Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

ANALISIS PROSEDUR TUKAR GULING (RUISLAG) TANAH WAKAF DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF Akbar Muzaky; Abnan Pancasilawati
Ghaly: Journal of Islamic Economic Law Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Ghaly: Journal of Islamic Economic Law
Publisher : Islamic Economic Law Study Program, Faculty of Sharia Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda Islamic State University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/ghaly.v4i1.11282

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis prosedur tukar guling (ruislag) tanah wakaf Masjid Darul Ni’mah di Desa Tani Harapan, Kecamatan Loa Janan, Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara, yang dipicu oleh potensi sumber daya alam berupa batu bara di bawah tanah wakaf. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan terkait, seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 tentang Wakaf, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 42 Tahun 2006, Peraturan BWI Nomor 1 Tahun 2008, dan Keputusan Menteri Agama Nomor 1009 Tahun 2023, serta membandingkan dengan pandangan mazhab fikih. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prosedur ruislag telah sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum positif melalui tahapan permohonan nazhir, verifikasi independen, dan persetujuan Kementerian Agama serta BWI. Dalam perspektif hukum Islam, Mazhab Hanbali membolehkan istibdal jika penggantian lebih maslahat, sementara Mazhab Syafi’i, Maliki, dan Hanafi melarangnya. Meskipun prosedur formal telah dipenuhi, tetap diperlukan penguatan prinsip kemaslahatan, transparansi, dan pengawasan agar tujuan wakaf terjaga dan perubahan status tanah wakaf dapat diterima masyarakat.
Access to Justice for The Poors in The Sub Urban Area in The East Kalimantan Lilik Andaryuni; Abnan Pancasilawati; Aulia Rachman; Akhmad Haries
QONUN: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan Vol 10 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : FASYA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/qj.v10i1.12763

Abstract

Access to justice is a state guarantee to all its citizens, that every citizen must have access to justice. The facts on the ground, they are not easy to implement, due to the high costs of the case, the low public understanding of access to justice, low public awareness of accessing justice, as well as geographical conditions, especially with regard to distance travel and unsustainable transprotation. There are some religious courts that have very broad jurisdiction with geographical conditions, in which remote communities are not easy to reach the court office in question. One of the efforts made by the Supreme Court in the framework of justice for all, is a round trial. Whether the circuit court is capable of providing access to justice to remote communities, that's why this study is being conducted. Using the theory of legal effectiveness, the results of this study show that the execution of the mobile court the Religious Court of Tenggarong is effective and Religious Court of Sangata is not effective in giving access to justice because not all areas that are in the jurisdiction of religious courts fo Sangata are the place of execution. Besides, the public awareness is also low, as evidenced by the fact that sometimes the execution of circular hearings only few register.