Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 35 Documents
Search

PROSECUTOR'S AUTHORITY AS A COUNTRY LAWYER IN RETURNS OF STATE LOSSES DUE TO CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTION Krisna Boboy, Rini; L. Pekuwali, Umbu; Sinurat, Aksi
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v1i2.147

Abstract

The Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia, as one of the law enforcement agencies in Indonesia, plays an important role in the law enforcement process. The role of the prosecutor in enforcing the Law for the Maintenance of Public Order, Legal Security, and the Protection of the Interests of the State and the Civil Rights of the People, as set forth in Law No. 16 of 2014 concerning the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia, became known as the Prosecutor General. The role of prosecutors includes their ability to represent the state in efforts to offset financial losses incurred by the state due to criminal acts of corruption. However, this agency has not guaranteed a significant return on government losses due to corruption. The writing of this thesis uses a normative legal research methodology and serves two purposes, namely, to analyze the laws and regulations governing the authority of prosecutors as prosecutors in relation to the restitution of state losses, and to study and describe the role of prosecutors to make the restitution to guarantee government assets or to offset government losses. due to criminal acts of corruption. Therefore, it is necessary to review the existing regulations so that the existing regulations do not open opportunities for corrupters to avoid being responsible for restoring government losses. The Attorney General's Office uses an asset recovery approach that is effective, efficient, transparent, and accountable so that the recovery of state finances can be achieved for justice, certainty, and legal benefits in society.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Turut Serta Melakukan Pembunuhan di Kabupaten Ende Vinsensius Rau; Karolus K. Medan; Aksi Sinurat
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i2.4974

Abstract

Criminal liability is a form of imposing punishment on the perpetrator of a crime because of his/her unlawful actions. In other words, criminal liability determines whether a person will be acquitted or convicted of a crime that has been committed. This process involves the transfer of the existing punishment for the crime to the perpetrator. This research is a normative research. The results of the research show that Criminal liability for perpetrators who participate in the crime of murder, anyone who intentionally helps, plans, or plays an active role in murder can be held criminally responsible, either as the main perpetrator or as a participant (medeplichtige or medepleger). The sanctions imposed depend on the role and level of involvement of each perpetrator, in accordance with the principle of criminal responsibility and the element of error in criminal law. This must be reviewed carefully by the judge so that in making a decision on the defendant, it can have a deterrent effect on the perpetrator and not cause unrest for the victim's family regarding the decision handed down by the judge. The judge's decision to impose a light sentence on the perpetrator who participated in a crime that resulted in the death of a person shows an imbalance in law enforcement. This injustice can be caused by the judge's non-objective considerations, weak evidence, or lack of bias towards justice for the victim. This kind of decision risks weakening the deterrent effect and public trust in the justice system.
Pengaturan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 45 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perikanan Maria Elviana Lelangwayan; Aksi Sinurat; Orpa Ganefo Manuain
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i1.5034

Abstract

Law Number 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries as amended by Law Number 45 of 2009 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries recognizes corporations as subjects of criminal acts in criminal acts in the fisheries sector, but the corporations are not held criminally responsible.This research is a normative legal research, using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach with literature study techniques or document studies. The processing of legal materials is carried out with several processes, namely the validity of legal materials, classification of legal materials, recording legal materials and analysis of legal materials. Analysis of legal materials is carried out in a normative qualitative juridical manner with descriptive and prescriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate first, the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the current Fisheries Law still has shortcomings/weaknesses, namely it does not clearly formulate when a corporation is said to have committed a crime and based on the history of the development of corporations as subjects of criminal law, corporate criminal liability in the current Fisheries Law is still at stage II where corporations are recognized as perpetrators of criminal acts, but their criminal liability has not directly affected the corporation and only the corporate administrators are responsible. Second, the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the future can be seen in the Fisheries Bill which has answered the weaknesses/deficiencies in the Fisheries Law and has accommodated corporate criminal liability where corporations can be subject to principal or additional criminal sanctions for the crimes they commit.
Kajian Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaksanaan Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi Jalan Yang Berimplikasi Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Simamora, Franky; Sinurat, Aksi; Manuain, Orpa G.
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Vol. 4 No. 5 (2023): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jist.v4i5.622

Abstract

Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dalam menganalisa suatu putusan pengadilan  Sulawesi Tenggara Nomor 3/PID.SUS-TPK/2020/PT KDI) yang menjatuhkan vonis tindak pidana korupsi pada permasalahan kekurangan volume pekerjaan konstruksi.  Pekerjaan konstruksi merupakan suatu jenis pekerjaan dalam jasa konstruksi yang telah diatur dalam undang-undang jasa konstruksi. Pada undang-undang tersebut ditekankan bahwa penyelesaian permasalahan dalam jasa konstruksi dapat diselesaikan secara keperdataan dalam kontrak telah dibuat untuk melaksanakan kegiatan jasa konstruksi tersebut. Apabila dikemudian hari terdapat penrmasalahan pelaksanaan yang berpendapat bahwa telah terjadi kerugian negara maka sebenarnya kerugian negara yang terjadi dapat diperbaiki dengan penggantian agar tidak menjadi kerugian keuangan negara sehingga selama unsur-unsur  dalam tindak pidana korupsi seperti perbuatan curang, suap-menyuap, gratifikasi dan lain-lain maka tidak dapat dibuktikan secara nyata maka permasalahan dalam pekerjaan jasa konstruksi tersebut tidak dapat ditarik kedalam tindak pidana korupsi  atau dapat dikatakan bahwa hukuman pidana pada jasa konstruksi harus benar-benar menerapkan asas hukum pidana merupakan  pilihan terakhir (ultimum premedium).
Analisis Pergeseran Budaya Kawin Tangkap Terhadap Perempuan Dalam Pemikiran Legal Feminist Di Kabupaten Sumba Tengah Fortuna Umbu Laiya, Andraviani; Kopong Medan, Karolus; Sinurat, Aksi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1661

Abstract

The culture of capture marriage in Central Sumba Regency has experienced a shift in cultural values that has resulted in violence against women, triggering debates between customary law and Indonesian positive law. This study aims to describe the essence of the culture of catch marriage for women in Central Sumba Regency and its compatibility with Positive Law and to elaborate on the shift in the culture of catch marriage for women in Central Sumba Regency in Legal Feminist thinking. The research method used is empirical legal research which obtains data from primary data or data obtained directly from the community and library legal sources. The results of the study show that the practice of catch marriage is no longer in line with the principles of the Indonesian State which ratified the Human Rights Law, because this practice indicates various oppression against women specifically in the process of arrest and detention. Using feminist legal theory, from the legal text analysis approach, it is found that the weaknesses of customary law in Central Sumba are patriarchal and communal, while the legal text of the Sexual Violence Crime Law has weaknesses in the unavailability of implementing regulations and there is a legal vacuum in the local government of Central Sumba Regency regarding arrest marriages. In the approach to legal application, cases of capture marriage are dominantly resolved by custom, due to family relations and the attachment of capture marriage to the culture of the indigenous people of Central Sumba. The novelty in this research is to describe the essence of culture and the reality of a shift in the culture of capture marriage in Central Sumba Regency, which is analyzed through a legal feminist theory approach to its handling. This research is only limited to the culture of capture marriage that occurs in Central Sumba Regency in a feminist legal approach.