Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

Mekanisme Eksekusi Sita Jaminan Aset Kripto di Indonesia Chiquita Andina Putri; Yati Nurhayati; Iwan Riswandie
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): Edisi Oktober 2022
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v3i3.82

Abstract

Cryptocurrency is a type of virtual currency that works similarly to real money and enables users to virtually send payments for transactions involving business. With the development of crypto assets today, several pawn and loan institutions accept crypto assets as collateral objects. In the case of pawning, default can also occur which requires that the collateral from the debtor be confiscated in the event of default. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal strength of crypto assets used as collateral objects and to find out the execution mechanism for crypto asset confiscation in Indonesia in the event of default. This study used a normative juridical research method for its research. The type of information used in this study is secondary information, specifically information found through library research. The result of this research is that crypto assets can be used as collateral objects, but not as main collateral. Crypto assets as collateral objects already have strong legal force, this is based on Book II of the Civil Code, Law no. 10 of 2011 concerning Amendments to Law Number 32 of 1997 concerning Commodity Futures Trading, Regulation of the Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency Number 5 of 2019 concerning Technical Provisions for the Implementation of the Physical Crypto Asset Market on the Futures Exchange. In terms of regulating the confiscation of crypto assets, it can be said that currently in Indonesia itself there are no special regulations and special institutions that regulate the confiscation of crypto assets. But the process of confiscation of crypto assets can be carried out with procedures such as foreclosure of other material guarantees.
Kewajiban Perusahaan Pertambangan Dalam Reklamasi Lahan Tambang Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara Diaz Rahadiyan Rizkirobbi; Nurul Listiyani; Iwan Riswandie
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): Edisi Oktober 2022
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v3i3.92

Abstract

Aside from the rise of environmental issues regarding mining activities, especially in the context of reclamation and post-mining activities, there have been changes in the regulations governing them. The reclamation program for ex-mining land is a mandatory program that must be carried out by every company, both private and non-private. Reclamation is an activity carried out throughout the mining business stages to organize, restore, and improve the quality of the environment and the ecosystem so that they function again according to their designation. The placement of post-mining guarantees by companies should not eliminate the company's obligation to carry out post-mining activities. If the company has a shortage of reclamation planning costs, placement of reclamation guarantees, implementation of reclamation, or release or disbursement of reclamation guarantees to complete post-mining activities under the stipulated guarantee, it remains the company's responsibility.  
The Concept of Restitutive Guarantee in Employment Relations: Normative Reconstruction of Training Bonds and Cost Recovery Agreements in Indonesia Riswandie, Iwan; Syafa'i, Imam
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19223047

