p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.619
P-Index
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

The Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Influence of Participative Leadership Style and Teachers’ Professional Ethics on Students’ Learning Engagement: Peran Efikasi Diri dalam Memoderasi Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Partisipatif dan Etika Profesional Guru terhadap Keterlibatan Belajar Siswa Anggreani, Bunga; Widhiastuti, Ratieh
Academia Open Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.11.2026.14174

Abstract

General Background: Student learning engagement is a central factor in educational success because it reflects students’ behavioral, emotional, and cognitive participation in academic activities. Specific Background: This study examined participative leadership style, teachers’ professional ethics, and self-efficacy within the framework of Social Cognitive Theory to explain student learning engagement. Knowledge Gap: Previous studies have commonly examined leadership, teacher professionalism, self-efficacy, and student engagement separately or through direct relationships, while integrated moderation models remain limited. Aims: This study aimed to analyze participative leadership style and teachers’ professional ethics in relation to student learning engagement, with self-efficacy as a moderating variable. Results: Using a quantitative survey design and Partial Least Squares analysis assisted by SmartPLS 4, the findings showed that participative leadership style had a positive and significant relationship with student learning engagement, while teachers’ professional ethics did not show a significant relationship. Self-efficacy had a direct positive relationship with student learning engagement but did not moderate the relationships between participative leadership style, teachers’ professional ethics, and student learning engagement. Novelty: The novelty lies in the simultaneous examination of participative leadership style, teachers’ professional ethics, and self-efficacy in one moderation model, showing that self-efficacy does not strengthen external factors in explaining student engagement. Implications: The findings indicate that student engagement is shaped more by active classroom participation and students’ self-belief, supporting the use of collaborative discussions, problem-based learning, and constructive feedback in learning activities. Highlights • Participative classroom leadership shows a significant positive relationship with student engagement.• Teachers’ professional ethics does not show a significant relationship in the tested model.• Self-efficacy contributes directly but does not act as a moderating variable. Keywords Participative Leadership; Self Efficacy; Student Engagement; Professional Ethics; Social Cognitive Theory
Analisis Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa dalam Kajian Teori Fraud Hexagon Sevira Ananditya; Ratieh Widhiastuti
Paedagogie Vol 21 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/paedagogie.16732

Abstract

This study aims to examine the influence of the fraud hexagon on academic fraud among students in the Faculty of Economics and Business at Universitas Negeri Semarang, Class of 2024. This study employs a quantitative method using a questionnaire in the form of a Google Form distributed via personal and group chats. The sampling technique selected was proportional random sampling to ensure that each department was proportionally represented, resulting in a sample of 322 students. Instrument validation was conducted using validity and reliability tests to ensure the quality of the indicators used. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistical analysis and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) based on Partial Least Squares (PLS). The results of the study indicate that the variables of pressure, rationalization, and arrogance do not influence student academic fraud, while the variables of opportunity, ability, and collusion do influence student academic fraud. The recommendation from this study is that the university should strengthen its monitoring system and minimize opportunities for academic fraud, as well as channel students’ potential toward more positive directions to curb academic fraud.