Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Mekanisme Eksekusi Sita Jaminan Aset Kripto di Indonesia Chiquita Andina Putri; Yati Nurhayati; Iwan Riswandie
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): Edisi Oktober 2022
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v3i3.82

Abstract

Cryptocurrency is a type of virtual currency that works similarly to real money and enables users to virtually send payments for transactions involving business. With the development of crypto assets today, several pawn and loan institutions accept crypto assets as collateral objects. In the case of pawning, default can also occur which requires that the collateral from the debtor be confiscated in the event of default. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal strength of crypto assets used as collateral objects and to find out the execution mechanism for crypto asset confiscation in Indonesia in the event of default. This study used a normative juridical research method for its research. The type of information used in this study is secondary information, specifically information found through library research. The result of this research is that crypto assets can be used as collateral objects, but not as main collateral. Crypto assets as collateral objects already have strong legal force, this is based on Book II of the Civil Code, Law no. 10 of 2011 concerning Amendments to Law Number 32 of 1997 concerning Commodity Futures Trading, Regulation of the Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency Number 5 of 2019 concerning Technical Provisions for the Implementation of the Physical Crypto Asset Market on the Futures Exchange. In terms of regulating the confiscation of crypto assets, it can be said that currently in Indonesia itself there are no special regulations and special institutions that regulate the confiscation of crypto assets. But the process of confiscation of crypto assets can be carried out with procedures such as foreclosure of other material guarantees.
Kewajiban Perusahaan Pertambangan Dalam Reklamasi Lahan Tambang Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara Diaz Rahadiyan Rizkirobbi; Nurul Listiyani; Iwan Riswandie
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): Edisi Oktober 2022
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v3i3.92

Abstract

Aside from the rise of environmental issues regarding mining activities, especially in the context of reclamation and post-mining activities, there have been changes in the regulations governing them. The reclamation program for ex-mining land is a mandatory program that must be carried out by every company, both private and non-private. Reclamation is an activity carried out throughout the mining business stages to organize, restore, and improve the quality of the environment and the ecosystem so that they function again according to their designation. The placement of post-mining guarantees by companies should not eliminate the company's obligation to carry out post-mining activities. If the company has a shortage of reclamation planning costs, placement of reclamation guarantees, implementation of reclamation, or release or disbursement of reclamation guarantees to complete post-mining activities under the stipulated guarantee, it remains the company's responsibility.