Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.232
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FORUM STATISTIKA DAN KOMPUTASI Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Media Statistika Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan Specta Journal of Technology Budimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat NUCLEUS: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Natural Science Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Aptekmas : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Community Service Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR) Javanologi: International Journal of Javanese Studies Equiva Mathematics Education Journal
Dewi Retno Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurusan Matematika FMIPA UNS
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 90 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 90 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT (NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER) DENGAN ASSESMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTRAPERSONAL SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA SE-KABUPATEN TULUNGAGUNG ‘Aini, Addin Zuhrotul; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (637.003 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this study were to investigate: (1) among the model of NHT, NHT with AfL and classical model, which learning model can give better mathematics learning achievement. (2) which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, those with high, medium, or low intrapersonal intelligence. (3) viewed from learning models, which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement those with high, medium or low intrapersonal intelligence. (4) viewed from intrapersonal intelligence, which learning model produces better mathematics learning achievement NHT with AfL, NHT or classical learning model. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students  of state junior high  school  in  Tulungagung Regency.  Sampling was  done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The size of the samples was 266 students. The data collection technique was include the documentation method to get 2013/2014 initial capability data before the experiment, achievement test for mathematics student’s achievements data, and questioner of intrapersonal intelligence. The data was analyzed  using analysis of variance. Based on the analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The model of NHT with AfL providing better mathematics learning achievement than the model of NHT and classical, while the model of NHT providing better mathematics learning achievement than classical model. (2)  Students with high intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than students with medium or low intrapersonal intelligence, students with medium intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics achievement than student’s with low intrapersonal intelligence. (3) Viewed from learning models, student’s with high intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than medium or low, and medium intrapersonal intelligence have better mathematics learning than low intrapersonal intelligence. (4) Viewed from intrapersonal intelligence, mathematics learning using NHT with AfL resulted students with better mathematics learning achievement than using NHT and classical learning model, learning mathematics using NHT resulted students with  better mathematics learning achievement than using classical learning model.Keywords: Numbered Head Together, Assessment for  Learning, Intrapersonal Intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI), PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN PEMBELAJARAN KLASIKAL DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA Suprapto, Suprapto; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (593.128 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student’s leraning activity. The learning models compared were TAI with scientific approach, PBL with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach.This experiment was quasi-experimental. It uses 3 x 3 factorial planning. The population was the entire 8th grade students of State Junior high School in Grobogan regency in the academic year 2014/2015. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of students of SMP N 2 Tegowanu, SMP N 3 Godong and SMP N 5 Purwodadi. Data collection instruments used were learning achievement test and student learning activity questionnaire. Hypothesis examination used was variance analysis (anava) with unequal cell.Conclusions acquired from this thesis are as follows: 1) PBL using scientific approach gives better mathematics learning achievement compared to TAI and classical Learning, TAI using scientific approach gives better mathematics learning achievement compared to classical learning. 2) student’s mathematics achievement with high learning activity is better than those with intermediate and poor learning activity, intermediate learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity. 3) on TAI using scientific approach, student’s mathematics achievement with high learning activity is as good as those with intermediate learning activity, high learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity, and intermediate learning activity is good as those with poor learning activity. Students which is given PBL using scientific approach, students with high learning activity have mathematics learning achievement as good as those with intermediate learning activity, high learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity, and intermediate learning activity is good as those with poor learning activity. 4) for students with high learning activity, PBL gives learning achievement as good as TAI, PBL gives learning achievement better than classical learning, and TAI gives learning achievement better than classical learning. For students with intermediate learning activity; TAI, PBL and classical learning gives the same good result. For students with poor learning activity; TAI, PBL and classical learning gives the same good result on student’s learning achievement. And student’s learning achievement on algebra which is given PBL is as good as those which is given classical learning.Keywords: TAI using scientific approach, PBL using scientific approach, classical learning, learning activity, learning achievement 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI POKOK HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) Ikawati, Nur; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (321.52 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the student Adversity Quotient (AQ). The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the Group Investigation with scientific approach (GI-S), the cooperative learning model of the Think Pair Share with scientific approach (TPS-S), and model of classical learning with scientific approach (K-S). The type of the research was a quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The population were all students of Junior High School in Bantul regency on academic year 2014/2015. The samples of  the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and questionnaires of AQ. The hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells at the significance level of . The results of the research are as follows. 