Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

Third-Party Litigation Funding: Legal Feasibility and Insights from Australia, the UK, and the US for Expanding Access to Justice in Indonesia Herliana, Herliana
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3444.pp173-193

Abstract

Access to justice is often hindered by financial constraints, preventing plaintiffs from pursuing legal claims. Third-Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) offers a potential solution by allowing external funders to finance litigation in exchange for a share of any awarded damages or settlement. By covering litigation costs, TPLF enables financially disadvantaged plaintiffs to seek legal redress, making it a crucial mechanism for expanding access to justice. However, unregulated TPLF poses risks, including the encouragement of frivolous claims, ethical concerns, and profit-driven motivations that may override legal merit. Indonesia currently lacks specific regulations governing TPLF, raising questions about its legal permissibility and practical implementation. This study examines TPLF frameworks in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to derive insights that may inform the development of TPLF practices in Indonesia. Utilizing a normative legal research methodology based on secondary data, the study explores the opportunities and challenges of introducing TPLF into the Indonesian legal system. The findings indicate that while TPLF can be legally accepted in Indonesia, its application should be restricted to cases with broad public interest, such as environmental and consumer litigation. Furthermore, Indonesia’s ongoing efforts to enhance access to justice and the absence of explicit legal prohibitions present opportunities for the regulated adoption of TPLF. This research contributes to the discourse on litigation funding by providing recommendations for policymakers, legal practitioners, and stakeholders in shaping a fair and regulated TPLF framework in Indonesia.
Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia’s Arbitration: Navigating Legal and Political Challenges Herliana, Herliana; Widowati, Dyah Ayu
Yuridika Vol. 40 No. 2 (2025): Volume 40 No 2 May 2025
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v40i2.62700

Abstract

As Indonesia explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into its arbitration processes, it faces a complex landscape of challenges and opportunities. This study investigates how AI can enhance efficiency, transparency, and decision-making in arbitration, while also addressing significant legal and political concerns. From a legal perspective, the use of AI in arbitration raises issues of compatibility with existing laws, the need for ethical guidelines, and the protection of data privacy. Politically, the adoption of AI is influenced by the potential for shifting power dynamics, regulatory concerns, and the broader implications for national sovereignty and international relations. Through a detailed analysis of these factors, the study aims to provide insights into how Indonesia can effectively navigate the integration of AI in arbitration, balancing technological advancements with legal and political considerations. By offering recommendations for addressing these challenges, the research seeks to contribute to the development of a robust framework for AI-driven arbitration in Indonesia. This research finds that the legal political landscape influences how AI is regulated, with potential resistance from established legal institutions or political entities concerned about losing control or influence. From a legal perspective, AI systems can minimize biases or inaccuracies and potentially improve the impartiality and fairness of arbitration decisions. Current regulations may not fully address the unique challenges posed by AI, necessitating updates or new legislation to govern AI use in arbitration. It is therefore important to engage with political and legal stakeholders to address concerns and build consensus on the adoption of AI in arbitration.
Ensuring Certainty through Legal Reasoning: What Can Indonesia Learn from the United Kingdom and the Unites States? Herliana, Herliana
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 13, No. 2, December 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v13i2.3057

