Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

Integrity Behind Toga: Strengthening The Welfade And Dignity of Judges For A Fair and Dignified Judiciary Suwardi Suwardi; Sugeng Dwiono; Slamet Haryadi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5006

Abstract

The enhancement of judicial welfare represents a pivotal aspect in the attainment of a just and respectable legal system. A financially secure judiciary will be better positioned to fulfill its obligations in an impartial and ethical manner, eschewing the allure of corruption. The objective of this research is to examine the necessity of enhancing the welfare of judges in the context of a fair and dignified judiciary. The research method employed is a normative research method with a statute approach, which was analyzed using content analysis. The findings of this study indicate the necessity for action to improve the welfare of judges, including the implementation of salary and allowance increases, the provision of adequate facilities and infrastructure, and the establishment of legal protection for judges in the performance of their duties. Furthermore, it is imperative to consider the necessity of rigorous oversight of judges' ethical conduct and the provision of incentives for exemplary performance. The improvement of judges' welfare is expected to facilitate the creation of a conducive working environment for fair and dignified law enforcement. This will reinforce public trust in the judicial system, guarantee the protection of people's rights, and maintain the integrity and dignity of the judiciary in carrying out its function as the upholder of justice. This research will address the urgency of improving judges' welfare in order to realize a fair and dignified judiciary.
Operationalizing Green Constitutionalism in Nusantara: A Constitutional Compliance Framework for Environmental Governance Sugeng Dwiono
BRIDGE : The Multidisciplinary Research Portal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): AUGUST (II)
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Nusantara Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article evaluates whether the post-2023 legal architecture for Indonesia's Nusantara Capital City (IKN) has converted green constitutional commitments into operational and reviewable environmental duties. It develops a Constitutional Green Compliance Framework (CGCF) from the constitutional right to a good and healthy environment, environmentally sustainable economic governance, and the earlier finding that IKN regulation remained vulnerable to a gap between constitutional aspiration and implementation. Using normative legal research, the study applies statutory, conceptual, and regulatory-design approaches to Law No. 3 of 2022 as amended by Law No. 21 of 2023, the IKN master-plan and spatial-planning instruments, Perka OIKN No. 8 of 2024, and Perka OIKN No. 17 of 2025. The audit examines six dimensions: constitutional traceability, ecological thresholds, decision controls, procedural rights, monitoring and disclosure, and remedial accountability. The analysis finds substantial regulatory consolidation, particularly through environmental planning, environmental approvals, recognition of local wisdom, information systems, supervision, and enforcement instruments. Nevertheless, compliance remains operationally partial because headline targets are not yet consistently linked to mandatory corrective triggers, publicly verifiable ecological budgets, independent review, and citizen-accessible remedies. Published evidence concerning biodiversity-sensitive urban growth, long-term water constraints, land-use conflict, and illegal mining reinforces the need for enforceable carrying-capacity limits. The article proposes a six-link CGCF that connects constitutional mandates to ecological budgets, decision gates, participatory assurance, public audit, and restoration-based remedies. Its contribution is to transform green constitutionalism from a justificatory principle into a repeatable compliance test for IKN governance.