Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pijar MIPA

Identification of Student Misconceptions on Dynamic Fluid Material using a Five-tier Diagnostic Test Hazmi, Hanifah Rahmania; Jauhariyah, Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul
Jurnal Pijar Mipa Vol. 20 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram. Jurnal Pijar MIPA colaborates with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v20i6.9717

Abstract

Misconception is one of the problems that often occurs in physics learning, especially in dynamic fluid materials. Misconceptions can affect physics learning outcomes if allowed to occur continuously. This study aims to identify students' misconceptions about dynamic fluid material using a five-tier diagnostic test. Five-tier diagnostic test is the newest form of diagnostic test that is able to detect deeper misconceptions experienced by students. By using the five-level diagnostic test, you will be able to see dynamic fluid material that still has misconceptions and requires more emphasis. Apart from that, teachers can design remediation learning better. This study employed a one-shot research method with a sample of 68 students from class XI of a high school who had received dynamic fluid material. The result of this study is that students experience misconceptions on dynamic fluid material, with an average percentage of 40.7% in the moderate category. Students' misconceptions on dynamic fluid material occur in the sub-matter of the principle of continuity and Bernoulli's Law. The misconceptions experienced by students in the continuity principle sub-matter regarding the relationship between cross-sectional area (A) and fluid velocity (v) by 37,5%, the relationship between cross-sectional area (A) and fluid debit (Q) by 46,9%, and the relationship between cross-sectional area (A) and volume (V) by 50%, with a moderate category. Meanwhile, in the Bernoulli's Law sub-matter, students experienced misconceptions regarding the relationship between the depth of the leak hole (h) and the distance of the fluid jet (x) by 40,6%, and the relationship between velocity (v) and fluid pressure (P) by 43,8% with moderate categories. Given the misconceptions students still experience with dynamic fluid materials, it is necessary to implement remediation strategies, such as tests, special learning methods, or assignments.
Development of Science Literacy Test Instruments on Temperature and Heat Materials by Integrating Local Wisdom in the Production of Karang Batik, a Speciality of Tuban Regency Muizzah, Novy Ainul; Jauhariyah, Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul
Jurnal Pijar Mipa Vol. 20 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram. Jurnal Pijar MIPA colaborates with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v20i6.9817

Abstract

The local wisdom of Karang Batik from Tuban can provide a contextual basis for developing scientific literacy test instruments that are more meaningful. This study aims to develop a science literacy test instrument integrated with the local wisdom of Karang Batik making, which is unique to Tuban, and to identify students' science literacy profiles on the subject of temperature and heat. The development was carried out using the ADDIE model with data collection through interviews, validation questionnaires, and tests. Data analysis included content validity (Aiken's V and Percentage of Agreement), empirical validity (item–total correlation), reliability (Cronbach's Alpha), difficulty level, and discriminating power. The instrument was tested on 30 university students and implemented for 70 students at Tuban 1 State Senior High School. The results showed that content validity was in the very good category (PoA ≥ 97%), 67% of the items were empirically valid, and reliability was 0.690, which is classified as high. The level of difficulty ranged from easy to moderate, with sufficient discrimination. Students' science literacy profiles varied from very low to very high, with the majority of students in the high category. These findings indicate that the developed instrument is suitable for measuring science literacy and contributes to contextual learning efforts based on local wisdom.
Identifying Student Misconceptions on Momentum and Impulse Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument with CRI Paramita, Uci Vebia; Jauhariyah, Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul
Jurnal Pijar Mipa Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram. Jurnal Pijar MIPA colaborates with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6086

Abstract

Identification of students' misconceptions is crucial in Physics learning as an evaluation tool to address and reduce these misconceptions. This study aims to assess the quality of a four-tier diagnostic test using the CRI instrument, assisted by JotForm, and describe the profile of students' misconceptions related to momentum and impulse. The quality of the instrument is evaluated based with validity and reliability. The research follows the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) method. The instrument is developed during the analysis, design, and development stages. The implementation and evaluation stages involve capturing the profile and causes of students' misconceptions. The instrument's quality is assessed based on theoretical validity, which reached 89.29%. Empirical content validity haved percentages of false positives 6.93%and false negatives 6.53%. The empirical validity of the construct, with a significance level of 0.05, resulted in an rtableof 0.273. From the 15 questions tested, 12 questions were found to have empirical validity, and a reliability score of 0.475 was obtained. The study revealed that 3 students had low misconceptions, 14 students had medium misconceptions, and 6 students had high misconceptions. The causes of students' misconceptions were primarily false positives and humanistic thinking, accounting for 28.56%. In conclusion, the instrument developed in this study is valid and reliable, and it effectively identifies the profile and causes of students' misconceptions.