Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Acta Law Journal

Analisis Terhadap Etika Profesi Hukum Notaris Dalam Menjalankan Tugasnya Sebagai Pejabat Umum Dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik Rizky, Fajar Khaify; Safnul, Doddy; Leviza, Jelly
Acta Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Talenta Publisher, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/alj.v2i2.16537

Abstract

Notary is a public official who is trusted by the public in the authority to make authentic deeds. In exercising his authority as a legal profession, a notary must uphold legal ethics and the dignity and nobility of his position, because if this is ignored by the notary, it can cause harm to the parties and the notary himself. The problem of this research is how the authority of the notary profession as a public official in making authentic deeds, how sanctions are imposed on violations of the code of ethics of the notary profession. The purpose of this study is to determine and examine the authority of the notary profession as a public official in making authentic deeds and sanctions imposed on violations of the notary profession's code of ethics. Type of normative legal research. Secondary data research data obtained from legal materials. Data collection techniques library research techniques. Qualitative data analysis. Notary is a public official who is authorised to make authentic deeds and has other authorities as in Article 1 number 1 jo. Article 15 of UUJN. Sanctions imposed on violations of the code of ethics of the notary profession as in Article 6 paragraph (1) of the Code of Ethics of Notaries of the Indonesian Notary Association (INI) in the form of reprimand, warning, temporary dismissal from Association membership, honourable dismissal from Association membership, dishonourable dismissal from Association membership.
Inviolability Under Fire: The 2024 Israeli Attack On Iranian Consular Premises And Syria’s State Responsibility Under Diplomatic Law Galio, Galio Parly Keliat; Sutiarnoto; Fajar Khaify Rizky
Acta Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Talenta Publisher, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/alj.v4i1.23613

Abstract

The attack on Iran’s consular premises in Damascus underscores significant legal challenges concerning the special duty of the receiving State to protect foreign representations. In international law, the protection of diplomatic and consular missions is a fundamental obligation of the receiving State, as regulated under the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. This research aims to analyze the obligations of Syria, as the receiving State, in protecting the consular premises of Iran in Damascus from third-party attacks based on diplomatic law. This research employs a normative legal research method with a descriptive approach, utilizing an analysis of international legal instruments, legal doctrines, and relevant State practices. The results indicate that Syria, as the receiving State, failed to fulfill its obligation to take all appropriate steps to protect the inviolability of the consular premises and the safety of consular officers. Such failure constitutes a breach of the protective obligations stipulated in Article 22 paragraph (2) of the 1961 Vienna Convention and Article 31 paragraph (3) of the 1963 Vienna Convention, specifically regarding the receiving State's duty to prevent any form of attack, damage, or disturbance of the peace of the consular mission. This research provides an academic contribution by strengthening the understanding of the nature of the receiving State's obligations in the context of consular protection as an obligation of conduct, as well as a practical contribution in affirming the standards of State responsibility within the context of modern armed conflict under diplomatic law.