Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search
Journal : Amicus Curiae

TINDAKAN KANTOR IMIGRASI JAKARTA PUSAT TERHADAP UCHECHUKWU ALVAN OKAFOR YANG MELAKUKAN PENYALAHGUNAAN IZIN TINGGAL Rahadinata, Fahira Febryanti; Sulistyowati, Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor menggunakan izin tinggal terbatas sebagai penanam modal untuk melakukan usaha perbedaan atas Pasal 75 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 tentang Keimigrasian mengakibatkan izin tinggal terbatas sebagai penanam modal menggunakan izin tinggal terbatas sebagai penanam modal untuk melakukan usaha. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor menangani kasus pelanggaran izin tinggalnya untuk menjalankan usaha, bagaimana Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I Non TPI Jakarta Pusat mengambil tindakan hukum keimigrasian terhadap Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor, dan bagaimana Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I Non TPI Jakarta Pusat menangani proses penuntutan terhadap Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor sesuai Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 tentang Keimigrasian. Penelitian ini bersifat normatif dan mengandalkan bukti sekunder, analisis kualitatif, dan penalaran deduktif untuk sampai pada kesimpulannya. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor menyalahgunakan izin tinggal terbatas dengan mempekerjakannya sebagai investor bisnis. Perbuatan hukum yang dilakukan Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I Non-TPI Jakarta Pusat terhadap Uchechukwu Alvan Okafor merupakan pengusiran berdasarkan Pasal 75 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Keimigrasian. UU Keimigrasian Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 diikuti dalam melakukan proses deportasi.
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM KEPARTAIAN DAN KAITANNYA DALAM PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN DI INDONESIA DAN FILIPINA: Comparison Of Participation Systems And Its Relationships In Presidential Elections In Indonesia And Philippines Darmansyah, Irawan Ro; Sulistyowati, Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19744

Abstract

The emergence of political parties in a country can determine its political system. Each democratic countries has its own way to elaborate their peoples right to vote and to elaborate any political parties to carry their strong member as President and Vice President in an election. This research used normative juridical research and comparative method where the conclusion were drawn using deductive method. In this research, two democratic country will be compared. Indonesia and Philippines has many similarities trough the differences in their political party system related to presidential election. Multi party system is used in both countries. There are similarities in the form of implementation of voting rights, nominating candidates through political parties, and nominating parties as election participants. Therefore the difference is known in the authority of the election commission, presidency period, the threshold for presidential nomination, the election round system, the vote counting mechanism, and the voting system. This differences and similarities generate values that can be developed such as general conditions for the establishment of political parties, the presidential thresholds, and utilize a vote counting machines to calculate the results of vote recapitulation.
EKSISTENSI HUKUM SYARIAH ISLAM DI NANGGROE ACEH DARUSSALAM DITINJAU DARI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA : The Existence of Islamic Sharia Law in Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam in Terms of Judicial Power in Indonesia Afriza, Della; Sulistyowati, Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i2.19783

Abstract

The Existence of Islamic Sharia has an impact on the application of Judicial Power that apply Islamic Sharia Courts run by the Sharia Court. The Sharia Court is authorized to resolve cases at the first level and appeal level in the domains of family law, civil law and Islamic criminal law courtesy of Islamic Sharia. The matter of this assessment is how the existence of Islamic Sharia Law in Aceh viewed from the Judicial Power in Indonesia and how the consent of the Sharia Court in the special autonomy of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. This assessment uses secondary data obtained from literature and analyze qualitatively by using deductive logic inference. Courtesy of the analyze of this assessment, the existence of Sharia Law in Aceh courtesy of Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh. Theses stipulations are intended for the population of Aceh who are Muslims and the authority of the Sharia Court in examining, judicating and deciding cases in cases of family law, civil law, Islamic criminal law in its implementation must not contradict national law especially the stipulations in the Civil Code, Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KEIMIGRASIAN PENYIMPANAN DOKUMEN PALSU REPUBLIK INDONESIA (STUDI PUTUSAN 82/PID.SUS/2022/PN.JKT.PST): Enforcement of Law Against Persons of the Immigration Crime of  Posting Fake Documents of the Republic of Indonesia (Decision Study 82/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst) Zulpa, Novia Afri Kahtul; Sulistyowati, Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/ep7jf561

