Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analysis of Prototype Electric Car Chassis Construction using Aluminum Hollow 6061 Profiles using Inventor Software 2016: Analisis Bentuk Kontruksi Chassis Mobil Listrik Prototype Tipe Hollow Alumunium 6061 Menggunakan Software Inventor 2016 Muhammad Zahir Bahasyim; Riyan Ariyansah; Oktarina Heriyani
Jurnal Asiimetrik: Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Dan Inovasi Volume 5 Nomor 2 Tahun 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35814/asiimetrik.v5i2.4995

Abstract

Vehicles are a means of transportation. Most vehicles use fossil fuels as an energy source. Fossil fuels will run out, so electricity is used as a substitute. Electric fuel is environmentally friendly and does not emit pollution. Making a prototype electric car, one of which is preparing a design and simulating it using software. This study aims to find the best 6061 hollow aluminum chassis model through static analysis using Autodesk Inventor software with the finite element analysis (FEA) method. This study compares three chassis models, namely chassis patterns H, X, and Y, which will be subjected to a static load test of 900 N, including the driver's load of 600 N. The values obtained are von Mises stress, displacement, and the safety factor. The dimensions of the chassis are 2,160 mm by 750 mm by 500 mm, with a thickness of 2 mm. The results can be concluded: the H-pattern chassis is the best and easier to design compared to the X and Y chassis. This chassis has a von Mises stress value of 84.47 MPa, a displacement value of 0.89 mm, and a safety factor of 3.20. Based on these results, the model H chassis is safe.
Finite Element Analysis of Aluminum Based R22 Car Wheel Design Modification Salman Alfarisi; Riyan Ariyansah; Dan Mugisidi
Jurnal Asiimetrik: Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Dan Inovasi Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35814/asiimetrik.v6i1.5077

Abstract

The wheels are one of the main parts of the vehicle. To make car wheels, manufacturers must complete several stages. Especially in the design of the wheels. This study aims to determine the comparative value of three different types of wheels with the same material using aluminum type 6061-T6 (SS). We will test the three-wheel models, namely model 1, model 2, and model 3, with a force of 3000 N and a pressure of 800 N to compare their performance. This test uses Solidworks 2019 software with the finite electronic analysis (FEA) method. The results obtained are the value of Von Misses stress, resulting displacement, equivalent strain and its deformation, and factor of safety. The dimensions of the wheels are 22 inches. The results of the best Model 3 alloy wheel research indicate that the design process is easier. These wheels have a Von Misses stress value of 11.02 MPa with a resulting displacement value of 0.021 mm, an equivalent strain of 0.000096, a safety factor of 25, and a deformation value of 1. Based on these results, model 3 alloy wheels are safe.
Evaluating Wind Deflector Effect on Cargo Vans Aerodynamic Drag Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Agus Fikri; Riyan Ariyansah; Firman Noor Hasan; Oktarina Heriyani; Rosalina; Muhammad Ghiffar Sistani
Jurnal Asiimetrik: Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Dan Inovasi Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35814/asiimetrik.v6i2.6073

Abstract

Suboptimal design and body shape in freight transport vehicles can lead to increased aerodynamic drag. To address this issue, the use of wind deflectors is proposed as a solution to reduce aerodynamic resistance in cargo vans. The methodology employed in this research involves Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations using the Ansys Fluent R2 2023 software. CFD simulations were conducted on the design of a cargo box vehicle with variations in Wind Deflector Models 1, 2, and 3, employing identical boundary condition parameters. The results of the CFD simulation for Wind Deflector Model 3 exhibited the lowest drag force at 1.1531116 Newton and a drag coefficient of 0.37031338. In conclusion, a comprehensive analysis of the CFD simulation results provides valuable insights into the intricate aerodynamic implications of Wind Deflector variations on cargo vans. Therefore, it is concluded that Wind Deflector Model 3 emerges as the optimal choice, showcasing superior aerodynamic characteristics.
Analysis of Vibration Characteristics in 17-Inch Aluminum Alloy Wheel Rims Using Finite Element Method Victor Indra Wijaya; Riyan Ariyansah; Delvis Agusman; Rifky; Oktarina Heriyani
Jurnal Asiimetrik: Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Dan Inovasi Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35814/asiimetrik.v6i2.6620

