Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.359
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Novelty INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Justitia et Pax Al-'Adl Lex Scientia Law Review GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan dan Konseling Nurani Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan Mimbar Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Journal of Community Dedication Mu'amalah : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Probono and Community Service Journal Tirtayasa Journal of International Law Indonesian Journal of Economics and Social Sciences Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Bersinergi Inovatif Journal of Law and Legal Reform Unifikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Anditya, Ariesta Wibisono
Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Justitia et Pax

 1 
PEMERIKSAAN KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN TERSANGKA OLEH PRAPERADILAN DALAM KONSTELASI PANCASILA Anditya, Ariesta Wibisono
Justitia et Pax Vol 34, No 1 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (371.565 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v34i1.1731

Abstract

ABSTRACTIndonesian supremacy of law principle is the ground rule to control the democracy flow in society. In order to do so, Pretrial institution is introduced. Pretrial, under Constitution Court Session Number 21/PUU-XII/2014, also has a jurisdiction in examining suspect naming procedure by investigator. Despite being regulated, there was found in which judge made decision to name a suspect, whereas the provision instructed the judge to only take measure and examine suspect naming by investigator, therefore undermining given regulation. This conceptual research conducted under normative method. Historical, grammatical, concept and case approach also applied. The result demonstrates that evaluating suspect naming could support and undermine Pancasila simultaneously.Keywords : pretrial, Pancasila, suspect naming, democracy  INTISARIPraperadilan hadir sebagai bentuk pengawas terhadap peran penyidik dan penuntut umum, dalam hal ini, berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 menambahkan kewenangan salah satunya untuk menguji keabsahan penetapan tersangka. Wujud kontrol yang demikian ternyata tidak sepenuhnya diterapkan oleh hakim dengan baik. Peristiwa yang menjadi bukti luputnya penerapan pemeriksaan keabsahan tersangka salah satunya dimana hakim Praperadilan memerintahkan menetapkan tersangka, dengan demikian melampaui batas kewenangan. Metode penelitian yang dilakukan adalah normatif dengan pendekatan filosofis, gramatikal, konsep dan kasus. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa wewenang Praperadilan dalam menentukan keabsahan tersangka dapat mendukung, tetapi sekaligus dapat juga menjadi alat peruntuh demokrasi Pancasila.Kata kunci : praperadilan, Pancasila, penetapan tersangka, demokrasi
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT’S JURISDICTION IN IMPUNITY PREVENTION Mega Jaya, Belardo Prasetya; Anditya, Ariesta Wibisono
Justitia et Pax Vol 36, No 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (475.238 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i1.2966

Abstract

This research aims to describe and explain the International Criminal Court’s jurisdictions in an effort to prevent impunity. Additionally, this research provides answer to the question of ICC’s effectiveness in upholding justice over international crimes. This research is a normative law research. The research results shows, under Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court 1998, the purpose of a trial is to end impunity over serious crimes. To implement such a purpose, ICC exercise their jurisdictions conform to Rome Statute. However, the exercise of ICC’s jurisdictions are still ineffective, such phenonemon could arise by many factors.
PEMERIKSAAN KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN TERSANGKA OLEH PRAPERADILAN DALAM KONSTELASI PANCASILA Ariesta Wibisono Anditya
Justitia et Pax Vol. 34 No. 1 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v34i1.1731

Abstract

ABSTRACTIndonesian supremacy of law principle is the ground rule to control the democracy flow in society. In order to do so, Pretrial institution is introduced. Pretrial, under Constitution Court Session Number 21/PUU-XII/2014, also has a jurisdiction in examining suspect naming procedure by investigator. Despite being regulated, there was found in which judge made decision to name a suspect, whereas the provision instructed the judge to only take measure and examine suspect naming by investigator, therefore undermining given regulation. This conceptual research conducted under normative method. Historical, grammatical, concept and case approach also applied. The result demonstrates that evaluating suspect naming could support and undermine Pancasila simultaneously.Keywords : pretrial, Pancasila, suspect naming, democracy  INTISARIPraperadilan hadir sebagai bentuk pengawas terhadap peran penyidik dan penuntut umum, dalam hal ini, berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 menambahkan kewenangan salah satunya untuk menguji keabsahan penetapan tersangka. Wujud kontrol yang demikian ternyata tidak sepenuhnya diterapkan oleh hakim dengan baik. Peristiwa yang menjadi bukti luputnya penerapan pemeriksaan keabsahan tersangka salah satunya dimana hakim Praperadilan memerintahkan menetapkan tersangka, dengan demikian melampaui batas kewenangan. Metode penelitian yang dilakukan adalah normatif dengan pendekatan filosofis, gramatikal, konsep dan kasus. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa wewenang Praperadilan dalam menentukan keabsahan tersangka dapat mendukung, tetapi sekaligus dapat juga menjadi alat peruntuh demokrasi Pancasila.Kata kunci : praperadilan, Pancasila, penetapan tersangka, demokrasi
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT’S JURISDICTION IN IMPUNITY PREVENTION Belardo Prasetya Mega Jaya; Ariesta Wibisono Anditya
Justitia et Pax Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i1.2966

Abstract

This research aims to describe and explain the International Criminal Court’s jurisdictions in an effort to prevent impunity. Additionally, this research provides answer to the question of ICC’s effectiveness in upholding justice over international crimes. This research is a normative law research. The research results shows, under Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court 1998, the purpose of a trial is to end impunity over serious crimes. To implement such a purpose, ICC exercise their jurisdictions conform to Rome Statute. However, the exercise of ICC’s jurisdictions are still ineffective, such phenonemon could arise by many factors.
Co-Authors Adlia Nur Zhafarina Ahmad Rayhan Ali, Muhammad Ghoffar Anak Agung Istri Agung Vidya Berliana Berliana Andi Redani Suryanata Anisah Karim Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani Antory Royan Adyan Anwar, M. Ian Hidayat Arsawati, Ni Nyoman Juwita Arvita Hastarini Arya Dewangkara Barora, Siti Baskara, Agri Beniharmoni Harefa Damayanti, Maulida Dwi Destyarini, Normalita Dikha Anugrah Dinda Anissa Ramadani Eko Ramdani Elza Qorina Pangestika Fadhil, Moh. Ferina Ardhi Cahyani Fernando, Zico Junius Hartati, Sawitri Yuli Heryadi, Adi Humana, Sri Jastisia, Mentari Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega Kristanto, Kiki Laili Nur Anisah Levia Tri Mustika Dewi Maharani, Asari Suci Mahmud Mulyadi Misran Wahyudi Mudiparwanto, Wahyu Adi Muhammad Ghoffar Ali Muhammad Hatta Mumpuni, Niken Wahyuning Retno Muna, Kholifatul Naufal El Qolbi N A Ni Luh Novi Astawati Nuraini, Paundri Sekar Paulus, Darminto Hartono Pengleang, RE Pratama, Aditya Andela Putra, Panca Sarjana Rahman, Yogi Muhammad Rahmawati, Diah Suci Ran, Duan Yan Rizki Wahyuning Damayanti Sary, Wevy Efticha Sawitri, Kiki Novita Suwari Akhmaddhian Vincentius Patria Setyawan Wali, Ahmad Widiartana, Gregorius Wina Driyan Pradana Wina Driyan Pradana Wirawan, Vani