Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : TEKNIK

METODE PENENTUAN VOLUME AGGREGAT PONDASI JALAN BERDASARKAN VARIASI DAN KESALAHAN: STUDI KASUS Simamora, Marsinta; Dwi Hatmoko, Jati Utomo
TEKNIK Volume 34, Nomor 1, Tahun 2013
Publisher : Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (468.361 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/teknik.v34i1.4817

Abstract

Variations between plans and reality can hardly be avoided in construction projects. These variations may beaccepted when they are still in the acceptance limits, or rejected when they are beyond the acceptance limits.The former is called variation in acceptance and the later is called error. Distinguishing these two in acompleted construction work is very important, as rejected variations (errors) may be considered as breaching acontract, thus may have legal implications. The research aims to evaluate the traditional calculation method(MeTrad) and to promote variation acceptance and error approach (MeVE) that is able to draw a clear linewhether a particular work to be accepted and rejected. The research was conducted by comparing the results ofcalculation of the aggregate volume between MeTrad and MeVE. The data was collected from Mauponggo-Puuwada road project in Nangakeo in 2010. The results show that there was no difference in the volumescalculated using both methods. The volume of Class B aggregate based on MeTrad calculation is 386.01m 3andthe volume based on MeVE is 386.01m3; where 16.67m3 of which (3.34% of the planned volume) is in the rangeof acceptance and 369.34m3 of which (73.94% of the planned volume)is the volume that is rejected (error). Theresults suggest that MeTrad cannot distinguish clearly whether the work is within the limits of acceptance orrejection, while on the other hand MeVE can describe in detail parts of the work to be accepted or rejected.Using this MeVE calculation, an assessment of a construction workis expected to be more objective anddetailed.
Implikasi Integrasi BIM dan ERP Terhadap Pengendalian Volume Pekerjaan Proyek: Studi Kasus Proyek Bendungan Wibowo, Muhammad Agung; Hatmoko, Jati Utomo Dwi; Satria, Gildam
TEKNIK Vol. 45, No. 1 (2024): May 2024
Publisher : Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/teknik.v45i1.60810

Abstract

Penggunaan informasi volume dari Building Information Modeling (BIM) pada proyek konstruksi di Indonesia belum efektif dalam meningkatkan kinerja pengendalian anggaran meskipun BIM telah menunjukkan dampaknya terhadap peningkatan kinerja proyek konstruksi bangunan. Salah satu upaya yang dilakukan untuk meningkatkan efektivitas penggunaan informasi BIM adalah dengan mengintegrasikan informasi BIM dengan Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) dimana ERP sangat membantu dalam pengambilan keputusan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi integrasi informasi BIM BIM dan ERP pada proyek konstruksi dengan studi kasus pada proyek bendungan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah observasi terkait penggunaan informasi volume dari BIM untuk pengendalian anggaran, wawancara mendalam dengan pihak-pihak terkait dalam proyek dan pada kantor pusat pada proyek bendungan dan mengukur informasi volume dari proses BIM dibandingkan dengan anggaran dan menilai seberapa akurat informasi volume tersebut sehingga dapat diandalkan untuk pengendalian volume pekerjaan. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi dalam penerapan BIM yang efektif untuk pengendalian anggaran melalui integrasi ERP pada proyek bendungan dan menjadi acuan bagi pengambil keputusan dalam upaya meningkatkan kinerja proyek konstruksi.
Mapping the Relationship Between Enterprise Risk and Project Risks at Construction Company Nurdiana, Asri; Wibowo, Mochammad Agung; Hatmoko, Jati Utomo Dwi
TEKNIK Vol 46, No 3 (2025): Juli 2025
Publisher : Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/teknik.v46i3.73603

Abstract

The construction industry is described as a project-based industry that inherently carries a wide range of risks. These risks are not only limited to projects but also extend to organizational or enterprise-level risks involving the company's directors, departments, and divisions. This study aims to examine the relationship between construction project risks and enterprise risks within construction companies. Specifically, it investigates how risks originating at the project level may influence or correlate with broader organizational risks, and vice versa. The research method involves analyzing secondary data, including project risk management reports and enterprise risk management documentation from construction firms. Through qualitative analysis, this study found a significant reciprocal relationship between project-level risks and company-level risks, which include the financial nature of the project risks, strategic risks, operational risks, and public & legal risks. These findings suggest that effective integration of project risk management (PRM) and enterprise risk management (ERM) is essential for enhancing overall risk resilience and organizational performance in the construction sector.
Co-Authors Adlina Kusumadewi Ahmad Hilmi Saifunuha Ainal Hamdah Aritonang Alif Fatoni Andreas Maruli Tua Nababan Antika Diah Cahyani Apsari Setiawati Ardhan Herdianto Ari Wibawa Budi Santosa Arif Hidayat Arif Hidayat ARIF HIDAYAT Arif Hidayat Arif Hidayat Asri Nurdiana, Asri Ayunda Dewi Ratih Tanjungsari Azalia, Nashwa Aziz Mudzakir Adiasa Bagus Hario Setiadji Beryl Adityanto Bima Iskandar dedy Ardiansyah Desi Marantika Dimas Kurniawan Prakoso Dony Yunianto Yunianto Evy Agustina Purba Ferry Hermawan Ferry Hermawan Firdaus, Naurah Raudhatul Fitrianto, Taufiq Frida Kistiani Frida Kistiani Frida Kristiani Geofanny Dominica Sihaloho Greecencia M. Limbong Hanintyo Hadiman Hasmi Nailul Hery Suliantoro Hizkia Kurniawan Tarigan Ilham Sahid Wismana Putra Indarto, Lukas Ris Islam Filardli, Abdullah Malik Islami, Rizky Citra Januadhistianto, Pradhito Jeni Pujiastuti Joko Yulianto Eko Warsito Khan, Naufal Sultan Azzam Khubab Basari Kristiani, Frida M. Agung Wibowo Marsinta Simamora Matias Roy Adi Wijaya, Matias Mayang Dhisyacitra Moammar Zachari Moch Bayu Erwinsyah Mochamad Agung Wibowo Mochamad Agung Wibowo Mochammad Agung Wibowo Moh Djaeni Monica Ade Kurnia B. Muhammad Agung Wibowo Muhammad Hanif Muhammad Yudha Albar Muhammad, Rizdian Arsyal Neno Ayu Luthfia Noviana Dwi Hastuti Praja, Wisnu Kurnia Prasetio, Riki Putri, Dita Mentari Raden Arya Pratistha Rakhma, Fajar Mega Rendra Yoga Pradipta Riqi Radian Khasani Riqi Radian Khasani Riqi Radian Khasani Riza Susanti Rizki Fatmawati Ronny Albar M Ruliana Febrianty S. Suripin Sarah Nur Eka Dini Satria Sentik Herman Merukh Satria, Gildam Setorini, Andhika Ajengtyas Sony Irawan Sri Sumarni Sriyana Sriyana Stefanus Catur Adi Prasetyo Stefanus Catur Adi Prasetyo Stefanus Catur Adi Prasetyo, Stefanus Catur Adi Supratomo, Ery Sutantiningrum, Kartika Hapsari Tanto Djoko Santoso Taqy, Muhammad Ravy Arkan Taufiq Lilo Adi Sucipto Titaley, Audysti Giacinta Uki Kusuma Herdiva Utama, Rahmana Pria Virginia Listiana Wahid, Sifa Nur Wibowo, Mochamad Agung Yoga A. Harsoyo Zein, Ahmad Rifqy