Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

Comparing Probing-Prompting and Problem-Based Learning to Improve Mathematical Reasoning, Self-Efficacy, and Adversity Quotient in Junior High Students Sophia Elma; Elly Arliani
AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol 17, No 4 (2025): DECEMBER 2025
Publisher : STAI Hubbulwathan Duri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35445/alishlah.v17i4.7934

Abstract

Developing students’ mathematical reasoning, self-efficacy, and adversity quotient is essential in supporting their academic resilience and problem-solving skills. This study compares the effectiveness of Probing-Prompting (PP) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) models in enhancing these three domains among junior high school students. A quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent (pretest-posttest) control-group approach was used. The study involved 56 seventh-grade students from a public junior high school in Yogyakarta, divided into two classes: an experimental group using PP and a control group using PBL. Data were collected using validated and reliable instruments, including mathematical reasoning tests and self-report questionnaires on self-efficacy and adversity quotient. Data analysis employed paired t-tests, independent t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and Hotelling's T² with a significance level of 0.05. Both PP and PBL significantly improved students' mathematical reasoning, self-efficacy, and adversity quotient. However, comparative analyses showed no statistically significant differences in the mean gain scores between the two groups for all three variables: mathematical reasoning (t = 0.829, p = 0.206), self-efficacy (U = 351.50, p = 0.256), and adversity quotient (U = 334.00, p = 0.173). While PP and PBL are both effective, neither demonstrated clear superiority in improving the targeted skills. The short intervention period may have limited the full impact of the PP model. Nonetheless, the findings suggest both models offer valuable strategies for supporting students’ cognitive and non-cognitive development.
The Effectiveness of Website-Assisted Ethnomathematics-Based RME on Junior High School Students’ Understanding of Mathematics Fikri, Darojatun; Hartono, Hartono; Arliani, Elly
Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 15 No 3 (2025): Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan matematika (Desember 2025)
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/edumatica.v15i3.47672

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education, also supported by a website based on ethnomathematics, on the understanding of math concepts among junior high school students. The research method used in this study is quantitative research with a pre-experimental design, one-group pretest-posttest. The sample in the study was 29 students, which was taken from the 8th-grade students of a junior high school in Yogyakarta, picked through cluster random sampling. This study’s instruments were essay tests, which had been validated and proven reliable. The data from the research were analysed by descriptive and inferential statistics, where the inferential statistics included the Normality Shapiro-Wilk test and the One-Sample T-Test. The results indicated a significant improvement in students' understanding of math concepts after using RME through ethnomathematics-based website reach a significant change. This is evidenced by the posttest average value of 82.228, which is far more significant than the Minimum Mastery Criteria value of 75, and 79.31% of the students achieved and exceeded it. These results suggest that including local cultural contexts, batik motifs, and the Borobudur Temple structures in students’ learning process can enhance the students’ conceptual achievement level by strengthening the relationship with the learning process in their daily lives.
ANALISIS INSTRUMEN TES KEMAMPUAN NUMERASI DAN ANGKET SELF-EFFICACY SISWA SMP PADA MATERI RASIO Fauziyyah Fauziyyah; Elly Arliani; Eminugroho Ratna Sari
EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 13, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/edumat.v13i2.23006

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kualitas butir tes kemampuan numerasi dan angket self-efficacy siswa SMP pada materi rasio. Instrumen yang digunakan difokuskan pada materi rasio pada 32 siswa kelas VII di salah satu sekolah menengah pertama di Yogyakarta. Instrumen terdiri atas soal pilihan ganda, esai, dan angket, yang telah divalidasi oleh ahli. Data dianalisis untuk mengevaluasi daya pembeda, tingkat kesukaran, dan reliabilitas setiap soal. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa butir soal tes kemampuan numerasi memiliki reliabilitas tinggi (r-11=0,834) pada soal pilihan ganda dan (r-11=0,886)  pada soal esai, sedangkan angket self-efficacymenunjukkan relianilitas sangat tinggi (r-11=0,915). Selain itu, daya pembeda dan tingkat kesukaran berada pada kategori cukup baik hingga baik. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa instrumen yang dikembangkan layak digunakan dalam evaluasi pembelajaran matematika, khususnya pada materi rasio. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi dalam pengembangan instrumen evaluasi yang valid dan reliabel, serta memperkuat pentingnya analisis butir sebagai langkah kritis dalam menjaga mutu asesmen pendidikan. Kata kunci: Analisis Butir, Numerasi, Self-Efficacy, Rasio Abstract: This study aims to analyse the quality of numeracy test items and student self-efficacy questionnaires on ratio material. The instruments used focused on ratio material for 32 seventh-grade students at a junior high school in Yogyakarta. The instruments consisted of multiple-choice questions, essays, and questionnaires, which had been validated by experts. The data was analysed to evaluate the discriminating power, difficulty level, and reliability of each question. The results indicated that the numeracy test items had high reliability (r-11=0,834) for multiple-choice questions and (r-11=0,886) for essay questions, while the self-efficacy questionnaire showed very high reliability (r-11=0,915). In addition, the discrimination power and difficulty level were in the fair to satisfactory category. These findings indicate that the developed instruments are suitable for use in mathematics learning evaluation, especially in ratio material. This study contributes to the development of valid and reliable evaluation instruments and reinforces the importance of item analysis as a critical step in maintaining the quality of educational assessment. Keywords: Item Analysis, Numeracy, Self-Efficacy, Ratio