Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.908
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Cita Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jambura Law Review JURNAL INOVASI PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA (JIPM) Batulis Civil Law Review Indonesian Journal of International Law Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law Klausula: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Adminitrasi, Pidana dan Perdata Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science
Sukarmi Sukarmi, Sukarmi
sebagai tenaga pengajar di Raudhatul Athfal Attaqwa kota Palangka Raya
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Analisis Faktor Penyebab Dua Anak Slow Learner di SD Negeri Bacem Kelas VI Adjie, Bagas Samodro; Sukarmi, Sukarmi; Malawi, Ibadullah
Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Riau, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pembelajaran dua siswa lamban belajar dan mengetahui penyebab lamban belajar pada anak kelas VI SD Negeri Bacem Kabupaten Madiun. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif studi kasus dengan metode pengumpulan data observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Hasil analisis dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat salah satu siswa lamban belajar tersebut dalam kegiatan pembelajaran sering tertinggal dibandingkan teman-temannya, selalu mendapatkan nilai di bawah Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal (KKM), lebih pasif, lebih sensitif, kurang fokus, sering bermain sendiri bahkan memperhatikan tapi materi tidak bisa diserap dengan baik ketika guru menjelaskan materi, Hal ini dikarenakan kognitif siswa lamban belajar terbatas, sehingga setiap mengerjakan soal yang diberikan oleh guru. Hal ini membuat guru merasa kesulitan ketika menghadapi peserta yang mengalami Slow Leaner karena pembelajaran tetap dilanjutkan sesuai waktu namun peserta didik tersebut dibiarkan dan terus menyesuaikan, Beberapa faktor menyebabkan siswa lamban tersebut adalah faktor perkembangan anak, faktor kondisi lingkungan keluarga, sehingga membuat anak tersebut tidak berprestasi optimal secara akademiknya.
Assessing the Merger of Online Platform Companies: Does it Lead to Monopoly or just Business Expansion? (Analysis of The Merged Company of GoTo) Sukarmi, Sukarmi; Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin; Tejomurti, Kukuh; Alam, Moch. Zairul
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 9 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v9i3.21667

Abstract

Two large digital platform companies, Gojek and Tokopedia, officially merged to form a holding company called the GoTo Group that is considered to have anti-competitive behavior and potentially data monopoly. This article aimed to analyze the adequate response to potential violations of the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition Regulation and legal issues related to consumer data monopoly issues. This article uses normative legal research with the conceptual research and statute approach. The result shows that it is necessary to define “relevant markets” and the “substituted products” to determine the existence of unfair business competition in the Gojek-Tokopedia merger. It requires analyzing the consumer behavior in other marketplaces other than Tokopedia; when consumers do not "run" to Gojek, it means they are not in the same market. To prevent privacy protection failures in post-merger data integration, companies need to assess data sharing that may be carried out as part of a risk assessment. Regarding the rights of data subjects, The company needs to provide notification to the data subject regarding the Merger and Acquisition (M & A) given the data subject's right to refuse and guarantee that the M & A process will not violate the right to privacy of the customer's dataKeywords: Competition Law; Digital Platform; Merger Menilai Penggabungan Perusahaan Platform Online: Apakah Mengakibatkan Monopoli atau Hanya Ekspansi Bisnis? (Analisis Penggabungan GoTo)AbstrakDua perusahaan platform digital besar, Gojek dan Tokopedia, resmi bergabung membentuk holding company bernama GoTo Group yang dinilai memiliki perilaku anti persaingan dan berpotensi monopoli data. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis respon yang memadai terhadap potensi pelanggaran Peraturan Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat serta masalah hukum terkait masalah monopoli data konsumen. Artikel ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan penelitian konseptual dan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perlunya mendefinisikan “pasar relevan” dan “produk substitusi” untuk mengetahui adanya persaingan usaha tidak sehat dalam merger Gojek-Tokopedia. Hal ini membutuhkan analisis perilaku konsumen di pasar lain selain Tokopedia; ketika konsumen tidak “lari” ke Gojek, berarti mereka tidak berada di pasar yang sama. Untuk mencegah kegagalan perlindungan privasi dalam integrasi data pasca-merger, perusahaan perlu menilai pembagian data yang mungkin dilakukan sebagai bagian dari penilaian risiko. Mengenai hak subjek data, Perusahaan perlu memberikan pemberitahuan kepada subjek data mengenai Merger dan Akuisisi (M&A) mengingat hak subjek data untuk menolak dan menjamin bahwa proses M&A tidak akan melanggar hak privasi data pelangganKata Kunci: Hukum Persaingan Usaha; Platform Digital; PenggabunganОценка слияний компаний онлайн-платформ: приведет ли это к монополии или просто к расширению бизнеса? (Анализ слияний GoTo (Gojek и Tokopedia)  АннотацияДве крупные компании, занимающиеся цифровыми платформами, Gojek и Tokopedia, официально объединили свои усилия, чтобы сформировать холдинговую компанию GoTo Group, которая, как считается, ведет антиконкурентную политику и может монополизировать данные. Данная статья направлена на анализ адекватного реагирования на возможные нарушения Положения о запрещении монополистической практики и недобросовестной конкуренции, а также на правовые вопросы, связанные с проблемой монополии на данные потребителей. В данной статье используется нормативно-правовое исследование с концептуальным и правовым исследовательским подходом. Результаты исследования указывают на необходимость определить «соответствующие рынки» и «продукты-заменители», чтобы определить наличие недобросовестной деловой конкуренции в слиянии Gojek-Tokopedia. Это требует анализа поведения потребителей на рынках, отличных от Tokopedia; когда потребители не «бегут» в Gojek, это означает, что они не находятся на одинаковом рынке. Чтобы предотвратить сбои в защите конфиденциальности при интеграции данных после слияния, компаниям необходимо оценить возможное совместное использование данных в рамках оценки рисков. Что касается прав субъекта данных, Компания должна уведомить субъект данных о слиянии и поглощении (M&A), учитывая право субъекта данных отказаться и гарантировать, что процесс M&A не нарушит права на конфиденциальность данных клиента.Ключевые слова: Закон о деловой конкуренции; цифровые платформы; слияние
Dumping Practices and Competition as Double-edged Sword: Indonesia Practices Sukarmi, Sukarmi; Susanto, Fransiska Ayulistya
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dumping practices are typically related to business competition, namely predatory pricing. The issue under consideration is how the practice of dumping is viewed through the perspectives of business competition law and international trade law, as well as how the Indonesian Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition (KPPU) handles this issue. This article examines and analyzes the relationship between dumping behavior and business competition, as well as the authority with which institutions will handle predatory pricing caused by dumping behavior. The results of the analysis show that dumping is a violation of international trade law under the World Trade Organization (WTO). If the Indonesian Anti-Dumping Committee (KADI) discovers dumping practices, the party will be subject to sanctions in the form of Anti-Dumping Import Duty (BMAD). Aside from that, selling below market prices or carrying out predatory pricing will hinder fair competition from the perspective of competition law. Dumping practices benefit consumers in the short term but harm consumers and similar competing industries in the long term. If the aim is to eliminate competitors, of course, this is unhealthy competition and falls under the supervision and authority of KPPU to enforce the law. This article only focusses on the when the dumping practices can become the predatory pricing on competition law perspective and who will handle the case.
Hakekat Dari Asas Maslahah Al Mursalah Dalam Melakukan Pengalihan Utang (Take Over) Dari Transaksi Non Syariah Ke Transaksi Syariah Dalam Pembiayaan Pemilikan Rumah Syariah Setyawan, David Novan; Luth, Thohir; Sukarmi, Sukarmi; Chanifah, Nur
KLAUSULA (Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Adminitrasi Dan Pidana) Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Klausula (Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Adminitrasi, Pidana Dan Perdata)
Publisher : Universitas Islam kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/klausula.v5i2.9455