Abstract

The wheel rim serves as a component designed to provide stability and necessary support for vehicle tires. The phenomenon of resonance occurring when the external vibration frequency approaches the natural frequency of the structure has the potential to increase vibration amplitude, which can lead to wheel rim damage. This study aims to investigate the shape patterns and natural frequencies of 17-inch aluminum alloy wheel rims, as well as to analyze the maximum total deformation that occurs. The finite element method is employed to simulate the vibration characteristic of 17-inch aluminum alloy wheel rims under various natural frequencies. Modifications to the wheel rim design are made by altering the spoke angle in variations of 5°, 10°, and 15°. The vibration characteristic data of the wheel rim was obtained through simulation using ANSYS software. The research findings indicate that the natural frequencies range from approximately 364.7 Hz to 723.21 Hz. Furthermore, the maximum total deformation values range from approximately 9.7 mm to 22.5 mm.
Co-Authors Abdullah Darussalam Ade Davy Wiranata Ade Sunardi Ade Sunardi Ade Sunardi Ade Sunardi Adhes Gamayel Aep Surahto Aep Surahto Agung Hermawan Agung pangestu Agus Fikri Agus Fikri Ahamad Ahdani Akhmad Rizal Dzikrillah Alfara, Hafiz Asep Supriadi Ashura, Amar Avorizano, Arry Bintoro, Sefrian Rizki Dan Mugisidi Delvis Agusman Delvis Agusman Deni Dzikrillah, Achmad Rizal Fahmi Ahmad Yulianto Faris Setio Wibowo Fathoni Fauzi, Herman Ferdiansyah, Zulkarnain Fikri, Agus Firman Noor Hasan Fitria Efendy Giovanika, Muhamad Ikbal Goodman Octavianus Hanggoro, Dhimar Setyawan Suryo Hendra, Rizky Putratama Hermanto Ibrahim, Dimas Nurcholish Irwansyah Irwansyah Istianto Budhi Rahardja Kasum Leo Fendi Sadewo Lutfan Zulwaqar M. Shofriyan Efendi Maruli, Alkha Oceano Mohammad Mujirudin Muchammad Sholeh Muhamad Aris Muhamad Fadilah Rafli Muhammad Ghiffar Sistani Muhammad Hambali Muhammad Rayhan Muhammad Zahir Bahasyim Mujirudin Mujirudin Mujirudin, Mujirudin Murtalim Murtalim Nofendri, Yos Noor Hasan, Firman Nugraha, Aldi Nugraha, Rayhan Ihsan Nugraha, Reza Alfi Nur rohman Nurhardiansyah, Moch Octavianus, Goodman Oktarina Heriyani Oktarina Heriyani Oskar Mahardika Prasetyo, Kurniawan Eko Pratama, Reynaldi Ramadhani Pungkas Prayitno Purbayani, Aditya Pradana Qommaruddin Rahman, An Naas Rahmatullah, Ahmad Faiz Rahmi Imanda Ramzah, Harry Reza Ferizal Akbar Rifky Rifky Rifky, Rifky Rizki Dwi Ardika Rizki, Dicky Septia Rojo Agung Rizqi Rosalina Rosalina Rosalina Rosalina Saca Andika Saefulloh, Mochamad Salman Alfarisi Saputra, Alfian Ady Saputro, Andry Wahyu Saryanto, Hendi Sefnath J E Sarwuna Sinduningrum, Estu Sinta Restuasih Sistani, Muhammad Ghiffar Sunaryo Sutoyo Sutoyo Tjetjep Margono Ujiburrohman Ujiburrohman U Victor Indra Wijaya Werdhana, Wisnu Muflhi Wijaya, Victor Indra Wulansari, Aprilya Siti Yongkimandalan, Nicky Yulia Widhianti