Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 35 Documents
Search

Kriteria Pertanggungjawaban dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengancaman Mahasiswa di Media Sosial dalam Putusan Nomor : 172/PID.SUS/2019/PN.JKT.SEL Ni Made Purnawati; Akhmad Munawar; Hanafi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 7 (2024): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the factors that influenced the judge's decision in the case of criminal threats on social media in Decision Number: 172 / PID.SUS / 2019 / PN.JKT.SEL against children as sexual abuse perpetrators in South Jakarta City to analyze and analyze the decision. The statutory and case approaches are two examples of the normative research methodology that is employed. The information was gathered from theses, journals, legislation, and literature. In this study, data management and analysis were done in a deductive manner. According to the study's findings, the court continues to violate the proportionality principle while imposing a sentence on the offender. The judge's decision is then influenced by a number of factors, such as: 1. Elements that come from the judge. 2. Elements that come from the accused.
Proses Penyidikan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Mutia Hafina Putri; Akhmad Munawar; Muhammad Aini
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 4 No 7 (2023): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Investigation is a crucial stage in criminal law to find the suspect, as stipulated in Article 1 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Chief of Police Regulation Number 6 of 2019. However, Articles 14 paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) of this Police Regulation demonstrate inharmonicity. Paragraph (2) states that a suspect can be determined in the Investigation Commencement Order (SPDP), while paragraph (3) states the opposite. Paragraph (4) regulates the notification of a suspect after 7 days of issuing the Investigation Order. Ideally, the determination of a suspect should refer to Article 10 paragraph (1) of the said Police Regulation so that the criminal justice system can run more firmly and consistently.
Urgensi Restorative Justice dalam Penghentian Penuntutan oleh Kejaksaan dalam Perkara Pidana Ary Chandra Kristiyawan; Akhmad Munawar; Hidayatullah
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 4 No 7 (2023): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The restorative justice approach offers a progressive solution within Indonesia's criminal justice system to address the shortcomings of the retributive approach, which focuses primarily on punishment. This principle emphasizes victim recovery, offender accountability, and community involvement, thereby fostering more inclusive and substantial justice. The prosecution has strategic authority to discontinue prosecutions based on restorative justice, as stipulated in Article 14 Criminal Procedure Code and the Attorney General’s Regulation No. 15 of 2020. This study aims to examine the urgency of restorative justice principles in resolving criminal cases and the prosecutorial authority in discontinuing prosecutions under this approach. The findings indicate that restorative justice holds significant potential to overcome the weaknesses of the retributive criminal justice system. This approach effectively reduces court caseloads, prison overcrowding, and offender stigmatization while delivering more substantive justice for victims. The prosecutorial authority to discontinue prosecutions through this approach has proven to be an essential instrument in creating a more efficient, inclusive, and socially harmonious justice system.
Penuntutan terhadap Perkara Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia Siti Nurbadaliah; Akhmad Munawar; Indah Dewi Megasari
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 4 No 7 (2023): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v4i7.782

Abstract

Prosecution of children's cases in the juvenile criminal justice system in Indonesia focuses on the principles of restorative justice, which aims at the rehabilitation and social reintegration of children. Even though Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (JCJS) regulates the protection of children's rights, prosecution practices often face obstacles, such as a lack of understanding by law enforcement officials regarding restorative approaches and limited rehabilitation facilities. This research aims to analyze the prosecution mechanism, the role of prosecutors, and the challenges that exist in the juvenile criminal justice system. The research results show the need to strengthen the capacity of law enforcement officers, improve rehabilitation facilities, and community understanding to realize the goals of an effective and fair juvenile criminal justice system.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana terhadap Malpraktik Medis pada Rumah Sakit Renita Meidiana Putri; Akhmad Munawar; Sudiyono
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 4 No 7 (2023): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v4i7.783

