Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.406
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Journal of Consumer Science LAW REVIEW JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Journal of Consumer Sciences Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Empowerment : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Adigama International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP) Pamulang Law Review Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika Amicus Curiae Journal of Law and Legal Reform Tribuere
Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 79 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 79 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
How to Ensure Consumer Safety for Unbranded Refill Drinking Water Depots? Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
Journal of Consumer Sciences Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Consumer Sciences
Publisher : Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29244/jcs.8.2.111-123

Abstract

Drinking water is water that has been processed to meet health standard regulations. However, some water can be consumed directly without several processes if it meets health safety requirements. This research aims to ensure the safety, health, and hygiene of unbranded refilled drinking water by looking at the quality of the drinking water content following SNI (Indonesian National Standard) standards and providing recommendations to the government to protect consumers of unbranded drinking water. This research applied qualitative methods through data collection techniques Focus Group Discussion (FGD), literature studies, and field observations in Semarang and Balikpapan. This study found that some refilled drinking water depots violated applicable safety regulations. However, no legal sanctions were applied for the business actors who violated it, and no regional regulations or Mayer Regulations regulate the unbranded refilled drinking water. Therefore, efforts need to be made to foster actors, educate consumers to be smart in choosing drinking water, and the establishment of implementing regulations from the Regulation of the Minister of Health Number 492 of 2010 in supervising business actors from this research is expected to be an effort to increase consumer protection in Indonesia.
Consumer Protection Regarding Health Information and Warnings on Tobacco Cigarette Packaging Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri; Purnamasari, Dian; Sabirin, Ahmad; Putra, Dimas Ananta; Elizaga , Jhon Rojell Y.
Journal of Consumer Sciences Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Consumer Sciences
Publisher : Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29244/jcs.9.2.247-265

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the countries that has a cigarette community, it becomes a problem when the packaging on cigarettes does not provide accurate information, this certainly blames consumer protection. This study aims to delineate consumer protection measures regarding tobacco cigarette circulation without providing accurate information. Conducted in a normative framework. The findings suggest that legal protection for cigarette consumers who receive unclear or inaccurate information on cigarette product packaging can encompass preventive and repressive legal measures. Preventive measures are outlined in PP No. 109 of 2012 and PERMENKES No. 28 of 2013, specifically in Article 4 sub-articles c and i. Conversely, repressive measures enable individuals to file complaints with the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (known as BPSK) or initiate lawsuits. Furthermore, the responsibility of business actors to provide accurate information is underscored by Decision Number 32/Pid.B/2021/Pt. Pbr. This responsibility extends not only to distributors but also to cigarette manufacturers, such as PT. Leadon International, found in violation of various regulations, including Article 8 paragraph (1) sub-paragraphs a I, and j of the Godrej Consumer Products Limited (GCPL), in conjunction with Article 14 of Government Regulation Number 109 of 2012, and Article 10 paragraph (2) sub-paragraph a and paragraph (3) of PERMENKES No.28 of 2013. Sanctions for producers should adhere to Article 19, in conjunction with Article 62 paragraph (1) of the GCPL. At the same time, distributors face reprimands for product withdrawals as stipulated in Article 60 paragraph (3) of PP No. 109 of 2012.
The Urgence of Renewal Investment Law and Investment Dispute Settlement in Indonesia Tubagus Andri Purnama; Yohanes Firmansyah; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini‬; Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom; Imam Hartanto
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Juli : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (169.16 KB) | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v1i2.403

Abstract

Legal certainty can be reached by good and explicit principles in a legislation, as well as its application. Investment requires legal certainty as well. On April 26, 2007, the Investment Law No. 25 of 2007 was enacted. This legislation was enacted to replace Law No. 1 of 1967 on Foreign Investment and Law No. 6 of 1968 on Domestic Investment. There are eleven factors that serve as benchmarks for gauging a country's ease of doing business. One of the indications is related to the resolution of investment conflicts, or in this case, contract enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings. According to the Doing Business 2019 report, Indonesia ranks 73rd (seventy-three) in terms of ease of doing business. Indonesia's EoDB ranking remains distant from the aim of entering the world's top 40 (forty) ranks. This is due to the fact that, among other things, dispute resolution in Indonesia still has various issues, including basic regulations, the trial procedure, and decision implementation. Meanwhile, affordable, fast, and simple conflict resolution facilities are required in the corporate world (according to EoDB indications). The results of this descriptive analytical research utilizing a normative juridical approach reveal that there is no implementing regulation of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment, which focuses on discussing investment disputes, therefore there is no strong legal certainty in investing in Indonesia. Furthermore, there are several issues concerning the resolution of bankruptcy cases, some of which stem from regulations, namely Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, some of which can result in certain interests, the length of the bankruptcy court process, and legal certainty following the bankruptcy decision. A breakthrough or update that can support EoDB is required, one of which can be done in the field of investment dispute resolution, particularly connected to contract enforcement and bankruptcy case settlement, by creating implementing regulations and updating associated regulations.
Dampak Pinjaman Online bagi Masyarakat: Mensejahterakan atau Menyengsarakan? (Studi Tentang Pandangan Masyarakat di Wilayah Bintaro, Tanggerang Selatan) Sharda Abrianti; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini; Ignatius Pradipta Probondaru
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1926

