda Abrianti, Sharda Ahmad Sabirin Ahmad Sabirin Ahmad Sabirin Ahmad Sabirin Alex Siswanto Alfin Sulaiman Alfiyyah Inayah Taqyuddin Andrina, Bidhari Arief Safari Azzahra, Mutiara Bachry, Ramadhana Anindyajati Berto Mulia Wibawa Dian Purnamasari Dian Purnamasari Dimas Ananta Putra Dwi Tiara Febrina Elfrida Ratnawati Elizaga , Jhon Rojell Y. Ermania Widjajanti Farhandi Himawan Farhandi Himawan Fitrah Bukhari Gladys Prita Pertiwi Grace Michaela Japranata Grace Riana Yudistira Hendrian Wulansari Ignatius Pradipta Probondaru Illona . Imam Hartanto Intan Purwanti Jhon Haward Hutagaol Jhon Rojell Y. Elizaga Jimi Rambo Arranchado Joice Chintya Mardohar Kabes, Irianto Kemal Kusuma Wardana Kerti, Renti Maharaini Laeli Rahmawati M Faqih Surbakti M Faqih Surbakti Magfirah, Wanda Pasya Mahal Frawansa, Syukron Mali, Yosefa Oktriviani Mutiara Mardohar, Joice Chintya Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wangga Maya Indrasti Notoprayitno Mayva, Verandha Megawati Simanjuntak Mia Amelia Monica Alina Yolanda Muhammad Fathan Zahran Dika Muhammad Raldo Johansyah Muhammad Riziq Babeheer Muhammad Vachry Irsyad Prasanna Muninggar, Roro Ajeng Nadya Angelina Notoprayitno, Maya Indrast Notoprayitno, Maya Indrasti Oktabiani, Andiya Putra, Dimas Ananta Putri Fildzah Andini Raafid Haidar Herfian Raafid Haidar Herfian Rafli Syah Maulana Rahma, Rais Akbar Rahmadhani, Zahra Fide Raras Ayundhani Rizal E. Halim Rizal Edy Halim Rizka Syarifa Roro Ajeng Muninggar Rumahorbo, Yoel Nixon A Sabirin, Ahmad Safari , Arif Safari, Arief Salsabila, Anzela Séréna Ortigosa Fernandez Serena Ortigosa Fernandez Sharda Abrianti Sharda Abrianti Simanullang, Venty Elisa Margareth Siti Nurbaiti Slamet Riyadi Slamet Riyadi Sri Bakti Yunari Stella Trixie Jane Sultan Naufal Sivha Syahreza Jakti Kusuma Syukron Mahal Frawansa Takenia Tifany Triani Nabila Diaqilah Surmana Tribuana Chris Shinta Tubagus Andri Purnama Vizna Qurrotul A’yuniyah Wangga, Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wati, Widiya Yohanes Firmansyah Zayyan, Khalillah