Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.99
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Wicara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Semaya Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Patrika JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Acta Comitas Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Constitutional Review Udayana Journal of Law and Culture Journal Equity of Law and Governance Jurnal Konstitusi Journal of Social Research East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV)
I Dewa Gede Palguna
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 29 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 29 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The Power of Constitutional Court to Settle Disputes on Local Election Results : Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Memutus Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Bisariyadi Bisariyadi; I Dewa Gede Palguna
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2011

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision No. 85/PUU-XX/2022 abolished the proposal to establish a special court that have the power to resolve disputes on local election. As a result, that power shifted to Constitutional Court. This, de facto, is not the power designed to be exercised by the Court. Back tracked on historical trajectory of holding direct local elections, there has been a tug-of-war between judicial bodies on who have the legitimate power to settle the disputes on local elections results. This study aims to examine the power of Constitutional Court to adjudicate disputes on local election results. To achieve the research objective, this research framework will look at the historical context to have an overview of the dynamics of transposition of judicial bodies to settle the disputes. In addition, this also assess Constitutional Court decisions which provide interpretations as the basis for the legitimacy of the Court's power to adjudicate local election disputes.
PENAFSIRAN ORIGINAL INTENT DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 14/PUU-XI/2013 TENTANG RENCANA PENYELENGGARAAN PEMILU DAN PILKADA SECARA SERENTAK Claudia Samantha Rico; I Dewa Gede Palguna
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 7 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i07.p11

Abstract

Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui serta menganalisis terkait metode original intent dalam pengujian undang-undang terhadap konstitusi serta penerapan original intent dengan penafsiran Pasal 18 dan Pasal 22E UUD NRI 1945 dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 tentang Rencana Penyelenggaraan Pemilu dan Pilkada secara Serentak. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil studi ini menjelaskan bahwa dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 tentang Rencana Penyelenggaraan Pemilu dan Pilkada secara Serentak metode penafsiran original intent kurang tepat digunakan mengingat , namun jika putusan terkait dengan masalah kedaulatan atau dalam konteks negara kesatuan maka metode penafsiran original intent memang tepat digunakan. Hal ini karena secara hukum memang pelaksanaan Pemilu dan Pilkada serentak tidak dilarang, namun pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-Xi/2013 menjadi kabur, bahwa memang harus dilaksanakan secara serentak. Namun yang paling penting adalah melihat secara empiris mengenai keuntungan dan kerugian apabila Pemilu dan Pilkada dilakukan secara serentak dan tidak serentak. Jika melihat bahwa adanya fakta mengenai banyaknya Kepala Daerah yang selesai masa jabatan pada tahun 2022 dan 2023, sehingga Pilkada tetap dilaksanakan pada 2024 maka disini hakim mengabaikan konsekuensi politik terhadap putusan. ABSTRACT This study aims to find out and analyze the original intent method in reviewing laws against the constitution and the application of the original intent with the interpretation of Article 18 and Article 22E of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 concerning Plans for Elections and Pilkada simultaneously. This study uses normative legal research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this study explain that in the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 concerning Plans to Hold Simultaneous Elections and Pilkada, the method of interpreting the original intent is not appropriate considering that, however, if the decision is related to issues of sovereignty or in the context of a unitary state, the method interpretation of the original intent is appropriate to use. This is because legally it is true that simultaneous elections and local elections are not prohibited, but after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-Xi/2013 it became unclear, that indeed they must be carried out simultaneously. However, the most important thing is to look empirically at the advantages and disadvantages if the General Election and Pilkada are held simultaneously and not simultaneously. If you see that there are facts regarding the number of Regional Heads who have finished their terms of office in 2022 and 2023, so that the Pilkada will still be held in 2024, then here the judge ignores the political consequences of the decision.
Agrarian Reform Responding to the Challenges of the Times Dharsana, I Made Pria; I Dewa Gede Palguna; Indrasari Kresnadjaja
Journal Equity of Law and Governance Vol. 2 No. 2
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55637/elg.2.2.5879.86-93

Abstract

Indonesia has entered the age of 77 years. In a long period of time, it seems we should be concerned that the implementation of Agrarian Reform as an effort to reorganize the ownership, control, use, and utilization of land for justice, prosperity, and people's welfare which is a national priority has not been fully successful. The Agrarian Reform Movement must be admitted that it is not a solution to the existing conflict. However, the aim of the agrarian reform is expected to be a systematic effort that is more preventive in nature to avoid the occurrence of agrarian inequality and conflict in the country in the future. So the author concludes that the main goal of “Agrarian Reform Responding to the Challenges of the Times is the creation of social justice which is marked by the existence of agrarian justice, increased productivity, and increased people's welfare.
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Decisions on Outsourcing Scheme: Balancing Protection and Efficiency? Palguna, I Dewa Gede; Nurjanah, Ita; Padmawati, Ni Komang Tari; Dananjaya, I Komang; Halmadiningrat, I Made
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Contemporary Issues on Law, Development, and Justice: Indonesian Context and Beyo
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v8i2.66507

