Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.232
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FORUM STATISTIKA DAN KOMPUTASI Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Media Statistika Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan Specta Journal of Technology Budimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat NUCLEUS: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Natural Science Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Aptekmas : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Community Service Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR) Javanologi: International Journal of Javanese Studies Equiva Mathematics Education Journal
Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurusan Matematika FMIPA UNS
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 90 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 90 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE COOPERATIVE INTEGRATED READING AND COMPOSITION (CIRC) DAN PROBLEM POSING BENTUK WITHIN-SOLUTION POSING PADA MATERI PERBANDINGAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA SMP NEGERI KOTA PONTIANAK Susiaty, Utin Desy; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (279.066 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this study were to investigate: (1) which learning model produces student’s better mathematics learning achievement, Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC), Problem Posing Learning Model Within-Solution Posing (WSP) Form or classical learning model; (2) which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low interpersonal intelligence; (3) viewed from learning models, which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low interpersonal intelligence; (4) viewed from interpersonal intelligences, which learning model produces better mathematics learning achievement, CIRC, WSP or classical learning model. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of state junior high school in Pontianak City. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 313 students. The data collection technique was include the documentation method to get the 2013/2014 National Test (UN) of Elementary School for initial capability data before the experiment, achievement test for mathematics student’s achievement data, and questioner of interpersonal intelligence. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. Based on these results it can be concluded as follows. (1) Mathematics learning using CIRC produced the same mathematics achievement as using classical learning model. However, mathematics learning using WSP produced student’s better mathematics learning achievement than using CIRC and classical learning model. (2) For students with high, medium, or low interpersonal intelligence have the same mathematics achievement. (3) Viewed from learning models, students with high, medium, or low interpersonal intelligence have the same mathematics achievement. (4) Viewed from interpersonal intelligences, mathematics learning using WSP produced student’s better mathematics learning achievement than using CIRC and classical learning model. However, mathematics learning using CIRC and classical learning model have the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: CIRC learning model, WSP learning model, interpersonal intelligence, the mathematical achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING(PBL) DAN LEARNING CYCLE 5E DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI DI-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Paryatun, Suji; Usodo, Budi; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (501.012 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The research aims to know: 1) which learning model is better achievement LC 5E with scientific appraoach, PBL, or direct learning models : 2) the learning autonomy category giving a better achievement among the high, medium, and low level of learning autonomy; 3) the learning autonomy which yields a better achievement of each learning model ; and 4) learning model which yields a better achievement of each learning autonomy category. The type of the research is a quasi-experimental research. The research is carried out in Sukoharjo regency. The populations of research are all 10th students of in Sukoharjo regency in which  school based curriculum applied in the academic year of 2014-2015. The sampling technique uses Stratified Cluster Random Sampling. The data collecting techniques use documents, questionnaires, and tests. The data analysis technique uses two-way variant analysis with unequal cells. The research concludes that; 1) the LC 5E learning model with scientific approach gives a better achievement in mathematics learning; 2) the students with high learning autonomy get better mathematics scores. The indicator is the average  scores of students with high learning autonomy are better than those with low or medium level; 3) In each learning model, the students with high learning autonomy get  better achievements than those  with medium or low as well  learning autonomy in general,whereas in high learning autonomy category, the LC 5E learning with scientific approach shows a better math achievement than PBL; and 4) For the classification of learning autonomy between the high level and the medium one,  learning model  LC 5E with scientific approach shows better achievement mathematics learning than the one with PBL  or direct learning, whereas, the low learning autonomy has no different achivement LC 5E with scientific approach, PBL or the direct one.Keywords: Mathematics Learning Achievement, Learning Autonomy, Learning Model
PENGEMBANGAN MODUL MATEMATIKA UNTUK PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH (PROBLEM BASED LEARNING) PADA MATERI POKOK PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS KELAS VIII SMP Khayati, Fitrotul; Sujadi, Imam; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (300.06 KB)

Abstract