Abstract

This research discusses the immigration crime of storing falsified Republic of Indonesia documents by Thevarajah Mathiraj, the law enforcement applied at the Central Jakarta District Court, and the preventative efforts from immigration authorities.  Research  Object,  Decision  Number 82/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Jkt.Pst. The research is normative juridically and descriptive in nature. The analysis uses secondary data and then analyzed qualitatively using deductive methods. The results of this research is the occurrence of an Immigration Crime was discovered after immigration officers received public reports or complaints of immigration violations committed by Thevarajah Mathiraj by keeping his KTP and Passport of the Republic of Indonesia while waiting to submit fake Republic of Indonesia documents to Jamil, an Indian citizen in the form of one Indonesian passport and one ID card in the name of Anthony Anadjeron which were forged. Therefore, Thevarajah Mathiraj violated Article 127 of Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration. The law enforcement applied in this case at the Central Jakarta district court was imprisonment for ten months and a fine of two hundred million rupiah. The preventative efforts made by the immigration authorities in dealing with this case are tightening the selection of foreigners, and Indonesian immigration permits domestically and abroad for foreigners.  
PERBANDINGAN PEMBERHENTIAN PRESIDEN DALAM SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN PRESIDENSIAL DI INDONESIA, KOREA SELATAN, AMERIKA SERIKAT: Comparison Of The Removal Of Presidents In Presidential Systems In Indonesia, South Korea, And The United States Fadillah, Evi; Sulistyowati, Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/x7sqa690

Abstract

In a presidential system of government, the President is the head of state with extensive powers, and their term in office is fixed until the end of their government's term. To balance the President's authority, a system of oversight leading to the process of presidential removal is necessary. The issue addressed here is how the removal of the President during their term in office is carried out in Indonesia, South Korea, and the United States, and what role Congress/National Assembly plays in the process of presidential removal. This research employs a normative juridical approach, descriptive in nature, drawing from secondary and primary data sources, and arriving at conclusions through deductive logic. The findings of this study are as follows: the procedure for the removal of the President in Indonesia, before the amendment of the 1945 Constitution, was regulated under Article 8, while after the amendment, it is regulated under Articles 7A and 7B. In South Korea, the procedure is governed by Article 111 of the 1987 Constitution of the Republic of Korea, and in the United States, it is regulated by Article 1, Section 5, of The Constitution of the United States. The reasons for presidential removal in each country are based on the commission of criminal acts by the President, with the Indonesian People's Consultative Assembly (MPR), the U.S. Congress serving as determinants of whether the President should be removed or not, while in South Korea, it is the Constitutional Court of Korea that makes the determination
PERAN KANTOR IMIGRASI KELAS I KHUSUS TEMPAT PEMERIKSAAN IMIGRASI (TPI) SOEKARNO-HATTA DALAM RANGKA PENGAWASAN ORANG ASING DI INDONESIA: The Role of Exclusive Class I Immigration Office at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport Check Place (TPI) in the Framework of Foreign Citizen Control Nurafifa, Ninda; Sulistyowati, Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/kgvc2604

Abstract

Efforts to mitigate the disruptive effects of foreign visitors' admission and leave into Indonesia are governed by the country's immigration laws. Controlling the behavior of aliens is a part of the immigration process. In this piece, we discuss the challenges encountered by the Soekarno-Hatta Special Class I Immigration Office (TPI) and how they affect their ability to provide immigration supervision to foreign nationals seeking entry into Indonesia. Foreigners are strongly discouraged from entering Indonesia. This study is an example of the normative, descriptive research type. Qualitative in-depth interviews supplement secondary sources of information for this study. According to the findings, the TPI Soekarno-Hatta Special Class I Immigration Office is responsible for monitoring the activities of foreigners entering Indonesian territory through both administrative supervision (verifying immigration documents, conducting interviews, and checking the deterrence list) and field supervision (monitoring against the activities of foreigners). A lack of human resources, a lack of facilities and infrastructure at the TPI Soekarno-Hatta Special Class I Immigration Office, and an inadequate budget all work against the TPI Soekarno-Hatta Special Class I Immigration Office's ability to carry out immigration supervision of foreigners. visitors from outside Indonesia.
PEMENUHAN HAK TERHADAP PENYANDANG DISABILITAS MENTAL DALAM MENERIMA PENDIDIKAN DARI PEMERINTAH DAERAH KOTA KABANJAHE: Fulfillment Of The Rights Of People With Mental Disabilities In Receiving Education From The Kabanjahe City Regional Government Purba, Viona Abigail; Sulistyowati, Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/dw8f8398

Abstract

Indonesian Laws and Regulations have regulated various rights of persons with disabilities in the field of education in Law Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System, Law Number 8 of 2003 concerning Persons with Disabilities, and Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning the Government. Education in Law Number 20 of 2003 about the National Education System, is a programmed efforts to build a learning atmospgere and teaching and learning process that supports students in maximizing their potential.. Education is a right that everyone, including people with disabilities, must receive. The right to education for persons with disabilities is regulated in Article 10 of Law Number 8 of 2003 about persons with disabilities which states that persons with disabilities have the right to receive inclusive education. Inclusive educationreceived by persons with disabilities is within the authority and must be facilitated by the Central Government and Regional Government. For matters of educational affairs and fields, Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning regional government regulates that district/city Regional Governments have authority over basic education and the Central Government has authority over special schools which are assisted by the role of Regional Governments in providing facilities and monitoring the fulfillment of educational rights. So that it runs well,