Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.341
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Pleno Jure Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP) Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG) Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Askari Razak
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Pengaturan Gratifikasi Sebagai Salah Satu Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Undang-Undang Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Askari Razak; Romi Sunggara; Hambali Thalib
Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Lex Theory (JLT)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52103/jlt.v4i1.1537

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis pengaturan gratifikasi dalam UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 jo UU No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Metode yang digunakan peneliti di sini adalah Penelitian secara umum dapat digolongkan dalam dua jenis yaitu penelitian empiris sosiologis (lapangan). Hasil penelitian bahwa Setiap gratifikasi kepada pegawai negeri atau penyelenggara Negara dianggap pemberian suap, apabila berhubungan dengan jabatannya dan yang berlawanan dengan kewajiban atau tugasnya dengan ketentuan: Yang nilainya Rp 10.000.000,00 (sepuluh juta rupiah) atau lebih pembuktiaannya bahwa gratifikasi tersebut bukan merupakan suap dilakukan oleh penerima gratifikasi. Ketentuan ini merupakan sistem pembebanan pembuktian terbalik, dimana kepada penerima gratifikasi diberi kewajiban untuk membuktikan bahwa dia tidak ada menerima gratifikasi, atau bahwa hadiah yang diterimanya tidak ada hubungannya dengan jabatannya, dan tidak bertentangan dengan tugas dan kewajibannya. The research objective is to analyze the gratuity regulations in Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The method used by researchers here is Research can generally be classified into two types, namely empirical sociological (field) research. The research results show that every gratuity to a civil servant or state administrator is considered a bribe if it is related to his/her position and is contrary to his or her obligations or duties with the provisions: The value of IDR 10,000,000.00 (ten million rupiah) or more is proof that the gratuity is not bribery is carried out by the recipient of the gratification. This provision is a reverse burden of proof system, where the recipient of the gratification is given the obligation to prove that he or she did not receive the gratuity, or that the gift he or she received has nothing to do with his position, and does not conflict with his duties and obligations.
Penyidikan Terhadap Kelalaian Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian Oleh Pengendara Di Jalan Raya (Studi Kasus Lakalantas Polrestabes Makassar) Ilham Ashari; Askari Razak; Nur Fadhila Mappaselleng
Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1 No 2: September 2020 – Februari 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research was conducted to determine how the investigation of the Makassar Police Traffic Police, in carrying out investigations into negligence that resulted in the death of motorists on the highway, and what are the factors that affect the course of the investigation process carried out by the Makassar Police Traffic Police.Based on the results of research conducted in empirically analyzing the investigation process and the factors that can influence it, it can be concluded that the investigation of negligence that results in death on the road is that the driver's behavior in driving his vehicle has been negligent or careless which results in death, in this case. is a criminal act that can be subject to criminal penalties for the rider. The Makassar Police District Police handled the case by processing motorists who due to their negligence resulted in death by carrying out investigations and investigations where the process was to find out whether the rider fulfilled the elements and could be made a suspect so that the event could be made to delegate the case to the prosecutor for further processing. .The investigation process can be influenced by the absence of eye witnesses at the scene of the case, which complicates the course of the investigation process and the lack of public awareness to report when they find out about a crime that has occurred on the road because they consider it an important act. Investigation; Negligence; Accidentally Resulting in Death; Driver; On the highway;
PENERAPAN ASAS PRADUGA TAK BERSALAH TERHADAP PELAKU PENCURIAN YANG DISERTAI DENGAN KEKERASAN Fathur Abdillah Ikhsan; Askari Razak; Fauziah Basyuni
Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 1: Maret – Agustus 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to identify and analyze the application of the principle ofpresumption of innocence to perpetrators of theft accompanied by violenceand to determine the factors that influence the application of the principle ofpresumption of innocence to perpetrators of theft accompanied by violence,the type of research used in writing this thesis is empirical research. , withprimary and secondary data coverage, the research was conducted in twolocations, namely the Makassar Port Police Resort and the Makassar CityDistrict Court, the results of this study indicate that the perpetrators of theftaccompanied by violence in the Makassar District Court Decision ThePresumption of Guilt is applied because the principle of The presumption ofinnocence means that a person cannot be considered guilty before there is adecision that has permanent legal force, the influencing factor is the existenceof evidence and evidence found with statements of similarities and matchesfrom witnesses. and suspects, therefore in carrying out the investigationprocess the principle of the presumption of innocence should always be basedon the applicable laws and regulations and not neglect the suspect's humanrights, and also improve the quality and quantity of law enforcementpersonnel proportionally so as to meet the resource requirements. humanbeings who are able to carry out and realize the criminal justice process inaccordance with legal certainty, fair and true. Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis penerapan asaspraduga tak bersalah terhadap pelaku pencurian yang disertai dengankekerasan dan Untuk mengetahui faktor yang mempengaruhi penerapan asaspraduga tak bersalah terhadap pelaku pencurian yang disertai dengankekerasan, tipe penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan skripsi ini adalahtipe penelitian empiris, dengan cakupan data primer dan sekunder, penelitiandilakukan di dua lokasi, yaitu di Kepolisian Resor Pelabuhan Makassar danPengadilan Negeri Kota Makassar, hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwaterhadap pelaku pencurian yang disertai dengan kekerasan pada PutusanPengadilan Negeri Makassar Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah diterapkan karenaAsas Praduga Tak Bersalah mengandung arti seseorang tidak dapat dianggapbersalah sebelum ada putusan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap, faktor yangmempengaruhi yaitu adanya alat bukti dan barang bukti yang ditemukandengan keterangan-keterangan persamaan dan pencocokan dari saksimaupun tersangka, maka dari itu dalam melakukan proses penyidikan asaspraduga tak bersalah hendaknya senantiasa berpijak pada aturanperundang-undangan yang berlaku dan tidak mengaibaikan hak- hak asasitersangka, dan juga dilakukan peningkatan kualitas dan kuantitas tenaga penegak hukum yang proporsional sehingga memenuhi persyaratan sumberdaya manusia yang mampu melaksanakan dan mewujudkan proses pradilanpidana yang sesuai dengan kepastian hukum, adil dan benar
Penunjukan Gubernur oleh Presiden dalam Wacana RUU Daerah Khusus Jakarta: Kontroversi dan Orientasi Askari Razak
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1455

