Muhammad Ishar Helmi, Muhammad Ishar
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Published : 44 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Constructing Muslim Identity in a Secular State: The Strategic Role of Two Singapore Islamic Organizations Zulkifli; Syafiq Hasyim; M Zaki Mubarak; Husnul Khitam; Muhammad Ishar Helmi
Al-Ihkam, Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Vol 18 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia IAIN Madura collaboration with The Islamic Law Researcher Association (APHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i1.6002

Abstract

In Singapore, Islamic identity matters mainly because Muslims and Malays have special constitutional status. However, state policies seem to contradict the status while the community is still dealing with the problem of backwardness in educational and economic development. This article examines the profile and strategic role of two Islamic organizations, MUIS (Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura, the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore) and Pergas (Persatuan Ulama dan Guru-Guru Agama Islam Singapura, Singapore Islamic Scholars, and Religious Teachers Association), in accommodating the expression and reconstructing Singaporean Muslim identity. Through intensive library research and using an interdisciplinary approach from social constructivist and fiqh of minorities’ perspectives, this article found that both have played a very important role in the expression and construction of Singaporean Muslim identity. There have been dynamic contestation and cooperation between the state policies towards the Muslim community. However, the global effect of Islamist extremism and terrorism has united them in terms of religious thought, attitude, and the formulation of the ideal Singaporean Muslim identity. The changing process of their stances toward the government’s policies was effective due to the function of fiqh of minorities in contextualizing Islamic teachings in the context of Singapore as a secular state.
Existence of customary law in Indonesian criminal law Muhammad Ishar Helmi; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Khamami Zada
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 10, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v10i3.29829

Abstract

Currently, the scope and regulation of the criminal law system which only recognizes written law is deemed unable to accommodate the various legal needs of indigenous peoples who are still alive today. This is due to the principle of legality of criminal acts which is oriented towards individual-liberalism, not the plurality of society. Therefore, recognizing acts that violate customary law within the framework of the national legal system is considered appropriate in meeting the legal plurality needs of indigenous communities. The rigidity and arrogance of the current legalistic view of criminal law is no longer able to respond to plurality and a sense of justice, especially for customary law communities, because the reality of indigenous people's lives shows that there are countless customary law provisions outside of the law, which continue to live and are obeyed in every vein. community group members. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research method with a socio legal research approach. The socio-legal approach is intended as an approach in legal research that is focused on studying legal phenomena from the perspective of social sciences. The research results state that the position of traditional justice institutions is actually in a state of existence and absence, on the one hand it is not recognized by the Indonesian positive legal system but there are practices of these traditional justice institutions. However, cases decided based on customary law can still be found in a very limited number of cases.
Reducing The Culture of Corruption Through The Zakat Social Solidarity Movement Nur Rohim Yunus; Asep Syarifuddin Hidayat; Muhammad Ishar Helmi
Ekonomica Sharia: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Ekonomi Syariah Vol 9 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ekonomica Sharia : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Ekonomi Syariah - Agu
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ekonomi dan Bisnis Syariah (STEBIS) Indo Global Mandiri Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36908/esha.v9i1.885

Abstract

This article examines the role of zakat social solidarity in reducing the Indonesian culture of corruption. Corruption is pervasive and detrimental to development and the welfare of the people in Indonesia's numerous sectors. In Islam, social solidarity is a fundamental value that encourages Muslims to share their prosperity with those in need through the tithe. This article explains that the practice of tithing social solidarity can play a significant role in preventing and reducing corruption culture. Through qualitative research methods with a literature approach, this article explores an understanding of social solidarity and its impact on reducing the culture of corruption. Various related literature and research are used as references to support the arguments presented. The results of the study state that by practicing zakat, people are empowered economically, educationally and healthfully, thereby reducing social inequality and increasing welfare. In addition to fostering strong social awareness and concern, the practice of zakat reduces harmful behaviors such as corruption and extortion. Social solidarity through zakat also promotes the adoption of ethical and moral values in business, increases public participation in monitoring corruption, and fosters cooperation among economic actors to promote transparency and accountability.
Legal Policies for Non-Subsidized Hajj Financing in Indonesia Ahmad Mukri Aji; Muhammad Ishar Helmi
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 9, No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v9i3.23686

