Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Kegagalan Felicity Conditions dan Pelanggaran Maksim Grice dalam Tuturan Fitnah Aparat: Studi Kasus Sudrajat Es Gabus Sabrina, Fadhilah; Alpris, Zai; Aprilia, Saibil; Sihite, Yusnika; Syarifah, Rini; Puspitarini, Herning; Gafari, M. Oky Fardian
Mesada: Journal of Innovative Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): January-June
Publisher : Yayasan Zia Salsabila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61253/wfpmgm34

Abstract

Dalam penelitian ini, kondisi felicity teori speech acts (Austin & Searle) dan maksim Grice digunakan untuk menganalisis kegagalan komunikatif yang melanggar prinsip pragmatik ketika aparat negara menuduh Sudrajat Es Gabus. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan pragmatik kualitatif, data primer dari transkrip tuturan fitnah aparat di media sosial dan konferensi pers diuji menggunakan checklist felicity conditions (sincerity, preparatory, propositional, essential) dan klasifikasi pelanggaran maksim (Quantity, Quality, Relation, Manner). Mengungkapkan kegagalan sincerity condition karena niat manipulatif dan pelanggaran kualitas karena informasi palsu dan pelanggaran hubungan yang menimbulkan implikasi fitnah.
Fenomena Tumbler Tuku Di Kai Dalam Perspektif Cyber Pragmatik Charolin, Mika; Valiza, Intan; Harahap, Mesya Fadila Sani; Afarrel, Muhammad Ridho; Manurung, Afriani Sasmita Br; Gafari, Oky Fardian; Puspitarini, Herning
Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): BASADYA - Januari
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/basadya.v2i1.1355

Abstract

The viral phenomenon of "tumbler tuku" at PT Kereta Api Indonesia (KAI) is one example of the dynamics of digital communication in the social media era. This case began with a passenger's complaint posted on social media and then escalated into a communication crisis involving multiple parties. The purpose of this research is to examine this phenomenon from a cyberpragmatic perspective, particularly regarding how context functions to understand the intent of utterances in the digital space. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach by examining utterances on social media, institutional responses, and media coverage. The results indicate that utterances on social media tend to be emotional and judgmental, which can lead to misunderstandings. The virtual context plays a crucial role in rectifying, affirming, clarifying, and underlying the intent of utterances from a cyberpragmatic perspective. Conflicts in the digital public space increase due to misinterpretation of context.
Analisis Tutur Dan Tindak Tutur Dalam Media Sosial: Studi Kasus Sea-Blings Vs Knetz Andini, Adinda; Lubis, Delfira Almuharomah; Nainggolan, Ledy Novwanty; Hutasoit, Shema Eklesiya; Pakpahan, Wijar; Puspitarini, Herning; Gafari, Oky Fardian
Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): BASADYA - Januari
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/basadya.v2i1.1357

Abstract

Social media has become a space for interaction that allows users to express themselves quickly and openly. This often gives rise to debate, especially when involving communities with different cultural backgrounds, such as the Sea-Blings and Knetz. This study aims to analyze the forms of speech and speech acts that emerge in interactions between these two groups on social media. This study uses a pragmatic approach with a focus on the study of speech and speech acts, along with descriptive quantitative methods. The research data consists of written utterances obtained from social media posts and comment columns. The data are then classified based on the type of speech act (locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary), and the type of illocutionary function (expressive, directive, assertive, and commissive). Furthermore, the data are analyzed quantitatively to determine the frequency and trends of each type of speech act. The results show that expressive and directive speech acts are the most dominant forms in interactions between the Sea-Blings and Knetz. These utterances are generally used to convey emotions, criticism, defense, and affirmation of group attitudes and identities. Differences in cultural background and perspective influence how speakers convey and interpret speech, potentially leading to misunderstandings and verbal conflict. This research is expected to provide insight into language usage patterns on social media and raise user awareness of the importance of using polite, wise, and contextually appropriate language in online communication.
Tindak Tutur Netizen Pada Kontroversi Kasus Bunuh Diri Anak Sd Di NTT Kusmariati, Kusmariati; Nababan, Melyanty; Sitanggang, Melinda Maria; Barus, Irfansyah; Tamba, Yuni; Puspitarini, Herning; Gafari, Oky Fardian
Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): BASADYA - Januari
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/basadya.v2i1.1370

Abstract

This article investigates linguistic phenomena in digital spaces arising as a response to a humanitarian tragedy intersecting with controversial public policy. The primary focus of this research is the analysis of netizen speech acts on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) following the suicide of a fourth-grade elementary student, YBS, in Ngada Regency, East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) in January 2026. This tragedy became a national discourse as it was triggered by the victim's inability to purchase stationery, amidst a heated debate regarding the allocation of the IDR 335 trillion Free Nutritious Meal (MBG) budget, which consumes a significant portion of education funds in the 2026 State Budget. Utilizing a critical pragmatic approach, this research aims to identify types of illocutionary acts, their pragmatic functions, and the politeness and impoliteness strategies employed as instruments of social criticism. The research method is qualitative descriptive, using the non-participatory observation technique (SBLC) on 47 netizen utterances. Findings indicate a dominance of expressive (38.3%) and directive (34.0%) speech acts, reflecting an escalation from collective emotion into structured political demands. This study confirms that social media has transformed into a digital arena where linguistic power is exercised to dismantle structural injustice and demand state accountability for fundamental educational rights.  
Analisis Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Dominan Dalam Komentar Masyarakat Terhadap Video Kekerasan Aparat Terhadap Pelajar Di Media Sosial Ameria, Cristin; Manullang, Delima Br; Vanesa, Lusia Gita; Rismauli Natalia; Yusuf, Syahiba Nadin; Gafari, Oky Fardian; Puspitarini, Herning
Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): BASADYA - Januari
Publisher : CV. SINAR HOWUHOWU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70134/basadya.v2i1.1372

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dominant types of illocutionary speech acts found in public comments on social media related to the video of violence by Brimob officers against students in Tual City. This issue is important because the use of excessive force, or police brutality, triggers strong emotional reactions on digital platforms like TikTok. Using a descriptive qualitative approach and Searle's pragmatic theory, this research examines netizen comments collected through documentation and note-taking. The results show that expressive and directive illocutionary speech acts dominate the conversation. Expressive acts serve as a means for shared anger and empathy, while directive acts manifest as public demands for a thorough investigation. These findings suggest that language on social media works not only as a communication tool but also as a method of social control and mass mobilization that pressures law enforcement to uphold accountability and professionalism.