Absrtact:The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) how to develop of Mathematics module development for problem-based learning on the topic of discussion of  Linear Equation of Straight Line for Grade VIII of Junior Secondary School; and (2) the effectiveness of result of Mathematics module development for problem-based learning on the topic of discussion of Linear Equation of Straight Line for Grade VIII of Junior Secondary School. This research consisted of two phases. The first phase was the phase for development and stipulation of a module as a product of research and development. It included preliminary study, module development, module validation, focus group discussion, product testing, and revision. The second phase was the phase of module effectiveness testing with the quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 2x1. The population of research was the students in Grade VIII of Junior Secondary Schools in Yogyakarta City. Sample consisted of students of SMP N 5 Yogyakarta and SMP N 2 Yogyakarta.  The data of research were gathered through observation, unstructured interview, questionnaire, and test of learning result. They were then analyzed by using the descriptive quantitative analysis.  Based on the result of the analysis, we can conclude that: 1) development of Mathematics module for problem-based learning on the topic of discussion of Linear Equation of Straight Line for Grade VIII of Junior Secondary School includes preliminary study, module drafting, module validation, module revision I,focus group discussion, module revision II, initial field testing, module revision III, field testing or module effectiveness testing, module revision IV (Finalizing the final product). The result of development in this research was Mathematics module for problem-based learning on the topic of discussion of Equation of Straight Line for Grade VIII of Junior Secondary School. 2) The result of module effectiveness testing shows that Mathematics module for problem-based learning on the topic of discussion of Linear Equation of Straight Line for Grade VIII of Junior Secondary School is proven to be effective.Keywords: Development, Mathematics Module, Problem-based learning 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN LEARNING STARTS WITH A QUESTION DAN THINK PAIR SHARE PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN BEKERJA SAMA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Susanti, Ika; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (296.541 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which of the TPS-LSWQ learning model, the TPS learning model, and the direct learning model results in a better mathematics learning achievement; (2) which of the students with high, medium, and low team work have a better mathematics learning achievement; and (3) which of team work of the students result in a better learning achievement for each learning models; and (4) which of the TPS-LSWQ, TPS and direct learning models result in a better learning achievement for each level of team work of the students. This research used the quasi-experimental method. The population of this research was all students of the junior secondary schools in Karanganyar in the academic year of 2014/2015. The samples of this research consisted of 272 students who were divided into three experiment groups. The three groups consisted of group 1, group 2, and group 3. In each group 1,2, and 3 consisted of 90, 92, and 90 students. The data of this research were gathered from test of learning achievement in mathematics and questionnaire. The data were then analyzed by using unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. According to the research results, it can be concluded: (1) the learning model of TPS-LSWQ was better than that of the TPS and direct learning models while the learning model of TPS was better than the direct learning model; (2) the students with high team work had a better learning achievement than those with medium and low team work while the students with medium team work was better than the low team work; (3) in each team work, student with high team work, medium team work, and low team work, the mathematics learning achievement of the students taught with TPS-LSWQ learning model, TPS learning model, and direct learning model was as good as that of those; and (4) in TPS-LSWQ learning model, students with high, medium and low team work had the same achievement, the TPS learning model, students with high, medium, and low team work had the same achievement, the direct learning model, students with high and medium team work had  the same achievement, students with high team work had better achievement than low team work, and students with high team work had better achievement than low team work.Key words: TPS-LSWQ learning model, TPS learning model, direct learning model, team work and learning achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (446.135 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the students learning activity. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the numbered heads together with scientific approach (NHT-S), the cooperative learning model of the Think Pair Share with scientific approach (TPS-S), and model of classical learning with scientific approach (K-S). The type of the research was a quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The population were all seventh grade students of Junior High School in Temanggung  regency on academic year 2014/2015. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and learning activities questionnaires. The hypotheses of the research was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells at the significance level of . The results of the research were as follows. 1) NHT-S gave better mathematics achievements than TPS-S and K-S. Both TPS-S and K-S gave the same mathematics achievements. 2) Students with high learning activity gave better mathematics achievements than students with medium learning activity and low learning activity, while students with medium learning activity got mathematics achievements as good as students with low learning activity. 3) For NHT-S, students with high learning activity and medium learning activity got the same mathematics achievements, students with high learning activity got better mathematics achievements than student with low learning activity, and students with medium learning activity and low learning activity  got same mathematics achievements. For TPS-S and K-S, student with high, medium, and low learning activity got the same mathematics achievements. 4) For students with high and medium learning activity, NHT-S gave better mathematics achievements than TPS-S , both NHT-S and TPS gave the same mathematics achievement with K-S. For students with low learning activity , NHT-S, TPS-S  and K-S gave the same mathematics achievements.Keywords: NHT, TPS, Classical, Scientific Approach, Learning Activity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN OPEN-ENDED LEARNING (OEL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI SEGI EMPAT DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS VII MTs NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN NGAWI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Purwaningsih, Tri; Usodo, Budi; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (356.728 KB)

Abstract

