Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PERLINDUNGAN PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS APABILA TIDAK DIIKUTSERTAKAN DIREKSI PADA PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN SIRKULER Ratna Emilia; Putu Devi Yustisia Utami
Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Vol. 3 No. 9 (2025): JURNAL MEDIA AKADEMIK Edisi September
Publisher : PT. Media Akademik Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62281/8aycbd02

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh pemahaman secara komprehensif mengenai perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas yang tidak diikutsertakan direksi pada pengambilan keputusan sirkuler, yang juga membahas mengenai syarat sah keputusan sirkuler, bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas, serta upaya hukum yang dapat diambil pemegang saham minoritas. Dengan menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, kajian ini menganalisis berbagai aspek hukum yang relevan terkait hak pemegang saham minoritas pada pengambilan keputusan sirkuler. Hasil dari penelitian ini menemukan bahwa untuk dianggap sah, sebuah keputusan sirkuler harus disetujui oleh seluruh pemegang saham. Perbuatan direksi yang tidak mengikutsertakan pemegang saham minoritas dalam keputusan sirkuler merupakan sebuah bentuk penyalahgunaan wewenang. Pemegang saham minoritas dilindungi melalui berbagai regulasi dan dapat mengajukan gugatan hukum atas pelanggaran tersebut. Adapun upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh oleh pemegang saham minoritas antara lain mengajukan gugatan langsung atau derivatif, audit dokumen perusahaan, RUPS, pembubaran perusahaan, menuntut keterbukaan informasi, hingga pelaporan dan gugatan ke OJK dan pengadilan.
Execution of Mortgage Rights: Creditor’s Legal Remedies for Third Party Claims Against Auctioned Collateral Utami, Putu Devi Yustisia; Purwanti, Ni Putu; Yusnia, Gusti Ayu Era; Paramitha, Sally; Palguna, Made Gde Surya Dharma
Journal Equity of Law and Governance 151-159
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/elg.7.2.2025.151-159

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications of lawsuits filed against collateral objects on the implementation of mortgage right execution under Indonesia Mortgage Law. Normatively, Article 6 of the Mortgage Law stipulates that upon the debtor’s default, the first-ranking mortgage holder has the right to independently sell the mortgaged object through a publich auction (parate execution). However, in practice, such executions are frequently obstructed by pre-auction lawsuits concerning the collateral, thus impeding enforcement. Using an empirical juridical method, this research analyzes the legal consequences of lawsuits on the execution of mortgage rights and the creditor’s legal remedies upon a lawsuit filed against the object of the mortgage right. The result of this study indicate that a lawsuit concerning the collateral object for auction legally prevents the execution of mortgage rights through parate execution, and the legal remedy available to banks as a creditor is to pursue execution through an executorial title in District Court. This process requires a fiat executions issued by the Chief Judge of the District Court, in accordance with Article 34 paragraph (3) of the Minister of Finance Regulation concerning Auction Guidelines 2023. This study recommend that the government should enact a specific regulation governing the procedures for executing mortgage rights via District Courts as mandated by article 26 of Mortgage Rights. Furthermore, the judiciary is encouraged to establish dedicated units within District Courts specifically tasked with handling collateral executions, to develop and implement of nationwide online filling system for execution applications.
Co-Authors Agita Justisia Br. Tarigan Alia Yofira Karunian Anak Agung Ayu Gangga Muni Anak Agung Gde Ramanda Bradjawangsa Djelantik Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu Dewi Angelin Rachelia Aryawan, I Komang Budi Mas Bambang Admadi Harsojuwono Budi Mas Aryawan, I Komang Christin Atika Cresta Violy Veronika Dandy Widhianto Putra Denise, Denise Desak Putu Nugraheni DEWI, NI MADE LIANA Dinda Rana Ningtyas Divayani, Ni Putu Ardelia Dwitayani, Ni Made Ayu Rusmega Febripuspa Surya Candra Gede Agus Angga Saputra Gusti Ayu Mirah Febriary Adhyaksa I Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan I Gusti Ayu Vhira Indra Sasmita I Gusti Putu Ardya Maharani I Komang Budi Mas Aryawan I Made Pasek Diantha I Made Sarjana I Made Wahyu Chandra Satriana I Putu Destra Markandeya I Putu Putra Widiarista Ida Ayu Dyah Sukmaningrum Widnyana Ida Ayu Ketut Diah Mahadewi Kadek Agus Sudiarawan Kadek Anggarita Patni Sekarini Kadek Puri Gita Pertiwi Kinanti Balqis Kurnia Dewi, Lusiana luh sarini Mandasari, Putu Dita Rahayu Mira Widiantary Ni Kadek Ari Sukma Wedayanti Ni Luh Putu Yoni Priyacitta Ni Made Cahyani Indiraswari Ni Putu Arista Ratna Dewi Ni Putu Purwanti Ni Wayan Karina Ni Wayan Nitya Varshini Sahare Palguna, Made Gde Surya Dharma Paramitha, Sally Pradnyandewi, Anak Agung Ketut Asti Pramana, Made Winata Pratama, Alvyn Chaisar Perwira Nanggala Putu Anggina Agistya Budiardianti Putu Shinta Dewi Pramayanti Ratna Emilia Ratu, Ida ayu Mas Sayi Hatiningsih Sayi Hatiningsih Sopiani, Ni Luh Ayu Trisna Yunita, Komang Anggie Warsiani, Ni Ketut Yuliawati, Ni Kadek Gita Yusnia, Gusti Ayu Era