Abstract

Malpractice is an error or negligence committed by professional staff, such as doctors, lawyers, accountants, dentists or veterinarians, which do not comply with professional standards. In reality, malpractice still often occurs, both in hospitals and medical personnel, even though there are several legal instruments that regulate hospitals and medical practice with sanctions for violators of health laws. The aim of this research is to explore existing deficiencies in legal policies, and propose new legal policies in order to optimally prevent and overcome hospital malpractice. The research method used is a normative research method by examining aspects of criminal law in health law regarding malpractice, as well as theories and expert opinions for better legal policy proposals. From the qualitative analysis of data on primary and secondary legal materials, the following results were obtained: first, there are weaknesses in the health law policy so that it cannot prevent and deal with malpractice optimally, namely the lack of completeness and lack of clarity regarding the formulation of malpractice and its strict sanctions, and a turn towards acts of resistance. the law and limitations of the hospital's responsibility for malpractice committed by doctors or medical personnel. Second, a new legal policy that can be proposed is by formulating clearly and in detail the limits of hospital malpractice in health law, accompanied by strict sanctions or accountability both criminally, civilly and administratively, hospitals.
Integrasi Asas Legalitas dan Asas Oportunitas: Suatu Kajian Komparatif terhadap Penerapannya dalam Praktik Penuntutan Muhammad; Akhmad Munawar; Hanafi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 4 No 7 (2023): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v4i7.790

Abstract

The integration of the legality principle and the opportunity principle in prosecutorial practice in Indonesia is a complex issue that requires in-depth study. The legality principle, which demands legal certainty, often clashes with the opportunity principle, which grants prosecutors discretion in decision-making. This study analyzes the dynamics of the interaction between these two principles through a literature review and case studies. The findings indicate challenges in achieving a balance between the two, particularly in defining the boundaries of prosecutorial authority and objective criteria for applying the opportunity principle. The study concludes that there is a need for regulatory improvements, increased transparency, and effective oversight mechanisms to ensure that the application of the opportunity principle does not deviate from the principles of justice and legal certainty.
Analisis Hukum terhadap Perlindungan Whistleblower dalam Mendukung Kebebasan Berpendapat di Indonesia Aina Pramita Sari; Akhmad Munawar; Lutfi Yusup Rahmathoni
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 4 No 7 (2023): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v4i7.791

Abstract

Freedom of opinion and protection of whistleblowers are two critical aspects in maintaining transparency and accountability in Indonesia, particularly within the context of a healthy democracy. Article 28E, Paragraph (3), and Article 28F of the 1945 Constitution guarantee the right of every individual to express opinions, access information, and communicate freely. However, the implementation of freedom of opinion often faces obstacles, especially in relation to the ITE Law, which contains multi-interpretive articles, such as Article 27, Paragraph (3), and Article 28, Paragraph (2). These provisions are frequently used to criminalize individuals who express criticism or file public reports. This creates an imbalance between the right to freedom of expression guaranteed by the constitution and the inconsistent application of the law. This article also underscores the importance of legal protection for whistleblowers, who often face both physical and legal threats. While existing legal protections, such as Law No. 13 of 2006 in conjunction with Law No. 31 of 2014 regarding Witness and Victim Protection, provide a legal foundation, their implementation remains limited in the digital context. Therefore, harmonizing regulations, including revising the ITE Law, is essential to ensure that both freedom of expression and whistleblower protection are properly safeguarded. Reform in Indonesia's legal system is urgently needed to create a safe environment for the public to voice their opinions and report violations. This, in turn, will strengthen transparency, prevent corruption, and bolster democracy in Indonesia.
Paradigma Baru Hukum Acara Pidana: Rekonstruksi Perlindungan Hak Asasi Tersangka dalam Proses Peradilan M. Supian Noor; Akhmad Munawar; Lutfi Yusup Rahmathoni
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 12 (2024): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v5i12.821

