Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 36 Documents
Search

Transforming Islamic Philanthropy: Strategies and Impacts of Zakat Institutions in Advancing Social Welfare Haq, Akiq Zainul; Supriatna, Encup
Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama
Publisher : Program Studi Studi Agama-Agama Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/hanifiya.v9i1.44880

Abstract

Islamic philanthropy through zakat management plays a crucial role in achieving social welfare. This study aims to explore the transformation of zakat management strategies in the Zakat Collection Unit (UPZ) of Pacet Sub-district, Cianjur, and analyze its impact on the local community. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the study gathered data through in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentation involving UPZ administrators, zakat recipients (mustahik), and other stakeholders. The findings reveal that the UPZ of Pacet Sub-district has implemented various innovations, including the digitalization of zakat collection and distribution systems, as well as enhanced transparency in reporting. These strategies have successfully increased public trust and participation in Islamic philanthropy. The impacts include improved access to education and healthcare services, economic empowerment of zakat recipients, and reduced poverty rates in the area. This study confirms that the transformation of zakat management in the UPZ of Pacet Sub-district significantly contributes to social development. The recommendations proposed include strengthening the capacity of administrators, developing sustainable empowerment programs, and enhancing inter-agency synergy to maximize the benefits of zakat in creating inclusive social welfare.
The Application of The Principles of Justice, Legal Certainty, and Benefit in Regulating Civil Rights of Children After Divorce and Its Contribution to the Indonesian Legal System Faiq Faiq; AH. Fathonih; Encup Supriatna; Syahrul Anwar
Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Vol 5 No 2 (2025): Juli
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/jkih.v5i2.541

Abstract

The high number of divorce cases in the jurisdiction of the Religious Courts under the Surabaya High Religious Court raises serious concerns about the civil rights of children post-divorce. In many cases, children's rights to maintenance, education, healthcare, and guardianship are neglected. This study aims to evaluate how the principles of justice, legal certainty, and benefit are implemented in legal decisions related to children’s civil rights after parental separation. Using a normative-empirical method with statutory, case, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes court rulings across various types of divorce cases within the Surabaya jurisdiction. The findings reveal a disparity in judicial considerations, particularly in child custody, maintenance, and guardianship rulings, reflecting the lack of consistency in substantive legal protection. While many decisions formally protect children’s rights, enforcement remains weak. The study concludes that institutional reform is needed to ensure the effectiveness of legal norms protecting children after divorce.
PERSPEKTIF GENDER TENTANG KONSEP AL ‘ADALAH DALAM HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM Koko Komarudin; Encep Rifqi Abdul Aziz; Nina Nurmila; Encup Supriatna
AKSELERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Vol 8 No 2 (2026): AKSELERASI: JURNAL ILMIAH NASIONAL
Publisher : GoAcademica Research dan Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/jin.v8i2.1855

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi konsep al-‘adalah dalam hukum keluarga Islam melalui perspektif gender sebagai respons terhadap paradigma keadilan yang selama ini lebih berorientasi pada aspek formal-prosedural dan cenderung mereproduksi relasi hierarkis antara laki-laki dan perempuan. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan normatif-filosofis. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap literatur fiqh klasik, pemikiran hukum Islam kontemporer, serta putusan Pengadilan Agama, kemudian dianalisis secara integratif menggunakan tujuh kerangka konseptual, yaitu mubādalah, naẓariyyah al-ḥudūd, qiwāmah, maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah berbasis gender, zawj al-mīthāq, konsep wilāyah–wiṣāyah, dan maṣlaḥah al-usrah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konsep al-‘adalah perlu direkonstruksi dari keadilan formal menuju keadilan substantif-relasional yang berorientasi pada kemitraan dan kemaslahatan keluarga. Pertama, al-‘adalah menempatkan suami dan istri sebagai zawj al-mīthāq yang terikat oleh mīthāqan ghalīẓan, sehingga qiwāmah dipahami sebagai amanah tanggung jawab, bukan legitimasi superioritas gender. Kedua, konsep wilāyah yang bersifat hierarkis ditransformasikan menjadi wiṣāyah yang berlandaskan kompetensi, kapasitas, dan kemaslahatan. Ketiga, naẓariyyah al-ḥudūd dan maṣlaḥah al-usrah menjadi instrumen evaluatif untuk menilai sejauh mana produk hukum keluarga mampu mewujudkan kemanfaatan, keadilan, dan perlindungan dari mafsadah bagi seluruh anggota keluarga. Penelitian ini menawarkan paradigma baru al-‘adalah yang menempatkan relasi suami-istri sebagai hubungan yang setara, saling bertanggung jawab, dan berorientasi pada tercapainya tujuan hukum Islam (maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah) dalam kehidupan keluarga.
Childfree as a Modern Life Option: An Analysis of Islamic Law and Psychology on Contemporary Social Phenomena Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti; Ija Suntana; Irfan Fahmi; Encup Supriatna; Yernar Yessimkulov
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v3i1.434

Abstract

The phenomenon of childfree or the conscious decision not to have children is becoming an increasingly prominent social issue in modern society, including in Indonesia. This decision gave rise to normative, moral, and psychological debates in society based on religious values. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of childfree from the perspective of Islamic law and psychology, in order to understand how this life choice can be accepted or rejected within the framework of religious values and individual psychological well-being. The research uses a qualitative approach with the library research method through descriptive analysis of Islamic legal literature, maqāṣid al-syarī'ah theory, and studies of modern psychology and Islamic psychology. The results of the study show that in Islamic law, childfree can be categorized as a decision that is mubah as long as it is based on considerations of benefits such as health, emotional stability, or economic factors, and does not contradict the principles of maqāṣid al-syarī'ah. From a psychological perspective, these decisions are closely related to the factors of mental readiness, social pressure, and the need for self-actualization that reflect the process of finding a balance in life and personal happiness. Meanwhile, from the socio-religious side, this phenomenon still causes stigma because it is considered deviant from cultural norms and religious values that place children as a symbol of family success. Thus, the phenomenon of childfree requires a holistic and moderate approach in order to understand the proportionate relationship between individual freedom, social welfare, and Islamic spiritual values.
Dynamics of Social Change in Sundane Society: Between Tradition and Modernity in Cireundeu Traditional Village, Cimahi Ortho Wiria Razak; Encup Supriatna
Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Vol. 24 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu sosial
Publisher : Pengurus Pusat Perkumpulan Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara Indonesia (PIANI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63309/dialektika.v24i1.946

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of social change within the Cireundeu Traditional Village community in Cimahi, a Sundanese community that maintains tradition amidst modernity. This village is known for its cassava-based food security system (rasi) and Sundanese Wiwitan traditional values, which are still practiced in social life. The research used a qualitative approach with a descriptive case study design through non-participatory field observation, visual documentation, and literature review. The results show that modernization in the form of urbanization, digital technology, and cultural tourism activities does not erase tradition but rather encourages a process of selective adaptation and value negotiation. Core traditions such as rasi consumption and ritual practices are maintained, while non-essential aspects are adapted to contemporary needs. These findings indicate that social change in the Cireundeu Traditional Village is non-linear and represents a form of localized modernity, where cultural identity is reproduced through contextual adaptation mechanisms
The Integration of Psychological Aspects and Islamic Values in Domestic Dispute Mediation in Religious Courts Sofia Gussevi; Encup Supriatna; Irfan Fahmi; Ujang Abidin; Maida Zahra
Muttaqien Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Islamic Studies
Publisher : Muttaqien Publishing, Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Mayarakat (P3M) STAI DR. KH.EZ. Muttaqien Purwakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52593/mtq.07.1.08

Abstract

Mediation is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution that aims to achieve amicable settlements between disputing parties. In the context of family disputes in Indonesia, mediation plays a strategic role in preventing divorce and maintaining family unity and harmony. However, the effectiveness of mediation is influenced not only by legal and procedural factors but also by the psychological conditions and dynamics of the parties involved. This study examines the role of psychological aspects in determining the success of family dispute mediation in the Religious Courts of Indonesia. Using an empirical legal research design with a qualitative sociological approach, primary data were collected through in-depth interviews with judges, mediators, and disputing parties at the Religious Court of Purwakarta, supported by direct observation of mediation sessions. The findings reveal that mediators who understand the psychological dynamics of the parties are more capable of creating a conducive mediation environment, managing emotions effectively, and facilitating constructive communication. Psychological aspects significantly contribute to the achievement of amicable agreements and to the sustainability of post-mediation relationships. Accordingly, the integration of psychological approaches into the training and practice of family mediation in the Religious Courts should be strengthened to enhance the effectiveness of family dispute resolution in a peaceful, humane, and just manner. This study aligns with the principles of Islamic law, particularly the concepts of islah (reconciliation) and shulh (amicable settlement), as well as the objectives of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, especially hifz al-nasl (the protection of progeny and family integrity).