Abstract. The aims of this research are to know: 1) which learning models between OEL learning model using scientific approach, PBL scientific approach, or direct learning, give better achievement in learning quadrangle, 2) what kind of creativity between high creativity, medium creativity, or low creativity give better achievement, 3) in each students’ creativity, which learning model gives better achievement in mathematics learning between OEL using scientific approach, PBL using scientific approach, or direct learning, and 4) in each learning model, which one gives better achievement in mathematics learning or mathematics learning achievement between the students who have high creativity, medium, or low. This research was a quasi-experimental study by using a 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was the seventh grades of MTsN in Ngawi regency in the Academic Year of 2014/2015. The sample was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling. Consist consisting of 318 students: 108 students in first experiment, 102 students in second experiment, and 108 students in control class. This experimental used independent variables that were learning model and the students’ creativity, and dependent variable was achievement in mathematics learning or mathematics learning achievement. Moreover, the validity test of instruments (the mathematics test and questionnaire) was done by validator. Then, the reliability of test instrument used KR-20 formula, whereas, the reliability of questionnaire used Cronbach Alpha. The internal consistency test of questionnaire was done by using Product Moment Correlation of Karl Pearson. The prerequisite test consists of Normality Test done by Lilliefors and Homogeneity Test using Bartlett. Then, data was analyzed by using two-way ANOVA.The results of the research are: 1) the mathematics learning using OEL with scientific approach gives better achievement than using PBL with scientific approach or direct learning, and PBL with scientific approach gives better achievement than direct learning, 2) the students who have high, medium and low creativity have same/equally mathematics learning achievement, 3) each  creativity, the students who learn mathematics using OEL have better achievement than those who learnt mathematics using PBL and direct learning, while the students who learnt mathematics using PBL have better achievement than those who use direct learning, and 4) in each learning model, the students who have high, medium and low creativity have same/equally mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Problem-Based Learning, Open-Ended Learning, Students’ Creativity. 
ANALISIS PROSES BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA NON RUTIN DI KELAS VIII SMP ISLAMIC INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL PESANTREN SABILIL MUTTAQIEN (IIS PSM) MAGETAN DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN AWAL Alfa Lutfiananda, Immas Metika; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (222.739 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed at describing reflective thinking process of eight graders of SMP Islamic International School Pesantren Sabilil Muttaqien (IIS PSM) Magetan viewed from high, moderate, and low initial abilities of Mathematics in solving non routine mathematical problems. Initial abilities of Mathematics influenced problem solving skill of students. Problem solving skill should be developed not only to obtain the solution but also to make students think for explaining the reasons in every problem solving steps. Therefore, one way to develop that skill was by reflective thinking process. This study was qualitative descriptive research. Subjects of this study were eight students from VIII grade of SMP IIS PSM Magetan and represented each mathematics ability categories. Those subjects were determined by purposive sampling. For collecting data, this study used task-based and in-depth interview methods, then time triangulation was used to validate the collected data. Meanwhile, data analysis in this study was qualitative descriptive including data reduction, data display, and verification. The results of this study showed that students with high initial ability in Mathematics had reflective thinking process in four steps of problem solving (Polya), as follows: (a) understanding problem, retelling the problems, and identifying the information, (b) devising strategy, relating the given information and believing that it will find solution, (c) conducting strategy, explaining how to solve the problem based on plan clearly and reasonably, realizing some mistakes and revising it, and believing that those solution are the correct one, and (d) looking back, checking all problem solving steps and the solution based on the constraints or the given information, revising some parts, and giving alternative strategy or solution. In the other hand, students with moderate inital ability in Mathematics had reflective thinking process in three steps of problem solving, as follows: (a) understanding problem, retelling the problems, identify the information, (b) devising strategy, relating the given information for devising a plan by clear consideration, (c) conducting strategy, explaining how to solve the problem based on plan, realizing some mistakes and revising it, and believing that those solution are the correct one. Meanwhile, students with low initial ability in Mathematics only had reflective thinking process in understanding problem, that retelling the problems and identifying the given and asked information of the problems.Key words: reflective thinking, problem solving, non routine problems, inital ability in Mathematics
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA POKOK BAHASANGARIS DAN SUDUT DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWATERHADAP MATEMATIKA KELAS VII SMP Maharani, Swasti; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (324.307 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which learning model of the GI with CTL approach, TAI with CTL approach or conventional learning results in a better learning achievement in mathematics; (2) which students attitudes toward mathematics of the positive, neutral, or negative types results in a better learning achievement in mathematics; (3) in each students attitudes toward mathematics, which learning model of the GI with CTL approach, TAI with CTL approach or conventional learning results in a better learning achievement in mathematics; and (4) in each learning model, which students attitudes toward mathematics of the positive, neutral, or negative types results in a better learning achievement in mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3x3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior High Schools in Ngawi regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The data of the research were analyzed by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance at the significance level of 