Abstract

The Special Capital Region of Jakarta Bill has generated controversy regarding the proposal to grant the President the authority to appoint the Governor. Despite concerns about conflicting with regional autonomy, this provision is considered crucial for maintaining the stability of the capital. This research aims to analyze the controversy surrounding the mechanism of the President's appointment of the Governor in the bill and formulate an ideal policy orientation to bridge the interests of the central and local governments. A normative method, utilizing legislative and case law approaches, is employed to examine primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, qualitatively analyzing the controversy and policy orientation. The study identifies the controversy arising from Article 10, paragraph (1), allowing the President's direct appointment, potentially undermining citizen participation and democratic principles. To balance central and local government interests, policy orientation can refer to Law No. 23 of 2014, involving direct election of the Governor by the people, with additional conditions and recommendations from the central government. Aligning the Governor of Jakarta's term with the President's and establishing a Jakarta Consideration Council involving both central and local government elements ensures checks and balances. Detailed tasks for the Governor regarding the coordination of national development programs in Jakarta, along with incentives and affirmative policies from the central government, support the region's development as the capital.
Co-Authors A Khaerun Hidayah A Muin Fahmal A. Muin Fahmal A. Muin Fahmal A. Muin Fahmal Adi Verry Anggeryawan Agung Munandar Amrayadi Amrayadi Andi Asrul Sani Andi Ento Mulyanto AM Ariani Vemi Octaviani Aris Munandar Azhar Arsyad Bakri Abubakar Daniel Junwaldi MP Nainggolan Fathur Abdillah Ikhsan Fauziah Basyuni Fitra Darlian Gabriel Rumbayan Hambali Thalib Hamzah Hamzah Ilham Ashari Imran Imran Irfan Syafar La Ode Husen Lauddin Marsuni Megawati S Megawati S Mohammad Arif Muh. Syarif Nuh Muhammad Asyrar Achmad Mulyati Pawennai Nawisa Nawisa Nellyati Nellyati Nur Fadhila Mappaselleng Nur Fajri Rahman Setiawan Romi Sunggara Sapri Sapri Sufirman Rahman Sultan Alauddin Parawansa Syahruddin Nawi Welfrick Krisyana Ambarita Wildan Syauqil Umam Yuda Bosniawan H Zaenal Arifin Zulfikar Hendra Zulkifli Zulkifli