Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.03
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unram Law Review JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Jurnal Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Hang Tuah Law Journal ANDREW Law Journal Rechtsvinding
Ristanti, Yuni
Universitas Mataram
Religion Arts Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Reconstruction of Criminal Liability in Infanticide of Children Born out of Wedlock A Juridical Feminism Perspective Yuni Ristanti; Atika Zahra Nirmala
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1723

Abstract

The phenomenon of infanticide involving children born out of wedlock reflects not merely individual conduct but a complex interplay of psychological pressure, social stigma, and gender inequality. This study aims to analyze the regulation of infanticide under the Indonesian Criminal Code, examine the ambiguity of the phrase “fear of being discovered by others,” and assess criminal liability from a feminist legal perspective, including the role of the biological father. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that Article 460 constitutes a delictum proprium that designates the mother as the offender based on biological conditions. However, its formulation remains partial and fails to address underlying structural factors. The phrase “fear of being discovered by others” is vague and may lead to interpretative disparities. From a feminist legal perspective, the provision reproduces gender inequality by concentrating liability on women, while the role of the biological father remains insufficiently addressed. Accordingly, reconstructing criminal liability to incorporate the role of the biological father and broader social factors is necessary to achieve gender-sensitive substantive justice.
Coastal Reclamation Policy In Indonesia From The Perspective Of Sustainable Development: Between Investment Interests And Coastal Ecosystem Protection Nathania Satriawan; Yuni Ristanti
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1786

Abstract

Coastal reclamation is a development policy intended to support economic growth, urban expansion, and investment. However, its implementation frequently causes environmental degradation, spatial conflicts, and social impacts on coastal communities, raising concerns regarding its consistency with sustainable development principles. This study aims to analyse Indonesia’s coastal reclamation policy from the perspective of sustainable development by examining the balance between investment interests and the protection of coastal ecosystems. The research employs a normative legal method using statute and conceptual approaches, supported by qualitative analysis of legislation, scholarly literature, and relevant legal documents. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s regulatory framework has formally incorporated sustainable development principles through provisions on environmental protection, licensing, and coastal management. Nevertheless, implementation remains constrained by the predominance of economic interests, weak environmental compliance monitoring, inadequate regulatory harmonisation, and limited public participation in decision-making. These challenges hinder the achievement of an appropriate balance between economic development, ecological sustainability, and the protection of coastal communities’ rights. The study concludes that coastal reclamation policies require reform by strengthening environmental oversight, improving regulatory coherence, and ensuring meaningful public participation alongside the application of the precautionary principle. Such measures are essential to align reclamation practices with sustainable development objectives and to promote environmentally sound and socially equitable coastal development.
Perbandingan Sanksi Pidana Pada Kuhp Lama, Kuhp Nasional Dan Criminal Code Romania 2017 Yuni Ristanti; Ahwan
Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v6i2.403

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas perbandingan sistem sanksi pidana antara KUHP Lama, KUHP Nasional 2023 Indonesia, dan Criminal Code Romania 2017. Tujuan makalah ini adalah untuk mengkaji perbedaan dan persamaan filosofi, struktur, serta mekanisme pemidanaan pada masing-masing sistem hukum, serta dampaknya terhadap penegakan hukum pidana di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif-komparatif dengan pendekatan mazhab hukum dan analisis pasal-pasal yang berlaku di ketiga kode pidana tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KUHP Lama masih berorientasi pada keadilan retributif klasik dengan dominasi pidana penjara dan pidana mati, sedangkan KUHP 2023 mengusung paradigma utilitarian dan restoratif dengan perluasan jenis pidana dan penguatan prinsip proporsionalitas. Criminal Code Romania 2017 menampilkan sistem yang lebih modern dan humanis, menghapus pidana mati, mengedepankan individualisasi hukuman, serta mengadopsi mekanisme pengawasan dan denda yang lebih adil. Pembaruan KUHP 2023 menempatkan Indonesia pada jalur harmonisasi dengan standar global dan sekaligus mempertahankan karakteristik lokal dalam sistem pemidanaan nasional.
KONSEP RADIKALISME DIGITAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA Yuni Ristanti; Titin Nurfatlah
Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v7i1.426

Abstract

Radikalisme digital merupakan fenomena yang berkembang seiring dengan kemajuan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi, yang ditandai dengan penyebaran ideologi ekstrem melalui platform digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis definisi radikalisme dan radikalisme digital, mengkaji pengaturannya dalam hukum positif Indonesia, serta mengidentifikasi indikator-indikator yang dapat digunakan dalam proses scraping data untuk mendeteksi konten radikal di ruang digital. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, kasus, dan penafsiran hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa radikalisme dalam perspektif hukum positif tidak selalu dirumuskan secara eksplisit, namun dapat diidentifikasi melalui perbuatan yang mengarah pada ancaman terhadap keamanan negara, seperti yang tercermin dalam delik makar dan ketentuan terkait dalam peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya. Dalam konteks digital, radikalisme ditandai oleh pola penyebaran konten yang sistematis, penggunaan narasi ideologis yang bersifat ekstrem, serta adanya indikasi ajakan atau mobilisasi tindakan. Indikator-indikator tersebut dapat digunakan sebagai dasar dalam teknik scraping data untuk mengidentifikasi dan memetakan potensi radikalisme digital. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi dalam pengembangan kajian hukum pidana, khususnya dalam merespons dinamika kejahatan berbasis teknologi informasi di Indonesia.
Co-Authors Abu Sa'it Ahwan Ahwan Ahwan, Ahwan Atika Zahra Nirmala Beverly Evangelista Febrihadi Suparidho Imas Octaviana Dewi Lalu Panca Tresna D Lalu Parman Lalu Rangga Satria Wijaya Mulyana, Septira Putri nathania satriawan Prandy Arthayoga Louk Fanggi Rahmania, Nunung Sumaragatha, I Gusti Bagus Sakah Titin Nurfatlah Ufran, Ufran