Abstract

This article explores the Indonesian Constitutional Court’s views through its decisions in shaping the practice of outsourcing in Indonesia based on the 1945 Constitution. The study was first conducted by analyzing Decision No. 012/PUU-I/2003 and later Decision No. 27/PUU-IX/2011. The novelty of this research is evident from the involvement of perspective in analyzing the outsourcing scheme in Indonesia as newly regulated in several laws, namely Job Creation Law and the Government Regulation in lieu of Job Creation Law. Using the normative legal research method, the authors used statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Based on the research conducted, the authors found that the Constitutional Court aims to uphold the balance of companies’ efficiency and outsourced workers’ rights protection. The findings are evidenced by the Constitutional Court’s stance in a decision that implies that outsourcing is constitutional to enhance the State’s economy while simultaneously protecting the outsourced workers’ rights to ensure the fulfillment of their constitutional rights by setting two-fold models of protection. Therefore, even if new outsourcing scheme regulations are issued, the criterion of legality in future judicial reviews must involve determining whether such balance has been sufficiently met.
Dialektika Sanksi Pidana Mati Dalam Bangunan Hukum Pidana Yang Berkeadilan Palguna, I Dewa Gede; Sugi Hartono, I Made
Kertha Patrika Vol 46 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2024.v46.i01.p07

Abstract

In this study aims to unravel the synthesis of dialectics that hold and negate the formulation of death penalty sanctions in Indonesian criminal law. Using juridical-normative method, secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials are collected through document and literature study techniques and analyzed descriptively-qualitatively. The scientific mind of criminal law has undergone development from classical to modern to neo-classical (daad strafrecht to dader strafrecht to the last daad-dader strafrecht). In relation to death penalty sanction, through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007, the state has firmly determined its constitutionality although there is an interpretation that is not fully in line with one Supreme Court cassation decision Number 39 PK/Pid.Sus/2011 which is based on international developments in various countries that the death penalty sanction has been abolished. This study produces findings that the Indonesian criminal law policy related to the formulation of the death penalty sanction is a synthesis between the thesis that holds and the antithesis that negates according to the formulation in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP) that the death penalty sanction is a special type of criminal sanction carried out through a probationary period and can then be changed to a type of life imprisonment or for a maximum period of 20 years if it meets certain qualifications. The pursuit of fair and usefulness criminal law is a dialectical process with a positioning on the balance between individual protection and collective interests.
Legal Morality of Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Based on Pancasila Wijaya, Made Hendra; Subawa, I Made; Palguna, I Dewa Gede; Astariyani, Ni Luh Gede; Sumadi, I Putu Sudarma
East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 9 (2024): September 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/eajmr.v3i9.10863

Abstract

Pancasila, as the source of legal morality of Indonesia, is used as the primary benchmark by Judges of the Constitutional Court in providing decision. The paper at hand explains that the constitutional court decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 has moral weaknesses related to legal behaviour derived from Pancasila, specifically, First: Constitutional Court Decision had led to conflict and arising different views that potentially might cause disruption to Indonesia nation entity. Second: Constitutional Court Decision does not fully align with the Wisdom in Deliberation principle contained in the Fourth Principle of Pancasila. Third: Constitutional Court Judgment does not satisfy the sense of justice for Indonesian People. This paper employs a normative research method with a conceptual approach and a value-based approach.
Urgensi Sui Generis Regime Permintaan Slot Geostationary Orbit melalui Perspektif Negara Khatulistiwa Khususnya Indonesia Andriwinata, Rackel; Palguna, I Dewa Gede
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 24, No 1 (2024): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2024.V24.089-106

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the countries whose position is crossed by the equator, which is parallel to the Geostationary Orbit (GSO). The passing of Law No. 16 of 2002 marks Indonesia’s binding to the Outer Space Treaty, which encourages Indonesia to have regulations regarding the resolution of issues relating to the use of GSO slots in the national interest. Indonesia proposes a special legal regime that recognizes GSO as an independent territorywithout disturbing existing rules. This research emphasizes the urgency of creating a fair and equitable legal framework in utilizing GSO, especially for developing countries. This research aims to explore legal certainty in the context of space utilization and exploration, especially Geostationary Orbit (GSO). This research uses a normative juridical method with the main approaches, namely legislation and conceptual. The results show the needfor a special regime that regulates the utilization of GSO so that there is no gap between countries with the principles of maintaining peace, justice and mutual benefit, with the hope of providing clarity of rules and guidelines in exploring and utilizing space safely and fairly.
The Legal Power of the Constitutional Court Decisions Remains Suandika, I Nyoman; Usfunan, Yohanes; Palguna, I Dewa Gede; Adiyaryani, Ni Nengah
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 12 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i12.1606