Abstract

Purpose of the study : This study analyzes the principle and methodologies of legal reasoning by judges in the United Kingdom and the United States. Legal reasoning ensures legal certainty by promoting consistency, predictability, transparency, and adherence to legal principles and precedents. Legal reasoning provides a structured and principled approach to judicial decision making. The Indonesian legal system which predominantly follows a civil law tradition, stands to gain valuable insights from these common law models. Learning from common law models of legal reasoning can be used to overcome the existing problems with Indonesian judgment which considered to be lacking legal certainty. Methodology: This study is primarily normative legal research design to analyze and contrast legal reasoning practices in the United Kingdom and the United States. Results : This paper finds that elements of common law legal reasoning that can be implemented in Indonesia are the requirement for judge to provide ratio decidendi and obiter dicta in the court decision. The lesson Indonesia can learn from legal reasoning done by judges in the UK and the US are that Indonesian judges should not put the parties’ argument in their decision. Rather, the judges only need to focus on their own reason to be written in the judgment. In addition, Indonesian judges should not be too formalistic as this can result in a strict law enforcement without considering broader policy considerations or context. This paper posits that Indonesia's path to legal certainty lies in the consistency of legal reasoning in court judgment.  The experiences of the United Kingdom and the United States, when thoughtfully adapted, promise a brighter future for Indonesian judiciary in which legal certainty thrives and justice prevails. Applications of this study : This analysis can provide insight into how the UK and the US that follow a common law system approach, provide takeaways or lessons that Indonesia can apply in order to ensure the principle of legal uncertainty. Novelty/ Originality of this study: This research offers a novel point of view on how the problem of lack of legal certainty in Indonesian judiciary can be overcome by implementing elements in the common law system. The author did not find any studies which use the United Kingdom and the United States approaches to legal reasoning as case studies to be learned from when Indonesia is about to ensure legal certainty. Therefore, this research provide a novelty in the field of Jurisprudence. ABSTRAK Tujuan: Tujuan penlitian ini adalah menganalisis asas dan metodologi penalaran hukum yang dilakukan oleh hakim di Inggris dan Amerika Serikat. Penalaran hukum merupakan unsur yang penting dalam  kepastian hukum karena dengan penalaran putusan hakim dapat memberikan konsistensi dan prediktabilitas, transparansi dan kepatuhan terhadap asas hukum dan yurisprudensi. Penalaran hukum memberikan panduan structural dalam putusan hakim. Sistem hukum Indonesia yang mengikuti civil law system dapat mengambil manfaat dari common law system yang berlau di Inggris dan Amerika Serikat. Dengan mempelajari system di dua negara tersebut, penalaran hukum dapat digunakan untuk mengatasi masalah kurnagnya kepastian hukum di Indonesia.     Metodologi: Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normative yang didesain untuk menganalisis dan membandingkan praktek penalaran hukum di Inggris dan Amerika Serikat. Temuan:   Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa elemen dari penalaran hukum di system common law yang dapat diterapkan di Indonesia adalah keharusan bagi hakim untuk mencantumkan ratio decidendi dan obitur dicta. Pelajaran yang dapat diambil oleh Indonesia dari penalaran hukum di Inggris dan Amerika Serikat adalah bahwa putusan hakim tidak perlu memuat argumen para pihak secara keseluruhan karena hakim seharusnya fokus pada penalaran hukum, memberikan argumentasinya sendiri. Selain itu, dalam memutus perkara, hakim tidak bersikap terlalu formalistik karena hal itu akan mengesampingkan konteks perkara dan pertimbangan lain. Hal ini akan memberikan kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa apabila Indonesia ingin mewujudkan kepastian hukum salah satunya dapat dicapai melalui penalaran hukum. Pengalama Inggris dan Amerika Serikat bila diterapkan dapat memberikan masa depan yang lebih baik bagi penegakan hukum di Indonesia dimana kepastian dan keadilan hukum dijunjung tinggi. Kata kunci: Kepastian hukum, Penalaran hukum, system common law, system civil law
Reconstruction of Arbitration Agreement Arrangements to Prevent Pathological Arbitration Clauses in Indonesia Nugrahenti, Meydora Cahya; Herliana, Herliana; Sugiharti, Rr. Retno
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Vol 7, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v7i3.405-427

Abstract

Pathological arbitration clauses can hinder the arbitration process and open up opportunities for the parties to avoid arbitration or challenge its decision. These clauses may arise due to deliberate intent or a lack of understanding on the part of the parties. Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (AAPS Law) does regulate arbitration agreements, but it is not comprehensive in preventing the emergence of pathological clauses. This study aims to identify forms of pathological arbitration clauses that hinder the effectiveness of arbitration and to formulate a reconstruction of arbitration agreement regulations to prevent them in Indonesia. The research method used is juridical-normative with an emphasis on legal norms as the main object. The data used consists of primary and secondary legal materials through legislative, analytical, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The results of the study show that pathological arbitration clauses hinder arbitration because they contain ambiguities, such as unclear arbitration authority to resolve disputes, the existence of options for the parties to choose a court, and the appointment of unavailable arbitrators. To prevent pathological arbitration clauses, Article 9 of the AAPS Law needs to be reconstructed by including arbitration clause regulations that explicitly state the authority of arbitration without exception. The conclusion of this study is that there are pathological clauses in the agreement and therefore the reconstruction of Article 9 of the AAPS Law is carried out by providing legal certainty on the pactum de compromittendo in the arbitration agreement.
Enhancing ADR through Collaborative Clinical Legal Education: Law Schools and BANI's Optimized Partnership in Indonesia Herliana Herliana; Umar Mubdi; Arief Sempurno; Erma Nuzulia Syifa
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Legal Education in Current Development: Problems and Challenges
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/iccle.v5i2.36608

