Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Rekonstruksi Keadilan Dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama Ketika Istri Lebih Dominan Mencari Nafkah: Perspektif Maqasid Syariah Sugih Ayu Pratitis; Sukiati; Nurasiah; Mhd Yadi Harahap
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol. 6 No. 1: Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v6i1.9064

Abstract

Changes in gender roles and the increasing economic participation of women in Indonesia have given rise to a new family reality in which wives often become the more dominant income earners. This condition raises issues of justice in the distribution of marital property after divorce, which has traditionally adhered to an equal division as stipulated in Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). This study aims to analyze the problem of justice in the distribution of marital property when the wife contributes more significantly to the household economy and to formulate a reconstruction of justice based on maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. This research employs a normative legal method with a descriptive-analytical approach, utilizing statutory, conceptual, comparative, and sociological approaches as supporting perspectives, with maqāṣid al-sharīʿah serving as the primary analytical framework. The data were obtained through a systematic literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and were analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that an equal division of marital property does not always reflect substantive justice when the economic contributions of husband and wife are unequal. The maqāṣid al-sharīʿah approach particularly the principles of hifẓ al-māl (protection of property) and hifẓ al-nasl (protection of family) emphasizes that justice should be understood proportionally, in accordance with the actual contributions of each party. Therefore, this study recommends a progressive interpretation of Article 97 of the KHI so that the distribution of marital property is more oriented toward public interest (maṣlaḥah) and substantive justice within Islamic family law in Indonesia
Larangan Riba dan Gharar dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an dan Maqasid Al-Syariah Sugih Ayu Pratitis; Nawir Yuslem; Akhyar Zen
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 1 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i1.3910

Abstract

Islam sebagai agama yang komprehensif menetapkan prinsip-prinsip muamalah untuk mewujudkan keadilan, transparansi, dan perlindungan terhadap pihak yang rentan dalam aktivitas ekonomi, salah satunya melalui larangan riba dan gharar. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis konsep, dasar normatif, dan implikasi larangan riba dan gharar dalam perspektif Al-Qur'an dan Maqasid Al-Syariah serta relevansinya dalam praktik ekonomi modern. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kepustakaan, melalui penelaahan tafsir Al-Qur'an, hadis, kitab fikih muamalah, karya ulama klasik dan kontemporer, serta literatur ekonomi syariah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa riba diharamkan secara mutlak karena mengandung unsur eksploitasi, ketidakadilan, dan perolehan keuntungan tanpa risiko produktif, yang bertentangan dengan prinsip perlindungan harta (hifz al-mal) dan keadilan sosial. Gharar dilarang karena mengandung ketidakpastian dan spekulasi yang merugikan, meskipun gharar ringan (yasir) ditoleransi karena sulit dihindari dan tidak berdampak signifikan terhadap keadilan akad. Dalam konteks ekonomi modern, prinsip larangan riba dan gharar diimplementasikan melalui instrumen keuangan syariah berbasis bagi hasil, juaal beli, dan sewa, serta mitigasi risiko dalam transaksi digital. Dari perspektif maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah larangan riba dan gharar berfungsi menjaga harta, jiwa, akal, dan keadilan sosial, sehingga selaras dengan tujuan syariat dalam mewujudkan kemaslahatan umat secara menyeluruh.
Criminal Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of the Crime of Flying Hot Air Balloons (Study of Decision Number 114.Pid.B/2022/PN Mjy) Tarisa, Mona; Pratitis, Sugih Ayu
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1299

Abstract

Hot air balloon flights are considered as dangerous for aviation safety because they can interfere with air traffic and endangered aircraft, particularly when balloon materials risk being drawn into aircraft propellers. The Ministry of Transportation states that unauthorized hot air balloon flights may be subject to Article 411 of Law Number 1 of 2009 on Aviation, which provides for a maximum imprisonment of two years and a fine of up to IDR 500,000,000. This study examines the hot air balloon case decided in Decision Number 114/Pid.B/2022/PN Mjy, involving several defendants. The main legal issue concerns the judges' considerations in applying Article 411, given that the provision does not explicitly mention hot air balloons in its elements. Using normative juridical research based on secondary data and qualitative analysis, the study finds that the judges imposed criminal sanctions on the grounds that the defendants' actions violated Article 411 of the Aviation Law and Ministry of Transportation Regulation Number 40 of 2018. The defendants were sentenced to one month's imprisonment and a fine of IDR 1,000,000 each. However, ideally, criminal sanctions should not have been imposed due to the absence of explicit regulation of hot air balloons in Article 411
Criminal Law Enforcement for Children Who Perpetrated Hit-and-Run Accidents Resulting in Death in Traffic Accidents (Case Study Number 19/Pid.Sus-Anak/2024/PN.Mks) Ardiansyah, Nugra; Pratitis, Sugih Ayu
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1314

Abstract

A traffic accident is a sudden and unintentional incident on the road, involving a motorized vehicle and other road users, and causing human casualties and property damage. This study aims to analyze the enforcement of criminal law against children as perpetrators of hit-and-run accidents that result in death in traffic accidents. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with qualitative data analysis. The results show that the handling of children who commit hit-and-run crimes in Indonesia is regulated by Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, which emphasizes the principles of restorative justice, diversion, and the protection of children's rights. The role of parents, law enforcement officers, and the government is very important in prevention and response efforts. In practice, judges tend not to impose detention sentences to prevent children from being imprisoned.