Abstract

Additional quotas for hajj have not been resolved, particularly in regard to the financing of hajj, which requires subsidies. The state's goal of distributing subsidies to those who are unable to afford them has not been met, and the state's concept of welfare democracy has not been realized. Accordingly, this investigation employs normative legal research in order to focus on government policies as well as developing issues related to Hajj financing. A constitutional practice that has gradually become law is revealed in this study, namely the existence of subsidies created by the existence of benefit value instruments and the practice of subsidies that have been carried out previously in an indirect manner by the Minister with agreement from the DPR in determining BPIH by applying a 50% discount to the real cost of the hajj. As long as the constitutional practice is carried out in order to complete, perfect, and revitalize the legislation, this is normal. A formal legislative body or statutory regulation is required if there are any actual or potential constitutional issues with the practice of constitutional law.Keywords: Open Legal Policy; Hajj Financing; Non-Subsidized Hajj; Hajj Category Kebijakan Hukum Pembiayaan Haji Non Subsidi di Indonesia  Abstrak.Banyaknya tambahan kuota haji belum teratasi, terutama perihal pembiayaan haji yang memerlukan subsidi. Target subsidi yang seharusnya menjangkau masyarakat yang tidak mampu secara finacial dan konsep demokrasi kesejahteraan melalui instrumen subsidi yang digunakan oleh negara dalam hal ini belum terpenuhi. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus sehingga analisis penelitian lebih menekankan kepada kebijakan pemerintah dan permasalahan yang berkembang mengenai pembiayaan haji. Temuan penelitian ini yakni, keberadaan subsidi yang tercipta dengan adanya instrumen nilai manfaat dan praktik subsidi yang secara tidak langsung, telah dilakukan sebelumnya melalui penetapan BPIH dengan besaran 50% dari real cost biaya haji yang dilakukan oleh Menteri dengan kesepakatan DPR, secara tidak langsung menjadi kebiasaan yang praktik ketatanegaraan yang telah berangsur-angsur lama menjadi hukum. Hal ini adalah lumrah, karena selama kebiasaan ketatanegaraan dilakukan demi melengkapi, menyempurnakan, menghidupkan kaidah-kaidah hukum perundang-undangan, hal tersebut konstitusional. Namun jika praktik ketatanegaraan tersebut justru mengalami permasalahan atau potensi konstitusional, maka hal tersebut harus dipertegas dalam sebuah legis formal atau peraturan perundang-undangan.Kata Kunci: Open Legal Policy; Pembiayaan Haji; Haji Non Subsidi; Kategori Haji Правовая политика для не субсидируемых Финансирование хаджа в Индонезии Абстрактный.Дополнительные квоты на хадж не решены, особенно в отношении финансирования хаджа, который требует субсидий. Задача государства по распределению субсидий среди тех, кто не может их себе позволить, не была достигнута, а концепция государственной демократии всеобщего благосостояния не была реализована. Соответственно, в этом расследовании используются нормативно-правовые исследования, с тем чтобы сосредоточить внимание на государственной политике, а также на разработке вопросов, связанных с финансированием хаджа. В этом исследовании раскрывается конституционная практика, которая постепенно стала законом, а именно наличие субсидий, созданных наличием инструментов оценки выгоды, и практика субсидий, которые ранее осуществлялись косвенным образом министром с согласия ДНР. при определении БПЖ путем применения 50% скидки к реальной стоимости хаджа. Пока конституционная практика осуществляется с целью дополнения, совершенствования и оживления законодательства, это нормально. Официальный законодательный орган или законодательное регулирование требуется, если есть какие-либо фактические или потенциальные конституционные проблемы с практикой конституционного права.Ключевые Слова: открытая правовая политика; финансирование хаджа; хадж без субсидий; категория хаджа 
Limitation and Reduction Human Rights in Indonesia Through Substitute Government Regulations Marli Candra; Tigor Einstein; Muhammad Ishar Helmi
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v7i2.10867

