Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.665
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Informatika CommIT (Communication & Information Technology) Jurnal TIMES Sinkron : Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika JIKO (Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer) Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control JOURNAL OF APPLIED INFORMATICS AND COMPUTING METHOMIKA: Jurnal Manajemen Informatika & Komputerisasi Akuntansi Jiko (Jurnal Informatika dan komputer) JURIKOM (Jurnal Riset Komputer) JURTEKSI Building of Informatics, Technology and Science Jurnal Sistem Komputer dan Informatika (JSON) Jurnal Ilmiah Smart Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology (JACOST) Bulletin of Computer Science Research Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) Majalah Ilmiah METHODA TAMIKA: Jurnal Tugas Akhir Manajemen Informatika & Komputerisasi Akuntansi Journal of Computing Theories and Applications Jurnal Ilmiah Smart
Robet Robet
STMIK TIME
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Automotive Engineering Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL OF APPLIED INFORMATICS AND COMPUTING

 1 
A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Heart Disease Classification Simanjuntak, Martina Sances; Robet, Robet; Hoki, Leony
Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing Vol. 9 No. 6 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30871/jaic.v9i6.11546

Abstract

Heart disease remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, necessitating accurate early detection. This study aims to compare the performance of several Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms in heart disease classification using the Heart Disease dataset with 918 samples. The methods tested included Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Deep Neural Network (DNN). Preprocessing included feature normalization, data splitting (80:20), and simple hyperparameter tuning for parameter-sensitive models. Evaluations were conducted using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, AUC, and confusion matrix analysis to identify error patterns. The results showed that SVM and DNN achieved the highest accuracies of 91.3% and 92.1%, respectively. However, DNN has higher computational costs and risks of overfitting on small datasets. These findings confirm that traditional ML models such as SVM remain highly competitive on tabular medical data.
Comprehensive Comparison of TF-IDF and Word2Vec in Product Sentiment Classification Using Machine Learning Models Sinaga, Asra Gretya; Robet, Robet; Pribadi, Octara
Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30871/jaic.v10i1.11582

Abstract

Sentiment analysis supports data-driven decisions by turning product reviews into reliable polarity labels. We compare four text representations, TF-IDF, TF-IDF reduced via SVD, Word2Vec (trained from scratch), and a hybrid TF-IDF(SVD-300). Word2Vec, for sentiment classification of Indonesian Shopee product reviews from Kaggle (~2.5k texts). After normalization (with optional emoji handling and Indonesian stemming), ratings are mapped to binary sentiment (≤2 negative, ≥4 positive; 3 discarded). Each representation is evaluated with Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines (linear/RBF), Naive Bayes, and Random Forest under stratified 5-fold cross-validation. TF-IDF with Logistic Regression (C=1.0) yields the best results (F1-macro = 0.816 ± 0.026; Accuracy = 0.816 ± 0.026), with LinearSVC as a strong runner-up. Word2Vec (scratch) performs lower, consistent with limited data being insufficient to learn stable embeddings, while the hybrid representation offers only modest gains over Word2Vec and does not surpass TF-IDF. These findings indicate that TF-IDF is the most reliable and consistent representation for small, short-text review datasets, and they underscore the impact of feature design on downstream classification performance.
Co-Authors Agus Maringan Siahaan Alvin Alvin, Alvin Andi Andi Andy Andy Arnold Adimabua Ojugo Barus, Hanisa putri Bayu Teta Bimo Haryo Setyoko Br Tarigan, Widia CANDRA GUNAWAN Carles Juliandy Chandra Chandra Darwin, Jenime De Rosal Ignatius Moses Setiadi Didik Aryanto Donna Natalia edi edi Edi Wijaya Edi Wijaya Edi Wijaya Eferhire Valentine Ugbotu Etika Kartikadarma Feriani Astuti Tarigan Feriani Astuti Tarigan Feriani, Feriani Astuti Tarigan Hendri Hendri Hoki, Leony Hose, Fernando Jackri Hendrik Johanes Terang Kita Perangin Angin Jonathan Kevin Fernando Juan Charles Kohsasih, Kelvin Leonardi Lase, Wisriani Liecero, Marcus Md Kamruzzaman Sarker Michael Angelo Nurhayati Harahap Octara Pribadi Panjaitan, Tabitha Martha Agustine Parapak, Yehezkiel E.A Perangin Angin, Johanes Rizkita, Ari Robin Robin Robin Robin, Robin Robin Zheng Satriya Miharja Setiawan, Jerico Siahaan, Agus Maringan Simanjuntak, Martina Sances Sinaga, Asra Gretya Siregar, Tarq Hilmar Suyud Widiono Suyud Widiono Tabitha Chukwudi Aghaunor Tio, Nicholas Vincent Vincent, Vincent Wirawan, Haria Yuliana Yuliana