Abstract

The Indonesian criminal justice system faces significant challenges in balancing legal certainty and the protection of suspects' human rights. Although the presumption of innocence principle is enshrined in various laws and regulations, pretrial detention practices are often misused by law enforcement officials as a psychological pressure tool against suspects. Article 21 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) grants broad discretionary powers to investigators and prosecutors in determining detention, without stringent judicial oversight. This situation creates a high risk of arbitrary criminalization, which contradicts the fair trial principle as stipulated in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). This article analyzes the fundamental weaknesses in the criminal procedural law system, particularly in detention mechanisms and pretrial judicial oversight, and proposes a more just and accountable system reconstruction. KUHAP reform is necessary to establish stricter minimum evidence standards before detention, expand pretrial judges' authority to assess the substance of evidence, and strengthen independent oversight of detention decisions made by law enforcement officials. By implementing these reforms, Indonesia's criminal justice system can become more transparent, accountable, and aligned with internationally recognized human rights protection principles.
PENYULUHAN HUKUM PENCEGAHAN, DAMPAK, DAN SANKSI PIDANA BULLYING DI MADRASAH ALIYAH SULTAN SULAIMAN KARANG INTAN KABUPATEN BANJAR Munawar, Akhmad; Hidayatullah, Hidayatullah; Aini, Muhammad; Sariati, Muhamad Ali; Adhani, Fadhan; Alfathudzikri, Gusti; Riswanda, Bima Aditya
JURNAL PENGABDIAN AL-IKHLAS UNIVERSITAS ISLAM KALIMANTAN MUHAMMAD ARSYAD AL BANJARY Vol 11, No 3 (2025): AL-IKHLAS JURNAL PENGABDIAN
Publisher : Universitas Islam kalimantan MAB

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/jpaiuniska.v11i3.20831

Abstract

Anak merupakan bagian penting bagi kelangsungan hidup manusia dan masa depan bangsa. Untuk mendukung tumbuh kembang optimal, baik fisik, mental, maupun sosial, anak memerlukan perlindungan dan kesempatan yang memadai. Salah satu ancaman terhadap kesejahteraan anak adalah praktik bullying, yang dapat menimbulkan dampak serius seperti depresi, kecemasan, bahkan risiko bunuh diri. Korban bullying sering kali enggan bersekolah karena takut menjadi sasaran kekerasan.Di Madrasah Aliyah Sultan Sulaiman Karang Intan, Kabupaten Banjar, belum ada penyuluhan mengenai bullying, sehingga banyak siswa yang kurang memahami dampaknya, jenis-jenisnya, serta sanksi hukum yang bisa dijatuhkan kepada pelaku. Oleh karena itu, kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk memberikan penyuluhan hukum kepada siswa mengenai bullying. Metode yang digunakan meliputi ceramah dan dialog interaktif, dengan materi tentang pengertian, jenis, dampak bullying, serta upaya pencegahan dan sanksi pidana bagi pelaku. Kegiatan ini diakhiri dengan sesi tanya jawab untuk memperdalam pemahaman siswa. Hasil kegiatan ini diharapkan dapat dipublikasikan dalam jurnal atau prosiding untuk memberikan kontribusi pada pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan solusi praktis mengatasi masalah bullying di sekolah.
Analisis Yuridis Dihapusnya Ketentuan Pasal 26 Ayat (4) Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Dalam Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Akhmad Munawar; Muhammad Aini; Dedi Sugiyanto; Miftah Ulumudin Tsani
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Edisi Oktober 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v2i3.40

Abstract

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 28 H paragraph (1) states that everyone has the right to live in physical and spiritual prosperity, to have a place to live, and to have a good and healthy living environment and have the right to obtain health services. After the enactment of the Employment Creation Law on October 5, 2020, the impact of changes to several provisions stipulated in the PPLH Law, including the part that was deleted was Article 26 paragraph (4) of the PPLH Law which reads "The community as referred to in paragraph (1) may file an objection to The AMDAL document” is also not accompanied by an explanation so that it can lead to confusion in what kind of society rejects the document, with the abolition of the provisions of Article 26 paragraph (4) of the PPLH Law, resulting in the community no longer having the right to file an objection to the environmental impact analysis document. alias Amdal on a project because their rights have been removed in the Job Creation Act. The formulation of the first problem in this study is how the legal consequences of the abolition of the provisions of Article 26 Paragraph (4) of Law no. 32 of 2009 concerning the Protection and Management of the Environment on the participation of the community in the supervision of a good and healthy environment. Furthermore, the formulation of the second problem is how the provisions in Article 26 paragraph (4) of Law no. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management from the perspective of Human Rights in Article 28 Letter H Paragraph (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study uses a type of juridical-normative research because the problem will be analyzed by reviewing the laws and regulations relating to the abolition of the provisions of Article 26 paragraph (4) of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management in Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation.