Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.282
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kawistara : Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial dan Humaniora Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika TOMALEBBI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Hukum, Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (PPKn) Journal Research and Multidisciplinary (JRM) Qadauna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Keluarga Islam Al-Tafaqquh: Journal of Islamic Law Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika Ash-Shahabah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Asian Journal of Islamic Studies and Da'wah Legal: Journal of Law Compile: Journal of Society Service Jurnal Kawistara Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan
Andi Herawati
Universita Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Penerapan Undang-Undang Tentang Pemilihan Umum Dalam Upaya Pemenuhan Hak Pilih Penyandang Disabilitas di Desa Bola Muharawati; Ismail Ali; Mustafa, Dewi Wahyuni; Mustari; Andi Herawati
Legal Journal of Law Vol 4 No 1 (2025): Mei 2025
Publisher : YP-SDI Lamaddukelleng

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the implementation of the right to vote for people with disabilities in the 2024 general election based on Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. The data collection method used was primary legal materials with interviews and secondary legal materials, namely other legal literature and official archives. The results of this study indicate that the factors that hinder the implementation of the right to vote for people with disabilities in Bola Village, Bola District, Wajo Regency are 1) there is still data that is not synchronized and concrete between the Wajo Regency KPU and the Wajo Regency Social Service regarding data on people with disabilities in Wajo Regency, 2) Socialization related to elections for people with disabilities is not evenly distributed, 3) PPS still does not understand the provision of assistance services to people with disabilities, so they are considered less friendly by voters with disabilities, 4) There are still people who are less able to accept differences and have not been able to act inclusively towards people with disabilities, 5) Rejection of families of people with disabilities who do not want to be registered
Pluralisme Hukum Waris Indonesia: Ketegangan Antara Adat, Islam, Dan Hukum Perdata Muh. Sudirman; Andi Herawati
Ash-Shahabah : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Ash-Shahabah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Islam Makassar (UIM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59638/ash.v12i1.2150

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas pluralisme hukum waris di Indonesia yang ditandai oleh keberlakuan hukum waris Islam, hukum waris adat, dan hukum waris perdata (KUHPerdata/BW) dalam satu sistem hukum nasional. Kondisi tersebut melahirkan ketegangan norma dan praktik, terutama pada perbedaan konsep keadilan, legitimasi sosial, prosedur administratif, serta kewenangan lembaga peradilan dalam penyelesaian sengketa waris. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, komparatif, dan kasus melalui analisis literatur serta putusan pengadilan yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pluralisme hukum waris mendorong masyarakat memilih sistem hukum berdasarkan kebutuhan sosial dan kepentingan praktis, sehingga memunculkan ketidakpastian hukum, potensi konflik keluarga yang berkepanjangan, serta praktik pemilihan forum (forum shopping) antara Pengadilan Agama dan Pengadilan Negeri. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan harmonisasi melalui penguatan regulasi dan standardisasi prosedur, peningkatan literasi hukum waris, penguatan mediasi, serta penegasan batas kewenangan peradilan agar tercapai kepastian hukum dan keadilan sosial dalam pembagian warisan.
DINAMIKA EFIKASI DIRI PENGASUHAN IBU MELALUI KONTEN MEDIA SOSIAL: STUDI HUKUM ISLAM PADA FOLLOWERS INSTAGRAM @igdailyjour Humairah Al Fatihah Nur Fajry; Zulhas'ari Mustafa; Andi Herawati
Qadauna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 7 No 2
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/qadauna.v7i2.63518

Abstract

Parenting self-efficacy is a crucial factor in shaping the quality of parental caregiving. One of its key sources is vicarious experience, obtained through observing others’ parenting practices, including through social media content such as Instagram. This study aims to examine the dynamics of maternal parenting self-efficacy among followers of the @igdailyjour account and to analyze it from the perspective of Islamic law. This research is a field study employing a qualitative approach with a case study method, using in-depth interviews and content observation as data collection techniques. The findings indicate that parenting content shared by the account contributes to strengthening mothers’ parenting self-efficacy, particularly in enhancing their confidence, understanding, and daily caregiving practices. The parenting approach presented reflects values that align with Islamic principles of caregiving, such as compassion, patience, and responsibility. From the perspective of Islamic law, the use of social media as a source of parenting information may be considered a form of ikhtiar (effort) in fulfilling parental responsibility, which is deemed permissible (mubah) as long as it does not contradict Islamic principles.
Negotiating Maslaḥat and Maḍarat: Uang Panai and the Socio-Cultural Dynamics of Bugis–Makassar Customary Marriages Syarifa Raehana; Nasriah Nasriah; Andi Herawati
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 12, No 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v12i2.9359