1) GI-S gives better mathematics achievements than TPS-S, and both gives better mathematics achievements than K-S. 2) Students with AQ type of climber have better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of camper and type of quitter, while students with AQ type of camper have better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of quitter. 3) For GI-S and TPS-S, students with AQ type of climber and type of camper have the same mathematics achievements, and students with AQ type of climber and type of camper gives better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of quitter. For K-S, students with AQ type of climber have better mathematics achievements than students with AQ type of camper and type of quitter, and both have the same mathematics achievements. 4) For students with AQ type of climber and type of quitter, GI-S, TPS-S, and K-S gives the same mathematics achievement. For students with AQ type of camper, GI-S and TPS-S gives the same mathematics achievements, and both gives better mathematics achievements than K-S.Keywords: GI, TPS, Classical, Scientific Approach, AQ 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA POKOK BAHASAN HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Fakhri Auliya, Nanang Nabhar; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from the emotional quotient of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the NHT type with scientific approach, the Cooperative Learning Model of the TPS type with scientific approach, and the classical model with scientific approach. This research used the quasi experimental research. It’s population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Sukoharjo. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 262 students. They were grouped into three classes, namely: 92 students in Experimental Class 1, 85 students in Experimental Class 2, and 85 students in Control Class. The instruments to gather the data were test of achievement in Mathematics on the learning topic of Set, and emotional quotient questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the NHT type with scientific approach results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the cooperative learning model of the TPS type with scientific approach, and the classical model with scientific approach, the cooperative learning model of the TPS type with scientific approach results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the classical model with scientific approach. 2) Emotional quotient gives students a different effect on mathematics achievement of students in the topic of Set. The students with the high emotional quotient have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate emotional quotient and those with the low emotional quotient, the students with the moderate emotional quotient have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low emotional quotient. (3) There was not an interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the emotional quotient on the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students.Keywords: NHT, TPS, Classical, Scientific Approach and Emotional Quotient.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the students learning activity. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning model of the numbered heads together with scientific approach (NHT-S), the cooperative learning model of the Think Pair Share with scientific approach (TPS-S), and model of classical learning with scientific approach (K-S). The type of the research was a quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The population were all seventh grade students of Junior High School in Temanggung  regency on academic year 2014/2015. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and learning activities questionnaires. The hypotheses of the research was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells at the significance level of . The results of the research were as follows. 1) NHT-S gave better mathematics achievements than TPS-S and K-S. Both TPS-S and K-S gave the same mathematics achievements. 2) Students with high learning activity gave better mathematics achievements than students with medium learning activity and low learning activity, while students with medium learning activity got mathematics achievements as good as students with low learning activity. 3) For NHT-S, students with high learning activity and medium learning activity got the same mathematics achievements, students with high learning activity got better mathematics achievements than student with low learning activity, and students with medium learning activity and low learning activity  got same mathematics achievements. For TPS-S and K-S, student with high, medium, and low learning activity got the same mathematics achievements. 4) For students with high and medium learning activity, NHT-S gave better mathematics achievements than TPS-S , both NHT-S and TPS gave the same mathematics achievement with K-S. For students with low learning activity , NHT-S, TPS-S  and K-S gave the same mathematics achievements.Keywords: NHT, TPS, Classical, Scientific Approach, Learning Activity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL), GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA Hidayati, Dwi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract. The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from student learning creativity. The learning models compared were problem based learning, group investigation and think pair share. This research used the quasi-experimental research method. The population of the research was all of the students in Grade VIII of Junior Secondary Schools of Banyumas Regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of research consisted of 295 students. Techniques of collecting data used were documentation, test, and questionnaire. Balance test used one way ANOVA test. From the research, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Learning model of PBL gave better mathematics learning achievement than model of GI and TPS, model of GI gave better mathematics learning achievement than model of TPS, (2) students who have high creativity gave better mathematics learning achievement than students who have medium and low creativity, students who have medium creativity gave better mathematics learning achievement than students who have low creativity, (3) in the students with high and low creativity, the GI learning model gave the same learning achievement in mathematics with the PBL and TPS learning model, the PBL learning model gave better learning achievement in mathematics the TPS learning model. The PBL, GI and TPS learning model gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, (4) in the PBL and GI learning model, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with high creativity were better than the students with medium and low creativity, the students with medium and low creativity gave same the learning achievement in mathematics. In the TPS learning model, the students with high and medium creativity gave the same learning achievement in mathematics, the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with the high and medium creativity were better than the students the low creativity.