Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.909
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Peternakan Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Unes Law Review Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Journal of Administrative and Sosial Science (JASS) Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Jurnal Sosial dan Sains Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) BULLET : Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Artemis Law Journal Petitum Law Journal Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Desentralisasi: Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Pemerintahan Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi Pemuliaan Keadilan Jurihum Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Sinurat, Aksi
Faculty Of Law, Nusa Cendana University
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 40 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 40 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana bagi Pelaku Pembunuhan yang Mengidap Gangguan Jiwa Periodik : (Studi Kasus Putusan No.41/Pid.B/2020/PN End) Geraldus Damansus Boro Sale; Karolus K. Medan; Aksi Sinurat
JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Administrative and Social Science
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jass.v6i1.2096

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out about someone who has a mental disorder periodically committing an unlawful act, can be given legal responsibility for his actions, and the basis for the judge's considerations in sentencing the perpetrator of the crime of murder who has a mental disorder periodically. The type of research is normative legal research. The research data collection technique uses literature studies. The data will then be analyzed using qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that based on the theory of criminal responsibility, a person with a mental disorder cannot be punished because he is considered not to have the awareness and ability to be responsible or his actions, but there is a submission in the case of periodic mental disorders experienced by the defendant in the sentence, the legal status of the perpetrator does not immediately get a full element of forgiveness, in the audit the judge considered it worthy of being held criminally responsible because his actions had fulfilled the elements of criminal responsibility. The judge's decision ignored the conditions of the conversation with a history of periodic mental disorders showing weaknesses in aspects, legal certainty, benefits and protection of human rights, in contrast to the principles of legalization and violation of national law and imprisoning people who have a history or even are mentally ill does not provide benefits to the person himself.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA (ASN) YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAKAN PEDOFILIA TERHADAP ANAK DI LINGKUNGAN SEKOLAH DASAR TIMOR TENGAH UTARA SERTA PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI KORBAN Manubulu, Cristin Octavia; Sinurat, Aksi; Fanggi, Rosalind Angel
Petitum Law Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2024): Petitum Law Journal Volume 1, Nomor 2, Mei 2024
Publisher : Petitum Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35508/pelana.v1i2.14189

Abstract

Criminal responsibility means that every person who commits a criminal offense or against the law, as formulated in the law, then that person should be held accountable for his actions in accordance with his guilt. Criminal responsibility is determined after there is a criminal offense. To be held criminally responsible, a person must first prove that he has fulfilled all the elements of the criminal offense charged to him. This research is an empirical legal research, which examines and analyzes data obtained from the research location.This research was conducted at the Kefamenanu District Court. Data processing is carried out with data obtained both primary data and secondary data and analyzed based on the formulation of problems that have been applied. The results of this study indicate that (1) the perpetrator defendant fulfills the four conditions of criminal responsibility, namely the existence of a criminal act, the element of guilt, the existence of a responsible maker, there is no excuse so that he is punishable in Article 82 paragraph (2) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2014 concerning amendments to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection Jo. Article 65 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, therefore the Chief Judge sentenced the defendant to 20 (twenty) years imprisonment and a fine of Rp.100.000.000,- (one hundred million rupiahs). (2) the protection of child victims is very important to ensure that their rights are fulfilled and they get proper justice by providing legal assistance or assistance from the police investigation to the court, which can be provided by the Consultation and Legal Aid Institute or institutions such as the Indonesian Child Protection Commission (KPAI) and the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK), conducting a post mortem at the hospital and laboratory examinations according to the direction of medical personnel and asking for psychologist assistance. Apart from the police, there are also institutions that cooperate in protecting victims, namely the Social Service Unit of the Indonesian Ministry of Social Affairs.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENERAPAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA (STUDI PUTUSAN NO 46/PID.SUS/ 2019 PENGADILAN NEGERI MAUMERE) Ndaumanu, Novaldy I; Sinurat, Aksi; Wilhelmus, Bhisa Vitus
Petitum Law Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2024): Petitum Law Journal Volume 1, Nomor 2, Mei 2024
Publisher : Petitum Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35508/pelana.v1i2.15502