Abstract

Debt transfer (take over) from non-Sharia transactions to Sharia transactions in housing financing represents a transformation of a legal relationship that involves not only the transfer of payment obligations but also changes in contractual characteristics, transactional principles, and the legal relationship between customers and financing institutions. This issue becomes significant when debt transfer occurs from conventional financing mechanisms involving interest to Sharia financing based on the prohibition of riba, gharar, and maysir. This research aims to analyze the essence of the principle of maslahah al-mursalah in implementing debt transfer (take over) from non-Sharia transactions to Sharia transactions in Sharia housing financing and to formulate its application in a manner that provides benefit, justice, and legal certainty for the parties involved. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and Islamic legal approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively and prescriptively by examining positive legal provisions, principles of Sharia contracts, and the concept of maslahah al-mursalah. The findings demonstrate that the essence of maslahah al-mursalah in debt transfer lies in realizing benefits consistent with the objectives of Islamic law while preventing harm within financing relationships. The principle may serve as a normative foundation for developing a take over mechanism that does not merely transfer debt but transforms the financing relationship into a contractual structure that complies with Sharia principles. The application of maslahah al-mursalah must satisfy substantive requirements, including the existence of genuine benefit, relevance to the interests of the parties, consistency with established Sharia principles, and the capacity to protect the rights and obligations of the parties. This framework is expected to strengthen legal certainty and promote justice within Sharia housing financing. The application of maslahah al-mursalah therefore provides an important conceptual foundation for developing debt-transfer arrangements that harmonize contractual interests, Sharia compliance, and legal protection
Co-Authors Abdul Rachmad Budiono ABDUL RACHMAD BUDIONO Abraarsyah, Abraarsyah Adjie, Bagas Samodro Afrizal Mukti Wibowo Agung, Muhammad Maghfur Alam, Moch. Zairul Arief Bowo Prayoga Kasmo Audrey, Patricia Daniel Happy Putra David Novan Setyawan, David Novan Devianti, Dwi Nugrahayu Dewantara , Reka Dwi Budi Santoso Erma Defiana Putriyanti Fitri Handayani Ganindha, Ranitya Hanif Nur Widhiyanti, Hanif Nur Henny Nurhasnawati Jauharoh, Arini KARINA, AHNIA SEPTYA Kawuryan, Endang Sri Kukuh Tejomurti, Kukuh Kurniawan, Furqon Lucky Nugroho Luth, Thohir Malawi, Ibadullah Novenry, Yudiet Nur Chanifah Nurcahyanti, Indri Ike Nuzul Sa'adah, Bilqis Laila Permono, Yudhi Tri Prija Djatmika, Prija Reka Dewantara Safitri, Yolanda Sangadah, Nur Laeli Sekarasih, Setijati Shinta Hadiyantina Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Siti Hamidah Sjafiie, RR. Imam Rachmad Susanto, Fransiska Ayulistya Tyas, Hesti Ning Umar, Azahlia Wayan Firdaus Mahmudy Yelia Habib, Laila