Abstract

Job training has become a strategic investment in contemporary employment relations, yet the absence of clear regulatory frameworks governing training cost reimbursement in Indonesia generates legal uncertainty and normative tensions between employers and employees. Practices such as training bonds and cost recovery agreements often blur the distinction between legitimate investment protection and restrictions on labor mobility. This study aims to develop a normative reconstruction of training cost reimbursement through the concept of restitutive guarantees. This research employs a normative legal approach, combining statutory, conceptual, and limited comparative analyses, complemented by hypothetical normative illustrations as a normative stress test to assess the legitimacy of workers’ financial obligations in structurally asymmetric employment relationships. The findings demonstrate that training cost reimbursement is normatively justifiable only when it is limited to actual, verifiable, proportionate, and unamortized costs, and when it functions as a restitution mechanism rather than a contractual penalty. The proposed concept of restitutive guarantees establishes a coherent legal framework grounded in the principles of proportionality, transparency, and non-coercion. This study contributes to labor law discourse by clarifying the legitimate boundaries of workers’ financial obligations and offering a normative model that reconciles employer investment protection with workers’ freedom of mobility. It also provides a conceptual basis for future labor law policy development in Indonesia within an internationally relevant framework.
ANALISIS KEKUATAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) SEBAGAI PERJANJIAN PENDAHULUAN DALAM HUKUM PERDATA INDONESIA Noor Azizah; Iwan Riswandie; Istiana Heriani
Cangkal : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Mei - Oktober 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Literasi Borneo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The use of Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) as initial agreements or contractual stages is growing in Indonesia, but their legal status remains valid. This research aims to examine the position of MoUs in Indonesian contract law, focusing on several valid agreement requirements as stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code and the court's interpretation of MoUs in law enforcement. This research applies a normative approach in legal studies and case studies. The results show that an MoU can be legally binding if it meets the valid requirements of an agreement, namely agreement, the capacity of the parties, a clear object, and a legitimate cause. Several court decisions, such as Denpasar District Court Decision No. 419/PDT.G/2012/PN.DPS, recognize MoUs as preliminary agreements that give rise to legal obligations. However, if an MoU only contains a general understanding without clear obligations, then the MoU is considered merely a moral agreement without legal consequences. This research emphasizes the importance of clarity in establishing an MoU to provide legal certainty.
EFEKTIFITAS PEMBERIAN UPAH LEMBUR TERHADAP KARYAWAN DI SALON SOFI MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KETENAGAKERJAAN Emilia; Iwan Riswandie; Adwin Tista
Cangkal : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Mei - Oktober 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Literasi Borneo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Overtime pay is a form of legal protection for workers who work beyond normal working hours. Law Number 13 of 2003 Article 78 stipulates that workers who perform overtime work are entitled to compensation in the form of overtime pay. However, in practice, the implementation of this regulation is often not optimal, especially in the small business sector such as beauty salons. Sofi Salon in Banjarmasin City was the object of research because it often implements an overtime work system, especially on weekends. Based on observations and interviews, it was found that employees work overtime almost every day, but do not receive overtime pay in accordance with legal provisions. This raises questions about the effectiveness of the implementation of overtime pay at that place and its impact on employee rights and work motivation.
Keseimbangan Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor dan Debitor Dalam Pinjaman Online Iwan Riswandie
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 16, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v16i1.13718

Abstract

Pinjaman online merupakan mekanisme perbuatan hukum yang berkembang seiring dengan perkembangan teknologi di masyarakat dengan menawarkan kemudahan dari berbagai aspek terhadap hubungan yang terjadi. Hanya saja di samping dengan berbagai kemudahan yang ditawarkan kepada para pihak (kreditor sebagai peminjam dan debitur sebagai pihak yang melakukan pinjaman) dimana hubungan yang terjadi didasari atas kesepakatan (kebebasan berkontrak) tidak jarang hubungan ini menimbulkan dampak signifikan yang cukup meresahkan masyarakat, sehingga hubungan hukum yang saling menguntungkan tersebut harus diintervensi oleh negara dalam kerangka memberikan perlindungan kepada para pihak yang ada didalamnya. Keseimbangan Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor dan Debitur Dalam Pinjaman Online”. Metode yang dipakai ialah melalui analisis hukum dan konsep, dengan menggunakan norma-norma yang ada dan landasan perundang-undangan. Pada akhirnya, kesimpulan dari tulisan ini yaitu adalah pinjaman Online yang mengakomodir perkembangan teknologi dimana Kreditor (pemberi pinjaman) dan debitur (penerima pinjaman) terjadi hak dan kewajiban dari para pihak yang dilandasi hukum perjanjian diwilayah privat, dimana kesepakatan para pihak adalah merupakan Undang-Undang bagi yang membuatnya. Kondisi yang dilandasi dengan koridor kesepakatan tentunya akan membawa dampak yang signifikan terhadap kewajiban pemenuhan hak dan kewajiban Kreditor dan debitur sama-sama dalam kondisi yang tidak menguntungkan apabila hak dan kewajiban tersebut tidak dilakukan, sehingga dalam hal ini perlu regulasi dari instrumen hukum (perundang-undangan) untuk bisa membawa hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak ke ranah publik dengan tetap memberikan kebebasan dalam wilayah teknis untuk diatur atas dasar kesepakatan yang sudah di perjanjian dalam pinjaman berbasis Online ini.