Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Education and Socialization of Mosquito Nest Erradication with 3M Plus Movement to Students and Teachers at SMA Negeri 1 Binjai District, Langkat District, North Sumatera, Indonesia Amelia, Rina; Wijaya, Hendri; Eyanoer, Putri Chairani; Yunanda, Yuki; Wahyuni, Arlinda Sari; Fujiati, Isti Ilmiati; Harahap, Juliandi; Alona, Ivana
ABDIMAS TALENTA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): ABDIMAS TALENTA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/abdimastalenta.v9i1.17177

Abstract

Until now, there has been a tendency for dengue fever patients to increase, and its transmission has become one of Indonesia's most common public health problems. Getting rid of mosquito nest eradication (MNE) with the 3M Plus Movement regularly, which includes draining water reservoirs, burying used items, and closing water reservoirs, which make it harder for mosquitoes to breed, can stop the spread of dengue. Even though this disease can attack all groups, several studies have shown that children and teenagers are more susceptible to dengue fever, so it is essential to make efforts to increase understanding and education for school-aged children, including high school students and teachers, who must work together to prevent dengue fever. As a result, the community service team from the Medical Faculty of Universitas Sumatera Utara carried out this activity using an outreach strategy that included questions and answers with students about MNE, Clean and Healthy Living Behavior, and other topics as well as the actual implementation of 3M Plus. A good understanding of MNE among students and teachers allows for the formation of awareness of MNE's significance in the school environment, which is the outcome of this activity.
Hemodynamic Effects of Phenylephrine 100 µg versus Ephedrine 5 mg During Propofol-Induced General Anesthesia: A Randomized Study Sibarani, Nicholas Hamonangan; Lubis, Andriamuri Primaputra; Bangun, Chrismas Gideon; Yunanda, Yuki
Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif Vol 13, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15851/jap.v13n3.4454

Abstract

Background: Propofol is widely used for induction of general anesthesia; however, it frequently associated hypotension due to vasodilation and myocardial depression. Vasopressors such as phenylephrine and ephedrine are commonly administered to counteract this effect, but evidence comparing their hemodynamic efficacy during induction remains limited.Methods: This randomized double-blind clinical trial included 80 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups to receive either phenylephrine 100 µg or ephedrine 5 mg at the time of propofol induction. Demographic characteristics (sex, age, body mass index, and ASA physical status) were recorded. Hemodynamic parameters, including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate, were measured after premedication and 30 seconds following propofol administration.Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. At 30 seconds after induction, there were no statistically significant differences in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, or heart rate between the phenylephrine and ephedrine groups. Both vasopressors effectively maintained hemodynamic stability during propofol induction.Discussion: The findings suggest that phenylephrine and ephedrine have similar hemodynamic profiles when administered during propofol induction. Despite their differing pharmacological mechanisms, both agents were equally effective in preventing early hypotension without significant differences in heart rate or blood pressure responses.Conclusion: Phenylephrine 100 µg and ephedrine 5 mg demonstrated comparable efficacy in maintaining hemodynamic stability during propofol-induced general anesthesia, with no significant difference in their ability to prevent hypotension.