Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika)

Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fungsi Pembangkit Mutianingsih, Ninik; Prayitno, Lydia Lia; Kurniawan, Agus Prasetyo
JURNAL REVIEW PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA Vol 3 No 1 (2018): Juni 2018
Publisher : UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jrpm.2018.3.1.29-39

Abstract

This study aims to describe students’ thinking process in solving the problems of generating function. This is a case study that classifies students into three categories: high, medium, and low. Subjects were asked to solve the problems then use think aloud to reveal their thinking process. The results show that in understanding the problem, using conceptual and procedural knowledge related to the problems, strategies, and experiences they have in solving similar problems between the three subjects is different. Subjects with high and medium capability are able to reveal the problem-solving component of Polya in detail, whereas low-ability subjects use only some of the problem-solving components of Polya.
Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fungsi Pembangkit Ninik Mutianingsih; Lydia Lia Prayitno; Agus Prasetyo Kurniawan
JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018)
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (636.617 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/jrpm.2018.3.1.29-39

Abstract

This study aims to describe students’ thinking process in solving the problems of generating function. This is a case study that classifies students into three categories: high, medium, and low. Subjects were asked to solve the problems then use think aloud to reveal their thinking process. The results show that in understanding the problem, using conceptual and procedural knowledge related to the problems, strategies, and experiences they have in solving similar problems between the three subjects is different. Subjects with high and medium capability are able to reveal the problem-solving component of Polya in detail, whereas low-ability subjects use only some of the problem-solving components of Polya.