Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Model of Zakat Utilization in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era: Perspective of Maqashid Sharia Ramadhita, Ramadhita; Sudirman, Sudirman; Bachri, Syabbul
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 7 No 1 May (2022)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (779.922 KB) | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v7i1.4462

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic brought significant changes in human social life. One of the most affected sectors is the economy. One of the financial institutions that can be used to alleviate poverty is zakat. This article aims to describe the utilization of zakat in East Java province and analyze it using the principles of Maqashid Sharia. This article is based on empirical research using a conceptual approach. Primary data was generated from interviews with Badan Amil Zakat East Java, Yayasan Dana Sosial Al-Falah Malang, Nurul Hayat Malang, and Baitul Mal Hidayatullah Malang. This study shows that zakat management institutions have distributed productive zakat. There are three models of the productive distribution of zakat: the provision of Business Capital, Revolving Funds, and scholarships. Productive management of zakat can be maximized through mentoring and monitoring the program. Assistance to mustahiq beneficiaries can improve the quality of religious knowledge, reason, and economic income as stated in maqashid syariah.
The Criminalization of Polyamory Perspective Islamic Penal Law and Indonesian New Penal Code Bachri, Syabbul; Samuri, Mohd Al Adib; Moosa, Najma; Duran, Büşra Nur; Ramadhita, Ramadhita
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 8 No 2 November (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v8i2.7221

Abstract

Regardless of the social stigma faced, polyamory has become a widely discussed issue and has received much attention in various fields. This study aims to examine the legal aspects regarding the criminalization of polyamory from the perspective of Islamic criminal law and the new penal code in Indonesia. This study is a type of normative juridical research with a conceptual and statutory approach. The research results show that any sexual relation outside of legal marriage is considered adultery in Islam, requiring criminal sanctions for the perpetrators. Polyamory cases involving same-sex couples are also included in the criminal act. In the Indonesian legal context, although the term polyamory is not mentioned explicitly, the new Penal Code has the potential to criminalize polyamorous perpetrators with the latest regulations regarding adultery and cohabitation offenses. This new penal code can also criminalize homosexual behaviour including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and Queer plus(LGBTQ+) people. However, the perpetrator of polyamory can only be convicted if there is a complaint from the aggrieved party (i.e. the legal spouse, children, and parents of the perpetrator), because those articles fall into the category of absolute complaint offenses. Looking at the cultural values of Indonesian society, especially the teachings of Islam as a religion adhered to by the majority of citizens, the criminalization of polyamory should be included in the ordinary complaint offense so that it can be in line with the living norms in society.
Regulation of the Waqif Heirs in the Law of Waqf in Indonesia and Malaysia Al-Anshori, Huzaimah; Ramadhita, Ramadhita; Manfaluthi, Agus
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2535

Abstract

Indonesia and Malaysia, as developing countries, have similarities and differences regarding the heirs of the waqif, from their implementation, legal basis, and system, to the resolution of waqf disputes. This investigation scrutinizes the convergences and divergences within the waqf juridical frameworks of Indonesia and Malaysia, with implications that enrich the global dialogue on waqf jurisprudence. The study adopts a doctrinal, literature-oriented methodology, employing a normative juridical paradigm and relying on secondary data comprising primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The analytical technique employed is comparative in nature. The outcomes of this inquiry elucidate that the legal configuration governing the heirs of a waqif in both Indonesia and Malaysia embodies distinct attributes reflective of their respective sociocultural typologies. The legislative treatment of waqif heirs in the two jurisdictions diverges; in Indonesia, their recognition is expressly articulated in Article 6, paragraphs (2) and (4) of Government Regulation No. 42 of 2006, which operationalizes the Waqf Law. The existing nazir informs the waqif or the waqif heirs, and the waqif heirs have the right to propose to the Indonesian Waqf Board (BWI) for the nazir‘s termination and replacement. In Malaysia, the waqif heirs are not specifically regulated, but there is legislation stipulating that in the waqf practice, the waqif must obtain approval from the King and the waqif heirs. The common point between these two countries lies in the framework of Islamic law, which follows the Shafi'i madhhab but is not absolute. However, in Malaysia, this only applies in certain states.
Regulation of the Waqif Heirs in the Law of Waqf in Indonesia and Malaysia Al-Anshori, Huzaimah; Ramadhita, Ramadhita; Manfaluthi, Agus
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2535

Abstract

Indonesia and Malaysia, as developing countries, have similarities and differences regarding the heirs of the waqif, from their implementation, legal basis, and system, to the resolution of waqf disputes. This investigation scrutinizes the convergences and divergences within the waqf juridical frameworks of Indonesia and Malaysia, with implications that enrich the global dialogue on waqf jurisprudence. The study adopts a doctrinal, literature-oriented methodology, employing a normative juridical paradigm and relying on secondary data comprising primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The analytical technique employed is comparative in nature. The outcomes of this inquiry elucidate that the legal configuration governing the heirs of a waqif in both Indonesia and Malaysia embodies distinct attributes reflective of their respective sociocultural typologies. The legislative treatment of waqif heirs in the two jurisdictions diverges; in Indonesia, their recognition is expressly articulated in Article 6, paragraphs (2) and (4) of Government Regulation No. 42 of 2006, which operationalizes the Waqf Law. The existing nazir informs the waqif or the waqif heirs, and the waqif heirs have the right to propose to the Indonesian Waqf Board (BWI) for the nazir‘s termination and replacement. In Malaysia, the waqif heirs are not specifically regulated, but there is legislation stipulating that in the waqf practice, the waqif must obtain approval from the King and the waqif heirs. The common point between these two countries lies in the framework of Islamic law, which follows the Shafi'i madhhab but is not absolute. However, in Malaysia, this only applies in certain states.