Mohamad Rosyidin
Departement Of International Relations, Faculty Of Social And Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro. Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, S.H. – Tembalang Semarang, Indonesia 50275

Published : 76 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Usaha Mendapatkan Pengakuan Internasional: Kebijakan Indonesia Mengeluarkan Peraturan Presiden 125/2016 dalam Menangani Isu Pengungsi Kevin Ronaldo Sirait; Mohamad Rosyidin; Ika Riswanti Putranti; Shary Charlotte
Indonesian Perspective Vol 4, No 2: (Juli-Desember 2019), hlm. 100-196
Publisher : Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (864.533 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/ip.v4i2.26700

Abstract

As a transit country, Indonesia is obliged to temporarily accommodate thousands of refugees and asylum seekers who are waiting to be processed by UNHCR for resettlement to the third countries. To facilitate refugees and asylum seekers, Joko Widodo’s government issued Presidential Regulation 125/2016. The international community appreciates the regulation because it shows Indonesia commitment to take part in addressing one of the humanitarian issues that is currently being concern to the world. This paper aims to analyze Joko Widodo’s policy that facilitate refugees and asylum seekers. By using the concept of international recognition in the constructivist paradigm, this paper argues that the government issued Presidential Regulation 125/2016 is influenced by the desire of Indonesia to be recognized as a “human rights defender” in terms of refugee handling. In this case, recognition, appreciation, and positive response from the international community has been obtained by Indonesia leading to the reduction of pressure from international community which could trigger the phenomenon of misrecognition. In this regard, Indonesia’s identity as “human rights defender” can be maintained.
Di Bawah Spirit Liberal-Institusionalisme: Kajian Komparatif Gagasan Dynamic Equilibrium dan ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific Ardianti, Dinar Elly; Rosyidin, Mohamad; Alfian, Muhammad Faizal
Indonesian Perspective Vol 8, No 1: (Januari-Juni 2023): 1-210
Publisher : Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ip.v8i1.55088

Abstract

This article aims to compare two Indonesia’s foreign policy ideas, namely, dynamic equilibrium and the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP). It treats both ideas as an analytical tool instead of propositions to be tested against empirical evidence. Using liberal-institutionalism approach, this article argues that despite both ideas applies in the Indo-Pacific region, both have different characteristics. While dynamic equilibrium can be regarded as a foreign policy doctrine which only proposes the basic principles of interstate relations, AOIP is a cooperative framework which becomes policy guidance for countries in the region. However, both ideas conforms liberal-institutionalism premises that international regimes matter because it provides set of rules for cooperation rather than rivalry, recover ASEAN’s role as a key actor in the region, promote dialogue in dispute settlement, and gain economic development. 
Realisme versus Liberalisme: Suatu Perbandingan Paradigmatis Rosyidin, Mohamad
Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 2: (Juli-Desember 2022): 134-255
Publisher : Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i2.50775

Abstract

Realism and liberalism are the most dominant paradigms in the study of International Relations. Both are often positioned diametrically because they have basic assumptions that contradict each other. Even though comparing the two paradigms violates the principle of incommensurability, it doesn't mean it's not useful. This paper attempts to map the two paradigms based on their underlying assumptions. Although in many respects realism and liberalism are opposites in viewing the phenomenon of international relations, both of them basically have similarities in viewing the nature of the international system and the nature of actors. This paper attempts to see what are the strong and weaknesses of each paradigm to see how far both are able to explain the phenomenon of international relations. Nevertheless, this paper does not pretend to judge one paradigm as better than another. 
Usaha Mendapatkan Pengakuan Internasional: Kebijakan Indonesia Mengeluarkan Peraturan Presiden 125/2016 dalam Menangani Isu Pengungsi Sirait, Kevin Ronaldo; Rosyidin, Mohamad; Putranti, Ika Riswanti; Charlotte, Shary
Indonesian Perspective Vol 4, No 2: (Juli-Desember 2019), hlm. 100-196
Publisher : Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (864.533 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/ip.v4i2.26700

Abstract

As a transit country, Indonesia is obliged to temporarily accommodate thousands of refugees and asylum seekers who are waiting to be processed by UNHCR for resettlement to the third countries. To facilitate refugees and asylum seekers, Joko Widodo’s government issued Presidential Regulation 125/2016. The international community appreciates the regulation because it shows Indonesia commitment to take part in addressing one of the humanitarian issues that is currently being concern to the world. This paper aims to analyze Joko Widodo’s policy that facilitate refugees and asylum seekers. By using the concept of international recognition in the constructivist paradigm, this paper argues that the government issued Presidential Regulation 125/2016 is influenced by the desire of Indonesia to be recognized as a “human rights defender” in terms of refugee handling. In this case, recognition, appreciation, and positive response from the international community has been obtained by Indonesia leading to the reduction of pressure from international community which could trigger the phenomenon of misrecognition. In this regard, Indonesia’s identity as “human rights defender” can be maintained.
Major Power in the Making: Analisis Komprehensif Status Indonesia dalam Hirarki Politik Internasional, 2014-2024 Mohamad Rosyidin; Indra Kusumawardhana
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 12, No 2 (2023): Published in November 2023
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.12.2.163-182.2023

