Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Pengaruh Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issues Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Novita Hari Ramadhanti; Dyah Astriani
Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): AGUSTUS - SEPTEMBER 2024
Publisher : PT. Intelek Cendikiawan Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam (IPA) atau sains menuntut siswa untuk melek sains atau literasi sains di abad 21. Rendahnya literasi sains akan mempengaruhi kemampuan berpikir kreatif, logis, kritis, yang mencakup di berbagai aspek kehidupan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD berbasis SSI terhadap kemampuan literasi sains di SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Taman Sidoarjo. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode Pre Experimental Design, dengan rancangan desain penelitian one group pretest-posttest design. Data dianalisis menggunakan SPSS dengan hasil uji t menujukkan nilai Sig. (2-tailed) kurang dari 0,01 yang artinya terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD berbasis SSI terhadap kemampuan Literasi Sains. Besar pengaruh diukur menggunakan Effect Size. Hasil Effect Size sebesar 2.96 dengan kategori sangat besar. Hal ini menunjukkan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD berbasis SSI berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan literasi sains siswa
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PROBLEM SOLVING SISWA KELAS VIII SMP PADA MATERI SISTEM PENCERNAAN nugraheni, fitri; Dyah Astriani
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 No. 02, Juni 2026 Produce
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.48109

Abstract

This research is motivated by the low problem-solving ability of students in the science digestive system material, indicated by the difficulty in understanding contextual questions and connecting them to scientific concepts. The purpose of the study is to describe students' problem-solving abilities and identify the factors that influence them. This study uses a quantitative descriptive research method involving 30 eighth-grade students of SMP Negeri 3 Sidoarjo. Data were collected through multiple-choice tests based on Polya indicators, questionnaires, and interviews. The results show that students' problem-solving abilities are in the low category (average 60%), with details: understanding the problem 53%, planning a solution 63%, implementing the plan 57%, and reviewing 69%. Influencing factors consist of internal (48%) and external (52%), with external factors being more dominant. This indicates students' difficulties in solving contextual problems, so it is recommended to apply the Problem Based Learning model to improve problem-solving abilities.
EFEKTIVITAS TOULMIN’S ARGUMENTATION PATTERN (TAP) DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPA TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH MURID SMP Aulya Ayuning Sukma, Dyah; Astriani, Dyah
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 Nomor 02, Juni 2026 Public
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.49569

Abstract

Scientific argumentation skills are a crucial component of science literacy required for 21st-century students. However, students' initial abilities indicate that their scientific argumentation skills are still limited to the claim indicator. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of implementing Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) in improving junior high school students' scientific argumentation skills in ecology topics, specifically the sub-topic of human impacts on ecosystems. The research method used was quantitative with a One Group Pretest–Posttest Design. The research subjects consisted of 31 students of class VII A at SMP Asa Cendekia, selected using a simple random sampling technique. Data were collected through test techniques in the form of cognitive essay questions based on TAP indicators distributed via Google Form. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistical tests, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test, and hypothesis testing via Paired Sample t-test and N-Gain. The results showed a highly significant difference in students' scientific argumentation skills between before and after treatment (Sig = 0.000 < 0.05). The effectiveness of the intervention was further supported by an overall average Normalized Gain (N-Gain) score of 0.74, which falls into the high category. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the application of the TAP framework effectively serves as a cognitive scaffolding to improve students' scientific argumentation skills in a structured manner. Keywords: Scientific Argumentation, Toulmin Argumentation Pattern (Tap), Science Learning, Ecology.