Abstract

Financial Technology (Fintech) dan platform digital menawarkan model bisnis dan alternatif solusi yang dapat membantu pemerintah dan institusi finansial lainnya untuk memperluas jangkauan pemberian layanan finansial yang memadai. Masyarakat perlu mendapat edukasi untuk menambah pengetahuan dan pemahaman yang baik terkait kredit keuangan elektronik melalui perusahaan fintech khususnya Peer To Peer (P2P) Lending yang telah menjadi salah satu alternatif peminjaman dana dengan cepat. Metode pelaksanaan yang dilakukan dalam kegiatan PkM ini adalah melakukan penyuluhan dalam proses penyampaian pengetahuan mengenai obyek terkait, serta membuat rancangan metode penyampaian pengetahuan dan pemahaman regulasi dan kebijakan dalam pinjaman online atau fintech. Penyuluhan ini dilengkapi juga dengan contoh pelanggaran atau kasus pelanggaran hak debitur (konsumen) oleh perusahaan fintech yang menimbulkan kerugian bagi masyarakat. Kegiatan penyuluhan ini melibatkan beberapa penyuluh, yakni Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK-RI), dosen hukum Bisnis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti, dan pengacara/advokat yang merupakan perwakilan dari pihak mitra, gereja St. Matius Penginjil, Bintaro. Adapun tujuan penyuluhan disesuaikan dengan tema PkM adalah untuk meningkatkan pemahaman kepada masyarakat khususnya masyarakat di sekitar Gereja St. Matius Penginjil akan manfaat dan risiko dalam melakukan pinjaman online. Adapun permasalahan dalam penyuluhan ini adalah kurangnya pemahaman masyarakat setempat mengenai bentuk perlindungan konsumen (debitur) apabila gagal melakukan pengembalian utang, baik perlindungan atas ancaman, kekerasan, maupun terhadap data pribadi. Hal ini diungkapkan pada pengajuan surat yang disampaikan pihak mitra kepada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti. Adapun solusi dari permasalahan ini adalah memberikan pengetahuan kepada masyarakat agar memahami risiko-risiko yang mungkin terjadi apabila tidak dapat mengembalikan pinjaman sesuai waktu yang dijanjikan.
Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Jeratan Pinjaman Online di Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Simanjuntak, Megawati; Safari , Arif; Anggraini , Anna Maria Tri
Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan dan Biosains Tropika
Publisher : Direktorat Kajian Strategis dan Reputasi Akademik IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29244/agro-maritim.0401.235-238

Abstract

Pinjaman online (Pinjol) merupakan layanan pinjam meminjam berbasis teknologi informasi yang dilakukan secara online tanpa perlu tatap muka. Cara ini memberikan kemudahan dan kecepatan dalam proses pengajuan kredit. Pinjaman online yang mudah dan cepat dibandingkan dengan lembaga keuangan lainnya, menin gkat di masa Pandemi Covid 19. Berbagai permasalahan muncul karena kurangnya ketersediaan peraturan dan kebijakan yang menekankan kewajiban dan sanksi bagi pelaku usaha P2P Lending dan literasi konsumen yang rendah. Dalam upaya mewujudkan perlindungan konsumen jasa pinjaman online, berbagai pihak seperti Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Satgas Waspada Investasi (SWI), Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika serta Bareskrim perlu berkoordinasi. Perlu pembuatan aturan yang lebih rinci, pengawasan P2P Lending legal dan ilegal lebih ketat, sosialisasi dan penindakan P2P Lending ilegal, penyebarluasan informasi tentang P2P Lending legal secara efektif dan masif; dan aturan yang tegas kepada pelaku usaha P2P Lending ilegal agar dalam melakukan penagihan wajib menerap kan etika bisnis dan prinsip humanisme.
PENDEKATAN RULE OF REASON DALAM PRAKTIK DISKRIMINASI PADA PUTUSAN KPPU TAHUN 2020: Rule Of Reason Approach To Discrimination Practices In The 2020 KPPU Decisions Mardohar, Joice Chintya; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19751

