Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : law development journal

Optimizing Digital Forensics for Effective Cybercrime Law Enforcement in Indonesia Lilik Prihatini; Lasmin Alfies Sihombing; Yeni Nuraeni
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.443-457

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the optimization of digital forensic technology in enhancing the effectiveness of cybercrime law enforcement. The research method used a descriptive-analytical qualitative approach, involving in-depth interviews with cybercrime investigators, digital forensic experts, and legal practitioners, as well as documentation studies and non-participatory observations in digital forensic laboratories. The data were analyzed using an interactive analysis model to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings through triangulation techniques. The novelty of this research lies in its focus on the practical integration of digital forensic technology within law enforcement processes, particularly in examining the relationship between technological capability, human resource competence, and regulatory readiness in supporting cybercrime investigations. The findings reveal that the effectiveness of law enforcement is strongly influenced by the quality of digital evidence handling, the availability of standardized forensic procedures, and cross-sector collaboration among institutions. Furthermore, this study identifies those technological disparities, limited institutional capacity, and the lack of continuous training programs significantly affect the consistency and accuracy of investigation outcomes. Based on the research, it is concluded that optimizing digital forensic technology requires strengthening institutional capacity, improving investigator competence, enhancing infrastructure, and developing more responsive and integrated legal frameworks to ensure effective, accountable, and sustainable cybercrime law enforcement.
Reconstructing Global Health Law Post-Pandemic: Juridical Analysis of IPR and Equitable Access under WHO Pandemic Treaty Salma Farha Nabila; Lasmin Alfies Sihombing; Yeni Nuraeni; Yenny Febrianty
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.458-472

Abstract

This study examines the juridical architecture of global health law in the post-pandemic context, focusing on the tension between intellectual property rights (IPR) protection and equitable access to medical resources. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed structural weaknesses and inequalities in global health governance, particularly in the distribution of vaccines and essential medical technologies. This research aims to analyze how the evolving WHO Pandemic Treaty framework can serve as an integrative legal instrument to reconcile these competing interests. The study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, supported by qualitative legal analysis and the IRAC method to structure legal reasoning. The findings reveal that the current global health law architecture remains dominated by the IPR regime, which prioritizes innovation protection but inadequately ensures equitable access, especially for developing countries. Furthermore, mechanisms such as TRIPS flexibilities have not been effectively operationalized due to political, structural, and institutional constraints. The study also finds that global responses during the pandemic were shaped by power asymmetries and economic capacity rather than public health needs, leading to systemic inequities. As a novel contribution, this research highlights the potential of the WHO Pandemic Treaty as a transformative legal framework capable of integrating distributive justice principles, strengthening IPR flexibilities, and establishing binding obligations for equitable access. However, its effectiveness depends on robust normative design, enforceability mechanisms, and sustained political commitment from member states.
Analysis of Corporate Criminal Liability in Consumer Protection Crimes in Indonesia after the Enactment of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code Andreas Daniel Libri Anugrah Situmeang; Lasmin Alfies Sihombing; Yeni Nuraeni
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.750-772

Abstract

The practice of abusing the corporate veil as a shield for organized economic crime has caused massive losses to consumers and created serious loopholes for impunity for the intellectual actors involved. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the urgency of expanding the Piercing the Corporate Veil doctrine from the civil realm into criminal law as a progressive law enforcement instrument. In addition, this study also aims to formulate a model of criminal liability that is capable of ensnaring the actual beneficial owners in order to optimize restorative justice and restitution for the victims. To answer these questions, this study uses a normative juridical research method using a legislative and conceptual approach that is analyzed qualitatively and normatively based on a literature review. The extension of the Piercing the Corporate Veil (PCV) doctrine into the realm of criminal law through Law Number 1 of 2023 marks a fundamental transformation in prosecuting intellectual actors and beneficial owners behind corporate crimes. This extension effectively dismantles the limited liability immunity that is often abused, thereby providing a strong legal basis for the application of restorative justice through the optimization of asset restitution for victims of consumer protection crimes. Ultimately, the success of implementing this new paradigm depends heavily on cross-institutional synergy among law enforcement agencies in tracking assets and promoting a culture of corporate compliance in order to create an accountable business ecosystem.