5%. The results of this study showed that: (1) the GI and TAI with CTL approach learning models result in the same good learning achievement in mathematics, but both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model; (2) the mathematics learning achievement with positive attitudes toward mathematics was better than that with neutral and negative attitudes towards matematics, that with neutral attitude towards matematics was better than that with negative attitudes toward mathematics; (3) in each students attitudes toward mathematics type, the GI and TAI with CTL approach learning models result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics, but both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model; (4) in each learning model, the mathematics learning achievement with positive attitudes toward mathematics was better than that with neutral and negative attitudes towards matematics, that with neutral attitude towards matematics was better than that with negative attitudes toward mathematics.Key words: learning model, GI, TAI, conventional, CTL approach, students attitudes toward mathematics.
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL PADA MATERI TEOREMA PYTHAGORAS DI KELAS VIII SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA Mu’ti, Yafita Arfina; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (489.218 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to: (1) produce teaching and learning materials with CTL approach on Pythagorean theorem at VIII Grade of Junior High School that was valid, practical, and effective, (2) investigate the better achievement in mathematics, whether using teaching and learning materials of CTL approach than using conventional teaching and learning materials. This study was development research. The development model used in this research was a developmental  research by  Plomp that contained five phases, (1) preliminary investigation, (2) design, (3) realization/ construction, (4) test, evaluation, and revision, and (5) implementation.  Teaching and learning materials said have quality if fulfilled validity, practical, and effective criteria. Teaching and learning materials was categorized validity based on expert judgement. Taeching and Learning materials was categorized practical if based on theory, teaching and learning materials was able to use it without revision or little revision and had fulfilled criteria of a practical teaching and learning materials. Teaching and learning materials was categorized effective if it fulfilled the indicators for a effective learning, including students activity during studying, learning activities based on syntax, student response about the learning, and students learning result. The data in this research was collected using test, questionnaire, observation, documentation, and interview.  To investigate the better student achievement used t-test. The results of this study were as follows: teaching and learning materials of CTL approach that include lesson plans, worksheets, and test of learning outcome was said to be valid, practical, and effective. Besides  that, student achievement with teaching and learning materials of CTL approach was better than student achievement with teaching and learning materials of conventional approach.Keywords: Teaching and learning materials, CTL, Pythagorean theorem
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PBL, JIGSAW DAN STAD TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA Ariati, Lia; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (682.176 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to know the effect of the Problem Based Learning (PBL), Jigsaw, and Students Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) to the mathematics conceptual understanding and problem solving viewed from students Adversity Quotient (AQ). The type of this research was quasi-experimental with factorial design 3x3. The population was all the students of grade XI IPS SMA/MA in Wonogiri on the second semester of 2014/2015 academic year. The sample of this research consisted of 224 students. The instruments that used to collect the data were early ability test, conceptual understanding test, problem solving test, and questionnaires Adversity Quotient of students. Data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways multivariate analysis of variance with a significance level α = 5%. The results of the research were as follows. (1)Students who were subjected to the PBL learning model have a better conceptual understanding than with the learning model of Jigsaw and STAD while students were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw have a better conceptual understanding than with the learning model of STAD. (b) Students who were subjected to the PBL learning model have the same problem solving as students with the learning model of Jigsaw but it have better than with the learning model of STAD while students with Jigsaw learning models have the same problem solving as students with learning model of STAD (2)Students with high AQ have better conceptual understanding and problem solving than students with medium and low AQ, and the students with medium AQ were better than low AQ. (3)(a) In learning model of PBL and Jigsaw, students with high AQ have the same conceptual understanding as medium AQ but better than low AQ, and students with medium AQ have a better conceptual understanding than low AQ while in learning model of STAD, students with high AQ have a better conceptual understanding than students with medium and low AQ, and the students with medium AQ were better than low AQ. (b) In learning model of PBL, Jigsaw and STAD, students who have high AQ have better problem solving than students who have students with medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have a better problem solving than students with low AQ. (4)(a) For high and low AQ, students were subjected to the PBL learning model have the same conceptual understanding as students who were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw and STAD while for medium AQ, students who were subjected to the learning model of PBL have the same conceptual understanding as students who were subjected to the learning model Jigsaw but better than STAD and students who were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw have a better conceptual understanding than students who were subjected to the learning model of STAD. (b) In each AQ, students with the PBL learning model have the same problem solving as students with Jigsaw learning model but better than STAD learning model, and students with Jigsaw learning model have a better problem solving than students of  STAD learning model.Keywords : PBL, Jigsaw, STAD, AQ, conceptual understanding, problem solving. 