Abstract

AbstractSubstitute Governmental Regulations of law (Perppu) and Laws are two legislation products that are formed through different mechanisms with different formation reasons. Both also have a tendency to contain different material. However, the existence of Article 11 of Law Number 12 Year 2011 and the absence of restrictions on the material contained in the Perppu has resulted in issuing Perppu by the president which contains material that should be regulated in the Law. One of the Perppu contents is concerning the limitation and or reduction of human rights. The Perppu that has been issued has caused controversy among the community, namely the Government Regulation in substituting Law Number 1 of 2002 concerning Eradication of Terrorism Crimes, and then lastly is Substitute Governmental Regulations of Law Number 2 of 2017 concerning Amendment to Law Number 17 2013 about Community Organizations.Keywords: Limitation and/or Reduction, Human Rights, Perppu AbstrakPeraturan PemerintahPenggantiUndang-Undang (Perppu) dan Undang-Undangadalahduaprodukperaturanperundang-undangan yang dibentukmelaluimekanisme yang berbedadenganalasanpembentukkan yangberbeda.Keduanya jugamemilikikecenderunganyang memuatmateriberbeda. Akan tetapi, keberadaan Pasal 11 Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 serta tidak adanya pembatasan materi muatan dalam Perppu mengakibatkan Presiden sering kali menerbitkan Perppu yang berisi materi muatan yang seharusnya diatur dalam Undang-undang. Salah satu dari materi muatan Perppu yang seharusnya diatur di dalam Undang-Undang yakni mengenai pembatasan dan atau pengurangan hak-hak asasi manusia. Perppu yang pernah diterbitkan menimbulkan kontroversi di kalangan masyarakat di antaranya adalah Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2002 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme, dan yang terakhir adalah Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 Tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan. Kata Kunci: Pembatasan dan/atauPengurangan, HAM,PerppuАннотацияПостановления правительства взамен законов (Perppu) и акт – это два продукта законодательства, сформированные через разные механизмы с разными причинами их формирования. Оба также имеют тенденцию на содержание разныx материалов. Однако наличие статьи 11 акта № 12 от 2011 года и отсутствие ограничения на содержание в Perppu привели к тому, что президент часто издавал Perppu, содержащий материалы, которые должны управляться законом. Одним из материалов, содержащихся в Perppu, которое должно управляться законом, является ограничение и/или снижениeправ человека. Perppu вызвал споры среди людей, в том числе Постановления правительства взамен законов № 1 от 2002 года о борьбе стерроризмом и, совсем недавно, Постановления правительства взамен законов № 2 от 2017 года о поправках к акту № 17 от 2013 года об общественных организациях.Ключевые слова: ограничение и/или снижение, права человека, Постановления правительства взамен законов (Perppu).
Ambiguity Degrees of Courtesy in Trial: Ethical and Legal Norms, Legal Reasoning in Judicial Decisions Helmi, Muhammad Ishar; Pujiyono, Pujiyono; Zada, Khamami; Encep, Encep
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v8i2.23540

Abstract

Courtesy reasons are the basis for the legal reasoning of mitigation, as stated in the decision. Courtesy reasons only happen in one case. The Criminal Code explains the aggravating and mitigating circumstances of a sentence that is not considered decent in a conference. Explicitly, the word courtesy is not a reason to lighten the sentence. Article 197, paragraph 1, letter f of the Criminal Procedure Code contains the words "articles of statutory regulations which are the basis for punishment or action and articles of statutory regulations which are the legal basis of the decision." This paper uses normative legal research methods to analyze legal problems with analytical and prescriptive discipline. The findings in this research show that courtesy is not worthy of consideration in the decision as a basis for mitigation. Courtesy is an obligation for all parties in a court conference. Because when a party does not act politely, it is a crime against the judiciary or an insult to the Court. Also, courtesy norms are individual subjectivities that cannot be determined by law, especially by judges. Judges do not judge ethical norms but legal norms. The legal norms align with criminal law in that the use of norms of courtesy causes their application to criminal law because of their abstract and different nature.
Effectiveness of Criminal Offense Law Regarding Illegal Levies: Reforming Social Organizations within the Indonesian Legal Framework Helmi, Muhammad Ishar; Pujiyono, Pujiyono; Zada, Khamami; Rambe, Mara Sutan; Sahid, Mualimin Mochammad
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 7 Issue 2 (2024) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v7i2.10882

Abstract

The widespread occurrence of illegal levies suggests that the current laws are ineffective in addressing extortion practices by mass organizations. This ineffectiveness stems from inadequate supervision of youth organization activities, insufficient transparency in financial transactions, and weak enforcement measures against organizations engaging in extortion. Actions taken by these organizations, such as coercing traders for illegal levies or soliciting donations, constitute criminal offenses under Article 368, paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and are further underscored in Article 59, paragraph (2) of the law on Mass Organizations. This article aims to examine the challenges posed by the ineffectiveness of existing laws concerning criminal offenses related to illegal levies perpetrated by mass organizations and their members. The research employs a normative legal analysis, focusing on applicable legal rules and various doctrines to address specific issues. The methodologies utilized include statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the current mass organization law is ineffective and requires revision, particularly regarding legal frameworks governing donation requests (illegal collections) made through coercive means. The sanctions imposed on mass organizations engaged in these practices are not criminal, rendering them ineffective. This article proposes the revision of Law No. 16 of 2017, which stipulates government regulations, to replace Law No. 2 of 2017, thus amending Law No. 17 of 2013 concerning community organizations.
The Contribution of Legal Substance in the Indonesian Criminal Law System to Eliminating the Corruption Culture Hidayat, Asep Syarifuddin; Yunus, Nur Rohim; Helmi, Muhammad Ishar
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 9, No 6 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v9i6.31977