Abstract

This article endeavors to seamlessly incorporate the teaching of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) directly into the framework of Clinical Legal Education (CLE), utilizing collaboration with esteemed dispute settlement institutions, notably the Indonesian Arbitration Center (BANI) and the Indonesian National Mediation Center (PMN). The imperative for such integration is underscored by the heightened demand for skilled arbitrators and mediators, given the ubiquitous inclusion of ADR clauses in nearly every contractual arrangement. In the contemporary legal landscape where ADR clauses have become standard practice for resolving disputes arising from contractual relationships, the professional roles of arbitrators and mediators are indispensable. The significance of this initiative lies in recognizing that the success of CLE in ADR in Indonesia necessitates a fundamental shift in the mindset of the legal community. It is asserted that the conventional teaching methods, traditionally confined to the classroom, are insufficient for the cultivation of skills pertinent to amicable dispute resolution. Thus, the article advocates for the active involvement of professional arbitrators and mediators, calling for their comprehensive integration and support not only within law school curricula but also in the broader community. This transformative approach aims to bridge the practical gap between theoretical instruction and real-world application, envisioning a legal education system that produces professionals adept at ethical and effective dispute resolution in Indonesia.
ANALISIS KECACATAN BAHAN BAKU IKAN TUNA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIX- SIGMA PADA PT WAHYU PRADANA MULIA Rahymi, Alfiyani; Herliana, Herliana; Syarifuddin, Rizal; Andrie, Andrie
Journal Industrial Engineering and Management (JUST-ME) Vol. 6 No. 02 (2025): Journal Industrial Engineering and Management (JUST-ME)
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Industri Fakultas Teknik Universitas Islam Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47398/just-me.v6i02.193

Abstract

Persaingan industri yang semakin ketat menuntut perusahaan untuk menghasilkan produk berkualitas tinggi guna memenuhi kebutuhan konsumen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor penyebab kecacatan bahan baku ikan tuna dan memberikan rekomendasi perbaikan untuk meningkatkan kualitas produk di PT. Wahyu Pradana Binamulia. Metode yang digunakan adalah Six Sigma dengan pendekatan DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control). Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, serta analisis data produksi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kecacatan bahan baku ikan tuna disebabkan oleh empat faktor utama: manusia, material, metode, dan mesin. Jenis kecacatan dominan meliputi ikan terkena bakteri (34,94%), berlendir (30,49%), dan berjamur (34,56%). Nilai rata-rata DPMO sebesar 24.004 dengan nilai sigma 3,47, yang masih berada pada rata-rata industri di Indonesia. Untuk mengatasi kecacatan, disarankan pengawasan ketat terhadap pekerja, perbaikan SOP, pemeliharaan mesin, pengontrolan suhu ruangan secara rutin, serta evaluasi pemasok bahan baku. Kesimpulannya, penerapan metode Six Sigma terbukti efektif dalam mengidentifikasi dan meminimalkan kecacatan bahan baku. Perusahaan direkomendasikan untuk mengimplementasikan usulan perbaikan yang diberikan guna meningkatkan kualitas produk dan mengurangi kerugian akibat produk cacat.
PENGEMBANGAN EKONOMI KREATIF KWT SEJAHTERA KECAMATAN KAWAY XVI MELALUI PENERAPAN ECO-MARKET ‘GERAISTOK’ DAN STRATEGI MARKETING MIX Fuqara, Fantashir Awwal; Lisa, Oviana; Mulyana, Agusriati; Tanjung, Yulia Windi; Aminah, Siti; Hasibuan, Rony Rahmat Hidayat; Herliana, Herliana; Firwanda, Muhammad Rizki
Jurnal Abdi Insani Vol 12 No 11 (2025): Jurnal Abdi Insani
Publisher : Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/abdiinsani.v12i11.2919

Abstract

This community service program aims to enhance the capacity of the Kelompok Wanita Tani (KWT) Sejahtera in Kaway XIV Subdistrict, West Aceh Regency, to manage agricultural-based enterprises through the adoption of the Geraistok eco-market technology integrated with a marketing mix strategy. The program was initiated in response to the group’s limited market access, lack of modern technology adoption, and insufficient marketing strategies, which have hindered the optimal development of its creative economy potential. The activities were conducted from August to September, targeting 15 active members of KWT Sejahtera engaged in the production and marketing of agricultural products, particularly minaponic-based horticulture. The implementation method included participatory planning, preparation of sustainable materials and tools, construction of an eco-market stock outlet, training on business management, packaging innovation, flexible pricing strategies, distribution planning, and integrated online and offline promotion. The results indicated significant improvements in marketing infrastructure through a strategically located physical outlet and a digital platform that expanded market reach beyond the local area. Environmentally friendly packaging innovations and product identity labeling strengthened brand image and increased consumer appeal, particularly among the middle to upper market segments. The application of the marketing mix proved effective in boosting sales, enhancing members’ competencies, and expanding business partnerships. In the long term, this program establishes a replicable model for rural women’s empowerment that is adaptive, competitive, and sustainable. By integrating eco-market technology with modern marketing strategies, KWT Sejahtera has the potential to become a pioneer in developing an inclusive, competitive, and environmentally friendly agricultural creative economy ecosystem.
Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution in Medical Disputes Within Sharia-Compliant Hospitals: The Role of Good Faith in Balancing Patient Justice and Professional Protection Herliana, Herliana; Nugrahenti, Meydora Cahya
Mazahib Vol 24 No 2 (2025): VOLUME 24, ISSUE 2, 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UINSI Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/mj.v24i2.10308

