Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

SCENIC: INSTRUMEN EVALUASI KONTEKSTUAL BERBASIS SKENARIO UNTUK MEMPERKUAT KOMPETENSI MAHASISWA CALON GURU DALAM PROYEK STUDI KASUS Rufiana, Intan Sari; Utami, Anita Dewi; Fadhli, Muhibuddin; Randy, Mohammad Yusuf; Mustafidah, Fina Zulfa; Amaliya, Fierda Nursitasari; Izzati, Aulia Al Tsani
EDUPEDIA Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ed.v10i1.3640

Abstract

The evaluation of prospective teachers’ competencies during the pre-PPL phase still relies heavily on conventional instruments that fail to authentically assess their ability to solve classroom problems. In line with recent policies requiring case study projects in the PPG program, this article reports on the development of SCENIC (Scenario-based Contextual Evaluation for Nurturing Instructional Competence), a set of contextual scenario-based evaluation instruments integrated with case study projects. The research employed an R&D approach (Borg & Gall) through needs analysis, the design of seven scenarios, expert validation, and phased pilot testing with PPG students. The results indicate competency gaps in student needs analysis, inclusive learning design, and contextual communication; expert validation rated the content as relevant and highly applicable; and pilot testing showed that SCENIC helps calibrate performance assessments and strengthens students’ readiness to tackle case study assignments and UKIN/PPL. SCENIC is recommended as an authentic evaluation framework to bridge theory and practice in elementary teacher education.
Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Numeracy Literacy Problems of Graph Representation Model in Elementary School Intan Sari Rufiana; Slamet Arifin; Mohammad Yusuf Randy; Fierda Nursitasari Amaliya
Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): October 2024
Publisher : UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v11i2.18720

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to describe the types of student errors in solving numeracy literacy problems of graph representation models. This study used a mixed methods research design with a sequential exploratory type. The data collection techniques used were tests and interviews. The participants in this study were 30 elementary school students tested and six students selected by purposive sampling to be interviewed. The results showed that students experienced conceptual errors and procedural errors. In conceptual errors, 40% of students make errors in reading data, 43% between data, and 60% of students make errors beyond data. Conceptual errors occur when students cannot understand the context of the problem, cannot read the data, do not master the basic concepts of statistics, and do not understand number patterns. In procedural errors, 63% of students make errors in reading data, 73% of students make errors in reading between data, and 80% of students make errors in reading beyond data. Procedural errors occur when students are wrong in choosing the solution procedure, calculating, and predicting. Therefore, educators need to design appropriate learning strategies to minimize errors made by students in numeracy literacy questions on graph representation models, such as applying contextual learning-based numeracy problems.Keywords: student errors, graphic literacy, numeracy literacy, elementary school. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan jenis-jenis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi numerasi model representasi grafik. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian mixed methods dengan tipe eksploratori sekuensial. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes dan wawancara. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 30 siswa sekolah dasar yang dites dan enam siswa yang dipilih secara purposive sampling untuk diwawancarai. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa mengalami kesalahan konseptual dan kesalahan prosedural. Pada kesalahan konseptual, 40% siswa melakukan kesalahan dalam membaca data, 43% di antara data, dan 60% siswa melakukan kesalahan di luar data. Kesalahan konseptual terjadi ketika siswa tidak dapat memahami konteks soal, tidak dapat membaca data, tidak menguasai konsep dasar statistika, dan tidak memahami pola bilangan. Pada kesalahan prosedural, 63% siswa melakukan kesalahan dalam membaca data, 73% siswa melakukan kesalahan dalam membaca antar data, dan 80% siswa melakukan kesalahan dalam membaca di luar data. Kesalahan prosedural terjadi ketika siswa salah dalam memilih prosedur penyelesaian, menghitung, dan memprediksi. Oleh karena itu, pendidik perlu merancang strategi pembelajaran yang tepat untuk meminimalisir kesalahan yang dilakukan siswa dalam soal literasi numerasi pada model representasi grafik, seperti menerapkan soal literasi numerasi berbasis pembelajaran kontekstual.Kata kunci: kesalahan siswa, literasi grafik, literasi numerasi, sekolah dasar.