Co-Authors Ade Susanti Adhitama, Ria Puan Adzakie, Haabi Luckmanoor Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu Ahmad Faqihi, Ahmad Aji Hamim Wigena Al Barra, Andre Fajry Alfa Lutfiananda, Immas Metika Anik Djuraidah Antoni Wibowo Antoni Wibowo Ariati, Lia Arif Rahman Arrazaq, Khamid Muhammad Astutiningsih, Tiyas ‘Aini, Addin Zuhrotul Baharum, Aslina Budi Usodo Budi Usodo BUDIYONO Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Cahyono, Heri Christy, Alexander Yonathan Dewi, Noviana Sukma Doni Susanto dwi hidayati Gustiasih, Restuning Harun Al Rasyid Heri Cahyono Ikawati, Nur Ikhsan Abdul Latif Indriati, Sela Putri Joko Domas, Joko Khairina, Fadiah Khamsatul Faizati, Khamsatul Khayati, Fitrotul Khomariah, Nurul Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati, Kiki Riska Ayu Kusuma, Nunung Fajar Kusumo, Fahri Aimar M Mardiyana, M Maharani, Swasti Marchamah Ulfa, Marchamah Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Muhamad Safa’udin, Muhamad Muslikhah, Muslikhah Musmiratul Uyun Musta'in, Ghufron Nanang Nabhar Fakhri Auliya, Nanang Nabhar Nanda Noor Fadjrin, Nanda Noor Ningrum, Hanifah Listya Ni’am, Dafi’ Ichsani Aysar Nughthoh Arfawi Kurdhi, Nughthoh Arfawi Nugroho Arif Sudibyo Nurul Khairiatin Nida Pambudi, Pangesti Arum Paryatun, Suji Paryatun, Suji Pradipta Annurwanda, Pradipta Prasetyo, Heri Pratama, Rizcka Indah Hani Prihastini Oktasari Putri Primasari, Dessy Marlinda Purnami Widyaningsih Purwaningsih, Tri Purwaningsih, Tri Putera Khano, Muhammad Nazhif Abda Putri, Diah Purwaning Putri, Matin Enggar Rahman, Arif Ramadhanti, Fajhria Budi Ririn Setyowati Riyadi Riyadi Riyansyah, Husnun Nur Ghiffari Putri Rizky Anggar Kusuma Wardani Safa’udin, Muhamad Santika, Putri Aura Sena, Arya Bima Setiyowati, Ririn Sidiq, Krisna Sujadi, Imam Sulistyaningsih Sulistyaningsih Suprapto, Suprapto Suryani, S Susanti, Ika Sutanto Sutanto Sutanto sutanto sutanto Tanjung, Andjani Ayu Cahaya Ummu Salamah Utami, Dwi Sari Utin Desy Susiaty Wahyu, Nugroho Lambang Wibowo, Gusti Ngurah Adhi Widiyaningsih, Purnami Winarno, Bowo YAFITA ARFINA MUTI Yekti Widyaningsih Yumaroh, Siti Roqhilu Zaidah Nurul Hasanah