Abstract

Eradicating the culture of Corruption in people's lives cannot only be done by enforcing the Law, but also by having strong laws and also the courage and willingness of the authorities to apply these laws fairly and firmly. This study also aims to evaluate the effectiveness of criminal Law in dealing with criminal acts of Corruption and provide recommendations to improve weaknesses in the Indonesian criminal law system related to handling criminal acts of Corruption. The method used is a qualitative research method with a literature approach and a statutory approach. The results of the study state that there are weaknesses and challenges in enforcing the Law on Corruption in Indonesia. Therefore there must be government efforts to handle and prevent this criminal act of Corruption. Apart from building anti-corruption awareness so that Corruption does not become a culture in society.Keywords: Corruption Culture; Legal Substance; Legislation Abstrak:Pemberantasan budaya korupsi di dalam kehidupan masyarakat tidak hanya dapat dilakukan dengan penegakan hukum saja, namun juga harus memiliki undang-undang yang kuat dan juga keberanian serta kemauan dari pihak-pihak yang berwenang untuk menerapkan hukum tersebut secara adil dan tegas. Penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas hukum pidana dalam menangani tindak pidana korupsi dan memberikan rekomendasi untuk memperbaiki kelemahan yang ada dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia terkait penanganan tindak pidana korupsi. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan literatur dan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa ada kelemahan dan tantangan dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu harus ada upaya dari pemerintah dalam melakukan penanganan dan pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi tersebut. Selain harus membangun kesadaran anti-korupsi agar korupsi tidak menjadi budaya di masyarakat.Kata Kunci: Budaya Korupsi; Substansi Hukum; Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Legal Policy of Child Marriage In the Covid-19 Pandemic Period Subchi, Imam; Arsadani, Qosim; Helmi, Muhammad Ishar; Faridho, Efin
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.10570

Abstract

The increase in marriage dispensation applications that occurred during the Covid-19 pandemic also caused the high number of child marriage. Nevertheless, this has been strictly required in Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage (Marital Law), the minimum age limit for men and women is 19 years, and requirements of irregularities for this age that must meet urgent criteria and sufficient support evidence. This is done, to reduce underage child marriages as a form of enforcing the principle of children's best interests. This paper describes the complexity of underage children's marriage during the Covid-19 pandemic period, as a convenience requirement of marriage dispensation has been set rigid in the Marriage act. The method used in this paper is normative by using several approaches: the statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of the government's policy during the Covid-19 pandemic period which brought massive changes to the community's order had an impact on the collapse of the family economy. This resulted in the mass number of the child's marriages in the pandemic period. The research findings of this study deliver to children's rights violations through child marriages. The risk of decreasing individual economies, maternal and infant health, and household violence become unavoidable considering the psychological conditions of children who are immature in marriage.
The COVID-19 Vaccination: Realization on Halal Vaccines for Benefits Sholeh, M Asrorun Niam; Helmi, Muhammad Ishar
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 1 (2021): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9769

Abstract

Vaccination is one of the alternatives that has been found to overcome the COVID-19 outbreak. The long-awaited discovery of its reality remains a debate among the public. Various issues continue to emerge, both health-based and religious-based. The refusal is wrapped by questions related to doubts about treatment with vaccination or the halalness of vaccine products. MUI as an institution that is trusted by the public in determining the results of its ijtihad, issues a fatwa number 2 of 2021 concerning vaccines. This paper will conduct related studies regarding the permissibility of using the COVID-19 vaccine from the perspective of fiqh and applicable laws in Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal research method with a rule of law approach and a doctrinal approach, In addition, the data obtained by library research. The results of this study explain that the vaccines used are of course required to use halal and holy vaccines. However, immunization with haram and/or unclean vaccines can be permitted under several conditions, namely when used in an emergency; halal and holy vaccine ingredients have not been found, and there is information from competent and trusted medical personnel that there is no halal vaccine.