Abstract

Issues relating to granting permanent legal force to decisions of the constitutional court immediately after they are pronounced in a plenary session open to the public are important to research for several reasons Firstly, it is very important for us to know the rationale for granting permanent legal force to decisions of the constitutional court given immediately after completion. pronounced in a public meeting open to the public. Second, understanding the permanent legal force of constitutional court decisions is also related to the question of why it is not possible to have legal efforts to correct constitutional court decisions if errors occur in terms of achieving legal certainty. Based on this, the question also arises as to whether the constitutional court's decision regarding this error will continue or not. Third, it is related to whether the legislator (positive legislator) can override the decision of the constitutional court. What is the rationale underlying the granting of permanent legal force to a Constitutional Court decision from the moment it is pronounced in a session open to the public? This research is normative legal research because there is a legal vacuum if the constitutional court's decision is contrary to the spirit of the 1945 Constitution. The importance of immediacy in granting permanent character to the constitutional court's decision, if viewed from the law in book aspect, is indeed the best choice. This is based on the following reasons. First, the Constitutional Court was formed to protect the purity of the Constitution with a more detailed interpretation. This interpretation will be used as a basis for resolving problems by certain authorities who are given direct authority by the Constitution. Therefore, it is appropriate that the interpretation is only carried out once, which is binding so that the decision must be placed at the first and final level where no effort can be made to cancel it. Second, apart from that, it must also be understood that the constitutional court as a constitutional court can resolve problems and provide legal certainty quickly by the principles of fast and simple justice.
REGULATING FOOD WASTE MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA: DO WE NEED AN OMNIBUS LAW (AGAIN)? Satyawati, Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah; Suyatna, I Nyoman; Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa, Putu; Palguna, I Dewa Gede; Rajaratnam, Nadeeka
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 14, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesia was regarded to be the world's second-largest food loss and waste-producing country. Food waste contributes the most significant amount in Indonesia compared to other types of waste. This paper aims to discuss three legal issues. First, it identifies, in descriptive-normative means, the legal framework regulating food waste, which is the intersection of two legal regimes: 'the food management' and 'the waste and environmental management”. Second, it presents a comparative study by exploring the more advanced food waste legal frameworks, which take examples from Europe. The third objective is to recommend legal, institutional, and policy steps to mainstream food waste management in Indonesia. This paper suggests that statutory regulations have indicated an initial concern about food waste; however, they do not provide a strict mandatory obligation to relevant stakeholders. Indonesia may use Europe’s remarkable achievements as lessons learned in initiating a comprehensive legal framework for food waste in the future. This paper, therefore, proposes a Law on Sustainable Food System as an ius constituendum to figure out a comprehensive solution for combining food management and environmental sustainability needs. In terms of legislative drafting, an omnibus law seemed suitable for drafting such a law, which crosses different legal regimes, and the existing provisions are spread in various regulations.
Co-Authors Alan Kusuma Dinakara Amelia Febrina Merry Bogia Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa ANAK AGUNG SRI UTARI Andriwinata, Rackel Bisariyadi Bisariyadi Claudia Samantha Rico Dananjaya, I Komang Gede Afriliana Saputra Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa, Putu Halmadiningrat, I Made I Dewa Gede Adi Sanjaya I Gede Adhi Supradnyana I Gede Pasek Pramana I Gede Putra Ariana I Gede Tommy Guntara I Gusti Ayu Agung Ariani I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja I Kadek Oka Wijaya I Made Budi Arsika I Made Pria Dharsana, I Made Pria I MADE SUBAWA I Nyoman Suyatna I Putu Sabda Wibawa Indrasari Kresnadjaja Ketut Gede Sonny Wibawa Made Hendra Wijaya Made Maharta Yasa Made Suksma Prijandhini Devi Salain Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati Ni Luh Gede Astariyani Ni Nengah Adiyaryani Nurjanah, Ita Padmawati, Ni Komang Tari Rajaratnam, Nadeeka Risa Sandhi Surya Sakti Prasetiya Dharmapati Suandika, I Nyoman Sugi Hartono, I Made Sumadi, I Putu Sudarma Veronika Puteri Kangagung Wenies Ema Sinaga Windusadu Anantaya Yohanes Usfunan