Abstract

The quality of the judge's decision in adjudicating is when the judge is able to hand down a decision by paying attention to three very essential things, namely legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Interpreting the element of "possessing, storing, possessing, or providing" class I narcotics as contained in Article 112 paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Law must also consider the purpose or purpose of the accused. Because the terminology "possess, store, control or provide" provided for by Article 112, cannot be applied strictly following the textual. If this is not done carefully and carefully, it will have an impact on imposing crimes with inappropriate crimes and cause injustice to drug abusers. The results of the research stated that: first, the provisions of Article 112 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics do not have clarity in substance, namely in the word "possessing" if in the application there is a mistake in interpreting " possessing" can cause legal injustice, considering the application of article 112 paragraph (1) by the panel of judges in case number 46/ Pid.Sus/ 2019/ Maumere District Court is not appropriate, The application of this article is considered inappropriate because the judges' consideration only pays attention to the fulfillment of criminal elements written in article 112 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Second, the Maumere court judges ignored the subject's status as an abuser and skewed with the second alternative charge (article 112 paragraph 1), but in a review in accordance with the expectation of the application of article 127 paragraph (1) point a by the Supreme Court.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI PELAKU POLITIK UANG DALAM PEMILIHAN UMUM DI KABUPATEN LEMBATA PROVINSI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR Uran, Maria Novita Nigun; Sinurat, Aksi; Wilhelmus, Bhisa Vitus
Petitum Law Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Petitum Law Journal Volume 3, Nomor 1, November 2025
Publisher : Petitum Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35508/pelana.v3i1.22190

Abstract

This study examines the use of money politics in Lembata Regency by emphasizing the legal responsibility of the perpetrators and preventive efforts by Bawaslu, the Police, and the Prosecutor's Office. Using a descriptive-analytical approach, data were obtained through interviews with the Lembata Bawaslu Secretariat Coordinator and relevant literature reviews. The research findings indicate that the management of money politics faces various complex challenges: (1) structural obstacles such as the perpetrators' escape, weak evidence of transactions, and ineffective coordination between institutions; (2) the shift in the practice of money politics from giving cash to project-based activities or social relationships that are difficult to suspect; and (3) the powerlessness of the Gakkumdu mechanism due to its reliance on unanimous consensus and strict administrative time limits. This study shows that law enforcement is hampered by the dualism of regulations (the Criminal Code versus the Election Law) and the influence of local political interests. Some recommended solutions include increasing investigative capacity utilizing technology, devolution of prosecutorial authority, public education for participatory supervision, and adjustments to general and specific criminal laws. Without comprehensive reform, law enforcement efforts in elections risk getting caught up in procedural formalities.
KEKUATAN EKSEKUTORIAL PUTUSAN PERKARA PERDATA TERHADAP OBJEK EKSEKUSI YANG DISITA OLEH JAKSA DALAM PERKARA PIDANA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI Dance Mauboy, Yandrif; Kopong Medan, Karolus; Sinurat, Aksi
Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 2 No. 6 (2023): Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/locus.v2i6.1285

Abstract

Pelaksanaan eksekusi putusan perkara perdata seharusnya menjadi suatu hal yang krusial karena berkaitan dengan pemenuhan hak-hak Pemohon Eksekusi secara konkrit sesuai isi putusan guna mewujudkan keadilan dan kepastian hukum sepenuhnya. Kenyataannya, putusan perkara perdata Nomor 9/Pdt.G/2017/PN Lrt belum dapat dilaksanakan sebab harta milik Tergugat yang telah diletakkan sita jaminan dalam perkara perdata tersebut oleh putusan perkara TPPU Nomor 254/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Kpg menetapkan barang bukti berupa beberapa aset-aset Terdakwa dikembalikan kepada Penuntut Umum untuk dipergunakan dalam perkara lain. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami dan menganalisis tentang kekuatan eksekutorial putusan perkara perdata terhadap objek eksekusi yang disita oleh Jaksa dalam perkara pidana di Pengadilan Negeri. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu penelitian yang meletakkan hukum sebagai sebuah bangunan sistem norma yakni asas-asas, norma, kaidah dari peraturan perundangan, putusan pengadilan, perjanjian serta doktrin (ajaran). Perolehan bahan hukum dilakukan melalui penelitian kepustakaan yakni melalui pengumpulan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukan meskipun putusan perkara perdata mempunyai kekuatan eksekutorial terhadap objek eksekusi yang disita oleh Jaksa dalam perkara pidana, namun terdapat syarat yang harus dipenuhi yaitu mengetahui apakah barang bukti masih diperlukan dalam pembuktian perkara pidana lain atau barang bukti sudah tidak diperlukan dalam pembuktian perkara pidana lain.
IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP KEADILAN RESTORATIF PADA PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Mandala, Mersy Junedy; Sinurat, Aksi; Manuain, Orpa Ganefo
Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Dan Pengambangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jcm.v3i2.1645