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Group Investigation, Think Pair Share, Student Learning Creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE SNOWBALL THROWING DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Safa’udin, Muhamad; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from learning style types of the students. The learning models compared were PBL, ST, and direct learning. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade VIII junior high school in Nganjuk City on academic year of 2014/2015. The size of the sample was 274 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were learning style questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follow. (1) Mathematics achievement of students taught by Problem Based Learning and Snowball Throwing gave better than they taught by direct learning, and mathematics achievement of students taught by Problem Based Learning and Snowball Throwing was produce the same learning achievement (2) The learning styles of visual, auditory or kinesthetic was not have an influence on learning achievement. (3) In each learning model, the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have an equal learning achievement in mathematics; (4) In each learning style, mathematics achievement of students taught by Problem Based Learning provide the same learning achievement with cooperative Throwing Snowball, and mathematics achievement of students taught by Problem Based Learning and Snowball Throwing was better than they taught by direct learning.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Snowball Throwing, Direct Learning, Learning Style and Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA Faqihi, Ahmad; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

models on learning achievement viewed from learning style types of the students. The learning models compared were PBL, GI, and classical with scientific approach model. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade X1 higher Secondary School in Lombok East on academic year of  2014/2015. The size of the sample was 282 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were learning style questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach. (2) the student with the high, medium, and ow independent learning levels have equal learning achievement. (3) in each of the learning models, the high, medium, and, low independent learning levels, result in the equal learning achievement. (4) in each of the independent learning levels, the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach.Keywords: : learning model, PBL, GI, Classical learning model, Scientific Approach,  independent learning levels, Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN CONCEPT MAPS PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Faizati, Khamsatul; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

using PBL with concept maps (CM), PBL, or classical learning, (2) which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, student with high, medium, or low emotional intelligence (EI) types, (3) which one is more effective for each learning model, student with high, medium, or low EI types,  (4) which one is more effective for each EI type of students, using PBL with CM, PBL, or classical learning. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of state junior high school in Sukoharjo Regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sample was 282 students. The data collection technique was the document that was national test in elementary school for initial capability data before the experiment, achievement test for mathematics student achievement data, and questionnaire of EI. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows: (1) Mathematics achievement using PBL with CM is better than using PBL or classical learning. Likewise, mathematics achievement using PBL is as same as using classical learning. (2) Students with high EI have mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low EI. Likewise, students with medium and low EI have the same as mathematics achievement. (3) For each learning model, students with high EI have mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low EI. Likewise, students with medium and low EI have the same as mathematics achievement. (4) For each EI type of students, mathematics achievement using PBL with CM is better than using PBL or classical learning. Likewise, mathematics achievement using PBL is as same as using classical learning.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, concept maps, and emotional intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DAN LEARNING CELL PADA ASPEK PENGETAHUAN DAN KETERAMPILAN SISWA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN PACITAN Domas, Joko; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects in mathematics viewed from the emotional quotient of the students. The learning models compared were NHT, Learning Cell and classical model with scientific approach. This research used the quasi experimental research method. This population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Pacitan regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 261 students, divided into three groups, namely: 88 students in Experimental Group 1, 86 students in Experimental Group 2, and 87 students in Control Group. The instruments of the research include test of learning achievement of the knowledge aspect, test of learning achievement of the skill aspect, and questionnaire of emotional quotient. The technique of analyze data used the two-way multivariate analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: (1) the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than the classical learning model with scientific approach, and the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (2) the students with the high emotional quotient had a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than those with the moderate and low emotional quotient, and the students with the moderate and low emotional quotient had the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (3) in each learning model with scientific approach, the students with the high emotional quotient had a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than those with the moderate and low emotional quotient, and the students with the moderate and low emotional quotient had the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects; (4) in each of the emotional quotient, the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave a better learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects than the classical model with scientific approach, and the cooperative learning model of the NHT and the Learning Cell types with scientific approach gave the same learning achievement of knowledge and skill aspects.Keywords: NHT, learning cell, classical, scientific approach, emotional quotient, knowledge, skill.