Abstract

Discriminatory practices are common in business competition and this is not prohibited as long as it does not lead to unfair business competition. The thesis discusses 3 (three) KPPU decisions in 2020 regarding allegations of discriminatory practices committed by business actors. The main problem in this thesis is how the actions of business actors can fulfill the element of violation and how to apply the rule of reason approach in Article 19 point d of Law Number 5 of 1999 in the 2020 KPPU Decisions. This thesis is a normative descriptive using secondary data in the form of journals or books and primary data in the form of interviews with KPPU and data processing is carried out qualitatively, and conclusions are drawn using deductive logic. The conclusion from this study is that discriminatory acts cause obstacles in vertical business relations and are in the relevant market which are different but interrelated and often occur in the essential facilities sector. Discriminatory practices can occur effectively if the KPPU's business actors use the application of the rule of reason in handling the case, in which the result is that discriminatory practices can only run effectively if the business actors are in the position of highest market control.
PEMULIHAN HAK KONSUMEN DI SEKTOR JASA PENDIDIKAN (STUDI KASUS YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN X MELAWAN DJONI SUKOHARDJO): Restore Consumer Rights in the Education Services Sector Case Study of X Education Foundation Against Djoni Sukohardjo Magfirah, Wanda Pasya; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19777

Abstract

Education is an important aspect of life that everyone need. To protect students in order to ensure the comfort of learning, so the students can be said to be consumers. The problem raised is how legal remedies can be restored consumer rights in education services sector and how the application of legal remedies restored consumer rights in the case of the X Education Foundation against Djoni Sukohardjo. Legal remedies that can be taken if consumers are not fulfilled by business actors can be resolved through the court or out of court based on Article 45 paragraph (1)(2) of CPL. If the business actor ignores the request for compensation, the consumer can file a lawsuit through BPSK or to the general court according to Article 23 of the CPL. Legal remedies to restore the rights of consumer Djoni Sukohardjo from the business actor X Education Foundation in Decision Number 005/A/BPSK-DKI/II/BPSK does not consider the contract between business actors and consumers. BPSK's decision was wrong in determining relationship between consumers and business actor. In this case, BPSK Decision does not consider the agreement between the two parties, considering the theory of the Privity of Contract and the principle of freedom of contract.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PT. GRAB TEKNOLOGI INDONESIA TENTANG PENCAIRAN DANA TERHADAP RESTORAN SEBAGAI PENGGUNA JASA GRABFOOD: Liability of PT. Grab Teknologi Indonesia Regarding Fund Disbursement to Restaurants as GrabFood Merchants Azzahra, Mutiara; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19787

Abstract

Consumers using online food delivery applications that provide electronic payment in 2020 increased to date. One of the most used services by consumers in Indonesia is GrabFood, created by PT. Grab Technology Indonesia. In practice, the system for fund claim service provided does not follow the Restaurant's agreement as a Merchant. This study analyse how PT. Grab Teknologi Indonesia violates the UUPK. This study also analysed the fund claim method based on Law No. 8 of 1999 Consumer Protection (UUPK) between PT. Grab Teknologi Indonesia as a GrabFood service provider and Restaurant Menepi Kitchen as a merchant. This study uses normative and descriptive research methods based on secondary and primary data as supporting data and to obtain conclusions deductively. PT. Grab Teknologi Indonesia had violated UUPK article 7, letters a and g regarding the obligation of service providers to provide compensation if the services received are not following the content of the agreement and must be responsible for providing compensation as emphasized in UUPK article 19 and based on contractual liability
QUO VADIS AKUISISI TOKOPEDIA OLEH GOJEK DI ERA EKONOMI DIGITAL? Quo Vadis Tokopedia Acquisition by Gojek in the Digital Economy Era? Sabirin, Ahmad; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19818

Abstract

From early 2021 to 2022, Acquisitions and Mergers are an interesting issue to discuss. Two large companies, namely PT Karya Anak Bangsa, made acquisitions of PT Tokopedia. KPPU, as the supervisory body for business competition, assessed the acquisitions of the two companies, whether or not the acquisitions made by a business violated business competition in Indonesia. If we look at the provisions of Law No. 5 Year 1999 which provides three indicators to declare the existence of unfair business competition, namely; 1) Business competition conducted dishonestly; 2) Business competition is conducted in an unlawful manner. 3) Business competition conducted by inhibiting competition among business actors. These indicators have their own challenges in the era of digital economy as today, there are many challenges in enforcing business competition. Merger assessment using the SLC test method is insufficient to apply because the SLC test focuses less on market structure issues, and only focuses on the competitive impact of the acquisition and the market power that emerges after the acquisition. That is, the SLC test looks at the likelihood that prices will rise after an acquisition occurs. While the determination of relevant market and market share is very important in assessing the effect on competition, this has been done by the European Union, so the assessment of acquisitions for large technology companies needs to be evaluated.
EKSAMINASI PUTUSAN KPPU MENGENAI RAHASIA PERUSAHAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT: Examination Of KPPU Decisions Regarding Company Confidential That Might Lead To Unfair Business Practices Mayva, Verandha; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/ygbbhn17

Abstract

The guideline for article 23 of Law Number 5 of 1999 not yet approved, making company secrets andcriteria for company secrets often equated with the meaning of Trade Secret as regulated in Law Number30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets. The main problem is whether the information in the contractagreement between the musician and the recording company and company data about DMO in thecontract for the procurement of goods and/or services are included in the criteria for company secretsaccording to the perspective of business competition law and whether the decision of the panel of judgesin decision number 19/KPPU-L/ 2007 and number 35/KPPU-I/2010 are correct. This research usingnormative legal research by secondary and primary data. This research is descriptive and conclusionswith deductive reasoning. The results are, the essence the two decisions both discuss company secretswhich must keep the secret because it has economic value and if it open to the public will bring losses tothe company whose secrets are leaked so that both of them are included in the criteria of companysecrets in the perspective of business competition law. The decisions must contains more sanction onpenal law.
Co-Authors Abriant, Sharda Abrianti, Sharda Ahmad Sabirin Ahmad Sabirin Alex Siswanto Alfiyyah Inayah Taqyuddin Andini, Putri Fildzah Andrina, Bidhari Azzahra, Mutiara Bachry, Ramadhana Anindyajati Berto Mulia Wibawa Dian Purnamasari Dwi Tiara Febrina Elfrida Ratnawati Elizaga , Jhon Rojell Y. Ermania Widjajanti Farhandi Himawan Farhandi Himawan Fernandez, Séréna Ortigosa Gladys Prita Pertiwi Grace Michaela Japranata Grace Riana Yudistira Hendrian Wulansari Ignatius Pradipta Probondaru Illona . Imam Hartanto Intan Purwanti Israriyanto, Muhammad Firli Jhon Haward Hutagaol Joice Chintya Mardohar Kabes, Irianto Kemal Kusuma Wardana Kerti, Renti Maharaini M Faqih Surbakti M Faqih Surbakti Magfirah, Wanda Pasya Mahal Frawansa, Syukron Mali, Yosefa Oktriviani Mutiara Mardohar, Joice Chintya Mayva, Verandha Megawati Simanjuntak Mia Amelia Monica Alina Yolanda Muhammad Fathan Zahran Dika Muhammad Raldo Johansyah Muhammad Vachry Irsyad Prasanna Muninggar, Roro Ajeng Nadya Angelina Notoprayitno, Maya Indrasti Oktabiani, Andiya Putra, Dimas Ananta Raafid Haidar Herfian Rafli Syah Maulana Rahma, Rais Akbar Rahmadhani, Zahra Fide Rahmawati, Laeli Raras Ayundhani Rizal Edy Halim Sabirin, Ahmad Safari , Arif Safari, Arief Salsabila, Anzela Séréna Ortigosa Fernandez Sharda Abrianti Sharda Abrianti Simanullang, Venty Elisa Margareth Slamet Riyadi Stella Trixie Jane Sultan Naufal Sivha Syahreza Jakti Kusuma Syarifa, Rizka Syukron Mahal Frawansa Takenia Tifany Tribuana Chris Shinta Tubagus Andri Purnama Wangga, Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wati, Widiya Yoel Nixon A Rumahorbo Yohanes Firmansyah Zayyan, Khalillah