Abstract

Indonesia’s status as a middle power has become a commonsense in contemporary International Relations (IR) literature. Existing scholarships on this topic rely on a behavioral approach, emphasizing foreign policy characteristics in defining Indonesia’s status. Other scholars employ a material approach, measuring Indonesia’s economic as well as military capabilities. Previous studies have tended to overlook social and psychological elements of Indonesia’s international standing. This paper argues that Indonesia’s status cannot be determined by partial perspectives. Rather, it requires a comprehensive analysis by incorporating material, behavioral, social, and psychological elements to determine Indonesia’s status at the global level. Based on a comprehensive analysis of Indonesia’s foreign policy during Joko Widodo administration (2014-2024), this paper contends that Indonesia can be classified as an intermittent major power, that is, a country that not only aspires to be a major power but also asccending the hierarchy of international politics. In other words, Indonesia is a major power in the making. This idea supports the claim that Indonesia has a great power mentality stemming from its glorious past. This explains why Indonesia’s foreign policy frequently exhibits great power aspirations.
ASEAN (in)Security Community Rosyidin, Mohamad
Journal Of Global Strategic Studies : Jurnal Magister Hubungan Internasional Vol 3 No 1 (2023): Journal of Global Strategic Studies
Publisher : Master's Programs in International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Jenderal Achmad Yani University (UNJANI).

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36859/jgss.v3i1.1556

Abstract

The existence of arms modernization can be regarded as the high degree of security dilemma among states. In Southeast Asia, the fact that defense budget escalation followed by the military modernization may be the biggest obstacle to create an ASEAN Security Community. Unfortunately, there have been a little attention on the issue studying the correlation between arms modernization and the prospect of ASEAN Security Community. This paper seeks to fill the gap by analyzing how arms modernization in Southeast Asia is counterproductive to the ASEAN Security Community development. Using constructivism in International Relations, this paper argues that arms modernization among several ASEAN member states hinders collective identity building as a fundamental factor behind the security community. This argument implies that the formation of ASEAN Security Community will not create long-lasting peace in the region. This paper suggests that ASEAN should focus on collective identity formation to strengthen its own body institution rather than merely declare in a formal treaty.
Co-Authors A Rizki Tahmi Adinda Kinanti Prameswari, Adinda Kinanti Agnes, Pretty Al Sarah, Enno Nuri Alfian, Muhammad Faizal Alvian Rizky H, Alvian Rizky Ammar, Faishal Andi Akhmad Basith Dir, Andi Akhmad Annisa Antania Hanjani Ardianti Mawardika Ardianti, Dinar Elly Aulianisa Rahma Dyah Rusyadi Auliaur Rahman, Maulana Ammar Auva Syiahnaz Rizky Shafira Ayu Sabrina Ayu Sabrina Ayu, Albadii Fadhil Mila Birendra, Muhammad Basyir Buntaran, Veronika Suci Novitasari Charlotte, Shary Christanti, Naomi Febri Dea Tunjung Jatra Saputra, Dea Tunjung Jatra Dir, Andi Akhmad Basith Faiz Fadhlurrakhman, Faiz Fatoni, Muhamad Afi Fendy E Wahyudi, Fendy E Fendy Eko Wahyudi, Fendy Eko Firdaus, Yoga Arfiansyah Fitria, Dwita Artsy Gumilar, Duanda Handoyo, Khalda Khairunnisa Haryadi, Yulius Helga Prashernanda Hermini Susetianingsih, Hermini Hermini Susiatiningsih Himalia, Mia Risa Ika Riswanti Putranti Indra Kusumawardhana Indra Kusumawardhana Ines Florence Tabita Hutauruk Irfansyah, Fadhila Islamawati, Dian Jecklin Saragih, Jecklin Karisma, Dela Kevin Ronaldo Sirait Khairunisa, Adilah Hasna Khasanah, Yulian Maulida Kusumawardany, Chintya Kusumawardhana, Indra Lintang Suproboningrum Lyra Asaria Uthan Mahardika, Asyifa Margareth, Fitri Kamelia Marten Hanura, Marten Maruf, Wakhid Aprizal Mikael Witarka Muhammad Faiza; Alfian Muhammad Faizal Alfian Nadia Farabi, Nadia Nadya Yolanda Nainggolan Nur Ilmi Pangestu, Muhammad Rizky Putra, Tomy Darma Putri, Sapen Sartika Unyi Rachmat Hidayatullah, Rachmat Rahman, Dzulfiqar Fathur Ramdhani, Hafrian Yusuf Reni Windiani Roziqi, Muhammad Afif Maulana Rr. Hermini S, Rr. Hermini Satwika Paramasatya, Satwika Sekarini Santoso, Nabilla Ayu Sesarianto, Kevin Ali Shary Charlotte Shary Charlotte H.P, Shary Charlotte Sheiffi Puspapertiwi, Sheiffi Sinaga, Irene F Sirait, Kevin Ronaldo Syahputra, Eqqi Tri Cahya Utama Tri Cahyo Utomo Ula, Syarifatul Ungsi, Dien Nur Rahmaniar Wardhani, Ratna Kusuma Welas, Ibnu Rasyid Wicaksono, Wahyu Setyo Wulandari, Cintya Yovanka Ayunita Deborah Lasut Yulian Maulida Khasanah