Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Counter Narrative Sexual Violence in Alternative Media Mubadalah.id Sari, Ratu Arti Wulan; Jamaludin, Ahmad
Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31958/jsk.v6i2.7361

Abstract

The media has a strategic role in providing an understanding and description of something through the narratives it creates, including the narrative about sexual violence. The issue of sexual violence has become a sensitive issue so the media should not only provide information to catch up with the number of readers, but the media in the narrative must take sides with victims of sexual violence as a form of protection. The purpose of this study is to find out how the narrative of sexual violence is packaged by the alternative media Mubdalam. id. This research is qualitative research using Sara Mills's discourse analysis method and using Antonio Gramsci's theory of hegemony. The results of the study show that the narratives presented by the alternative media Mubadalah.id are (1) the subject of the narrator as a person who advocates using the victim's perspective and the perspective of positive law and Islamic religious rules. (2) The alternative media, Mubadalah.id, leads the readers to take sides with the victims and ignites the readers to be able to do advocacy together against sexual violence. In conclusion, the alternative media Mubadalah.id is a media that has a counter-narrative and counter-hegemony on the issue of sexual violence that is developing in the community.
Legal Certainty in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare and Medical Diagnosis Dede Hermawan; Ahmad Jamaludin
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Research Horizon - December 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.855

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence into healthcare promises to revolutionize medical diagnostics and service delivery. However, rapid technological advancement has outpaced the development of a specific legal framework, creating significant legal uncertainty. This study aims to examine Indonesia’s legal framework for medical artificial intelligence, identify key regulatory gaps, and propose an adaptive legal model to ensure safe and ethical artificial intelligence adoption. Using a normative juridical approach with statutory, conceptual, and comparative analyses, the study finds that current regulations, including Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health and Law Number 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions, provide general but insufficient guidance. Critical issues such as liability for artificial intelligence-induced errors, data governance, algorithmic transparency, and patient consent remain unresolved. This regulatory gap poses risks to patients, healthcare providers, and technology developers. The absence of a robust, adaptive legal framework undermines legal certainty and patient protection, limiting trust and safe adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare. The study proposes a tiered regulatory model based on international best practices to ensure accountability and foster confidence in artificial intelligence-driven medical services.
Legal and Humanistic Approaches to Medical Procedure Refusal Susilo, Dody Hendro; Jamaludin, Ahmad
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Research Horizon - December 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.856

Abstract

The refusal of medical treatment by patients, grounded in deeply held personal or religious beliefs, presents a profound legal and ethical dilemma, colliding with the healthcare professional’s fundamental duty to preserve life. This study analyzes this dilemma from both normative and humanistic perspectives. This study employs a qualitative, doctrinal methodology, synthesizing a literature review of national and international legal regulations, bioethics, health law, and academic sources published between 2013 and 2024. The analysis reveals three core findings: Patients possess a robust, legally protected right to autonomy and religious freedom; Healthcare professionals are bound by an equally compelling legal and professional obligation to provide care, particularly in emergencies; and a significant tension exists where rigid legal-formalistic solutions (normative) fail to address the underlying humanistic considerations of patient dignity. The study argues for an integrative normative-humanistic framework. This model reconciles the conflict by moving beyond legal formalism to emphasize therapeutic communication and participatory-dialogic solutions. This integration minimizes disputes by ensuring legal certainty for physicians while respecting patient dignity. This research concludes that this integrated approach is essential for providing just, ethical, and humane resolutions in multicultural societies.
The Deficit of Legal Effectiveness: A Juridical Review of Illegal Dental Practice by Non-Dentist Practitioners in Indonesia Juliantary, Sella Romika; Jamaludin, Ahmad
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Research Horizon - December 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.864

Abstract

The rise of dental procedures performed by non-dentists, especially high-risk aesthetic services such as illegal braces and veneer installations, has created significant legal and public health concerns in Indonesia. This study provides a juridical assessment of unauthorized dental practice and evaluates the effectiveness of law enforcement through the illegal veneer case in Karanganyar based on Decision Number 51/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Krg). Using a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches, it analyzes the hierarchy and consistency of relevant regulations, including the health law, medical practice law, and the Ministry of Health regulation on dental technicians. Guided by Soerjono Soekanto’s theory of law enforcement effectiveness, the findings show that such practices remain widespread due to inconsistent application of administrative and criminal sanctions, weak coordination among law-enforcement and health authorities, and low public legal awareness. The Karanganyar decision illustrates how lenient penalties and the absence of automatic administrative measures, such as closing the illegal practice undermine deterrence. The study concludes that effective enforcement of health law requires stronger institutional integration and improved legal culture. It proposes developing an integrated sanction system that links criminal rulings with mandatory administrative penalties to enhance deterrence and curb illegal dental practice nationwide.
Juridical Analysis of Delegated Authority from Anesthesiologist to Nurses in Performing Anesthetic Procedures Chiko, Syahruddin; Jamaludin, Ahmad
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Research Horizon - December 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.890

Abstract

The growing public demand for professional and legally accountable healthcare services, coupled with the limited availability of anesthesiology personnel, has led to the increasingly common practice of delegating anesthetic procedures to nurses, creating significant legal controversy that requires thorough examination. This study examines the legal aspects of the delegation of authority from anesthesiologists to nurses in performing anesthesia or sedation. The method used in this study is normative legal research, which is research using legislation covering three layers of legal science consisting of legal dogmatics, legal theory, and legal philosophy. The results of the discussion found that from a positive legal perspective, the delegation of authority from anesthesiologists to nurses to perform anesthesia within the scope of anesthesia services is contrary to the legal norms or rules as stipulated in Law Number 36 of 2014 concerning Health Workers and also Law-Law Number 38 of 2014 concerning Nursing, which is Lex Specialis for nurses, and Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health. Therefore, the delegation of authority from anesthesiologists to nurses can be categorized as an unlawful act because anesthesia is a special medical procedure that can only be delegated to health workers who have been authorized by the government.