Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.465
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris PALAR (Pakuan Law review) KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Jurnal Ilmiah Publika Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Batulis Civil Law Review Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Jurnal Nasional Pengabdian Masyarakat Abdi Bhara: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Journal of Law and Legal Reform Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal) Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia Publication of the International Journal and Academic Research (PIJAR) Ipso Jure
Syahruddin, Erwin
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 36 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Ipso Jure

 1 
The Antinomy Of Corporate Criminal Law Enforcement In The Environment Syahruddin, Erwin
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 12 (2025): Ipso Jure - January
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/gcm88z65

Abstract

A corporation whose business activities are suspected of polluting and damaging the environment and having a major and important impact on the environment. Corporations in carrying out their business activities can cause environmental crimes, one of which is the Lapindo mud case. Article 116 of UUPPLH has regulated law enforcement on environmental criminal cases committed by corporations where criminal charges and criminal sanctions are imposed on business entities and/or people who give orders to commit such criminal acts or people who act as leaders of activities in such criminal acts. This research is a doctrinal legal research, in which this research examines the enforcement of criminal law for corporations that commit environmental crimes with a focus on the Lapindo mud case. The results of this study found that there are several obstacles in law enforcement of the Lapindo mud case, namely in terms of legal factors / laws, law enforcement factors, facilities or facilities, and cultural factors.
Board Of Directors Accountability In Good Business Practice Syahruddin, Erwin
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 12 (2025): Ipso Jure - January
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/wvyd3x83

Abstract

In a Limited culpability Company (PT), where directors are frequently held responsible for their acts pertaining to the company's administration, this study examines the legal concerns surrounding the board of directors' culpability. This obligation may result in civil liability, criminal liability, or even removal from office. Finding the legal void surrounding acquit et de charge (free from liability) under Law No. 40/2007 on Limited Liability Companies (UUPT), which does not specifically govern the procedure, is the primary goal of this study. This study employs the normative technique, which focuses on examining relevant laws and regulations, specifically the UUPT, as well as jurisprudence and doctrine pertaining to the Board of Directors' liability. Using this method, the study discovered that while the Company Law governs the Board of Directors' power and duty, there are no explicit guidelines governing the acquit et de charge process in PT's Board of Directors' accountability process. This creates ambiguity in the way the Board of Directors' responsibility to the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is implemented and raises the possibility of power abuse that could hurt family members. In order to give the Board of Directors legal certainty and fairness in the performance of their obligations, this conclusion necessitates additional regulation of the absolve et de charge mechanism.
Co-Authors Abdillah Umar Lubis Adhi Inderaputra Adi Nur Rohman Agus Rimawan Akbar Sarif Akhmad Fauzi Aldy Kurniawan Dika Ali Johardi Ali, Alizah Alizah Ali Andika Nur Abdi Andre Cardenas Andre Cardenas Jr. Andre Faschal Neta Nyahu Aris Yulia, Aris Arum Rindani Bestian Adha Bionda Johan Anggara Cardenas, Andre Diana Fitriana Dika, Aldy Kurniawan Dwi Seno Wijanarko Elisa Sugito Emilda Yofita Fahlevi, Muhammad Reza Syah Fahmi Hafid Bachmid Fahririn, Fahririn Gerry Lesmana Gugus Atmoko Gunawan Gunawan Hardian Hardian Hari Purwadi Heru Mahendra Hotma P. Sibuea Husein Tamara Ubay Johan Johan Katrina Siagian Kiki Widya Sari Liu, Yaoping M. Khoerul Anam M. Kholilurrahman Meydi Nabillah Miharja, Marjan Misbahul Huda Misbahul Huda Nainggolan, Indra L Nur Abdi, Andika Nyahu, Andre Faschal Neta Rahmat Saputra Rahmawati Eka Sari Rizal Apriyanto Rohman, Adi Nur Romasindah Aidy, Widya Ronal Saut Rusnandi Rusnandi Saiful Anam Salamat Martua Saparuli Saparuli Saputra, Rahmat Sari, Kiki Widya Sugeng Sugeng Sugeng Supanto , Viktor Agung Pratama Wahyu Nugroho Yana Sukma Permana Zainab, Nina