Abstract

The expansion of Sharia-compliant hospitals in Indonesia requires a context-specific mechanism for resolving medical disputes. Law No. 17 of 2023 mandates Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), including arbitration, that aligns with Islamic legal principles—particularly good faith. This principle, rooted in sincerity, fairness, and respect, underpins Islamic jurisprudence and ensures ethical dispute resolution. This study proposes an ADR framework, specifically arbitration, for Sharia-compliant hospitals grounded in good-faith principles that safeguard patients’ rights while protecting healthcare professionals from unjust claims. Integrating values such as niyyah (sincere intent), ṣidq (honesty), adl (justice), huqūq (respect for rights), amānah (responsibility), and avoidance of ḍarar (harm) fosters trust, fairness, and accountability, thereby sustaining an ethical healthcare environment responsive to both patient welfare and practitioner integrity.
Evaluasi Efektivitas Program Pengkayaan Terstruktur terhadap Kompetensi Mahasiswa Kebidanan dalam Uji Kompetensi Nasional Fitria, Rahmah; Herliana, Herliana; Jasa, Novi Eniastina
Jurnal Kesehatan Panca Bhakti Lampung Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): JKPBL Vol 13 No 2 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Panca Bhakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47218/jkpbl.v13i2.433

Abstract

Uji Kompetensi (UKOM) Nasional merupakan syarat utama lulusan vokasi (D3) Kebidanan untuk mendapatkan sertifikat kompetensi dan juga sebagai cara menjaga standard kualitas lulusan. Hasil try out internal yang diadakan institusi menunjukkan 52,6% mahasiswa berada di bawah rerata, sehingga diperlukan intervensi berupa program pengkayaan terstruktur. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi efektivitas Program Pengkayaan Terstruktur terhadap Kompetensi Mahasiswa Kebidanan dalam UKOM Nasional. Desain penelitian menggunakan pre-eksperimental dengan rancangan one group pretest–posttest pada 29 mahasiswa (27 first-taker, 2 re-taker). Intervensi dilakukan selama 2 minggu dengan latihan soal, pembahasan interaktif, dan kisi-kisi berbasis blueprint. Hasil menunjukkan rerata skor meningkat dari 55,57 menjadi 76,32 (p=0,000). Proporsi kelulusan meningkat dari 51,7% saat pretest menjadi 79,3% pada posttest, dan 86,2% pada UKOM Nasional. Analisis Chi-square menunjukkan adanya hubungan signifikan antara hasil posttest dengan UKOM (p=0,001). Kesimpulannya, program pengkayaan terstruktur efektif meningkatkan kompetensi mahasiswa kebidanan menghadapi UKOM Nasional.
Optimalisasi Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia 4-6 Tahun melalui Edukasi Interaktif Penyuluhan dan Skrining Fitria, Rahmah; Mundari, Risa; Adriati, Febri; Herliana, Herliana
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jajama (JPMJ) Vol 4 No 2 (2025): JPMJ Vol 4 No 2 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Panca Bhakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47218/jpmj.v4i2.445

Abstract

Periode prasekolah merupakan masa kritis yang menentukan kualitas tumbuh kembang anak di masa depan. Upaya stimulasi dan deteksi dini sangat penting dilakukan untuk mencegah keterlambatan maupun gangguan perkembangan. Kegiatan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (PKM) ini dilaksanakan di TK Al-Fatih Bandar Lampung dengan tujuan meningkatkan pengetahuan orang tua serta guru, sekaligus melakukan skrining pertumbuhan dan perkembangan anak usia 4-6 tahun. Metode kegiatan mencakup penyuluhan interaktif menggunakan media audiovisual, leaflet, dan diskusi, dilanjutkan dengan pemeriksaan antropometri serta Kuesioner Pra Skrining Perkembangan (KPSP). Peserta terdiri dari 28 anak, 24 orang tua, dan 4 guru. Hasil menunjukkan sebagian besar anak memiliki status gizi baik (96,4%) dan perkembangan normal (89%), meskipun terdapat 1 anak dengan penyimpangan dan 2 anak kategori meragukan. Pengetahuan orang tua/guru meningkat dari skor pretest 50% menjadi 75% pada posttest. Kegiatan ini terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan kesadaran serta memungkinkan deteksi dini permasalahan tumbuh kembang. Disarankan kegiatan serupa diintegrasikan secara rutin dengan Posyandu maupun program SDIDTK di sekolah lain, khususnya di Provinsi Lampung.