Abstract

Uang panai is a central tradition in Bugis–Makassar customary marriage, functioning not only as a formal customary requirement but also as a symbolic expression of respect for women and the groom’s social and moral responsibility. This study seeks to harmonize the practice of uang panai with principles of social justice and Islamic law by proposing regulatory and normative measures that prevent it from becoming an excessive economic burden on families. The research addresses two main issues: the position of uang panai in Bugis–Makassar customary marriage from the perspectives of maslaḥah and maḍarah, and the influence of sociocultural dynamics on its contemporary practice. Employing a normative legal approach with qualitative methods, this study analyzes uang panai through the lenses of positive law, customary law, and Islamic legal principles. The analysis is supported by primary sources, including regulations, fatwas, classical fiqh texts, and customary documents, which are examined using content analysis to interpret legal norms and cultural values within current social dynamics. The findings indicate that uang panai holds a crucial position as a symbol of appreciation and a mechanism of social bonding between families, contributing to social harmony, mutual respect, and protection for wives and their families. Nevertheless, the practice may also generate economic pressure on the groom’s family and, in certain contexts, lead to exploitative tendencies. Ongoing sociocultural changes have reshaped the meaning and function of uang panai, reflecting broader socio-economic transformations and necessitating adaptive interpretations that preserve its core cultural values. The academic contribution of this study lies in its reconceptualization of uang panai as a dynamic customary institution, understood through a maslaḥah–maḍarah framework rather than as a static tradition, thereby enriching scholarship on Islamic family law and customary law through an integrative normative perspective that bridges local cultural values with principles of Islamic justice
Rekonstruksi Pendekatan Hukum Berbasis Maqasid Syariah dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia Abd. Rahman; Muhammad Afif; Zulfitriana Zulfitriana; Abdul Aziz Anwar; Andi Herawati; Azman Arsyad
Asian Journal of Islamic Studies and Da'wah Vol 4 No 4 (2026): Asian Journal of Islamic Studies and Da'wah
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ajisd.v4i4.10810

Abstract

The formation of laws and regulations in Indonesia is still dominated by a legal-positivist approach oriented toward procedure and formal validity, so it has not fully addressed the demands of substantive justice and public welfare. This condition is reflected in the continued existence of regulatory disharmony, overlapping norms, and the low effectiveness of legal implementation. This study aims to analyze the relevance of Maqasid Shariah as a substantive paradigm in the formation of laws and regulations and to formulate a maqasid-based legislative reconstruction model within the national legal system. This study uses a normative legal method with conceptual and statutory approaches. Data were obtained through library research covering laws and regulations, legal literature, scholarly articles, and relevant policy documents, then analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical techniques. The results of the study show that the dominance of the legal-positivist approach in national legislation tends to place formal legality as the primary measure of legal success. In contrast, Maqasid Shariah as developed by Jasser Auda offers a legislative paradigm oriented toward public welfare, justice, protection of fundamental rights, and societal well-being. This study formulates a maqasid-based legislative model through three main stages, namely legislative planning, norm formulation, and regulatory evaluation, with four basic principles: orientation toward public welfare, protection of fundamental rights, inclusive public participation, and policy sustainability. The conclusion of the study affirms that the integration of Maqasid Shariah into the legislative process can strengthen the coherence between formal legality and substantive justice. The implications of this study contribute to the development of legislative theory and provide practical direction for lawmakers in improving regulatory quality and legal effectiveness in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Abd. Qadir Gassing Abd. Rahman Abdul Aziz Anwar Abdul Halim Talli Aminuyati Andi Muhammad Fadil Akbar Asnidar Sri Nur Utami azman arsyad Herlina Humairah Al Fatihah Nur Fajry Ismail Ali Jumasniyanti Lomba Sultan Martono Muh. Arsal Akib Muh. Sudirman Muhammad Afif Muharawati Mukhlis Mukhtar Mukhlis Mukhtar Mustafa, Dewi Wahyuni MUSTARI Nasriah Nasriah Nur Hayati Masse Raehana, Syarifa Rini Octaviani DM St Samsuduha Zulfitriana Zulfitriana Zulhas'ari Mustafa