Abstract

Corruption is a social problem that results in efficiency in development, eats away at democracy, and causes economic losses. The handling of cases of criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia with the spirit of recovering state financial losses by the Attorney General's Office faces many problems and weaknesses with very large costs and burdens from the judiciary and correctional institutions that are not in accordance with the concept of criminal procedural law, namely fast, simple and low-cost trials or non-recovery. loss of state finances because the convict chooses to undergo water subsidies rather than paying replacement money. Restorative justice is present as a new paradigm to avoid handling protracted problems, not recovering state financial losses, operations and large handling costs. In practice, the spirit of restorative justice has been widely applied to corruption cases by returning all state financial losses, so cases are not proceeded to court, but it is necessary to regulate the handling of corruption based on restorative justice at every level of legislation as a guide for law enforcement officials.
PROSECUTOR'S AUTHORITY AS A COUNTRY LAWYER IN RETURNS OF STATE LOSSES DUE TO CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTION Krisna Boboy, Rini; L. Pekuwali, Umbu; Sinurat, Aksi
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v1i2.147

Abstract

The Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia, as one of the law enforcement agencies in Indonesia, plays an important role in the law enforcement process. The role of the prosecutor in enforcing the Law for the Maintenance of Public Order, Legal Security, and the Protection of the Interests of the State and the Civil Rights of the People, as set forth in Law No. 16 of 2014 concerning the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia, became known as the Prosecutor General. The role of prosecutors includes their ability to represent the state in efforts to offset financial losses incurred by the state due to criminal acts of corruption. However, this agency has not guaranteed a significant return on government losses due to corruption. The writing of this thesis uses a normative legal research methodology and serves two purposes, namely, to analyze the laws and regulations governing the authority of prosecutors as prosecutors in relation to the restitution of state losses, and to study and describe the role of prosecutors to make the restitution to guarantee government assets or to offset government losses. due to criminal acts of corruption. Therefore, it is necessary to review the existing regulations so that the existing regulations do not open opportunities for corrupters to avoid being responsible for restoring government losses. The Attorney General's Office uses an asset recovery approach that is effective, efficient, transparent, and accountable so that the recovery of state finances can be achieved for justice, certainty, and legal benefits in society.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Turut Serta Melakukan Pembunuhan di Kabupaten Ende Vinsensius Rau; Karolus K. Medan; Aksi Sinurat
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i2.4974

Abstract

Criminal liability is a form of imposing punishment on the perpetrator of a crime because of his/her unlawful actions. In other words, criminal liability determines whether a person will be acquitted or convicted of a crime that has been committed. This process involves the transfer of the existing punishment for the crime to the perpetrator. This research is a normative research. The results of the research show that Criminal liability for perpetrators who participate in the crime of murder, anyone who intentionally helps, plans, or plays an active role in murder can be held criminally responsible, either as the main perpetrator or as a participant (medeplichtige or medepleger). The sanctions imposed depend on the role and level of involvement of each perpetrator, in accordance with the principle of criminal responsibility and the element of error in criminal law. This must be reviewed carefully by the judge so that in making a decision on the defendant, it can have a deterrent effect on the perpetrator and not cause unrest for the victim's family regarding the decision handed down by the judge. The judge's decision to impose a light sentence on the perpetrator who participated in a crime that resulted in the death of a person shows an imbalance in law enforcement. This injustice can be caused by the judge's non-objective considerations, weak evidence, or lack of bias towards justice for the victim. This kind of decision risks weakening the deterrent effect and public trust in the justice system.
Pengaturan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 45 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perikanan Maria Elviana Lelangwayan; Aksi Sinurat; Orpa Ganefo Manuain
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i1.5034