Co-Authors Ade Susanti Adhitama, Ria Puan Adzakie, Haabi Luckmanoor Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu Agung Nugroho, Tri Wahyu Ahmad Faqihi, Ahmad Aji Hamim Wigena Al Barra, Andre Fajry Alfa Lutfiananda, Immas Metika Anik Djuraidah Antoni Wibowo Antoni Wibowo Ariati, Lia Arif Rahman Arrazaq, Khamid Muhammad Astutiningsih, Tiyas ‘Aini, Addin Zuhrotul Baharum, Aslina Budi Usodo Budi Usodo BUDIYONO Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Cahyono, Heri Christy, Alexander Yonathan Dewi, Noviana Sukma Doni Susanto dwi hidayati Gustiasih, Restuning Harun Al Rasyid Heri Cahyono Ikawati, Nur Ikhsan Abdul Latif Indriati, Sela Putri Joko Domas, Joko Khairina, Fadiah Khamsatul Faizati, Khamsatul Khayati, Fitrotul Khomariah, Nurul Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati, Kiki Riska Ayu Kusuma, Nunung Fajar Kusumo, Fahri Aimar M Mardiyana, M Maharani, Swasti Marchamah Ulfa, Marchamah Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Muhamad Safa’udin, Muhamad Muslikhah, Muslikhah Musmiratul Uyun Musta'in, Ghufron Nanang Nabhar Fakhri Auliya, Nanang Nabhar Nanda Noor Fadjrin, Nanda Noor Ningrum, Hanifah Listya Ni’am, Dafi’ Ichsani Aysar Nughthoh Arfawi Kurdhi, Nughthoh Arfawi Nugroho Arif Sudibyo Nurul Khairiatin Nida Pambudi, Pangesti Arum Paryatun, Suji Paryatun, Suji Pradipta Annurwanda, Pradipta Prasetyo, Heri Pratama, Rizcka Indah Hani Prihastini Oktasari Putri Primasari, Dessy Marlinda Purnami Widyaningsih Purwaningsih, Tri Purwaningsih, Tri Putera Khano, Muhammad Nazhif Abda Putri, Diah Purwaning Putri, Matin Enggar Rahman, Arif Ramadhanti, Fajhria Budi Ririn Setyowati Riyadi Riyadi Riyansyah, Husnun Nur Ghiffari Putri Rizky Anggar Kusuma Wardani Safa’udin, Muhamad Santika, Putri Aura Sena, Arya Bima Setiyowati, Ririn Sidiq, Krisna Sujadi, Imam Sulistyaningsih Sulistyaningsih Suprapto, Suprapto Suryani, S Susanti, Ika Sutanto sutanto sutanto Sutanto Sutanto Tanjung, Andjani Ayu Cahaya Ummu Salamah Utami, Dwi Sari Utin Desy Susiaty Wahyu, Nugroho Lambang Wibowo, Gusti Ngurah Adhi Widiyaningsih, Purnami Winarno, Bowo YAFITA ARFINA MUTI Yekti Widyaningsih Yumaroh, Siti Roqhilu Zaidah Nurul Hasanah