Abstract

Law Number 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries as amended by Law Number 45 of 2009 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries recognizes corporations as subjects of criminal acts in criminal acts in the fisheries sector, but the corporations are not held criminally responsible.This research is a normative legal research, using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach with literature study techniques or document studies. The processing of legal materials is carried out with several processes, namely the validity of legal materials, classification of legal materials, recording legal materials and analysis of legal materials. Analysis of legal materials is carried out in a normative qualitative juridical manner with descriptive and prescriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate first, the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the current Fisheries Law still has shortcomings/weaknesses, namely it does not clearly formulate when a corporation is said to have committed a crime and based on the history of the development of corporations as subjects of criminal law, corporate criminal liability in the current Fisheries Law is still at stage II where corporations are recognized as perpetrators of criminal acts, but their criminal liability has not directly affected the corporation and only the corporate administrators are responsible. Second, the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the future can be seen in the Fisheries Bill which has answered the weaknesses/deficiencies in the Fisheries Law and has accommodated corporate criminal liability where corporations can be subject to principal or additional criminal sanctions for the crimes they commit.
Analisis Pergeseran Budaya Kawin Tangkap Terhadap Perempuan Dalam Pemikiran Legal Feminist Di Kabupaten Sumba Tengah Fortuna Umbu Laiya, Andraviani; Kopong Medan, Karolus; Sinurat, Aksi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1661

Abstract

The culture of capture marriage in Central Sumba Regency has experienced a shift in cultural values that has resulted in violence against women, triggering debates between customary law and Indonesian positive law. This study aims to describe the essence of the culture of catch marriage for women in Central Sumba Regency and its compatibility with Positive Law and to elaborate on the shift in the culture of catch marriage for women in Central Sumba Regency in Legal Feminist thinking. The research method used is empirical legal research which obtains data from primary data or data obtained directly from the community and library legal sources. The results of the study show that the practice of catch marriage is no longer in line with the principles of the Indonesian State which ratified the Human Rights Law, because this practice indicates various oppression against women specifically in the process of arrest and detention. Using feminist legal theory, from the legal text analysis approach, it is found that the weaknesses of customary law in Central Sumba are patriarchal and communal, while the legal text of the Sexual Violence Crime Law has weaknesses in the unavailability of implementing regulations and there is a legal vacuum in the local government of Central Sumba Regency regarding arrest marriages. In the approach to legal application, cases of capture marriage are dominantly resolved by custom, due to family relations and the attachment of capture marriage to the culture of the indigenous people of Central Sumba. The novelty in this research is to describe the essence of culture and the reality of a shift in the culture of capture marriage in Central Sumba Regency, which is analyzed through a legal feminist theory approach to its handling. This research is only limited to the culture of capture marriage that occurs in Central Sumba Regency in a feminist legal approach.
Co-Authors A.C. Tabun Adrianus Djara Dima Adrya Gusmar Kapitan Agustina Putri Patricia Andreas F. Ratoe Oedjoe Ariance Boboy Banik, Agusthinus Bida, Deni Novein Saputra Cardial L.O. Leo-Penu, Cardial L.O. Dance Mauboy, Yandrif Darius Antonius Kian Daud Dima Tallo Debi F. Ng. Fallo Deddy R. Ch. Manafe Detji K. E. R. Nuban Dhesy Arisandielis Kase Djaclyn Herlince Kitu Rihi Fatma Ayu Jati Putri Ferdinan L. Bagaihing Fortuna Umbu Laiya, Andraviani Franky Simamora Geraldus Damansus Boro Sale Getri Kefi Gideon Tasi Heryanto Amalo Hironimus Buyanaya Jauhari Effendi Jauhari Effendi Karolus K. Medan Karolus Kopong Medan Khusnul Khusy Pit’ay Kopong Medan, Karolus Krisna Boboy, Rini L. Pekuwali, Umbu Leo, Rudepel Petrus Mandala, Mersy Junedy Manuain, Orpa Ganefo Manubulu, Cristin Octavia Maria Elviana Lelangwayan Maria Fatima More Maria Odilia Kolo Maria Oktaviani Kartika Tua Markus Yohanis Hage Marselinus Mardi Anto Masu, Reny Rebeka Ndaumanu, Novaldy I Obe, Elfrida Tipe Orpa G. Manuain Orpa G. Manuain Orpa G.Manuain Orpa Ganefo Manuain Padur, Maria Oktaviani Paulus, Gery Mario Paulus, Gery Mario Pello, Jimmy Petrus Leo, Rudepel Petrus, Marfilson Putri, Fatma Ayu Jati Rosalind Angel Fanggi Rudepel Petrus Leo Rudepel Petrus Leo Saryono Yohanes Sulistyanta Sulistyanta Sulistyanta Sulistyanta Susana Amos Pah Theresia Edelweis Putri Nurak Thomas Lapenangga Tri Nugraheni Uran, Maria Novita Nigun Vinni Denivita Tome Vinsensius Rau Wilhelmus, Bhisa Vitus Yayu Mederlin Nenotek Yohana Yosiana Djara Dima